‘Eminent Jews' Review: Pushing the Boundaries
The celebration does not come off. Mr. Denby hopes his book will exhibit 'a composite picture of the ideology and practice of postwar Jewish cultural achievement.' Yet even though Mr. Denby is himself Jewish, his 'Eminent Jews' could as easily be read as promoting antisemitic stereotypes—the book's cover features the prominent, or as I think of them the chosen, noses of its four subjects—emphasizing as it does Jews who specialized in vulgarity (Mel Brooks), intractable leftism (Betty Friedan), relentless self-promotion (Norman Mailer) and flamboyant egotism (Leonard Bernstein). Not, any of this, likely to bring much pleasure in the offices of the Anti-Defamation League.
All four of Mr. Denby's subjects were ostjuden, or Eastern European Jews, and thus Ashkenazi. Eastern European Jews, who came to the U.S. in profusion in the last two decades of the 19th and the first two decades of the 20th centuries, were once viewed in contrast to the more determinedly assimilationist German Jews, whom the Eastern European Jews called yekkes—Yiddish for jackets—denoting the formality of the German Jews in never removing their suit jackets. A joke of the time asked, 'What is the difference between a yekke and a virgin? The answer: A yekke remains a yekke.'
Mr. Denby devotes roughly 80 pages to each of his four subjects. He begins with Mel Brooks, whose specialty was to go up to the line of bad taste—and cross it. For Mr. Denby, Mr. Brooks 'was a more complicated Jewish clown than the world was ready to acknowledge' and 'a significant figure in Jewish history.' At one point he compares Mr. Brooks to Franz Kafka. Informed of the comparison, one imagines Kafka, not a man given to mirth, would have enjoyed a hardy, falling-off-the-couch laugh.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘Honey Don't!' Review: Bittersweet Crime Comedy
Robert Altman's sun-splashed Philip Marlowe yarn 'The Long Goodbye' cast a short shadow upon its release in 1973 but a long one ever since. A rambling, shambling anti-noir, it ignored the usual imperatives of the form and instead reveled in the irrelevant. It earned no Oscar nominations and died at the box office but became much esteemed by critics, its influence imprinted on such later films as David Robert Mitchell's 'Under the Silver Lake' (2018), Paul Thomas Anderson's 'Inherent Vice' (2014) and Joel and Ethan Coen's 'The Big Lebowski' (1998). Now Ethan Coen has made another homage, the circuitous, shambling comedy-mystery 'Honey Don't!' Altman's work made a foreground of its background—pre-disco SoCal cool—and Mr. Coen's latest is at least as focused on atmosphere over storytelling. In Bakersfield, the writer-director oozes fascination with every piece of worn linoleum or regrettable paneling; the best scene is the opening titles sequence, in which the names of cast and crew members turn up on dingy road signs and dilapidated façades. As for the second-best scene, I'm struggling to think of one. The dog days of summer invariably bring the dismal dregs of cinema.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kevin Costner Fires Back at ‘Patently False' Allegation Over ‘Horizon 2' Rape Scene: ‘An Absolute Nightmare'
Kevin Costner has fired back at a lawsuit from a 'Horizon 2' stunt performer who claims that she was forced to perform an unscripted rape scene in violation of union protocols. In a motion to throw out the lawsuit filed Tuesday, Costner said the allegations are 'patently false' and 'deeply disappointing' and were designed to damage his reputation. More from Variety 'Horizon 2' Intimacy Coordinator Documented Rape Scene Complaint: 'Protocols Were Abandoned' Kevin Costner Sued by Stunt Performer Over Unscripted 'Horizon 2' Rape Scene Kevin Costner Premieres 'Horizon: Chapter 2' in Santa Barbara, But There's No News on Next Two Installments 'I can only assume that purpose was to use this sensationalistic language to embarrass and damage me and the 'Horizon' movies on an ongoing basis in order to gain a massive and unjustified payday,' Costner said in a court declaration. 'Equally as bad, having to read about and address allegations I know to be false involving the words 'rape' and 'assault' has been an absolute nightmare.' Devyn LaBella sued Costner in May for sexual harassment and for creating a hostile work environment. She alleged that Costner improvised a scene in which an actor straddled her and raked up her skirt in an aggressive manner. The intimacy coordinator on the film later documented lapses in protocols during the scene, including a lack of planning, communication and the lack of a closed set. In response, Costner stated that it was not a 'rape scene,' and that while rape was implied, there was no nudity or simulated sex. 'This was one artistic shot designed to imply what was going to happen off-screen, and purposely was not a 'simulated rape' as Devyn now falsely describes it,' he stated. Costner and his company are seeking to throw out the suit under California's anti-SLAPP law, which is designed to protect free speech on matters of public concern. Marty Singer, Costner's attorney, wrote in the motion that 'Horizon 2' — which has yet to be released — addresses 'the horrific struggles endured by women' in the American West in the post-Civil War era, 'including their extreme vulnerability to rape and other forms of violence,' and that therefore it qualifies for protection under the anti-SLAPP law. In an anti-SLAPP motion, the losing side has the right to appeal immediately, which will likely delay the case for a year or more regardless of the outcome at the trial court. The motion includes declaration from many crew members who maintain that the shot was not out of the ordinary. Roger Ivens, the other performer in the scene, stated that LaBella offered a 'false and sensationalist' description of the scene in her lawsuit, in which she characterized it as depicting a violent rape. 'It is not what happened,' Ivens stated. 'This was not in any way, shape, or form a simulated sex scene.' Wade Allen, the stunt coordinator who hired and supervised LaBella, also stated that the scene involved 'no intimacy, no nudity, no sexual conduct or sexual movement of any kind.' He also stated that LaBella gave him a thumbs up before and after the run-through, and seemed upbeat and enthusiastic about the experience. 'At no point that day did she evidence any distress or discomfort, or any concern about what she had been asked to do,' Allen stated. In response to the filing, LaBella's lawyer, James Vagnini, said that LaBella's professional demeanor does not undermine her allegations, and noted that her claims have been corroborated by the intimacy coordinator and other witnesses and text messages. 'This filing is continued evidence that one of Hollywood's most powerful men is trying to skirt accountability for reckless and harmful behavior,' Vagnini said. 'This baseless motion is nothing but a desperate delay tactic from a panicked legal team with no real defense. The only things damaging Kevin Costner's reputation are his own reckless, harmful behavior and the offensive narrative he's spreading to cover it up.' Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025 What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
BBC pressured to cut ties with author Sally Rooney over support for terrorist group Palestine Action
The BBC faces mounting pressure to sever ties with bestselling Irish author Sally Rooney who recently said she would donate money to a pro-Palestinian organization that British authorities have categorized as terrorists. Rooney, the controversial author of a book that was adapted to a popular movie streamed on the British public broadcaster, stunned critics last weekend by announcing she would give a percentage of proceeds from book sales to Palestine Action. 'I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can,' the 34-year-old Rooney told The Irish Times. Advertisement 4 The BBC faces mounting pressure to sever ties with bestselling Irish author Sally Rooney. Getty Images The defiant novelist, who lives in Ireland and has declared a boycott of Israel, said if that branded her a 'supporter of terrorism' under British law, 'so be it.' Her bombshell declaration triggered fierce backlash from Jewish groups and legal experts who warned the BBC could face criminal liability for continuing to profit from her work. Advertisement Palestine Action, which was founded in 2020, has generated headlines for targeting British arms companies that conduct business with Israel. The group's members have engaged in blockades, occupied facilities and inflicted property damage at weapons factories and military installations. On July 5, the UK government officially banned Palestine Action as a proscribed terrorist organization under the Terrorism Act 2000, making membership punishable by up to 14 years in prison and criminalizing any form of support including fundraising, statements or displaying associated materials. 4 Rooney stunned critics this past weekend by announcing she would give a percentage of proceeds from book sales to Palestine Action. Getty Images for Hulu Advertisement Since the ban took effect, over 744 individuals have been arrested for showing support for the group, including a record-breaking single-day arrest of 522 people at a London Parliament Square protest on Aug. 9 The Campaign Against Antisemitism, a UK-based nonprofit, torched Rooney's stance as 'utterly indefensible' and demanded platforms cut ties immediately. 'This goes far beyond political activism — it is a deliberate statement of intent to channel money towards a group that vandalized RAF jets and terrorized the Jewish community,' the organization said. Advertisement 'Platforms and publishers profiting from her work must urgently review their relationship with her, as they now risk enabling the flow of funds to a terrorist organization.' The BBC has hosted 'Normal People' on iPlayer since its 2020 launch and aired another Rooney adaptation, 'Conversations with Friends,' in 2022. The corporation scrambled to distance itself from the controversy. 4 Rooney has declared a boycott of Israel over its policies in the Palestinian territories. She has refused to have her books translated into Hebrew. Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/Shutterstock 'Matters relating to proscribed organizations are for the relevant authorities,' the BBC stated tersely, noting Rooney was never a staff member and what authors do with previously received money is 'a matter for them.' But several BBC insiders expressed dismay privately, with some remarking that Rooney 'had form' for courting controversy, according to the UK-based Times. The timing couldn't be worse for the broadcaster. Netflix began streaming 'Normal People' just two weeks ago, with the 12-part drama immediately cracking the platform's top-ten UK chart. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Advertisement Downing Street fired back Monday, warning donors to Palestine Action they were committing terror offenses under the Terrorism Act. 'There's a difference between showing support for a proscribed organization, which depends on the Terrorism Act, and legitimate protest,' a government spokesman said. 'Where activity breaks the law, then obviously the police will take action.' Rooney has been reported to counterterrorism police, though no action is expected since Palestine Action isn't banned in Ireland, where she made her comments. Advertisement 4 Jewish groups have demanded that the BBC sever ties with Rooney. REUTERS A law enforcement official told the Times that arresting Rooney would be complicated given jurisdictional considerations. 'Ordinarily, offenses occur based on where the person is at the time,' the official told the newspaper. Advertisement 'If you're in the UK and you're sending money to a proscribed terrorist organization then yes, it would likely be an offense.' But legal experts told the Times that they believe Rooney could still face prosecution under UK terror finance laws that cover overseas actions. Jonathan Turner, chief executive of UK Lawyers for Israel, argued the author along with the BBC and booksellers could have broken the law. 'By providing financial assistance to an organization which clearly intends to commit criminal damage in the UK, she is likely to be guilty under UK law for knowingly assisting the commission of criminal offenses,' Turner said. Advertisement 'I think the BBC and other sellers of her books could also be liable for assisting criminal offenses by Palestine Action as well as offenses under the Terrorism Act 2000 for transferring funds that may be used for the purposes of terrorism.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper branded Palestine Action more than 'a regular protest group' this past weekend, citing its 'escalating campaign' of activities. The Post has sought comment from the BBC and Rooney.
