Letters to the Editor: The big picture on Trump might be darker than anyone realizes
Is President Trump seeking to become Emperor Trump? Does he have almost unlimited power? Is Congress rubber-stamping all of his proposals and nominations? Has the U.S. Supreme Court told him that he can pretty much do anything he wants while he is president without fear of consequences?
Are he and Musk dismantling the federal agencies that might slow down their agenda? Is the president seeking to expand his 'empire' by acquiring other countries?
Is there separation of powers any longer, or has it all been concentrated in one branch that also controls the armed forces? Can someone explain the difference between Trump's aspirations and those of old kings and recent dictators and autocrats who amassed great power at the expense of their own citizens and anyone who stood in their way?
We may be willing or unwilling witnesses to the start of another global shift in world power that most of us aren't ready for and don't want.
Robert Peltzman, Westlake Village
..
To the editor: Trump and Musk have just succeeded in making the United States the laughingstock of the entire world. Our democratic institutions, aided by a passive and cowed media and a toothless political opposition, have been unable to stop an unauthorized private citizen from seizing the reins of government.
The Los Angeles Time reports, ''Shadow government'? Billionaire Elon Musk's grip on U.S. government spending raises questions,' while the New York Times writes, 'Trump Brazenly Defies Laws in Escalating Executive Power Grab.'
If this were another country, the U.S. media would be screaming, 'Coup d'etat!'
So much for our much-vaunted checks and balances and separation of powers. No one will ever again believe that the mighty United States government is anything but a paper tiger.
Ruth Bettelheim, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands
..
To the editor: Democrats and Republicans have complained for 40 years about the rising national debt. Finally, Trump appoints Musk to get to work on finding wasteful spending and cut it. So why are Democrats going berserk over this? Or were they just pretending to care about the debt?
The left can whine and complain all they want about Trump and Musk, but it only makes them look even worse than polls suggest they're doing.
Americans have voted for and want fiscal responsibility. It's long overdue, so to criticize these actions is both hypocritical and not very intelligent.
The quicksand is only going higher on the left as it fights against common sense.
Wayne Taralson, Sioux Falls, S.D.
..
To the editor: Most of us want to help those less fortunate than us. We would like to be remembered as a compassionate person who wanted to make the world a better place.
So what explains the reason why people of great wealth and power seek to inflict pain and suffering on so many throughout the world? Why deprive them of badly needed food and medicine? Why blame immigrants and those whose sexuality or gender do not conform to outdated norms for problems in our society that they did not cause? Why make citizens pay more for lifesaving drugs that they can barely afford?
It is my hope that their names will forever become synonymous with the hatred and misery they inflict on others. Humanity and compassion are what make us great, not wealth.
Alan Coles, Long Beach
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Same-sex marriage is no threat to religious liberty
This is the ridiculous accusation being made by Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk. In 2015, she was briefly jailed for contempt of court after she refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples as required by law. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up She is asking the Supreme Court, with a more staunchly conservative bench than the one that codified same-sex marriage, to rule that federally recognized unions between two men or two women threaten 'her sincerely held religious beliefs on marriage,' according to her lawyers. Advertisement Davis's challenge to Obergefell stems from her appeal of a $100,000 jury verdict plus $260,000 for attorney fees that she was ordered to pay to the gay couple to whom she denied a marriage license. The nine justices have not yet decided whether to review Davis's appeal. Davis is being represented by the Liberty Counsel, a conservative legal group that specializes in religious liberty cases. In 2018, the group won a 7-2 Supreme Court decision that ruled in favor of a Advertisement In a statement, Mat Staver, the Liberty Counsel's founder and chairman, said the Davis case 'underscores why the U.S. Supreme Court should overturn the wrongly decided Obergefell v. Hodges opinion because it threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe that marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman.' Davis herself has entered that sacred union four times with three men. For last year's 20th anniversary of the Goodridge decision that legalized same-sex marriage in Massachusetts, After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, Justice Clarence Thomas ticked off a list of other After Roe was outlawed, 'I remember thinking 'Oh my God, is it possible that all of the rights and privileges that we've won as a community, whether it's women's or LGBTQ rights, will be washed away in the same lifetime in which we won them?'' Julie Goodridge, one of the plaintiffs in the Massachusetts case, told me. There's Advertisement But we're also witnessing the most tumultuous era in modern politics, when things we once believed impossible have now become as commonplace as they are alarming. The end of Roe proved that our civil rights are not sacrosanct. Opponents of reproductive rights chipped away at abortion access for decades until the political climate was primed to erase what had been considered settled law for nearly 50 years. So far, Trump hasn't mentioned Davis's appeal. That could change if the Supreme Court adds her case to its upcoming docket, but perhaps this White House may already be quietly tipping its hand. In 2022, Joe Biden signed into law the Respect for Marriage Act, which requires all states to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. But on the official White House website, instead of remarks from Biden officials about protecting same-sex marriage, there's now only a Here's hoping that a year from now, my friends, and every LGBTQ couple, will still have weddings and anniversaries to celebrate. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Two decades on, Krauthammer's coinage has been appropriated, rebranded, and defined down — way down. 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is now flung at anyone who objects to President Trump's conduct or opposes his policies. The term is no longer reserved for over-the-top expressions of revulsion — like actor Robert De Niro using a televised appearance at the Tony Awards to Advertisement No — today 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is used as an all-purpose put-down to deride any Trump critics, including those who stick to serious, fact-based analysis. I've lost count of all the times I've been Advertisement A woman seen at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on July 3, when President Trump was speaking there. Scott Olson/Getty The word 'syndrome' notwithstanding, this is merely political trash talk, popularized by Trump and his allies as a way to wave off criticism without having to engage it. Instead of refuting arguments or defending policy, the magic letters 'TDS' turn disagreement into proof of mental defect. Yet if 'derangement' means the loss of proportion and judgment Krauthammer was getting at, then the most severe cases aren't among Trump's critics. They're in the ranks of his most ardent loyalists. The real Trump Derangement Syndrome shows up in three telltale symptoms. First is the cult-like worship that treats Trump as infallible — his acolytes profess adoration not only for what he does, but for whatever could flow from him. Emblematic of that mindset are the Advertisement Second is the abandonment of principles that once seemed non-negotiable. Conservatives and Republicans who used to champion free trade A man with a MAGA tattoo on his stomach attended a rally at Macomb Community College in Warren, Mich., to mark President Trump's 100th day in office on April 29. EMILY ELCONIN/NYT Third is the unsettling delight so many supporters take in Trump's most outrageous behavior — a kind of giddy worship that equates offensiveness with authenticity. Such brazenness has been a hallmark of his political career — from mocking John McCain's Vietnam War heroism to charging undocumented immigrants with ' Advertisement Meanwhile, they reflexively use 'TDS!' as a go-to put-down for anything from mild disagreement to serious moral critique, framing opposition not as argument but as pathology — an easy, cheap discredit. Yes, plenty of Trump-haters go overboard — but in MAGA circles, the 'TDS' tag is sprayed far wider, hitting thoughtful critics just as readily as the genuinely unhinged. What is truly alarming is how some have sought to legalize that insult by casting dissent as disease. In Minnesota this spring, five Republican senators proposed a bill that would Krauthammer's original point in 2003 was that derangement is the breakdown of proportion and prudence. That breakdown isn't found among critics who quote Trump accurately and challenge his claims. The most alarming political derangement today affects those who cannot conceive that there are legitimate reasons to be appalled by the president, and so explain anti-Trump dissent as a sign of mental weakness. If reason is the measure, then those who shout 'TDS!' the loudest are the ones most in need of treatment. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump and Prince Andrew Were 'Swapping Tales About Women'—Author
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Donald Trump and Prince Andrew were overheard "swapping tales about women" by a diplomat in New York, a royal author told Newsweek. The two men have both been under fire over their respective friendships with Jeffrey Epstein, the New York sex trafficker who died in jail in August 2019. The president denied knowing Andrew that same year despite having previously said, in 2000, that he was a "lot of fun to be with." Now, historian Andrew Lownie argues in his new biography Entitled that the pair did enjoy each other's company and were seen together by diplomats. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, told Newsweek: "It seems like this random individual wrote a book of fiction that belongs in the bargain bin of a discount bookstore." Donald and Melania Trump and Prince Andrew pose at Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida, on February 12, 2000. Donald and Melania Trump and Prince Andrew pose at Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida, on February 12, It Matters Prince Andrew's reputation disintegrated due to allegations by Virginia Giuffre that she was forced to have sex with him by Epstein and Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, as a 17-year-old sex trafficking victim. Trump has denied knowing about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, but their friendship has been haunting him in recent weeks, since botched promises to release the Epstein files this year. Trump administration officials had hinted at major revelations and even new charges in the case after the president ordered a review of the files. Yet in July, the D.O.J. and FBI released a memo saying there was no "Epstein client list" to release, there would be no new investigations and there was no evidence the financier blackmailed prominent figures. What to Know Lownie said in an upcoming episode of Newsweek's The Royal Report podcast: "I had this fascinating lunch with the diplomat at the New York consulate, who had stories of Trump and Andrew swapping tales about women, swapping notes about masseurs, talking about golf. "They have all these interests, golf, sex and money. So, I mean, it was amazing that Trump subsequently denied having any knowledge of Andrew, having any contact with him, when of course there's plenty of pictures of them together in London, in Mar-a-Lago and elsewhere. "They were all fishing in the same waters. But I can understand why they may want to distance themselves now." Newsweek representatives of Prince Andrew for comment. What Donald Trump Said About Andrew After Prince Andrew's car crash interview in 2019, Trump denied knowing the royal: "I don't know Prince Andrew, but it's a tough story, it's a very tough story." Yet he told People at a party in October 2000: "He's not pretentious. He's a lot of fun to be with." The magazine's article read: "Attending a Halloween costume party hosted by model Heidi Klum at the chic Hudson Bar, the teetotaling Andrew sipped bottled water and chatted with Maxwell, who wore a leopard-print jacket and platinum wig, as well as with Donald Trump and his girlfriend, model Melania Knauss [as the First Lady was then known]." Months earlier, that February, Andrew was photographed chatting with the Trumps at Mar-a-Lago. Epstein and Maxwell were at the same event and were also pictured socializing with both Andrew and Trump. Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at a party at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, 2000. Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at a party at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, Happens Next The Epstein-shaped storm swirling around Trump has moved to questions about Ghislaine Maxwell, who had meetings over two days with Todd Blanche, deputy U.S. Attorney General, in July. Shortly afterward, she was moved to a minimum security prison to continue serving her 20-year sentence for sex trafficking related offences. Maxwell was convicted over allegations that she groomed girls for Epstein to sexually abuse. Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has requested documents relating to the transfer, telling Newsweek it "reeks of a coordinated protection racket run at taxpayer expense to shield the president." Lownie said he was concerned Maxwell could be a flight risk: "I think she'll disappear. I mean, we may assume that she's in the American prison service but I think she'll be sunning herself on the beach somewhere." And on her transfer, he added: "The victims must feel very strongly about this, that you know, here's someone who had a very serious sentence, was charged and convicted on several counts, and, it was clear from the trial, had been deeply involved in what Epstein was doing. "And yet, you know, here she is with a 20-year sentence being basically given a get out of jail free card." Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about Charles and Queen Camilla, William and Kate, Meghan Markle and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.
