logo
GCC on High Alert as Israel-Iran Conflict Threatens Regional Stability

GCC on High Alert as Israel-Iran Conflict Threatens Regional Stability

Arab Times9 hours ago

KUWAIT CITY, June 16: As direct hostilities between Israel and Iran escalate into what observers are describing as a phase of near-total military devastation, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) convened an emergency meeting to address the widening regional crisis and reinforce calls for an immediate ceasefire.
Now entering its fourth day, the unprecedented confrontation between the two arch-rivals has seen strikes deep within both countries' territories, raising fears of a broader conflict with severe global repercussions. Amid growing international pressure to end the violence, Kuwait has ramped up its diplomatic engagement, with Foreign Minister Abdullah Al-Yahya—current chair of the GCC Ministerial Council—presiding over the Council's 48th extraordinary meeting of foreign ministers.
The meeting, held to assess regional and global developments, focused on enhancing joint Gulf action and intensifying diplomatic efforts to safeguard regional security and stability. In a strongly worded statement, the GCC Ministerial Council condemned Israel's military attacks on the Islamic Republic of Iran, describing them as a flagrant violation of Iranian sovereignty, international law, and the United Nations Charter.
The Council emphasized the urgent need to return to diplomatic dialogue and called for an immediate ceasefire to prevent further regional destabilization. Particular concern was voiced over the risk of targeting nuclear facilities, a move that could have catastrophic consequences for both human safety and environmental security.
The Council urged the United Nations Security Council and the broader international community to intervene decisively, halt the conflict, and facilitate the resumption of stalled U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations—efforts currently being mediated by the Sultanate of Oman.
Reaffirming its commitment to maritime security, the GCC also highlighted the critical need to protect shipping lanes and commercial vessels across the region. The Council warned against continued attacks on oil infrastructure and trade routes, noting the potential impact on global energy markets and regional economies.
GCC Secretary-General Jassim Al-Budaiwi echoed calls for restraint, warning that continued military escalation could push the region into a full-blown war with unpredictable and uncontrollable consequences. He urged all involved parties to refrain from further military actions and to prioritize diplomatic solutions.
In anticipation of possible fallout, Al-Budaiwi also announced the activation of the GCC Emergency Management Center, tasked with monitoring environmental and radiation safety. 'So far, all technical indicators remain within safe limits and there is no immediate cause for concern,' he said, adding that the region remains on full alert to ensure maximum readiness for any developments.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How much damage has Zionist entity inflicted on Iran nuke program?
How much damage has Zionist entity inflicted on Iran nuke program?

Kuwait Times

time3 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

How much damage has Zionist entity inflicted on Iran nuke program?

VIENNA: Zionist strikes on Iran have targeted several of its nuclear facilities, as it claims the Islamic republic is seeking to develop nuclear weapons - an accusation Tehran denies. Experts told AFP that while the attacks have caused some damage to Iran's nuclear program, they are unlikely to have delivered a fatal blow. Here is an update on Iran's nuclear sites as of Monday: What is the extent of damage? Zionist entity's operation included strikes on Iran's underground uranium enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, and on its Isfahan nuclear site, the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said, citing Iranian officials. A key, above-ground component of Iran's Natanz nuclear site has been destroyed, including its power infrastructure. Agency chief Rafael Grossi said Monday that there has been 'no indication of a physical attack on the underground cascade hall containing part of the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant and the main Fuel Enrichment Plant'. However, power loss at the cascade hall 'may have damaged the centrifuges', the machines used to enrich uranium. There was 'extensive' damage to the site's power supply, according to a report from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a US-based organization specializing in nuclear proliferation, which analyzed satellite images. If backup power is lost, 'at the least, the enrichment plant is rendered inoperable for the time being', it said. At Iran's underground Fordow enrichment plant, the country's second uranium enrichment facility, the IAEA observed 'no damage' following the attacks, Grossi said. At the Isfahan nuclear site, however, 'four buildings were damaged': the central chemical laboratory, a uranium conversion plant, the Tehran reactor fuel manufacturing plant, and a metal processing facility under construction, the IAEA said. Significant uranium stockpiles are believed to be stored around the Isfahan site. Ali Vaez, International Crisis Group's Iran project director, told AFP that if Iran managed to transfer significant quantities to 'secret facilities,' then 'the game is lost for (Zionist entity)'. Iran's only nuclear power plant, the Bushehr plant, was not targeted, nor was the Tehran research reactor. Can the program be destroyed? While '(Zionist entity) can damage Iran's nuclear program... it is unlikely to be able to destroy it,' Vaez said, arguing that Zionist entity does not have the massively powerful bombs needed 'to destroy the fortified, bunkered facilities in Natanz and Fordow'. Destroying those would require US military assistance, added Kelsey Davenport, an expert with the Arms Control Association. She also stressed that Zionist entity's unprecedented attack cannot erase the expertise Iran had built up on nuclear weapons, despite killing nine Iranian nuclear scientists. What are the risks? The IAEA has not detected any increase in radiation levels at the affected sites. 'There is very little risk that attacks on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities would result in a harmful radiation release,' said Davenport. But an attack on the Bushehr plant could 'have a serious impact on health and the environment', she added. After Zionist entity launched its strikes, Grossi said that nuclear facilities 'must never be attacked' and that targeting Iranian sites could have 'grave consequences for the people of Iran, the region, and beyond'. Developing a nuclear bomb? After the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 from a landmark deal that sought to curb Tehran's nuclear activities, Iran has gradually retreated from some of its obligations, particularly on uranium enrichment. As of mid-May, the country had an estimated 408.6 kilograms enriched to up to 60 percent - just a short step from the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran theoretically has enough near-weapons-grade material, if further refined, for about 10 nuclear bombs, according to the definition by the Vienna-based IAEA. Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed state producing uranium to this level of enrichment, according to the UN nuclear watchdog. While the IAEA has been critical of Iran's lack of cooperation with the UN body, it says that there are 'no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear program'. Tehran has consistently denied ambitions to develop nuclear warheads. But Davenport warned the strikes could strengthen factions in Iran advocating for an atomic arsenal. '(Zionist) airstrikes set Iran back technically, but politically the strikes are pushing Iran closer to nuclear weapons,' she said. — AFP

GCC on High Alert as Israel-Iran Conflict Threatens Regional Stability
GCC on High Alert as Israel-Iran Conflict Threatens Regional Stability

Arab Times

time9 hours ago

  • Arab Times

GCC on High Alert as Israel-Iran Conflict Threatens Regional Stability

KUWAIT CITY, June 16: As direct hostilities between Israel and Iran escalate into what observers are describing as a phase of near-total military devastation, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) convened an emergency meeting to address the widening regional crisis and reinforce calls for an immediate ceasefire. Now entering its fourth day, the unprecedented confrontation between the two arch-rivals has seen strikes deep within both countries' territories, raising fears of a broader conflict with severe global repercussions. Amid growing international pressure to end the violence, Kuwait has ramped up its diplomatic engagement, with Foreign Minister Abdullah Al-Yahya—current chair of the GCC Ministerial Council—presiding over the Council's 48th extraordinary meeting of foreign ministers. The meeting, held to assess regional and global developments, focused on enhancing joint Gulf action and intensifying diplomatic efforts to safeguard regional security and stability. In a strongly worded statement, the GCC Ministerial Council condemned Israel's military attacks on the Islamic Republic of Iran, describing them as a flagrant violation of Iranian sovereignty, international law, and the United Nations Charter. The Council emphasized the urgent need to return to diplomatic dialogue and called for an immediate ceasefire to prevent further regional destabilization. Particular concern was voiced over the risk of targeting nuclear facilities, a move that could have catastrophic consequences for both human safety and environmental security. The Council urged the United Nations Security Council and the broader international community to intervene decisively, halt the conflict, and facilitate the resumption of stalled U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations—efforts currently being mediated by the Sultanate of Oman. Reaffirming its commitment to maritime security, the GCC also highlighted the critical need to protect shipping lanes and commercial vessels across the region. The Council warned against continued attacks on oil infrastructure and trade routes, noting the potential impact on global energy markets and regional economies. GCC Secretary-General Jassim Al-Budaiwi echoed calls for restraint, warning that continued military escalation could push the region into a full-blown war with unpredictable and uncontrollable consequences. He urged all involved parties to refrain from further military actions and to prioritize diplomatic solutions. In anticipation of possible fallout, Al-Budaiwi also announced the activation of the GCC Emergency Management Center, tasked with monitoring environmental and radiation safety. 'So far, all technical indicators remain within safe limits and there is no immediate cause for concern,' he said, adding that the region remains on full alert to ensure maximum readiness for any developments.

My friend Abbas ... and Iran-Israel conflict
My friend Abbas ... and Iran-Israel conflict

Arab Times

time11 hours ago

  • Arab Times

My friend Abbas ... and Iran-Israel conflict

Recently, Iran and Israel have dealt a blow to analysts and experts who long denied the existence of genuine hostility between them. Through their actions, both countries have disproved the claims that their apparent disputes and exchanged threats were merely tactics designed to mask behind-the-scenes cooperation and strategic harmony. These analysts had argued that Iran and Israel shared a common goal, which is to intimidate and manipulate the Arab world. Israel not only destroyed the majority of Iran's nuclear facilities, but, for the second time in history, it eliminated the entire top echelon of a hostile state's leadership without deploying a single soldier and without incurring any significant material losses to date. The first time was during its war against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Neutral observers believe that the situation is unlikely to conclude with any form of Iranian surrender. However, the loss of Iran's military, revolutionary, nuclear, and intelligence leadership may compel the regime to reconsider its strategic calculations, shift focus inward, and employ various methods to silence the opposition. The outcome we have reached was entirely predictable, and I have said so repeatedly. Weapons, no matter how advanced, dangerous, or effective, are meaningless without the human capacity to operate them. That human capacity must be grounded in the same freedoms, self-respect, and critical thinking enjoyed by citizens in the West. It must also be free from extremism and guided by the belief that the weapon of knowledge is the most powerful when placed in strong, educated hands. If I were in the place of Iran's adversaries, I would not have hesitated to do exactly what they did, which is to eliminate its ambitions to acquire a nuclear weapon. I simply do not trust Iran's intentions in this regard, especially given that it is the most extremist religious state in the region. The eight-year Iran-Iraq war stands as the clearest evidence that Iran is largely indifferent to the scale of losses that might result from the use of nuclear weapons. This isn't to suggest that I sympathize with Israel, as quite the opposite may be true. I am simply speaking from the perspective of a devil's advocate. My friend Abbas often says, 'Iran possesses all the elements of survival, resilience, resistance, and retaliation. We must recognize that Iran has, throughout its history, absorbed the patience of chess players and the precision of carpet weavers. We must support it. Iran is the last line of defense against Israel's growing ambitions to reshape the Middle East into a region completely loyal to its vision. Israel will use its military, financial, and technological power to bring everyone under the umbrella of the Abraham Accords. That would be a disaster for Arabs and Muslims. If that happens, we will lose all sense of identity and dignity, and become captives to Israel's agenda.' I told my friend Abbas that I fully understand his fears, as preserving our dignity is indeed our ultimate goal. But has the Iranian way of life become our ideal? Is Iran truly prepared to treat us as equals, respect our minds, and grant us the freedoms of expression, thought, and belief that we so deeply need? If Iran defeats its enemies, will it free us from one real or virtual prison only to place us in another? I do not doubt that the Israeli government is deeply extremist, and arguably the most brutal and criminal in the region's modern history. But it does not behave that way toward its own citizens, and that is the true source of its strength. Intelligence agencies in many of our countries struggle to find even a handful of citizens willing to collaborate as spies. In contrast, Israel receives a steady stream of applications from individuals eager to work with Mossad. Some of them even come from within the intelligence services of Arab states themselves, seeking to become agents, advocates of Israeli narratives, and defenders of its positions. One cannot give what they do not possess. A lack of dignity, humanity, and an educational system shaped by rigid ideology has left many among us feeling little guilt when cooperating with the enemies of our own nations. This war could end at any moment, and most likely, we will learn nothing from it. We will simply return to our old ways of life, unchanged and unaffected. It seems we have become almost entirely immune to any form of meaningful human development. Unfortunately, we have yet to learn this crucial lesson, even from our enemies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store