Can supplements actually boost your immune system?
And if you've ever felt tempted to try them, you're far from alone: Recent research suggests that millions of Americans have used dietary supplements for those supposed benefits.
The new study was published last week in JAMA Network Open and included more than 15,000 participants. It found that about 1 in 9 U.S. residents used supplements to enhance their immune systems between January 2017 and March 2020.
'It comes up all the time,' said Dr. Michael Ben-Aderet, the associate medical director of hospital epidemiology at Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles who wasn't involved with the study. 'There's really this sense of people trying to optimize their health.'
Many people also used the supplements without a doctor's recommendation, the researchers found. But infectious disease doctors, researchers and supplement experts say there isn't much evidence that these products actually help.
What does the science say?
Supplements claiming to support immunity often contain vitamins and minerals necessary for the immune system. So it isn't unreasonable to believe that these products could help you sidestep common viral infections or lessen symptoms once you've become sick.
In fact, some nutrients such as vitamins A, C, D and zinc are needed to protect against germs, and deficiencies in them raise your risk of becoming sick, said Dr. Mahtab Jafari, a professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of California, Irvine.
However, most people in the United States get the vitamins and minerals they need through a balanced diet, said Ben-Aderet. For those people, there isn't compelling evidence that supplements are useful, he added.
There are thousands of supplements claiming to help the immune system. Some contain just one vitamin or mineral, and others are packed with a hodgepodge of ingredients. Vitamin D, vitamin C and zinc are among the most studied and prevalent ingredients, experts said, and the benefits still aren't conclusive.
Research suggesting that vitamin D supplements treat viral infections like the common cold or reduce the risk of them is inconsistent. A 2020 review found that the supplements didn't protect against viruses in people with normal or high levels of vitamin D. A 2021 review involving nearly 50,000 participants, however, found that vitamin D supplements slightly reduced the risk of acute respiratory infections. (But the review involved authors who have received funding from supplement companies.)
The evidence is similarly unconvincing for vitamin C and zinc. A 2013 review from the Cochrane Library involving more than 11,000 participants found that vitamin C supplements failed to reduce the risk of catching a cold in the general population, though it sometimes shortened how long the illness lasted. And a 2024 Cochrane review involving more than 8,000 participants found that zinc supplements did next to nothing to prevent the common cold, though it may have reduced duration.
Plants like elderberry and echinacea are also used in immune system supplements. But unlike vitamins and minerals, botanicals aren't essential for immune health, and there's even less reliable research on whether they help prevent or treat common viruses, said Dr. Jen Wall Forrester, senior medical director of infection prevention at UC Health in Cincinnati.
'I wish there was a magic bullet,' she said, but immunity is complex, and supplements are unlikely to single-handedly change how it works.
Why don't we know if they help?
It's hard to firmly state the benefits of immune system supplements because there are few high-quality randomized clinical trials, the gold standard of medical research, assessing their effectiveness, said Dr. Pieter Cohen, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School who studies dietary supplement safety.
And dietary supplements aren't approved by the Food and Drug Administration before hitting the market. This means companies can sell products containing ingredients that haven't been rigorously tested to offer benefits, Cohen said, and they generally don't have to prove to the FDA that their products contain what they claim.
A 2022 study analyzing 30 supplements marketed to support the immune system found that more than half had inaccurate labels, 13 were misbranded and nine contained ingredients not listed on the label.
What's the bottom line?
'You need to have a really healthy dose of skepticism when you're pulling something off the shelf,' Ben-Aderet said.
But if you want to give supplements a try, check for high-quality third-party seals of approval from organizations such as U.S. Pharmacopeia or NSF, which test the quality of dietary supplements, Jafari said. Also scan the FDA's website to see if the agency has ever issued a warning letter to the supplement company for misleading claims or poor manufacturing, she added.
And talk to a health care provider before taking supplements. They can test your blood for deficiencies, inform you of side effects and unsafe dosages, and let you know whether some supplements could dangerously interact with medications you take, Wall Forrester said.
If your doctor says the supplement you want to try is generally safe, you 'could just try it out,' Wall Forrester said, 'but you might be wasting your money.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Does drinking milk make your bones stronger?
I've always heard that you need to drink milk to keep your bones healthy. Is that true? For generations, Americans have been told — through school nutrition programs and advertising campaigns — that milk is an essential part of a healthy diet. Key to that narrative was that milk builds strong bones. Your bones are made of calcium, and one cup of whole milk contains about 300 milligrams of this nutrient. So drinking three cups per day, the thinking went, must make them resilient. But that message was built on short-term studies and pushed by the dairy industry, said Dr. Walter Willett, a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. With over one-third of people in the United States having trouble digesting lactose, nobody needs to drink cow's milk, said Christopher Gardner, a nutrition scientist and professor of medicine at Stanford University. Getting enough calcium is still important, especially for some high-risk groups, but there may be better sources. What does milk do to bones? Calcium is an essential nutrient, critical for nerve, muscle, and heart function, as well as bone and tooth health. However, as with most nutrients, your body needs only a certain amount. The U.S. dietary guidelines recommend that adults consume 1,000 to 1,200 milligrams of calcium per day, but this threshold is debated among experts, and other countries, like the United Kingdom, recommend only 700 milligrams. Past clinical trials have found that when children and adults who weren't eating enough calcium increased their consumption, whether via dairy foods or supplements, their bone densities increased by up to 3%. But those gains were too small to meaningfully reduce fracture risk, Willett said. And other studies have found that people must consume extra calcium every day to maintain those gains, which may not be worth the investment, he added. 'The idea that we need a lot of calcium is based primarily on very short-term studies looking at calcium balance over a few weeks,' Willett said. An analysis of 79 milk papers published between 1999 and 2003 found that more than one-third received funding from the dairy industry. There's even evidence that people can have strong bones without drinking milk. According to one review published in 2020, people who live in countries with the lowest rates of hip fractures also tend to drink the least milk. And analyses of multiple studies have found that drinking more milk was not associated with lower fracture risk. Of course, studies like these can't prove any link between milk consumption and bone health, said Dr. René Rizzoli, the former head of the bone diseases department at the University Hospitals of Geneva. To show that milk consumption prevents fractures, for instance, you would need clinical trials on the topic, which have not been done. Ultimately, your exercise and broader diet may have more influence over your bone health. So don't count on milk alone to eliminate your fracture risk, Rizzoli said. Do some people need milk more than others? Experts say that children ages 9 to 18 need more calcium than any other age group to support their growth, as do older adults, since bone density tends to decrease after age 50. When a person's calcium levels are low, the body can adapt by pulling more calcium from food and rejecting less as waste, Gardner said. But these mechanisms decline with age, and when the body isn't getting enough, it pulls more calcium from bones, he added, weakening them. In a 2021 clinical trial, researchers assigned more than 7,000 older adults living in assisted care facilities in Australia to either maintain their usual two servings of dairy per day or increase their consumption to 3.5 servings per day. Over the two-year study, the higher-dairy group had an 11% reduced risk of falls and a 33% reduced risk of fractures. The researchers also found that they maintained more weight, muscle mass, and bone density than the lower-dairy group, though the team couldn't determine whether their lower risk of falls and fractures was because of stronger bones or something else, said Sandra Iuliano, a nutritionist at the University of Melbourne. Regardless, milk can be one of the most convenient sources of calcium, along with other nutrients such as protein, potassium, and phosphorus, said Jeri Nieves, a nutritional epidemiologist at the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City. Other foods — like tofu, bony fish, leafy vegetable,s and fortified orange juice or plant-based milks — are good sources too, Nieves said, even if they have less calcium per serving. The best option for calcium, however, might be fermented dairy products like yogurt and cheese. They support the gut microbiome, tend to be better tolerated by people sensitive to lactose, and are more strongly tied to lower fracture risk than milk, Rizzoli said. They're also packed with calcium — a 1.5-ounce serving of cheddar cheese, for example, has the same amount as a cup of whole milk. 'If you like milk, drink it. If you don't like milk, or if you can't tolerate it, use some other source,' Nieves said. This article originally appeared in
Observer
10-08-2025
- Observer
Dentists know you hate flossing. Try this instead
Lancette VanGuilder is the president of the American Dental Hygienists' Association, and she does not floss. 'We are brainwashed from the time we get into dental hygiene school that floss is boss,' said VanGuilder, who practices in Nevada. 'But the standard message we give everyone — brush and floss — doesn't work anymore.' To better clean between her teeth, VanGuilder has replaced her floss with tiny scrubbers called interdental brushes, with bristles that are typically made of nylon or rubber. And a growing number of dental professionals are encouraging their patients to try them, either along with or instead of floss. The American Dental Association says that the best method of interdental cleaning, or cleaning between your teeth, is the one that you will do regularly. And given that many people do not floss — only about one-third of Americans do, according to some estimates — the association advises dentists that other devices might be more pleasant or effective for those patients. According to the association, there are many effective tools for cleaning between teeth, including floss, dental picks, interdental brushes or water flossers. There is limited research comparing floss with other interdental cleaning tools, and most of those studies are relatively small. But a 2018 review of 22 clinical trials found that the brushes were more effective than floss or other tools at reducing gum inflammation. Anecdotally, many dental professionals said they had seen the difference interdental brushes have made for their patients — and sometimes even for their families. Dr. Mia Geisinger, president of the American Academy of Periodontology, convinced her husband to add interdental brushes to his daily brushing and flossing regimen. 'When he saw what came out from between his teeth, he was both appalled and hooked,' she said. A Deeper Clean for Your Mouth Whatever the tool or technique, the goal of cleaning your teeth is to get rid of plaque, which can lead to gum disease and inflammation around the tooth, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gum disease has been associated with a number of health conditions, including heart disease and diabetes. Using a toothbrush alone removes 'about 40 to 60% of the plaque on teeth but doesn't do a good job of getting in between the teeth,' Geisinger said. VanGuilder added that floss is generally effective for getting out big pieces of food, but when it comes to plaque — 'all the invisible bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites' — it doesn't always work as well. The challenge is twofold: Plaque is sticky, and the edges of your teeth aren't straight. Everyone's mouth is different, and some people are better than others at flossing in the nooks and crannies where pathogens live. Interdental brushes, on the other hand, are more flexible and they're easier to use correctly, VanGuilder said. How to Find What Works for You For those willing to put in the time, a combination of tools might be most effective. That's why when those patients come to visit Geisinger, she hands them a map of their mouths. She generally recommends interdental brushes of various sizes to clean between teeth, and suggests floss if a patient has a very tight space between two teeth. But Judith Albino, president emerita of the University of Colorado and professor emerita at the university's schools of public health and dental medicine, is skeptical that many people will take up a complicated dental routine. Most Americans don't follow the standard dental advice, she said. 'If you're adding something new, you're adding another element of time, and something to do that they're not used to,' Albino said. For that reason, VanGuilder leaves the decision up to her patients. If they prefer floss, she tells them to floss. If they prefer an interdental brush, she'll tell them which size to buy. If they're particularly enthusiastic, she'll guide them through using various brushes for spaces of different sizes. 'Ultimately, the only tool that's really beneficial is the tool that you're going to use,' VanGuilder said. This article originally appeared in
Observer
04-08-2025
- Observer
‘Japanese Walking' is a fitness trend worth trying
Going for a walk is one of the simplest workouts, but it can have powerful health impacts. Walking has been linked to improved mental and cardiovascular health, and it can be effective for managing back pain. But not all walking is equally effective. A method nicknamed 'Japanese walking' on social media — also known as interval walking training, or IWT — seems to offer greater advantages than a simple stroll, or even than walking at a moderate pace for 8,000 or more steps a day. The strategy was first introduced two decades ago in a study led by Hiroshi Nose, an exercise physiologist at Shinshu University Graduate School of Medicine in Japan. The country has one of the world's oldest populations, and Nose hoped that, by applying interval-training techniques used by elite athletes to its senior community, he could improve older people's health and reduce the country's medical costs, he told The New York Times in an email. After seeing promising early results, he and his collaborator, Shizue Masuki, continued to study the method in depth. While this type of exercise isn't new, it has been a trend on TikTok this summer. Here's what the science says about the benefits of interval walking and how to get started. What is 'Japanese walking'? As the name suggests, interval walking is a form of interval training, which involves alternating between bursts of intense activity and more gentle movement or rest. In this case, it's basically just alternating between fast and slow walking. But compared with more classic forms of high-intensity interval training, interval walking is more approachable for many people, especially those who haven't exercised in a while or who are recovering from injuries that make high-impact activities like running difficult, said Dr. Carlin Senter, the chief of primary-care sports medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. How do you do it? All you need are comfortable shoes, a safe place to walk, and a timer. In the studies by Nose and Masuki, subjects typically walked quickly for three minutes and then slowly for three minutes. During fast periods, the idea is to feel as if you're working somewhat hard, to the point that you would have a hard time carrying on a conversation. The movement during the slow periods should be a gentle stroll. (The researchers capped the fast intervals at three minutes, they said, because that was the point at which many older volunteers started to feel tired.) They recommend taking longer strides during the fast intervals than during the slow ones, to make the activity more challenging. They also suggest engaging your arms, bending them at the elbows, and swinging them vigorously with each step, which will help you maintain proper form during longer strides. In their studies, volunteers completed at least 30 minutes of interval walking four times a week. If you try it, those 30 minutes don't have to be continuous. The research suggests that breaking the sessions into roughly 10-minute segments three times a day can be just as effective. While conducting their research, they found that, by taking regular recovery breaks, many interval walkers spent more time exercising at a high intensity than they would have if they had walked continuously at that intensity, since they tired out sooner when they didn't have breaks. What are the health benefits? In their original study of older adults, which was small, Nose and Masuki found that interval walkers saw significantly greater improvements in blood pressure, cardiovascular health, and leg strength compared with volunteers who walked at a continuous, moderate pace. In the decade since, a growing body of evidence from Nose and Masuki and other researchers has reinforced these findings and has suggested the method may have even more benefits. A 2018 study found that, over 10 years, interval walking was linked to fewer age-related declines in aerobic capacity and muscle power. What's the best way to add interval walking to your exercise routine? If you haven't been active in a while, 'start low, go slow,' Senter said. If three minutes feels too long for the faster intervals, start with a minute and work your way up. Over time, as your fitness improves, you will probably be able to push yourself harder during the fast bouts. Finally, if interval walking is your main form of exercise, aim to complement it with at least two days a week of strength training, along with balance and mobility training, Senter said. This article originally appeared in
