Carney begins talks on NATO spending target as summit starts today in The Hague
Prime Minister Mark Carney begins a two-day stop Tuesday in the Netherlands, where NATO alliance members are prepared to decide whether to more than double the defence spending target.
The main talks in The Hague won't happen until Wednesday, with Carney first set to take part in several bilateral meetings.
Carney will meet with the President of Latvia Edgars Rinkēvičs and the Prime Minister of the Netherlands Dick Schoof. He will also meet with leaders of Nordic countries for talks focused on Arctic and transatlantic security.
The prime minister will also meet with King Willem-Alexander and Queen Máxima of the Netherlands.
Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand is set to speak to reporters twice today, first in The Hague at around 7:15 a.m. ET and then virtually at 8:30 a.m. ET.
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte have both said they expect alliance members to commit to a new target to spend the equivalent of five per cent of GDP on defence, up from the current two per cent target set in 2014.
None of NATO's 32 members spent that much on defence in 2024, according to the alliance's own data. All of them are pledging to meet the two per cent figure this year, including Canada for the first time since the target was created.
Carney to begin talks on NATO spending target as summit starts today in The Hague.
A Canadian government official who briefed reporters on background before the trip said the spending target and its timeline are still up for discussion. Some allies have indicated they would prefer a seven-year timeline, while others want a decade to reach the five per cent target.
Canada's defence spending hasn't reached five per cent of GDP since the 1950s. NATO estimates that Canada spent $41 billion in 2024 on defence, or 1.37 per cent of GDP. In 2014, Canada spent $20.1 billion, or 1.01 per cent of GDP, on defence.
In 2014, when the current two per cent target was first set, only three NATO members hit the mark — the US, the U.K. and Greece.
Any new spending guidelines have to be made with the consensus of all 32 NATO member states, and no member is currently anywhere close. The US, at 3.38 per cent in 2024, was the highest, but President Donald Trump has said the figure shouldn't apply to the United States — only to its allies.
The plan Rutte is expected to put forward at the summit contains some wiggle room to help allies reach that high figure.
It would commit members to spending 3.5 per cent of annual GDP on core defence needs — like jets and other weapons — and 1.5 per cent on defence-adjacent areas like infrastructure, cybersecurity and industry.
Internal divisions have emerged in the lead-up to the summit.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said Sunday that Spain reached a deal with NATO to be excluded from the new spending target. Like Canada, Spain has long struggled to meet the two per cent target and has rejected the new proposal.
Rutte warned Monday that no country can opt out of the target and that progress made toward the new target will be reviewed in four years.
NATO's defence buildup is also controversial in Italy, where defence minister Guido Crosetto said recently the alliance "no longer has a reason to exist."
Countries much closer to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine all have agreed to reach the target, as have nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the two-day summit starting Tuesday.
Canadian Defence Minister David McGuinty said "stay tuned" when asked earlier this month if Canada would agree to the five per cent plan.
Jan Techau, a senior fellow with the transatlantic defence and security program at the Center for European Policy Analysis, said the overall level of ambition in Europe on defence has "massively" increased over the last several years in response to Russian aggression.
"The closer to Russia you are, the more ambitious you are," he said.
Speaking to reporters at a military cemetery in Antwerp Monday, Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said that while he isn't comfortable with the five per cent target, it's important that the country remain in NATO. He also said the proposed 3.5 and 1.5 per cent breakdown "helps a bit."
Lauren Speranza, a fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, said the NATO summit is coming at a 'very precarious moment,' marked by uncertainty about the US commitment to Europe, the grinding conflict between Russia and Ukraine and ongoing tensions over transatlantic trade.
Speranza said the meeting will offer some insights into how the Trump administration will approach the alliance going forward, following its criticisms of NATO and calls for Europe to take more responsibility for its own defence.
On Monday, Rutte said recent US strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities were not a violation of international law.
Prime Minister Carney, who has called for a diplomatic solution to the crisis, said Monday that Iran has pursued nuclear weapons while expressing a desire to eliminate the state of Israel.
In a statement Sunday, Carney said Iran's nuclear program is a "grave threat" to international security and that Canada has been "consistently clear" that Iran "can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon."
Tuesday's schedule also includes a reception and a social dinner hosted by the king and queen of the Netherlands.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
Manitoba taps former White House correspondent Richard Madan to lead Washington trade office
Manitoba has opened a permanent office in Washington, D.C., and hired a former White House news correspondent to lead trade and economic discussions down south. Richard Madan, a former reporter for CTV and CBC, has been tapped to lead the office starting immediately, the province said in a Tuesday news release. The D.C. trade office, which Premier Wab Kinew first promised last December, is intended to strengthen Manitoba's ties with U.S. lawmakers, industry leaders and trade officials, as well as ensuring Manitoba's interests are protected in agreements such as a renewed Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement, Kinew said in the news release. Kinew previously said he wanted the person leading the trade office to intimately understand Manitoba's economic strategy, represent the province's values and "speak the language" of the Trump administration. Madan spent more than two decades as a journalist covering American and Canadian politics, including as a White House correspondent, and Kinew said he has deep ties with major figures in the U.S. capital that will help Manitoba in trade talks. adviser on Canada-U.S. relations, the province said. Manitoba's 2025 budget included $800,000 for the Washington office, which will provide funds for office space, salaries and administrative support, the province said. The trade office was initially recommended by the premier's business and jobs council.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Iran ceasefire an ‘opportunity' for Gaza peace, Palestinian state: Carney
Prime Minister Mark Carney says he's hopeful the unsteady ceasefire between Iran and Israel will provide an 'opportunity' for an end to hostilities in Gaza and ultimately broader Middle East peace, including a 'Zionist' Palestinian state committed to Israel's security. In an interview with CNN International that aired Tuesday ahead of the NATO summit at The Hague, Carney said U.S. President Donald Trump 'has the potential to be decisive' after he displayed 'U.S. power' by bombing Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend. That action and the resulting ceasefire announced by Trump on Monday, Carney said, 'does create the possibility of moving forward' on stabilizing Gaza as well. 'Can there be a lasting peace in the Middle East without peace in Gaza, that takes into account Gaza and West Bank and effectively working on a path to a Palestinian state? I would agree with all of those,' he said. Story continues below advertisement '(Palestinians) living side by side in security with Israel — a Zionist, if you will, Palestinian state that recognizes the right of Israel not just to exist, but to prosper and not live in fear — we can't have peace unless we move towards that.' He added that 'developments as we sit today and the potential trajectory with respect to Iran does create another window for that.' 5:10 Tensions escalate as Israel-Iran ceasefire teeters on collapse Trump has not openly supported a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict since returning to office. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and key members of the Trump administration, including U.S. ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, have vocally dismissed the idea of a Palestinian state. The U.S. State Department has referred all questions about whether U.S. foreign policy still supports a two-state solution to the White House and Trump. Story continues below advertisement Carney said an immediate ceasefire and 'the full resumption of humanitarian aid' into Gaza must be accompanied by the return of all remaining hostages held by Hamas, 'lest anyone think I'm not acknowledging this.' He pointed to the joint statement issued by G7 leaders during their summit in Alberta last week that said a resolution to the Iranian conflict must lead to 'a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza,' though his call for a Palestinian state went beyond that. Carney angered Netanyahu and the Trump administration by issuing a joint statement with the leaders of France and the United Kingdom last month that warned of consequences for Israel if it did not resume humanitarian aid deliveries to Gaza. The prime minister said the Canadian soldiers stationed at the U.S. military base in Qatar that was attacked by Iran on Monday were able to get 'out of harm's way,' after Iran warned the U.S. and Qatar ahead of its retaliatory action. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy He added he 'would lean toward President Trump's interpretation' of Iran's response as de-escalatory, which opened the window to the ceasefire agreement. 5:02 Trump furious after Israel-Iran ceasefire brokered by U.S. falls apart with strikes Carney, who spoke with Trump over the weekend as the Iran conflict unfolded, also sided with Trump in saying Iran's nuclear program posed an imminent threat, despite U.S. intelligence claiming the regime had not yet restarted its weapons program. Story continues below advertisement 'There was a fiction that they perpetrated that this was for only peaceful means,' he said. 'They were enriching uranium to a degree — they were hiding the facilities, or trying to hide the facilities — that was entirely not necessary for civilian use of nuclear technology. So I think the combination of that, the combination of their belligerence, the combination of their state sponsor of terrorism throughout the region, all of that points in one direction.' Canada will meet NATO's new 5% target, Carney says Carney also said Canada is committed to meeting NATO's new defence spending target of five per cent of GDP, which will be formally agreed to at this week's summit. Under the new 10-year plan, countries would spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on 'core' defence — such as weapons and troops — and a further 1.5 per cent on security-related investments, such as adapting roads, ports and bridges for use by military vehicles, protecting pipelines and deterring cyberattacks. Story continues below advertisement Carney has already committed to hitting the previous target of two per cent this fiscal year, with over $9 billion in new investments. Although he acknowledged that five per cent of Canada's GDP equals about $150 billion, he said the language of the NATO agreement allows Canada to hit the new target through programs not explicitly related to defence. 'Canada has one of the biggest and most varied deposits of critical minerals, and we're going to develop those,' Carney said. 'Some of the spending for that counts towards that five per cent. In fact, a lot of it will happen towards that five per cent because of infrastructure spending, ports and railroads and other ways to get these minerals. So that's something that benefits the Canadian economy, but is also part of our new NATO responsibility.' 2:11 Canada signs defence agreement with EU ahead of major NATO summit Carney said those investments, as well as partnerships on defence and trade with other allies like the one signed Monday with the European Union, will be 'positive for the U.S. relationship' as well. He credited Trump for pushing NATO allies to 'pay their fair share, carry their weight.' Story continues below advertisement 'I think we are now doing that,' he said. He also dismissed concerns that Canada turning to other allies will anger Trump or disrupt negotiations toward a new deal with the U.S. 'It's a reaction, if you will, to what's happening in the United States, but it's not a reaction against the United States,' he said. 'It's for something, not against.' Asked if Trump is still bringing up his oft-repeated call to annex Canada in their private discussions, Carney said, 'He's not.' 'He admires Canada, I think it's fair to say, and maybe for a period of time coveted Canada,' he said. 'We're two sovereign nations who are discussing the future of our trade relationships, our defense partnership, which has been very strong in the past. How is that going to evolve?' Will Carney push Trump on Ukraine? Asked if Carney will try to persuade Trump to maintain U.S. military support for Ukraine, Carney said, 'Yes, absolutely.' Story continues below advertisement He also said he doesn't believe the U.S. will fully 'walk away' from Ukraine either. 'There's other measures that can be taken,' he said, pointing to new sanctions imposed by Canada and Europe on Russia. A sanctions package has been introduced in the U.S. Senate by Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, but Trump has yet to endorse it. 'If it is enacted, which is a choice, it will be a game changer,' Carney said. 1:56 Zelenskyy shores up U.K. support ahead of NATO summit However, he acknowledged that military support 'is hugely important here — it is a war,' adding NATO won't be able to fully make up the gaps in military support if U.S. aid stops. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy attended several sideline meetings Tuesday ahead of the official NATO leaders' summit, which Zelenskyy was not invited to. He attended the G7 summit but was unable to meet with Trump, who left early for Washington to oversee the Iran-Israel conflict. Story continues below advertisement Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One he was hoping to meet with him in Brussels.
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
The Lowdown On This Week's NATO And EU Summits
Welcome to Wider Europe, RFE/RL's newsletter focusing on the key issues concerning the European Union, NATO, and other institutions and their relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe's Eastern neighborhoods. I'm RFE/RL Europe Editor Rikard Jozwiak, and this week I am drilling down on two big gatherings: The NATO summit in the Hague, followed by the EU summit in Brussels a day later. Briefing #1: All You Need To Know Ahead Of The NATO Summit What You Need To Know:NATO leaders will gather in The Hague on June 2425 with one key question looming: Can they agree on a hefty new defense spending target of 5 percent of GDP? The spotlight, however, will be firmly on US President Donald Trump. Ahead of the Hague meeting, speculation had been mounting that he may skip the summit altogether, although the White House eventually confirmed he will be present. The summit has essentially been designed to please the American leader and avoid any sign of disharmony in the club. Lingering fears remain of a repeat of the infamous 2018 NATO summit in Brussels, when Trump -- then in his first term -- threatened to pull the United States out of the alliance unless European countries and Canada significantly increased their defense outlays. Since then, most allies have ramped up spending, with most now reaching the 2 percent target agreed in Wales in 2014, driven by a mix of American pressure and the war in Ukraine. What was supposed to be a three-day-meeting in the Netherlands has now been reduced to a social dinner with spouses hosted by the Dutch king at one of the city's royal palaces on June 24, followed by a working session of the North Atlantic Council (NAC) the following day -- a meeting not even expected to last three hours. And that's it. Deep Background:It is at the NAC session that leaders will agree on the so-called Hague Declaration. The document hasn't been finally approved yet, but earlier drafts RFE/RL has seen indicate it will be a short one. While previous summit texts stretched several pages, touching upon all sorts of policy items, this one may only have as few as five paragraphs. Last year, it was 38 paragraphs with an additional six-point annex outlining security assistance for Ukraine. The key issue is the 5 percent defense spending target and when it should be reached. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has already sent a letter to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte ahead of the meeting saying the target is unreasonable and asking for an exemption for Madrid. Just before the summit, Spain was given some flexibility by Rutte to reach the target. The 5 percent target proposed by Rutte includes 3.5 percent for "hard" military spending on capabilities such as missiles, helicopters, and fighter jets. The other 1.5 percent has been earmarked for "resilience" -- a deliberately vague term for most member states as this spending can include pretty much anything. Most are likely to spend it on infrastructure, however, to improve military mobility. And they may also include contributions to Kyiv here, with the draft document noting that "allies reaffirm their commitment to provide support to Ukraine and, to this end, will include direct contributions toward Ukraine's defense and its defense industry when calculating Allies' defense spending." Drilling Down Disagreements also remain over the deadline for reaching the 5 percent target. Apart from the United States, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, few are happy with 2032 as the target date, simply because they think it is impossible to meet this deadline. It now looks like 2035 will be the target instead. In any event, the declaration will include a reference to a review of the target in 2029. It has not been lost on NATO officials that this date comes a year after the next US presidential elections, even though they have been quick to insist that this is simply the halfway mark between now and 2032. To the relief of European allies, NATO's mutual defense clause -- Article 5 -- is referenced in the draft declaration amid persistent fears that Washington wasn't truly committed to coming to the aid of the other 31 allies if they were attacked. Russia is also mentioned in the text as a "long-term threat" to Euro-Atlantic security. The document will also reference transatlantic industrial cooperation, a nod to Washington's interest in ensuring US companies also benefit from a European defense splurge. Furthermore, it reveals next year's summit will be in Turkey followed by a meeting in Albania. Turkey has long sought to host a NATO summit, but several alliance members have for years been reluctant due to the ongoing crackdown on the Turkish opposition. Now, with Ankara's growing geopolitical clout, from the Middle East to Ukraine, that ambition will finally be realized in 2026. Another major uncertainty is how prominently Ukraine will feature at the upcoming summit. Kyiv's NATO membership aspirations were headline topics at the Vilnius summit in 2023 and again in Washington a year later, but talk about this has died down since Trump publicly dismissed the country's chances of joining. There is no mention of Ukraine's potential membership in the draft Hague texts, with some NATO diplomats telling RFE/RL under condition of anonymity they believe omitting any mention is better than including a watered-down version of the language from the Vilnius and Washington communiques, which at least promised future membership. With no formal NATO-Ukraine Council slated for the summit at the leaders' level, NATO foreign ministers will instead have something of a compensatory dinner on June 24 in the presence of their Ukrainian counterpart, Andriy Sybiha. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will also be in The Hague to attend the leaders' social dinner, an event that NATO's Indo-Pacific partners -- Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea -- are also due to attend. Zelenskyy may also take part in some sidebar events at the summit, such as the NATO defense industry forum. There may also be a "mini summit" on Ukraine with Rutte and other European leaders after the formal NATO meeting is over. Briefing #2: And The EU summit In Brussels What You Need To Know:A day after the NATO summit in The Hague ends, EU leaders will take the short journey south to Brussels for their regular summer European Council. Kicking off on the morning of June 26, this summit may continue into the next day as there are plenty of items on the agenda -- most notably Iran, where the EU is struggling to stay relevant. According to the Brussels diplomats I have spoken with, however, the bloc stillaims to act as a conduit for potential direct talksbetween the United States and Tehran. That said, there are also several key political decisions on the table -- especially concerning Ukraine. When Poland took over the six-month rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union with much pomp and circumstance at the start of the year, the stated goal was that formal EU accession talks would start with Ukraine and Moldova during the first six months of 2025. Polish diplomats had even confidently voiced hopes that more than one of the six negotiating clusters would be opened during their chairmanship. It's fair to say that things have not panned out as expected. Deep Background:Unanimity is needed for every cluster to be opened, and Hungary has persistently blocked any move to this effect, even conducting a widely criticized consultative referendum on Ukrainian EU membership. This summit is something of a "last chance saloon" to unblock the situation, but few diplomats believe Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban will give it much thought. Some think that maybe things will get moving on this issue after the summit in July when Denmark takes over the presidency. However, since this has increasingly become a domestic political issue in Hungary, most believe Budapest will continue vetoing progress until the country's parliamentary elections in April 2026. As regards Ukraine and Moldova, the draft summit declaration seen by RFE/RL states that "the European Council looks forward to the next steps in the accession process in line with the merit-based approach, with clusters being opened when the conditions are met." The key question now is whether Ukraine and Moldova should be separated in the accession process, as none of the 27 EU member states appears opposed to allowing Chisinau to proceed. Several member states, however, are reluctant to green-light this "decoupling" as they don't want to "succumb to Hungarian blackmail," as they put it, and believe the pair should continue together on the road to membership. On the other hand, the EU also wants to give Moldova a carrot, with thefirst-ever EU-Moldova summit in early Julyand what are expected to be tightly fought parliamentary elections in September. Drilling Down The most likely scenario, however, is that all preparatory work on the accession talks will continue in the hope that every cluster can be opened once there is approval from everyone. For now, the most likely candidate to show concrete progress at the end of June is Montenegro, which is expected to close a cluster of chapters on June 27. So much for the "EU enlargement momentum" that eurocrats have so often keenly propagated in previous years. If there is one area where Hungary -- and increasingly Slovakia -- may be more willing to move forward, it's sanctions against Russia. There are two decisions to be taken on sanctions: the newly proposed18th round of restrictive measuresand the six-month rollover of all sanctions imposed on the Kremlin since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine nearly three years ago. Several European diplomats have indicated there might be something of a quid pro quo during the summit, whereby both sanctions decisions will be adopted, but it will be generally accepted that Ukraine cannot move forward on the accession path for now. For most officials, the most important thing is to get an extension of all the previous sanctions. This includes all frozen Russian assets in the bloc, totaling over 200 billion euro ($230 billion). Hungary was toying with the idea of not a giving thumbs-up to the prolongation last time around in January, but officials think it won't be too dramatic this time, with Russia's increased attacks on Ukrainian civilian targets making any calls for potential peace talks moot. The fact that the actual deadline for the extension isn't till the end of July means most people RFE/RL has spoken are confident that something can be worked out. For the 18th sanctions package, most things have been agreed on a diplomatic level already. This is not too surprising, as most of the blacklistings and proposals -- such as de-SWIFTing Russian banks and sanctioning Nord Stream 1 and 2 -- have been relatively uncontroversial. Quick approval is also more likely now that the headline proposal to lower the Russian oil price cap from $60 to $45 per barrel appears unlikely to gain traction. The United States didn't get onboard with this idea at the recent Group of Seven summit, and few believe that the EU -- even with potential political support from allies such as Britain and Canada -- is willing or able to lower the cap without Washington. Looking Ahead On June 25, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will be in Strasbourg to sign the final document establishing a new tribunal investigating the Russian crimes of aggression against Ukraine. The new court has been in the works ever since the full-scale invasion of the country over three years and will now be one step closer to realization. That's all for this week! Feel free to reach out to me on any of these issues on X @RikardJozwiak, or on e-mail atjozwiakr@ Until next time, Rikard Jozwiak If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition subscribehere.
