
US climate pullback threatens planned debt-for-nature deals
LONDON - Billions of dollars of debt deals aimed at protecting vital ecosystems from Africa to Latin America are at risk of unravelling or may need reworking amid concerns that crucial U.S. backing is about to dry up under President Donald Trump.
The 'debt-for-nature' swaps, which reduce a country's debt in return for conservation commitments, have gained traction in recent years with deals involving the Galapagos Islands, coral reefs and the Amazon rainforest among the most prominent.
The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation has been a key player, providing political risk insurance for over half of the deals done over the last five years, accounting for nearly 90% of $6 billion of swapped debt.
A source with direct knowledge of the plans said the DFC had about five swaps in the pipeline which are now in question with CEO-in-waiting Ben Black and U.S. government efficiency chief Elon Musk both criticising its climate work.
The source did not specify how much debt was covered by the swaps but pointed out that the last few DFC-backed deals involved over $1 billion each.
Spokespeople for the White House and the DFC did not respond to requests for comment on future DFC involvement in such deals.
A DFC official who spoke on condition of anonymity confirmed to Reuters it stepped down earlier this year as co-chair of a global task force set up in 2023 to expand the use of debt swaps.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also hit out at multilateral lenders for climate change work amid a broader U.S. retreat that has seen it withdraw from the Paris Agreement to curb global warming.
Angola and Zambia and at least one Latin American country are among those whose 'debt-for-nature' swap plans risk needing to be reworked or even abandoned due to DFC uncertainty, four sources that have been directly involved in the projects said.
Angolan Finance Minister Vera Daves de Sousa said her country, which is one of the most indebted in Africa and whose rivers feed the Okavango basin vital for endangered elephants and lions, has been talking to the DFC about two potential swaps.
One is a debt-for-nature deal, the other a broader 'debt-for-development' swap tied to education and young people.
"We feel openness from them , but especially on the debt-for-development swap," de Sousa recently told Reuters.
"We respect their vision," she added. "For us there is no difference – we have opportunities on the development side, and we have opportunities on the nature side."
In Zambia, which late last year was looking closely at a swap linked to its vast national parks that are home to over 40% of Africa's elephants, things have changed too.
"We are not completely shutting down but we are not actively at it right now," its Finance Minister Situmbeko Musokotwane told Reuters, declining to specify the reason for the shift.
NEW REALITY
Generating money for conservation by exchanging costly government bonds for cheaper ones is seen as an obvious choice for smaller nations grappling with heavy debt loads and climate change pressures.
The UK-based, non-profit International Institute for Environment and Development estimates that the world's 49 poorest countries seen most at risk of debt crises could swap a quarter of the over $430 billion they now owe.
Given the signals coming from Washington, those that do should drop hopes of DFC support and look at alternatives, said White Advisory managing director Sebastian Espinosa, who has advised Barbados, Belize and Seychelles on such swaps.
Those could include credit guarantees from major multilateral development banks, potentially alongside private sector insurers and guarantors, as pioneered by the Bahamas last year.
Historically, though, DFC backing has been crucial in scaling up deals, offering up to $1 billion in political risk insurance. That protects those who buy the new lower-cost bonds if the governments involved fail to make payments.
"Who's going to step in? I don't know," said Eva Mayerhofer at the European Investment Bank, which backed a 2024 Barbados swap. "We won't be able to do debt conversions that regularly."
The Inter-American Development Bank, involved in five of the last nine debt-for-nature swaps, sometimes alongside the DFC —declined to comment on whether any of its plans were being affected.
Investment firm Nuveen's Stephen Liberatore, who has been a cornerstone investor in some debt swaps, said while substitutes for the DFC could be found, the knock-on effects were yet to be seen.
"What is the price for a private entity versus a public entity like the DFC?" Liberatore said. "Does it change the amount of savings?" which are then spent on conservation. "That's the ultimate question."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

New Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
New normal amid a new cold war
The effect of Donald Trump's return to the White House is being felt in capitals all over the world. At the recently-concluded Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, the spectre of a new cold war rose once again to dominate discussions. In his ASEAN chairman's statement, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim categorically asserted the return of a cold war to systemic interstate relations. The reference does not augur well for the ASEAN, which has been trying to build resilience within while maintaining a degree of balance between the US and China. The second important aspect of this year's dialogue has been the tough stand India has placed on its recent military stand-off with Pakistan following the devastating terror attack at Pahalgam. The subsequent Indian political and military action against Pakistan has highlighted what the political leadership is calling the 'new normal', signalling that tolerance has its limits. Both these indicated a changed environment at the Shangri-La Dialogue, especially as they implied certain defining shifts. First, the very definition of the term 'cold war' and how this period will be different from the earlier cold war. Second, the Trump administration's impact on the wider Indo-Pacific and what it expects from the region vis-á-vis the US-China rivalry. Third, the choices for ASEAN states, particularly in light of the extending US-China rivalry. And finally, how this affects the role India plays within multilateral forums and how India's definition of the new normal affects the region. First, the reference to a new cold war is not new. Even during the first Trump term, a National Security Strategy paper released by the administration in November 2017 clearly reiterated that the foremost threats to American interests and leadership in the global order were from China and Russia, articulating the tensions at systemic levels.


Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump breaks silence on Putin after biggest Ukraine attack with 'he is hit...'
U.S. President Donald Trump broke his silence following the largest Ukrainian attack on Russian forces to date, declaring, 'Putin got hit hard, I don't think he is playing games.' Trump's remarks come after Ukraine's unprecedented drone and missile strikes devastated multiple Russian airbases. Speaking to reporters, Trump suggested that Russian President Vladimir Putin has suffered a major setback and warned that the Russian leader is likely to respond seriously rather than escalate with mere posturing. Watch for more


Economic Times
24 minutes ago
- Economic Times
The free filing IRS software TurboTax wanted to kill is now open source for all Americans
Why is Direct File under threat from Intuit and Donald Trump's new bill? What does it mean that the IRS open sourced Direct File's code? Live Events Who are the former IRS developers now shaping the future of tax filing? Why is the fight over free tax software such a big deal for Americans? What happens next for Direct File and taxpayers? FAQs: (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The IRS just made a major move to protect its free tax filing software—Direct File—by releasing most of its code publicly on GitHub. This decision comes at a crucial moment. As pressure mounts from Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, and political threats from Donald Trump's budget bill, the future of free, government-backed tax filing could be in real move to open source the code not only gives developers a peek into how the IRS built a modern, user-friendly filing tool—it's also a clear message: the work will live on, even if Washington politics try to shut it Direct File program, developed by teams from the US Digital Service (USDS) and 18F, was part of a pilot launched by the IRS in 2024. About 300,000 Americans used the tool, and according to Federal News Network, users gave it rave reviews for being free, fast, and simple. The idea was straightforward—make tax filing easy and accessible, directly through the not everyone is happy about this. Companies like Intuit, whose TurboTax software dominates the paid tax prep market, have lobbied heavily against Direct File. Now, Trump's budget reconciliation bill includes language that could shut down Direct File entirely. According to policy experts, ending the program 'is a gift to the tax-prep industry that will cost taxpayers time and money.'On GitHub, the IRS released much of the source code that powers Direct File. This is a big deal for transparency, accountability, and future development. It means anyone—from independent developers to watchdog groups—can now examine, improve, or even build upon the free move is especially significant because many believe the program is at risk of being dismantled for political reasons. By putting the code in the public domain, the IRS is essentially giving the project a second life—even if the federal government walks core developers of Direct File—Chris Given, Jen Thomas, and Merici Vinton—have left their government roles. They've now joined the Economic Security Project's 'Future of Tax Filing Fellowship,' an initiative dedicated to exploring better ways for Americans to file taxes without paying high not alone. Gabriel Zucker, who helped build Direct File while working at Code for America, is also joining the fellowship. Their goal? Find new, more efficient, and less expensive models of tax filing—keeping the spirit of Direct File alive in the private years, the IRS Free File program—offering no-cost filing options for low- and moderate-income Americans—has been plagued by private sector interference. Intuit and other companies have pushed hard to keep the government from creating a fully free and easy system, because it would directly threaten their like Direct File show that a simple, free tax filing solution can work. And not only that—it's popular. With over 300,000 users in its pilot year and overwhelmingly positive feedback, the public appetite for such a service is as corporate lobbying ramps up and Trump's bill threatens its existence, it's a reminder of how political power can override public benefit—unless the public speaks now, the fate of Direct File rests in the hands of Congress and policymakers. If the Trump-backed bill passes as written, the program could be killed despite its success. However, by releasing the code to the public and rallying around the cause of free tax tools, developers and citizens are making it harder to erase the program the fellowship led by Given, Thomas, Vinton, and Zucker is pushing forward. They're building something new—maybe even better—by applying the lessons learned from Direct short, this isn't just a tech story—it's a fight over who controls tax filing in America: the people or the a free IRS tax filing tool that helps Americans file their taxes easily without using paid services like it threatens their profits by offering a government-backed free tax filing option for the public.