Drug claims overshadow Elon Musk's Oval Office farewell with Trump
Elon Musk faced accusations on Friday that he used so much ketamine on the 2024 campaign trail that he developed bladder problems, as the billionaire gave a farewell press conference with US President Donald Trump.
Advertisement
A New York Times report that Musk's drug use had caused concerns was published just hours before he appeared with Trump in the White House on his last day as the US government's cost cutter-in-chief.
The newspaper said the world's richest man also took Ecstasy and mushrooms and travelled with a pill box last year, adding that it was not known whether Musk also took drugs while heading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (Doge).
The South African-born tech tycoon, the biggest donor to Trump's 2024 election campaign, told people that ketamine, an anaesthetic that can cause dissociation, had affected his bladder, the Times added, noting that it was a known effect of long-term use.
Space X and Tesla boss Musk did not immediately comment, but the White House played down the report. Asked if he was concerned about alleged drug use by Musk, Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller told reporters: 'The drugs that we're concerned about are the drugs running across the southern border.'
Advertisement
Musk has previously admitted to taking ketamine, saying he was prescribed it to treat a 'negative frame of mind' and suggesting his use of drugs benefited his work.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Fear-driven US policy on Chinese students sends the wrong message
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification Advertisement Every time I talk to my Chinese friends at Harvard, I hear the same worry: 'Will I be able to visit my family this summer – and will I be allowed back to finish my degree?' These are talented students who came here to learn, not get caught up in geopolitics. Yet now they're being treated like suspects simply because of the country they were born in. In 2024, I helped start a US–China student dialogue club at the Harvard Kennedy School. We gathered students, invited outside speakers, and created a space for honest conversation without pushing any agenda. That's what higher education is supposed to be about. Yet just as we built bridges, a new policy now threatens to tear them down. On May 28, the State Department announced plans to revoke the visas of potentially hundreds of thousands of Chinese students, citing vague fears about ties to the Chinese Communist Party. That's not national security – it's collective punishment. And it's wrong. Advertisement As a United States Army veteran who served in Iraq, I've seen what happens when fear shapes policy. I joined the army after 9/11 because I believed in public service, but I also saw how bad decisions, based on broad assumptions, can spiral out of control.
The Standard
3 hours ago
- The Standard
Two suspects arrested over Sha Tin bank robbery
Download The Standard app to stay informed with news, updates, and significant events - The upgraded app is now available on both iOS and Android platforms.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Sorry, but the ‘China shock' was actually pretty good for America
The idea that China has stolen millions of American jobs in recent decades, causing a collapse in the manufacturing labour market, has long been a staple anti-Chinese narrative on both sides of US politics. Even economists and media pundits who grudgingly acknowledge that cheap Chinese goods have made life easier and more affordable for the average American would complain about these alleged mass job losses. And the blue-collar voters most severely affected by sectoral lay-offs and the decline in regional manufacturing make up a fair segment of Donald Trump 's Maga – 'Make America Great Again' – movement. But is this so-called China shock actually real? 09:42 Trump promises to bring US manufacturing back from China, but will his tariffs work? Trump promises to bring US manufacturing back from China, but will his tariffs work? Among the most influential research defending the 'China shock' claim is a series of papers by David Autor of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, David Dorn of the University of Zurich, and Gordon Hanson of the Harvard Kennedy School – especially their 2016 paper 'The China Shock: Learning from Labour Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade'.
