Why Aussie state wants bounty hunters
A controversial plan to introduce bounty killings for feral animals and expand hunting rights would 'turn NSW into a South African game park', opponents have claimed.
The NSW government came under fire this week after Premier Chris Minns floated the idea of paying shooters for bounties for feral animals, including cats and pigs.
The proposal forms part of sweeping reforms proposed by the NSW Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party to hunting rights, including a new minister for hunting.
NSW Animal Justice Party MLC Emma Hurst said the Bill would 'take us backward' and bounty killings as a means of population control did not work.
'We know even just from research that these bounty programs don't work, but of course it also allows for extreme animal cruelty,' Ms Hurst said.
'There's no proper sort of oversight or accountability into these programs. It's encouraging a bloodbath for animals.
'The argument that's put forward by the Shooters (party) is that these animals are introduced.
'Therefore, we can do whatever we sort of want to them and we should ignore what animal cruelty is happening to them.
'They have the ability to feel pain and fear and we shouldn't be encouraging some kind of extreme Rambo-style killing spree on these animals within the communities.'
Ms Hurst said the Bill, which seeks to open up Crown land to hunting, would 'essentially turn NSW into a South African game park' and waste taxpayer money.
She urged for more species-specific control measure for feral animals in NSW, including the use of immunocontraceptive darting that is used overseas.
Several feral and invasive species are active in the state, including feral pigs, deer, and camels as well as wild dogs and feral cats.
Shooters MLC Rod Borsak said the Bill was about incorporating NSW's about 200,000 licensed hunters into 'the conservation hunting paradigm'.
'The whole idea is to try and develop a system of co-operation … something that brings the recreational hunting side of things into the conservation paradigm,' he said.
He went on to add that bounties would 'increase the incentive to farmers and to conservation hunters to go out there and target the animals that we think are important'.
Mr Borsak stressed the possibility of bounties to target feral cats that attack native fauna and are 'impossible' to control under the government's current 'instruments'.
The long-term Legislative Council representative dismissed the notion that the bounty plan would result in a 'free for all', citing longstanding regulation and safety measures.
'There's a whole lot of rules around all this stuff that has been tried and true for the last 20 years,' Mr Borsak said, referencing concerns about firearms safety.
'Anyone trying to run a scare campaign is moaning in the face of the evidence of what's actually occurred in two or three million hectares of public land in the last 20 years.'
Under the plan, a $1m 'pot' would be available for feral pig snouts, which Mr Borsak said could sell for $15-30, with another $1m pool for wild dogs, foxes, and cats.
Mr Borsak described hunting as a 'mainstream' activity that 'really benefits rural and regional NSW primarily, and we really should be recognising that'.
Under the Bill, spotlighting and the proposed use of thermal scopes would not be allowed on Crown land, including state forests.
Nor would the hunting bounty scheme – or any hunting at all – be allowed within national parks in NSW.
The proposal was panned by the Invasive Species Council, whose chief executive Jack Gough wrote to Environment Minister Penny Sharpe and Agriculture Minister Tara Moriarty.
'I am writing to urge you to reject the latest attempt by the NSW Shooters Party to undermine effective feral animal control in NSW,' Mr Gough said.
'This time through an attempt to secure government funding for bounties.
'Australia's long history of failed bounties has demonstrated they are expensive, ineffective and undermine genuine feral animal control programs.'
The council raised concerns that the scheme could be abused by way of fraud, and feral animal control was 'very different from ad hoc killing'.
While dismissing the plan, the council has lauded the successes of aerial culling into reducing the population of feral horses in the Snowy Mountains.
While significantly different in purpose, planning, and practice, the shooting of brumbies in the Kosciuszko National Park has been equally divisive.
A recent state government report found the population of brumbies in the park could be as low as 1500, down from 13,000 to 22,000 last year.
Mr Gough welcomed the report as a 'turning point', with the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service releasing images of ecological recovery in the park.
Ms Hurst questioned the government's earlier numbers and suggested alternatives, like darting, were also available.
'The problem that we have is that there's always this messaging pushed out there that it has to be done urgently and it has to be done as quickly as possible,' she said.
'Of course what happens is when you kill a whole lot of animals in any one system they breed back up pretty quickly, so it's always going to be a Band-Aid solution.
'It is not going to work in the long term.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trumpworld shrugs off Elon Musk's revolt over ‘Big Beautiful Bill': ‘Knew he'd throw a fit'
WASHINGTON — Trump White House confidants said Wednesday they were not surprised tech billionaire Elon Musk blew up at the House-passed 'Big, Beautiful Bill' — noting the former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) luminary would have found something to beef with the administration about sooner or later. The 53-year-old South Africa-born billionaire — who in April went chest-to-chest with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent over their respective visions for the IRS in the halls of the White House — shook up Washington Tuesday by decrying the signature GOP legislation as 'a disgusting abomination' and vowing to campaign to 'fire' Republican lawmakers who supported it. 'I'd say most knew he'd throw a fit sometime this year. It was exciting but not surprising,' one Trumpworld source told The Post of the outburst. Advertisement 'I do think he didn't leave on the best of terms,' added a second person close to the White House. 'But I also think there's a general awareness [that] this is just the way he operates.' The Tesla and SpaceX CEO went on the warpath for a second straight day Wednesday, declaring: 'A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS.' Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok!' he added in yet another X post. 'KILL the BILL'. Advertisement The second insider added that it was understandable Musk would take issue with his May 30 departure as a special government employee coinciding with the White House working to pass a bill that the Congressional Budget Office predicted Wednesday will add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit. 'His most legitimate point relates to DOGE and the fact that he exposed a bunch of waste and inefficiency with big government contractors like Accenture,' this person said, 'but right as he leaves they get awarded massive new contracts and it feels like 'back to business as usual.'' On March 20, Accenture CEO Julie Spellman Sweet told Wall Street analysts that the IT and management consulting company had lost federal contracts after DOGE ran the rule over them. 3 President Donald Trump and Elon Musk speak before departing the White House on his way to his South Florida home in Mar-a-Lago in Florida on March 14, 2025. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Since then, however, business has picked up for the Ireland-based firm — including a $336 million contract with the Air Force announced six days after Sweet's complaint. Musk departed on seemingly good terms, with Trump handing him a key to the White House during an Oval Office ceremony. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt also played down the initial angry posts by Musk Tuesday, telling reporters during her regular briefing that 'the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill' and that 'it doesn't change his opinion.' 3 Elon Musk looks on during a Cabinet Meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House March 24, 2025 in Washington, DC. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 3 President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. AFP via Getty Images Sources close to Musk confirmed to The Post Tuesday night that his rant against the legislation stems from four specific grievances with the administration. Those include the House GOP overturning Biden-era electric vehicle tax credits, the White House refusing to let Musk stay beyond his statutory 130-day special government employee tenure, the Federal Aviation Administration not using Starlink satellites to help manage the nation's air traffic control system, and Trump pulling his nomination for Musk ally Jared Isaacman to lead NASA over this past weekend. 'I think Elon doesn't totally understand how this works, and you aren't going to change the way the [government] operates,' argued a third source close to the White House, who noted that Musk's specific grievances were 'personal' rather than philosophical. 'I think there's a gap from it getting done and reality,' the source added. 'If Trump did [what Musk had asked], the media would be saying he's giving Elon favorable treatment. So it's a tough situation.' A rep for Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


News24
4 hours ago
- News24
If he comes to Parliament, we'll meet in the chamber – Malema on Shivambu's new role
Malema says the fuel levy court defeat is a loss for the public, not just the EFF, warning that rising fuel costs will worsen living conditions for ordinary South Africans. He dismisses claims of political rivalry with Floyd Shivambu, asserting the EFF's dominance in Parliament and criticising attempts to undermine the party through unity narratives. Malema acknowledges the retirement of Ekurhuleni city manager Imogen Mashazi, commending her leadership while clarifying there is no council resolution for extended benefits. EFF leader Julius Malema has rejected the notion that the party's failed court challenge against the government's fuel levy increases was a political defeat, arguing instead that it represents a broader loss for ordinary South Africans. Speaking to journalists after visiting the family of late actor Presley Chweneyagae on Wednesday, Malema said the Western Cape High Court's dismissal of the EFF's application to stop the levy hike meant that already burdened citizens would face increased costs across the board. When they rejected the EFF application for the levy, it was not the EFF that got rejected; it is the people of South Africa who lost. Julius Malema He explained that increases in fuel levies would have a cascading effect on the economy, pushing up transport costs and subsequently the prices of essential goods such as bread and food delivered to schools and hospitals. 'Our people are already struggling. To put any further increase on the fuel levy is to burden them more. They cannot afford it,' he said. Despite the court loss, Malema said the EFF had no regrets for pursuing the matter and insisted that the party, which holds about 9% of the seats in Parliament, would continue to represent the interests of the people '24 hours a day'. Malema on Shivambu and the MK Party Turning to political developments, Malema addressed questions about Floyd Shivambu's redeployment to Parliament. Shivambu, formerly with the EFF, has been redeployed by the Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) to Parliament after being demoted from his position as secretary-general, after a trip to Malawi to visit controversial 'pastor' Shepherd Bushiri. Malema downplayed the significance of Shivambu's new role, suggesting that Parliament was now under the influence of a younger generation of EFF-aligned MPs who would not be easily swayed. 'I don't work with Floyd – not in Parliament, not in football, nowhere,' said Malema. If he comes to Parliament, we'll meet in the chamber. But he won't be able to undermine the superior logic of the EFF. Julius Malema He added that the MKP's presence in Parliament would not disrupt the EFF's work and emphasised his party's commitment to its parliamentary duties through well-researched and effective contributions. On black political unity Malema also addressed criticism regarding black political unity, responding to claims that the EFF had not shown a willingness to unite with other black-led parties. 'The EFF has always advocated black unity,' said Malema. 'But forming a new party and then calling for unity is disingenuous; that's already a division.' READ: WATCH |'That man said, kill the white farmers, and then he danced': Trump calls for Malema's arrest He criticised what he called a targeted narrative that only questioned the EFF's role in black unity, while ignoring other parties such as the UDM or Patriotic Alliance (PA), which were not held to the same standard. 'This is not about unity. It's an agenda to destroy the EFF,' Malema asserted. On developments regarding Imogen Mashazi Malema also weighed in on the recent developments involving Ekurhuleni city manager Imogen Mashazi, whose contract is set to expire in August. A request for her to go on special leave has reportedly been made to allow the council to begin appointing her successor. He clarified that the request for leave was expected and not controversial, comparing it to similar practices followed by high-ranking public officials nearing retirement, such as former Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng when his term was coming to an end. 'She has been a good leader,' said Malema. 'We will miss her. She led from the front and was instrumental in achieving clean audits and delivering services.' While questions have been raised about whether Mashazi is owed compensation for her remaining term, Malema said he was unaware of any council resolution regarding an extension or special retirement package. 'There is no special package in retirement. You retire with your savings and benefits,' he explained. He concluded by noting that the EFF was actively involved in governance in Ekurhuleni and would continue to engage in municipal processes, particularly through the mayoral committee. Malema reiterated that the EFF remained committed to its role in Parliament. He highlighted the party's focus on rigorous preparation and meaningful contributions in parliamentary debates and oversight. 'The EFF will continue to play a meaningful role in Parliament. Nothing has changed,' Malema said.


News24
4 hours ago
- News24
ConCourt orders eThekwini to pay R30 million in service provider dispute
Nicolene Olckers/Gallo Images Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Show Comments ()