Gold set for worst drop in six months: Find out why
Image credit: Getty Images
Gold prices dropped on Friday and were poised for their steepest weekly decline in six months, as a stronger dollar and waning trade war concerns dampened its appeal as a safe-haven asset.
Read-
Spot gold was down 0.8 per cent at $3,213.56 an ounce, as of 0429 GMT. Bullion has lost 3.3 per cent so far this week and is set for its worst weekly performance since November 2024.
US gold futures shed 0.3 per cent to $3,217.20.
Dollar gain
The dollar has gained 0.4 per cent for the week so far and was headed for its fourth straight weekly gain, making greenback-priced gold more expensive for overseas buyers.
'Gold prices faced heavy selling pressure this week as markets cheered (a) de-escalation in the US-China trade (war),' said Ilya Spivak, head of global macro at Tastylive.
Tit-for-tat tariffs
Earlier this week, the US and China agreed to temporarily slash the harsh tit-for-tat tariffs imposed in April.
Meanwhile, data showed US producer prices fell unexpectedly in April and retail sales growth slowed.
Consumer prices rose less than expected in April, a report showed.
Trade policies
On Thursday, Federal Reserve Governor Michael Barr said the US economy is on solid footing with inflation heading to the central bank's 2 per cent target, but trade policies have clouded the outlook.
Markets are pricing in 57 basis points of rate cuts this year, with the easing projected to start in September.
Gold, traditionally seen as a hedge against economic and political uncertainties, thrives in a low-rate environment.
'On the plus side, gold price dips continue to attract buyers which shows that the precious metal remains a favoured asset, with the global growth and inflation outlooks still looking rather murky,' said KCM Trade Chief Market Analyst Tim Waterer.
Spot silver fell nearly 1 per cent to $32.37 an ounce, platinum was down 0.5 per cent at $984.83 and palladium lost 1.2 per cent to $956.43.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Global sovereigns outlook revised to deteriorating on tariffs, uncertainty
London: Fitch Ratings has revised the 2025 global sovereigns outlook to 'deteriorating' from 'neutral' reflecting the increase in trade tariffs and policy uncertainty, which will weaken the global growth outlook and heighten the risk of more testing financing conditions. Public finance and political risks remain high. The escalation in the global trade war, uncertainty over the endpoint for tariffs and their impact on global trade volumes, supply chains, investment and international relations is a significant adverse global economic shock. Uncertainty over the extent and timing of the effects on prices and activity add to uncertainty over the path of US Federal Reserve policy rates and the risk of volatility in financing conditions. A fall in Brent crude oil prices to USD65 a barrel in 2025 from USD79.5 a barrel in 2024 will increase economic and fiscal pressures on major exporters. Cuts to US international aid add to risks facing some emerging markets. In contrast, a depreciation of the US dollar eases the burden on emerging markets with US dollar-denominated debt and gives some emerging-market central banks scope to cut interest rates faster. Public finances will remain under pressure in 2025 from rising defence spending, interest costs, demographic trends, weak growth and social pressures, particularly in developed markets. We expect median government debt/GDP to increase slightly to 54.5% at end-2025 from 54.1% at end-2024. Geopolitical risks remain high given the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, US-China strategic rivalry, trade tensions, social discontent, and the flux in US foreign policy. Rating Outlooks are close to balance in mid-2025, with 13 on Positive Outlook, only slightly more than the 10 on Negative Outlook. Downgrades since 2020 have created headroom in some ratings to withstand a worsening in credit conditions. Policy responses will support ratings in some cases. 'Global Sovereigns Mid-Year Outlook 2025' is available at or via the link above. Contact: Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Email: Eleis Brennan, New York, Email: Peter Hoflich, Singapore, Email: Additional information is available on Disclaimer All Fitch Ratings (Fitch) credit ratings are subject to certain limitations and disclaimers. Please read these limitations and disclaimers by following this link: In addition, the following details Fitch's rating definitions for each rating scale and rating categories, including definitions relating to default. Published ratings, criteria, and methodologies are available from this site at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance, and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the Code of Conduct section of this site. Directors and shareholders' relevant interests are available at Fitch may have provided another permissible or ancillary service to the rated entity or its related third parties. Details of permissible or ancillary service(s) for which the lead analyst is based in an ESMA- or FCA-registered Fitch Ratings company (or branch of such a company) can be found on the entity summary page for this issuer on the Fitch Ratings website. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided 'as is' without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001. Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the 'NRSRO'). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the 'non-NRSROs') and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO. Copyright © 2025 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. Peter Fitzpatrick Senior Director, Corporate Communications Fitch Ratings 30 North Colonnade London E14 5GN
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
Dollar keeps losing market share but euro is no winner either: ECB study
FRANKFURT: The dollar continued to lose market share last year as the world's dominant currency but mostly smaller rivals and gold benefited rather than the euro, which aspires to fill any void left by receding confidence in the greenback, an ECB report showed. Investors have sold off dollar assets since April because of erratic U.S. economic policy and ECB President Christine Lagarde said this was an opportunity for the euro to become the dollar's alternative, provided the 20-nation bloc would finally push ahead with key integration steps. But figures predating this most recent turmoil suggest that the euro is not becoming more popular, and besides the Japanese yen, non-traditional currencies may be benefiting. In 2024 alone, the dollar lost 2 percentage points in its share in global foreign exchange holdings and while the euro made small gains, the yen and the Canadian dollar were the big winners, the ECB said on Wednesday. Although the dollar still has a 58% market share in global foreign exchange reserves, this is down by 10 percentage points in the past decade. Meanwhile, the euro's share has hovered just below 20%. Another big winner last year was gold, with central banks increasing their stock by more than 1,000 tonnes, a record pace and double the annual level seen in the previous decade, the ECB said. "Survey data suggest that two-thirds of central banks invested in gold for purposes of diversification, while two-fifths did so as protection against geopolitical risk," the ECB said. When all foreign reserves are added together, gold at 20% accounted for a bigger share than the euro, which stood at 16%, the ECB added. However, there have been some signs since April that euro assets may finally be benefiting. U.S. yields have increased but the dollar has weakened sharply against the euro, a highly unusual correlation, which appears to suggest that investors are questioning the dollar's status as the world's premier asset. These market moves indicate that investors are demanding a higher risk premium to hold U.S. assets and remain uncertain about debt sustainability given Washington's fiscal path. There has also been a steady stream of U.S. firms issuing debt in euros, often called reverse Yankee Bonds, and the euro did increase its share last year in foreign currency-denominated bond issuance. The euro zone, however, lacks critical financial infrastructure to take meaningful share from the dollar, economists warn. It lacks a truly liquid, large-scale safe asset since debt is issued by each country, leaving the bloc's debt market fragmented. Its banking system is also fragmented and the EU lacks a capital market union with harmonised rules and large, cross-border players. Moreover, Europe also lacks military defence capabilities to provide the sort of geopolitical assurance reserve managers demand. (Reporting by Balazs Koranyi; Editing by Kim Coghill)
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Musk regrets some of his Trump criticisms, says they 'went too far'
Elon Musk, the world's richest person and Donald Trump's former advisor, said Wednesday he regretted some of his recent criticisms of the US president, after the pair's public falling-out last week. "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote on his social media platform X. Musk's expression of regret came just days after Trump threatened the tech billionaire with " serious consequences" if he sought to punish Republicans who vote for a controversial spending bill. Their blistering break-up -- largely carried out on social media before a riveted public on Thursday last week -- was ignited by Musk's harsh criticism of Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" spending bill, which is currently before Congress. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk - one of the Republican Party's biggest financial backers in last year's presidential election - to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump, who also branded Musk "disrespectful," told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be.
