
Vladimir Putin's 100-tonne Satan II 'world's most powerful' missile that sparked WW3 fears
Vladimir Putin's 100-tonne Satan II 'world's most powerful' missile that sparked WW3 fears
The RS-28 Sarmat, also known as the 'Satan II', missile was announced by the Russian President in 2018 and has been described as the 'most powerful' nuclear weapon in the world, but it has a series of failed tests
Vladimir Putin, the man at the helm of Russia
(Image: Contributor, Getty Images )
Russian President Vladimir Putin triggered World War 3 concerns when he announced the world's most lethal nuclear weapon was under active trial seven years ago, generating a mixed international response.
Dubbed Satan II, the RS-28 Sarmat missile was unveiled as a prime example of "next generation" warfare technology during the Russian leader's state-of-the-nation speech in 2018. It boasts unmatched capabilities, with the potential to deploy nuclear warheads worldwide, posing a significant menace to global superpowers such as the US, the UK, and Europe.
Putin boasted that this formidable addition to Russia's military inventory would make other nations "think twice" about threatening Russia. Nonetheless, the Pentagon dismissed the notion that it poses any threat to the United States or its allies - but why such confidence?
The RS-28 Sarmat missile has been described as the "next generation" of warfare technology
(Image: Getty Images )
The missile's impressive specifications are intimidating: at 116 feet long and weighing a colossal 220 tons, its range is estimated to be between 10,000 to 18,000km, vastly overshadowing Russia's older intercontinental ballistic missile, the Voevoda (R-36). For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
Reports from Russian media indicate the RS-28 could transport as many as 16 independently targetable nuclear warheads, though speculations suggest the actual number might be lower, at 'up to 10 warheads', reports the Mirror US.
Article continues below
The Sarmat missile made its inaugural test flight on April 20, 2022, with the Russian Defence Ministry announcing: "At 15:12 Moscow time at the Plesetsk state test cosmodrome in the Arkhangelsk region, a Sarmat fixed-based [sic] intercontinental ballistic missile was successfully launched from a silo launcher."
Shortly after this trial, it was revealed that 50 new Sarmat missiles would soon be ready for combat.
However, this would be its only successful test. In February 2023, there were raised eyebrows when it seemed to leave a large crater on a launch site in Plesetsk in northern Russia - a fourth failure for the missile, if experts are to be believed, leaving significant doubts over the nuclear weapon.
Matt Korda, an associate senior researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), provided Euronews Next with a breakdown of the aptly nicknamed Satan II.
He described it as "politically significant" for Putin and stated that despite its failures, "construction continues."
"Russia has long planned to replace every single one of its Cold War-era delivery systems with newer versions," he said.
"The RS-20V Voevoda is the last of these types of ICBMs left in its arsenal. As a result, the introduction of the Sarmat will be politically significant for President Putin, as the embodiment of Russia's completion of this long-awaited transition".
Korda also mentioned that contrary to Russian reports, the new RS-28 is still yet to enter service. However, the status of the weapon remains uncertain.
He elucidated: "Not only has serial production of the missile been delayed, but its testing cycle has been marred by a series of postponed and failed tests.
"It is clear that Russia is proceeding with construction to facilitate the missile's deployment - satellite imagery indicates that major construction is well underway at the first regiment of the 62nd Missile Division in south Siberia, and will soon begin at other expected deployment sites."
Moreover, Malcolm Chalmers, Deputy Director-General of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), commented on Russia's nuclear capabilities, which already possess "already considerable destructive potential."
Despite the increase in destructive power, he believes the new Russian rocket adds little to the existing threat.
Speaking to the Telegraph, he remarked: "Russia and the Western nuclear states have had the ability to annihilate each other ever since they acquired strategic nuclear bombers, followed by intercontinental ballistic missiles, over 60 years ago.
"Putin adding this new missile to his pre-existing 'overkill' capability makes absolutely no difference to the effectiveness of our Trident nuclear deterrent submarines."
According to the Arms Control Association, Russia maintains 6,257 of the world's approximately 13,080 nuclear warheads.
Article continues below
In comparison, the US, which plans to upgrade one of its intercontinental ballistic missiles - the $100 billion LGM-35A Sentinel starting in 2029 - claims to have 5,550, while China, ranking third, reportedly possesses 350.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
13 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf sensationally quits
Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf sensationally quits He said he 'no longer believed working to get a Reform government elected was a good use of his time' Zia Yusuf has resigned (Image: Getty Images ) Outspoken Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf has sensationally quit his role after earlier suggesting it was 'dumb' of the party's newest MP to call for a ban on the burqa. In a statement, he said he "no longer believed working to get a Reform government elected was a good use of his time". The 38-year-old became chairman of the party 11 months ago, and said in a statement that he had worked as a volunteer to quadruple its membership and deliver historic electoral results. But in a statement issued on X, he resigned from his position on Thursday. In a statement, Mr Yusuf wrote: "Eleven months ago I became chairman of Reform. "I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30%, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. "I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office." The decision comes after a dispute sparked by calls to ban the burka. Newly elected Reform MP Sarah Pochin ignited controversy when she utilised Prime Minister's Questions to inquire about the possibility of outlawing the burka in the UK. Article continues below Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage expressed genuine disappointment regarding Mr Yusuf's decision to stand down. Mr Farage further stated: "As I said just last week, he was a huge factor in our success on May 1st and is an enormously talented person. "Politics is a high-pressure and often challenging game, and it appears Zia has reached his limit. His departure will be a great loss to our party and public life.", reports the Express. Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage and former party chairman Zia Yusuf (Image: PA ) Earlier, Mr Yusuf openly criticised Ms Pochin's question by branding it "dumb" as it diverged from the party's official stance. He explained: "Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it wasn't policy. Busy with other stuff. I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do." Ms Pochin posed a question to Sir Keir about the possibility of the UK joining countries like France, Denmark, and Belgium in banning the burka, a traditional garment worn by some Muslim women. She stated: "Given the Prime Minister's desire to strengthen strategic alignment with our European neighbours, will he in the interests of public safety follow the lead of France, Denmark, Belgium and others and ban the burka?". Ms Pochin's enquiry sparked indignation among some members of Parliament in the Commons, while it visibly caught the Prime Minister off guard. Sir Keir responded: "Can I welcome her to her place, but I'm not going to follow her down that line." He continued, "But now she is here and safely in her place, perhaps she could tell her new party leader that his latest plan to bet £80 billion of unfunded tax cuts, with no clue how he's going to pay for them, is Liz Truss all over again." Article continues below He concluded with an aside, "Although considering I think (Ms Pochin) was a Conservative member when Liz Truss was leader, she probably won't."


Daily Mirror
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Russia blames UK for Ukraine drone attack that 'risks escalation to World War 3'
Ukraine's drone attacks on airbases for nuclear bombers risk escalating the conflict to "World War III" claims Russia's ambassador to the UK, who suggested that the UK was involved in the mission. Andrei Kelin warned that Ukraine's actions "are bringing the conflict to a different level of escalation", and said Kyiv should "not try to engulf World War III". A surprise Ukrainian drone attack that targeted several Russian air bases hosting nuclear-capable strategic bombers was unprecedented in its scope and sophistication and for the first time reached as far as Siberia in a heavy blow to the Russian military. Mr Kelin pointed the finger at the UK when he said Ukraine must have had assistance in the attacks. "[This] kind of attack involves, of course, provision of very high technology, so-called geospaced data, which only can be done by those who have it in possession. And this is London and Washington," he told Sky News. "I don't believe that America [is involved], that has been denied by President Trump, definitely, but it has not been denied by London. We perfectly know how much London is involved, how deeply British forces are involved in working together with Ukraine." Satellite photos show seven destroyed bombers on the tarmac at an air base in eastern Siberia, one of the targets Ukraine said it struck with drones in one of the most daring covert operations of the war. Ukraine said over 40 bombers, or about a third of Russia's strategic bomber fleet, were damaged or destroyed Sunday, although Moscow said only several planes were struck. The conflicting claims couldn't be independently verified and video of the assault posted on social media showed only a couple of bombers hit. The operation was claimed to have been planned over 18 months and it is a heavy blow to Russia's air force and its military prestige. The bold attack demonstrated Ukraine's capability to hit high-value targets anywhere in Russia, dealing a humiliating blow to the Kremlin and inflicting significant losses to Moscow's war machine. While some Russian military bloggers compared it to another infamous Sunday surprise attack — that of Japan's strike on the U.S. base at Pearl Harbour in 1941 — others rejected the analogy, arguing the actual damage was far less significant than Ukraine claimed.


Powys County Times
29 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Trump says it might be better to let Ukraine and Russia ‘fight for a while'
President Donald Trump has said that it might be better to let Ukraine and Russia 'fight for a while' before pulling them apart and pursuing peace. In an Oval Office meeting with German chancellor Friedrich Merz, Mr Trump likened the war in Ukraine — which Russia invaded in early 2022 — to a fight between two young children who hated each other. 'Sometimes you're better off letting them a fight for a while and then pulling them apart,' Mr Trump said. He added that he had relayed that analogy to Russian president Vladimir Putin in their phone conversation on Wednesday. The US president still left the threat of sanctions on the table. He said sanctions could be imposed for both Ukraine and Russia. 'When I see the moment where it's not going to stop … we'll be very, very tough,' Mr Trump said. Asked about Mr Trump's comments as the two leaders sat next to each other, Mr Merz stressed that both he and the president agreed 'on this war and how terrible this war is going on', pointing to Mr Trump as the 'key person in the world' who would be able to stop the bloodshed. But Mr Merz also emphasised that Germany 'was on the side of Ukraine' and that Kyiv was only attacking military targets, not Russian civilians. 'We are trying to get them stronger,' Mr Merz said of Ukraine.