
Starmer: EU reset is good for our borders
The Government is locked in negotiations to determine how long young Europeans will be able to live and work in the UK as part of a deal to be announced on Monday.
The Telegraph understands that the EU is pushing for a Youth Mobility Scheme to allow migrants aged between 18 and 30 to stay in the UK for as long as three years.
Labour's minister for EU relations said that the reset would see Britain 'standing side by side with the EU'.
However, MPs from Labour's Red Wall have warned that the deal amounts to a reversal of Brexit and will alienate voters. The party is battling to fend off the threat from Reform UK, which has vowed to reverse any deal.
Speaking ahead of the final day of negotiations, Sir Keir insisted that his deal 'will be good for our jobs, good for our bills and good for our borders'.
He said: 'That's what the British people voted for last year, and it's what my Government will deliver.'
'Disingenuous charlatan'
However, the Conservatives challenged Labour's claims, with Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, saying: 'This scheme could open the floodgates to tens of thousands or more flooding into the country including people who recently entered Europe illegally and then got citizenship, which in some countries can happen in just three years.
'Last week, Starmer said he wanted to clamp down on immigration but he's now on the verge of throwing open the doors. He is a disingenuous charlatan when it comes to our border security.'
British officials negotiating the terms of the Youth Mobility Scheme are pushing for a hard numerical cap amid government concerns of an 'imbalance' between Europeans arriving and Britons leaving for the Continent.
Sir Sadiq Khan, the Labour Mayor of London, said that the plan would lead to EU migrants filling vacancies in the health and social care sector despite the Government announcing a crackdown on foreigners taking such jobs last week.
He told BBC Newsnight that the agreement would 'put rocket boosters up businesses in London where we have critical gaps in hospitality, in creative industries, in health and social care, in other sectors'.
But critics warned that the agreement would undermine Sir Keir's crackdown on mass immigration, which he unveiled last week in a speech warning that the UK was becoming an 'island of strangers'.
Negotiators are attempting to model the scheme on an existing arrangement the UK has with Australia, which is capped at 42,000 people a year.
That scheme was originally limited to two years' stay in Britain but was extended to three.
A Whitehall source close to the negotiations told The Telegraph: 'Obviously we're a country of 60 million people and they're a bloc of 450 million, so there are fears in government of an imbalance in numbers, and in terms of who is benefitting on each side.'
Discussions are expected to continue until the early hours of Monday morning as officials hash out further details on food and fishing.
Britain is set to concede to the EU on food standards, aligning with Brussels' rules on plant and animal health.
Such a deal – an agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards – would reduce trade barriers on food but mean that the UK would be obliged to follow European Court of Justice decisions in the case of disputes.
EU representatives are pushing for a time-limited agreement on food standards.
Officials are also wrangling over arrangements to allow European fishing boats access to British waters. Brussels' negotiators are pushing for four years of access, while the British side is understood to be holding firm on one year.
Separately, a defence and security pact with the bloc is understood to have been agreed, paving the way for British access to a fund of rearmament loans worth €150 billion.
Writing in The Telegraph below, Nick Thomas-Symonds, the EU relations minister, said that 'in an uncertain world' Britain was now 'standing side by side with the EU'.
He added: 'We aren't interested in rehashing old ideologies or fights. The world has moved on.'
Sir Keir will claim that the deal marks the third in a hat-trick of diplomatic successes, following trade agreements with India and the USA, when he unveils the agreement in principle on Monday at Lancaster House in London.
However, MPs within his own party – as well as the Conservatives and Reform, who seized hundreds of council seats from Labour at this month's local elections – have warned that the 'reset' will undermine Brexit promises.
Graham Stringer, the veteran Labour MP for Blackley and Middleton South in Manchester who supported Leave, told The Telegraph that the deal would amount to 'opening borders at a time when Starmer appears to want to take back control. It's giving up control.'
Another Labour MP in the Red Wall said: 'Anything that remotely resembles freedom of movement needs to be treated with utmost caution. The politics is very delicate on youth mobility'.
Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, told The Telegraph this week that he would scrap Sir Keir's Brexit deal if he was elected prime minister.
'The PM thinks he will get away with this surrender deal, but he underestimates how strong Brexit feeling still is in the Red Wall,' he said. 'The whole reset is an abject surrender from Starmer and politically something he will come to regret.'
Meanwhile, Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, echoed his language, saying the deal would mean 'getting free movement by the back door. This isn't a reset, it's a surrender.'
This is about getting the best for Britain
By Nick Thomas-Symonds
Our trade agreements with India and the US boosted business, unlocked investment and saved British jobs. They show that – through these tough times – the decisions this Government has taken has made the UK a country people want to do business with.
A third agreement in as many weeks is within our grasp on Monday. Why do we need this? Put simply, our post-Brexit Tory trade deal with the EU isn't working.
Labour is determined to deliver. For British families, who face not only higher energy bills but longer queues on holiday, and whose safety is compromised by a lack of cooperation with neighbouring countries. For supermarkets, whose lorries are left waiting up to 16 hours for lengthy inspections, while the food inside them goes off. For the farmers, who face endless red tape just to export to our nearest and biggest trading partner.
Businesses that drive the economy often find themselves paralysed by the current rules. On Friday, business leaders called for practical steps forward as the current agreement is 'not fit for purpose'. If our big retailers are feeling the pinch, then many of our smaller businesses have been delivered a knockout punch.
It is our right as an independent, sovereign nation to chase down the benefits of free trade. It is our duty to working people to make sure that it delivers for them.
But trade is not the only thing on the table at the UK-EU Summit. We will fill the gaps left by the Tory deal, which had nothing in it to tackle illegal migration and weakened our ability to tackle organised crime. It's right we control our borders with measures to make our streets safer, cut migration and tackle international gangs.
And instead of being at the mercy of Vladimir Putin, more control and stability within our energy supplies could secure lower bills into the future.
We'll cover the absence of security and defence cooperation, something the Tories failed to take seriously and refused to negotiate.
We aren't interested in rehashing old ideologies or fights. The world has moved on.
When I'm walking down Blaenavon High Street – the town where I grew up – in the shadow of its historic industrial might, I know the people around me are interested in what this Labour Government delivers for them on Monday. How do we ease their cost of living, how do we make their streets safer?
That is who I've had in mind when working towards this agreement. That's why we've negotiated hard to get a package that is in their interest, and in the national interest.
Under Keir Starmer's leadership, we have been guided by cool heads and pragmatism – this Government prefers striking agreements over striking poses. Driven by the ambition to get nothing less than the best for the UK – and willing to step away if anything failed to meet our red lines.
The interests of British people have been our priority throughout these negotiations, but in an uncertain world standing side by side with the EU on solid foundations to tackle the challenges we face will benefit us all.
So on Monday, we have the chance to agree a strategic partnership with the EU that strengthens our borders, cuts our bills and boosts our jobs. Britain back on the world stage – and back in the service of working people.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
10 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Cardiff Capital Region wants action on Severn Bridge limit
Vehicles weighing 7.5 tonnes and more have been barred from crossing the bridge, that spans the Severn from Aust to Chepstow, since Tuesday, May 27 and Monmouthshire County Council has warned it fears firms could relocate from Chepstow without continued easy access to the motorway network. Now members of the Cardiff Capital Region, which is the joint committee for the 10 unitary authorities in South East Wales, say they will look to support Monmouthshire's calls for a solution. Councillor Robert Bevan, who chairs its overview and scrutiny committee, promised to 'take the issue up' after it was raised at its meeting this week. The Labour member of Rhondda Cynon Taf Council said: 'Time is of the essence, we can't wait. I can certainly say I will take this up further and see what we can do.' He said the M48 bridge, at Chepstow, as well as the M4 and the Prince of Wales Bridge is a vital connection for the region's economy and key industries: 'We must emphasise it's not just Monmouthshire that will feel the impact but the rest of South Wales will feel it as well. 'We have deliveries come from the Midlands area, there's lots of companies in the automotive sector and aerospace which is built around Severnside and Filton.' Simon Griffiths, Labour councillor for Bridgend, noted the long term solution to strengthen the 1960s built suspension bridge's cables is estimated to cost between £300 million to £600m. He said it needed to be the 'top regional transport priority' for the body whose main functions are planning transport across the region and how land is used as well as growing the economy, including the Western Gateway project that involves councils across South Wales and the south west of England. Cllr Griffiths said: 'This really could damage any growth we see in South Wales.' Monmouthshire council's Labour representative on the body, Chepstow member Armand Watts who raised the bridge restriction at the meeting, said it's estimated up to 2,500 jobs in the town could be impacted. He also said the weight limit has scuppered plans for the Severnside area in Wales to rival the economic growth seen on the English bank. 'We had the opportunity to replicate what they've done in South Gloucestershire and Bristol where there are 9,000 jobs. I would say that's an economic hotspot.' Cllr Watts also complained the South East Wales Trunk Road Agency has 'not said anything publicly' about the weight limit and said it has been down to Monmouthshire to argue its case with the UK Government, which is responsible for both bridges over the Severn via National Highways. 'Our cabinet member was given 15 minutes with the junior minister, the minister for future highways, and that's it,' said Cllr Watts who also complained a working group has been set up 'without any elected members to decide our future.' Cllr Watts, who represents Bulwark and Thornwell, said his ward is only nine miles from the M4/M5 interchange, north of Bristol, which he said should allow it to benefit from the city's economic growth and said: 'I really hope you can show some solidarity with poor old Monmouthshire on this.' National Highways has previously said it is anticipated the weight restriction is expected to be in place for 12 to 18 months as a short term measure while it considers how it could allow vehicles over 7.5 tonnes to cross the bridge in a managed system as a medium-term solution.


Sky News
11 minutes ago
- Sky News
Inside Jeremy Corbyn's new party and the battle for leadership
Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn may be the figureheads of a new left-wing party, but already there is a battle over leadership. The confusion behind the initial launch speaks to a wider debate happening behind closed doors as to who should steer the party - now and in the future. Already, in the true spirit of Mr Corbyn's politics, there is talk of an open leadership contest and grassroots participation. Some supporters of the new party - which is being temporarily called "Your Party" while a formal name is decided by members - believe that allowing a leadership contest to take place honours Mr Corbyn's commitment to open democracy. 5:51 They point out that under Mr Corbyn's leadership of the Labour Party, members famously backed plans to make it easier for local constituency parties to deselect sitting MPs - a concept he strongly believed in. His allies now say the former Labour leader, who is 76, is open to there being a leadership contest for the new party, possibly at its inaugural conference in the autumn, where names lesser known than himself can throw their hat into the ring. "Jeremy would rather die than not have an open leadership contest," one source familiar with the internal politics told Sky News. However, there have been suggestions that Ms Sultana appears to be less keen on the idea of a leadership contest, and that she is more committed to the co-leadership model than her political partner. Those who have been opposed to the co-leadership model believe it could give Ms Sultana an unfair advantage and exclude other potential candidates from standing in the future. 2:18 One source told Sky News they believed Mr Corbyn should lead the party for two years, to get it established, before others are allowed to stand as leader. They said Ms Sultana, who became an independent MP after she was suspended from Labour for opposing the two-child benefit cap, was "highly ambitious but completely untested as leader" and "had a lot of growing into the role to do". "It's not about her - it's about taking a democratic approach, which is what we're supposed to be doing," they said. "There are so many people who have done amazing things locally and they need to have a chance to emerge as leaders. "We are not only fishing from a pool of two people. "It needs to be an open contest. Nobody needs to be crowned." 1:22 While Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana undoubtedly have the biggest profiles out of would-be leaders, advocates for a grassroots approach to the leadership point to the success some independent candidates have enjoyed at a local level - for example, 24-year-old British Palestinian Leah Mohammed, who came within 528 votes of unseating Health Secretary Wes Streeting in Ilford North. Fiona Lali of the Revolutionary Communist Party, who stood in last year's general election for the Stratford and Bow constituency, has also been mentioned in some circles as someone with potential leadership credentials. However, sources close to Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana downplayed suggestions of any divide over the leadership model, pointing out that their joint statement acknowledged that members would "decide the party's direction" at the inaugural conference in the autumn, including the model of leadership and the policies that are needed to transform society. A spokesperson for Mr Corbyn told Sky News: "Jeremy will be working with Zarah, his independent colleagues, and people from trade unions and social movements up and down the country to make an autumn conference a reality. "This will be the moment where people come together to launch a new democratic party that belongs to the members."


The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ukraine war briefing: death toll from Kyiv strike rises to 31 as Russia accelerates military advance
The death toll from Russia's worst airstrike of the year on Ukraine's capital rose to 31 on Friday after rescuers recovered more than a dozen more bodies from the rubble of a collapsed apartment block in Kyiv overnight. A two-year-old was among the five children found dead after Thursday's Russian drone and missile attack, the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said on Friday, announcing the end of the rescue operation. A total of 159 people were wounded in the strikes, which saw Russia launch more than 300 drones and eight missiles early on Thursday. The EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described Thursday's attacks as 'depraved' and posted a picture of the bloc's flag at half mast. 'More weapons for Ukraine and tougher sanctions on Russia are the fastest way to end the war. Getting more air defences to Ukraine fast is our priority,' she added in a post. Zelenskyy has been appealing to allies for more air defence systems and on Friday, Germany said it would soon start delivering two more US-made Patriot launchers to Ukraine. Germany has already delivered three Patriot systems to Ukraine since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Russia's military advance in Ukraine accelerated for a fourth straight month in July, according to AFP's analysis of data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War. From August 2024 to July 2025, the Russian army captured nearly 5,900 sq km, compared with 1,360 sq km in the previous 12 months. In July, the Russian army took 713 sq km of Ukrainian territory, while Ukraine reclaimed 79 sq km. Nearly three-quarters of Russian advances in July were in the eastern Donetsk region. Moscow fully or partially controlled 78% of the region at the end of July, compared with 62% a year ago. About 31% of this region was already under the control of pro-Russian separatists before the start of Russia's full-scale invasion. Donald Trump has said that he deployed nuclear-capable submarines to the 'appropriate regions' in response to a threatening tweet by Russia's former president Dmitry Medvedev. In a post on Truth Social on Friday, Trump wrote that he had decided to reposition the nuclear submarines because of 'highly provocative statements' by Medvedev, who had earlier said Trump's threats to sanction Russia and a recent ultimatum were 'a threat and a step towards war'. Vladimir Putin has said he wants a 'lasting and stable peace' in Ukraine but gave no indication that he is willing to make any concessions to achieve it. The Russian president told journalists on Friday that a peace would need to be built on 'solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries'. Seemingly referencing Trump's comments that he was 'disappointed' with Putin, the Russian leader added: 'All disappointments arise from inflated expectations.' Europe must start seeing the Ukrainian military as a European army, the prominent Russian opposition activist Ilya Yashin told hundreds of Russian exiles in Serbia on Friday. 'The Ukrainian army is not only protecting Ukraine, it is protecting Europe from Russian aggression,' he said in a speech at a Belgrade concert hall. Yashin was imprisoned in 2022 for criticising Russia's invasion of Ukraine and released last year. Between February 2022 and 2024, more than 74,000 Russians registered for temporary residence in Serbia, according to the latest interior ministry data.