logo
The global AI contest hits the UN

The global AI contest hits the UN

Politico5 days ago
With help from Aaron Mak
The rivalry between the United States and China over who will dominate artificial intelligence has moved to an obscure battlefield: A Geneva-based United Nations agency most people have never heard of.
The Trump administration announced in June — a full year early — that it will push for a second term for American diplomat Doreen Bogdan-Martin as secretary general of the International Telecommunication Union, the organization that sets voluntary international standards for technology ranging from radio frequencies and broadband to 6G mobile phones.
This is the earliest the State Department has ever made this kind of push at the ITU, an indication of the growing urgency of the U.S.-China technological rivalry. The Trump AI Action Plan, released earlier this month, specifically names the ITU as key to America's global tech dominance. But some observers worry that Trump's tough-minded foreign policy approach may already be hurting the U.S. in its quest to keep Bogdan-Martin in office.
The ITU has been a great-power battleground before. In 2022, with Huawei turning telecom into a global contest, America and China waged a proxy battle for control over the agency. The Chinese backed Russian candidate Rashid Ismailov, a former Russian telecom minister who lost decisively to Bogdan.
Government and tech insiders say the stakes are even higher now because the ITU is setting standards for AI —more than 150 to date — for how governments and countries integrate the technology across existing operations. That's included standards for testing and evaluation of AI systems in areas like conversational AI tools and computer network diagnostics. So whoever controls the ITU will shape the global standards for AI development and integration.
Founded more than 150 years ago to standardize telegraph systems, the ITU today includes the U.N.'s 193 members along with representatives of corporations including AT&T, China Unicom, Nokia and Sony. Over the years, the agency has become central to the growth of telecom technology, negotiating international agreements on everything from radio spectrum allocations to the orbital paths of satellites in outer space. ITU added AI to its suite of technologies with the launch of its AI For Good program in 2017.
U.N. members vote every four years to select the agency's secretary general, and that vote has grown more loaded each election.
Bogdan-Martin's predecessor, China's Houlin Zhao, developed a reputation among Americans of using his position to bend the ITU toward Beijing.
'What you saw over and over again was him trying to align the ITU with endorsing Chinese technology and downplaying U.S. complaints about the potential for security breaches by using ZTE or Huawei technology, or endorsing Chinese Belt and Road Initiative telecommunications projects in developing countries,' said Brett Schaefer, an expert on the U.N. at the American Enterprise Institute, and a former member of U.N. General Assembly's Committee on Contributions.
The U.S. blacklisted Huawei and ZTE in 2020 as 'companies posing a national security threat'.
China's Washington embassy and New York U.N. mission did not answer DFD's questions. Nor did the State Department or Bogdan-Martin. Beijing hasn't announced if it will contest Bogdan-Martin's renomination.
In some respects, the U.S. is at the apex of its technological prowess. Nvidia and Microsoft both reached valuations above $4 trillion, making them the wealthiest companies in world history. Trump's AI Action Plan, released in July, is in part a call to keep the U.S. dominant by exporting American technology around the world. Notably, for a White House that rejects much of the world order, it calls for the U.S. to leverage its positions in international bodies, including the ITU.
'Everyone in the world should be using our technology, and we should make it easy for the world to use it,' White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Michael Kratsios said last week in Washington.
Observers say Bogdan-Martin's early re-entry into the race shows American officials are wary of China's growing influence. Bogdan-Martin easily defeated her rival in 2022, but Mark Lambert, a State Department veteran of the Biden and first Trump administrations, anticipated Bogdan-Martin's rivals would start their campaign ahead of time as well.
'If the Chinese and Russians are crafty, they'll find a like-minded candidate from Africa or Latin America to put forward to line up lesser developed country votes,' said Lambert.
Mark Beall, who directed AI strategy in the Pentagon in the first Trump administration, said the U.S. would likely contest China's influence by appealing to the same voters from the lesser developed world, with the early announcement giving 'time to counter potential infrastructure-for-votes deals that some competitors might offer.'
Recent signals in the wonky world of global telecom diplomacy may give the U.S. some cause for concern. Daniel Baer, who served as ambassador to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe under former President Barack Obama, said Trump's tariffs and slashing of foreign aid might be alienating potential ITU votes. 'In much of the world, there's probably less interest in doing favors for the United States than there might have been a year ago,' he said.
In June, the ITU voted on the location of the agency's World Radio Conference, planned for 2027. Although Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick pitched Washington to host the confab, members voted instead to hold the event in Shanghai.
'That's not the outcome that the United States wanted,' said Fiona Alexander, a senior telecoms official in the Commerce Department from 2008 to 2019, during both the Obama and Trump administrations. 'We need to get serious. We need to get organized. There's a long-term play in all of these institutions because it's all about coalition building'.
Privacy hawks hound the TSA over facial recognition
Privacy-minded Senate Republicans are accusing the Transportation Security Administration of interfering with a bill to make airport screenings less intrusive, POLITICO's Benjamin Guggenheim reported Sunday.
Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said he'd delay consideration of the bill last Tuesday, which would have required the TSA to notify passengers of their ability to opt-out of facial recognition scans and put checks on the storage of biometric data collected in the process. The bill was subject to intense opposition from the travel industry, but Republicans also grumbled about the TSA's involvement.
When asked if the TSA raised concerns about the bill, co-sponsor Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said, 'The short answer is yes; the long answer is hell yes.' He added, 'They're working like an ugly stripper to kill this bill, which tells me we're doing the right thing.' A senior Senate GOP aide also told POLITICO that the 'smears against [the] bill have TSA's fingerprints all over it.'
The TSA did not respond to POLITICO's inquiries on the matter.
Delta says its AI is not using our data to set prices
Delta Air Lines is denying that it uses personal data to set 'individualized' airfares, POLITICO's Alfred Ng reports.
The airline made the claims in a letter that the company sent on Friday to Sens. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.), in response to their questions about its pricing practices. Peter Carter, Delta's chief external affairs officer, wrote in the letter, 'Our AI-powered pricing functionality is designed to enhance our existing fare pricing processes using aggregated data.'
This response doesn't seem to have allayed the senators' concerns. 'If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news,' Gallego said in a statement. 'But it still begs the question: why did their president brag to their investors about their desire to 'get you the right offer in your hand at the right time'?' Warner wrote in an X post on Friday that 'many questions remain.'
post of the day
THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS
Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@politico.com); Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@politico.com); Steve Heuser (sheuser@politico.com); Nate Robson (nrobson@politico.com); and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@politico.com).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UCSF doctor reinstated at FDA less than 2 weeks after resigning amid MAGA backlash
UCSF doctor reinstated at FDA less than 2 weeks after resigning amid MAGA backlash

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

UCSF doctor reinstated at FDA less than 2 weeks after resigning amid MAGA backlash

A divisive UCSF oncologist has reportedly been reinstated at the FDA less than two weeks after he resigned amid criticism from President Donald Trump's allies. Multiple media outlets on Saturday cited Health and Human Services Department officials confirming the reinstatement of Dr. Vinay Prasad, which was first reported by Endpoints News, a biotech-focused news organization. Spokespeople for HHS, which oversees the Food and Drug Administration, did not immediately respond to inquiries from the Chronicle about the news. Prasad resigned as the FDA's chief medical and scientific officer in late July after right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer and former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., accused him of being too liberal. He also drew backlash for criticizing the FDA's 2023 approval of a gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, a degenerative muscle disease that affects boys, who often do not survive past their 20s. In his role at the FDA overseeing vaccines, Prasad announced in May that the agency would limit updated COVID-19 vaccine access to seniors and people with certain people with certain medical conditions. Previously, the FDA had recommended annual COVID shots for all Americans over 6 months old. On social media, Loomer criticized Prasad's reinstatement, calling him a 'longtime progressive Marxist.' 'In the coming weeks, I will be ramping up my exposes (sic) of officials within HHS and FDA so the American people can see more of the pay for play rot themselves and how rabid Trump haters continue to be hired in the Trump administration,' she wrote. 'Should be a good time.'

Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan
Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan

The streets were almost deserted in Yerevan Saturday because of the summer heat, but at shaded parks and fountains, Armenians struggled to make sense of what the accord signed a day earlier in Washington means for them. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met Friday and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. - 'Acceptable' - "It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice," said Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia hasn't achieved much with this draft agreement, but it's a step in the right direction. "We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan," he said. "This accord is a good opportunity for peace." Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact "acceptable", provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. "If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement," she added. - 'endless concessions' - But Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. "We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another," she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region." Anahit also criticizes Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for "making decisions for everyone" and for his "endless concessions to Azerbaijan". "We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us," she fumes. Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement "is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia." "We can't trust Azerbaijan," Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having "turned his back" on Russia and Iran. "It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize." - 'More stability... in the short term' - According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed "to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity." For Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specializing in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement "certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come." But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, "I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term," she said. mkh-asy-pop/bds/gv/tc

European Leaders Call for Protection of Ukraine as Trump Set to Meet Putin
European Leaders Call for Protection of Ukraine as Trump Set to Meet Putin

Epoch Times

timean hour ago

  • Epoch Times

European Leaders Call for Protection of Ukraine as Trump Set to Meet Putin

Russia-Ukraine War 'We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests,' the leaders said. A coalition of European leaders released a joint statement on Aug. 9 welcoming the news of President Donald Trump's upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and stressing the need to ensure that European and Ukrainian interests are protected as the two leaders talk about ending the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Trump and Putin are scheduled to meet in Alaska on Aug. 15.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store