Affordable Care Act Insurance Could Be 75% More Expensive Next Year
Americans insured under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are facing a substantial increase in their monthly premiums and out-of-pocket costs next year as a result of the spending bill President Trump signed into law earlier this month.
According to NBC News, a study from health policy research group KFF found insurance companies are looking to raise premiums by an average of 15% in 2026 — the largest increase in five years. The findings come from an analysis of filings placed by over 100 insurers across 19 states.
Further adding to the price increases is the fact that several ACA subsidies are set to expire at the end of the year. The subsidies were implemented during the pandemic to allow more people to receive affordable healthcare through the ACA. 2022's Inflation Reduction Act extended those subsidies through 2025, but Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' which he signed into law earlier this month, doesn't continue them.
As a result, four million people are expected to be priced out of coverage through the ACA. With fewer people paying for coverage, insurance companies are expected to raise costs to make up the difference. There's also growing concern that Trump will follow through on his threat to place tariffs on pharmaceuticals, which would only further increase healthcare costs.
On top of increasing prices, the law adds more paperwork requirements for people looking to renew their existing plans, rather than the automatic renewal process currently in place. Furthermore, the open enrollment window has been shortened to only a month.
Basically, the Republican party did everything in its power to wipe away all the healthcare gains the ACA provided over the last 15 years. Source: Djordje Krstic / Getty
From NBC News:
According to KFF's latest analysis, most ACA insurers are proposing premium increases of 10% to 20% for 2026. More than a quarter, the group said, are proposing premium increases of 20% or more.
What people actually end up paying out of pocket for their monthly premiums could increase, on average, by more than 75%, Larry Levitt, the executive vice president for health policy at KFF, said on a call with reporters last week.
A family of three earning $110,000 a year and enrolled in a silver ACA plan — which usually comes with moderate monthly premiums — could see their monthly cost jump from $779 this year to $1,446 in 2026 when the enhanced subsidies expire, according to KFF. If insurers raise premiums by 15%, the monthly bill could climb even higher, to $1,662.
'This is not a repeal [of the ACA], but it's certainly an attempt to move in that direction,' Edwin Park, a research professor at the Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy, told NBC News. 'It'll be much more costly, so that means it'll be less affordable for you to purchase a plan or renew your coverage.'
Ending the ACA has long been a desire for President Trump. Despite these changes potentially harming millions of Americans, including many of his own voters, Trump cares more about destroying the legacy of his predecessors than doing what's best for American citizens. While these moves aren't outright ending the ACA, they're more or less destroying the intent of the program.
I mean, for God's sake, it's in the name. The Affordable Care Act is supposed to be affordable.
American healthcare is already absurdly expensive, and instead of finding ways to alleviate that, Trump and the GOP have only made the problem worse. These changes will undoubtedly lead to worse healthcare outcomes and place undue financial strain on millions of Americans. Are we feeling great again, yet?
SEE ALSO:
Trump Still Wants to Repeal Obamacare
Trump's Latest Obamacare Threat Puts Lives At Risk
SEE ALSO
Affordable Care Act Insurance Could Be 75% More Expensive Next Year was originally published on newsone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Wendy's wins an honor no restaurant wants
The pandemic and its afterburn decimated restaurants. Only one sector has been a bright spot: fast food. Fast-food joints like McDonald's, Chick-fil-A, Wendy's, and Taco Bell are still popular, thanks to convenience and value. We Americans love our fast food, but that convenience comes at a cost not reflected in the price tag. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter When you look at the nutritional data from many of the most popular fast-food chains, what you see is alarming, especially when you consider that 19.7% of children ages 2-19 years in the U.S. are obese. But the problem isn't just calories. Fast food contains fat, sodium, and added sugar that contribute to serious health problems like heart disease and Type 2 diabetes. Those fries, Frostys and bacon-laden burgers are definitely delicious, but a single meal from a fast-food chain often contains more calories than a person needs for a whole day. If you're trying to decide between a handful of your favorite spots, you might want to check out World Atlas' recent comparison of fast-food chains. They found that when it comes to unhealthy menu items, a couple of chains stand out from the rest. In their ranking, World Atlas looked at the nutritional data from nearly a dozen popular menu items. The survey factored in calories, saturated fat, sodium, and sugar. According to the findings, Wendy's is one of the unhealthiest chains in the U.S., but the legacy fast-food chain has plenty of company. Sonic Drive-In, Popeyes, McDonald's, Five Guys, Dairy Queen, and Carl's Jr. are also on the list of the worst for you. While Wendy's has made an effort to use and promote fresh ingredients, like its "Fresh never frozen beef" promise, and offers a variety of green salads prepared daily, its signature sandwich, the Baconator, rings in at more than 900 calories. When packaged with an order of medium fries and a medium Frosty, the tally jumps to than 1,600 calories. Related: McDonald's Snack Wrap causes alarming shortage The fat and sodium levels in this one meal are above daily recommended limits, yet Wendy's marketing embraces indulgence. Slogans like "You know you want it" and "Baconator. Resistance is futile," give off a "We know you can't help yourself" kind of energy. It's hard to beat the quick-service convenience and the fact that the Wendy's Baconator meal is just $12 (where I live in Nevada). A similar meal - bacon cheeseburger, fries, chocolate shake - at a sit-down restaurant like Red Robin will set you back more than $24. The bottom line is that fast-food chains are thriving, even as concerns around Americans' overall health grow. The one thing all the names on the unhealthiest list have in common is fiercely loyal fan bases, and appearing on lists like World Atlas' doesn't appear to hurt business much. Wendy's posted $2.9 billion in sales Q1 2025, down only slightly from the same time in 2024. Quick-service restaurants, including fast food chains, are popular and profiting because they offer value pricing and digital ordering and convenience. Customers also rate fast-food restaurants higher in terms of satisfaction than they do full-service restaurants. The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) 2025 report indicates that customer satisfaction with quick-service restaurants is higher than that of full-service restaurants. It can also be difficult for healthier restaurant chains to compete with the fast service and extended hours offered by national chains. So, even though healthier chains like Sweetgreen and Cava are popular in urban markets, traditional fast-food brands still dominate everywhere else. Turns out we want our food fast and cheap, no matter how many calories are in the bag. Related: McDonald's secures honor no restaurant wants The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Canned Fruit Recall Sparks Nationwide Warning to Customers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. W.W. Industrial Group is recalling Parashore brand pear slices in juice due to fears the product may contain elevated levels of lead and cadmium. Newsweek reached out to the company via phone Wednesday for comment and left a voicemail. Why It Matters Elevated levels of lead and cadmium can cause significant health problems, particularly among infants and children. The recall adds to a growing list of high-profile food safety actions, emphasizing the ongoing importance of vigilant federal oversight and thorough product testing to protect public health. Lead and cadmium are both toxic metals that can enter the food supply from environmental sources, such as contaminated soil or industrial byproducts. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), lead exposure poses particular risks to young children, whose developing brains are highly susceptible to neurotoxic effects. Elevated lead intake in early childhood has been linked to long-term issues affecting learning and behavior. Cadmium contamination can arise from soil composition, industrial activities and certain manufacturing processes. Prolonged exposure to cadmium, especially at levels above the FDA's interim reference level, can affect kidney function and increase the risk of bone demineralization. While it is not possible to completely prevent cadmium from entering the food supply, manufacturers are legally required to minimize and monitor such risks. Numerous recalls have been initiated in 2025 due to the potential for damaged products, foodborne illness, contamination and undeclared food allergens. Millions of Americans experience food sensitivities or allergies every year. According to the FDA, the nine "major" food allergens in the U.S. are eggs, milk, fish, wheat, soybeans, Crustacean shellfish, sesame, tree nuts and peanuts. What To Know In the FDA alert, the recalled sliced pears were distributed throughout grocery outlet stores in California and other locations across the United States. The products were sold in a 15-ounce can with a UPC number of #704817164237. "The specific lot found positive for heavy metals was Lot 3700/01172 6122J, Prod: 02/19/2024, Best by 2/19/2027," the FDA warns. The agency adds that there had been no reported illnesses related to the recall as of Tuesday. What People Are Saying The FDA alert, in part: "The heavy metal contamination was discovered via sampling by the Maryland Department of Health which is part of the FDA Laboratory Flexible Funding Model program. The company has recalled the products and is continuing an investigation to determine cause." What Happens Next Customers who have purchased the recalled pear slices are urged to throw them away or return the product to the original place of purchase for a full refund, the FDA says. People with additional questions can contact W.W. Industrial Group via phone at 516- 676-9188 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. ET weekdays.
National Geographic
2 hours ago
- National Geographic
Forget about 10,000 steps a day—science now has a more accurate number
Walking more is associated with reduced risk for dementia, diabetes, heart disease, and more—but a new study says you can get fewer than 10,000 steps a day and still see all those benefits. An explorer walks across sand dunes on Socotra, Yemen, 2018. Getting 10,000 steps in every day can be challenging, and a new study suggests 7,000 steps can reduce the risk of developing common but serious health conditions. Photograph by Martin Edstrom, Nat Geo Image Collection If you've been told that walking 10,000 steps a day is mandatory for good health, you might be surprised to learn that scientists suspect the figure was created to market pedometers and wasn't based on actual data. The number of steps that stave off numerous chronic conditions is actually much lower, according to a paper published today in Lancet Public Health that reviewed the past decade's research on steps and health. Walking just 7,000 steps a day lowers the risk of developing more than a half dozen medical conditions as well as premature death, according to the researchers. The scientists, from Australia, the United Kingdom, and Norway, analyzed dozens of studies involving 160,000 adults putting one foot in front of the other. Compared to people walking 2,000 steps, the 7,000-step total was associated with a 38 percent lower risk of dementia, a 25 percent reduction in cardiovascular disease, and 28 percent fewer falls. Mortality dropped nearly half in the 7,000-step walkers. Risks for depression and type 2 diabetes also fell, although by less than for the other conditions. It's long been known that physical activity, including moderate-intensity walking, benefits health. But this is the first time researchers were able to correlate step goals with the wide range of preventive health outcomes. 'Step counting devices are becoming so widely available that the general public wants to know what they should aim for,' says Melody Ding, a public health researcher at the University of Syndey in Australia and the study's lead author. People can now feel confident with a target of 7,000, she says. How more research led to a more accurate estimate This study 'is really exciting because it looks at how step volume makes a big difference in several major health outcomes,' says Michael Rocha, a cardiologist in Dartmouth, Massachusetts who leads walking excursions in his community as part of the nationwide Walk with a Doc health program. 'We now have more evidence to change what we are telling our patients. It doesn't have to be 10,000 a day to live longer and healthier,' he says. As recently as 2020, scientists formulating physical activity guidelines for Americans as well as for a global audience did not have enough evidence to recommend a specific step target, the study authors note. That left 10,000 steps as the public's holy grail—even as many people fell short. The large number of studies published in the past decade finally provided enough data to inform a broad step target. One study in 2023 that researchers included in their analysis, for example, found as few as 2,800 steps reduced the risk of cardiovascular disease, with the most benefits at 7,200. The reviewers did find that 10,000 steps are associated with even lower risks for a few conditions, such as cancer mortality, dementia, and depressive symptoms. But the incremental improvement above the 7,000 was small. For most other health metrics, including type 2 diabetes prevention, the extra 3,000 steps yielded no additional gains. Still, '10,000 steps may remain a viable target for people who are more active,' the study states. (Walking is great for your health. Walking backward? Even better.) Don't wait--walk The researchers reviewed results from 57 studies involving 35 groups of people. The studies involved participants from the United States, U.K., Japan, Australia, and several other countries. Some involved older adults or people who already had chronic conditions or increased risk factors, but many were conducted on healthy young adults. The majority of studies assessed deaths from all causes as well as cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality—areas where walking has long been known to offer protection. Other conditions, including cancer, type two diabetes, cognitive outcomes, mental health, and falls, were examined by a range of four to six studies. The researchers acknowledge that the small number of studies for certain conditions is a limiting factor of the review. 'Some outcomes have more data than others. As we start to accumulate more data and studies, these results may be updated in the future,' Ding says. In addition, the researchers acknowledge that walking speed likely plays a role in the health outcomes they uncovered, but they were unable to precisely determine its effect or what an ideal pace might be. Still, the confirmation that walking just 7,000 steps a day can help stave off chronic conditions, including dementia, is music to ears of many physicians. 'Aerobic exercise has consistently been shown to be one of the most robust ways to prevent and delay dementia,' says Stephanie Towns, a neuropsychologist at the Yale School of Medicine, who says mechanisms likely include increasing the flow of oxygen and nutrients to the brain as well as controlling major risk factors like hypertension. 'I personally recommend to all my patients that one of the best ways to reduce dementia risk is regularly engaging in brisk walks,' she says. Or as Ding puts it, 'definitely don't wait' for more data to accrue. Lace up your walking shoes and get active now.
