
Starmer: EU reset is good for our borders
The Government is locked in negotiations to determine how long young Europeans will be able to live and work in the UK as part of a deal to be announced on Monday.
The Telegraph understands that the EU is pushing for a Youth Mobility Scheme to allow migrants aged between 18 and 30 to stay in the UK for as long as three years.
Labour's minister for EU relations said that the reset would see Britain 'standing side by side with the EU'.
However, MPs from Labour's Red Wall have warned that the deal amounts to a reversal of Brexit and will alienate voters. The party is battling to fend off the threat from Reform UK, which has vowed to reverse any deal.
Speaking ahead of the final day of negotiations, Sir Keir insisted that his deal 'will be good for our jobs, good for our bills and good for our borders'.
He said: 'That's what the British people voted for last year, and it's what my Government will deliver.'
'Disingenuous charlatan'
However, the Conservatives challenged Labour's claims, with Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, saying: 'This scheme could open the floodgates to tens of thousands or more flooding into the country including people who recently entered Europe illegally and then got citizenship, which in some countries can happen in just three years.
'Last week, Starmer said he wanted to clamp down on immigration but he's now on the verge of throwing open the doors. He is a disingenuous charlatan when it comes to our border security.'
British officials negotiating the terms of the Youth Mobility Scheme are pushing for a hard numerical cap amid government concerns of an 'imbalance' between Europeans arriving and Britons leaving for the Continent.
Sir Sadiq Khan, the Labour Mayor of London, said that the plan would lead to EU migrants filling vacancies in the health and social care sector despite the Government announcing a crackdown on foreigners taking such jobs last week.
He told BBC Newsnight that the agreement would 'put rocket boosters up businesses in London where we have critical gaps in hospitality, in creative industries, in health and social care, in other sectors'.
But critics warned that the agreement would undermine Sir Keir's crackdown on mass immigration, which he unveiled last week in a speech warning that the UK was becoming an 'island of strangers'.
Negotiators are attempting to model the scheme on an existing arrangement the UK has with Australia, which is capped at 42,000 people a year.
That scheme was originally limited to two years' stay in Britain but was extended to three.
A Whitehall source close to the negotiations told The Telegraph: 'Obviously we're a country of 60 million people and they're a bloc of 450 million, so there are fears in government of an imbalance in numbers, and in terms of who is benefitting on each side.'
Discussions are expected to continue until the early hours of Monday morning as officials hash out further details on food and fishing.
Britain is set to concede to the EU on food standards, aligning with Brussels' rules on plant and animal health.
Such a deal – an agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards – would reduce trade barriers on food but mean that the UK would be obliged to follow European Court of Justice decisions in the case of disputes.
EU representatives are pushing for a time-limited agreement on food standards.
Officials are also wrangling over arrangements to allow European fishing boats access to British waters. Brussels' negotiators are pushing for four years of access, while the British side is understood to be holding firm on one year.
Separately, a defence and security pact with the bloc is understood to have been agreed, paving the way for British access to a fund of rearmament loans worth €150 billion.
Writing in The Telegraph below, Nick Thomas-Symonds, the EU relations minister, said that 'in an uncertain world' Britain was now 'standing side by side with the EU'.
He added: 'We aren't interested in rehashing old ideologies or fights. The world has moved on.'
Sir Keir will claim that the deal marks the third in a hat-trick of diplomatic successes, following trade agreements with India and the USA, when he unveils the agreement in principle on Monday at Lancaster House in London.
However, MPs within his own party – as well as the Conservatives and Reform, who seized hundreds of council seats from Labour at this month's local elections – have warned that the 'reset' will undermine Brexit promises.
Graham Stringer, the veteran Labour MP for Blackley and Middleton South in Manchester who supported Leave, told The Telegraph that the deal would amount to 'opening borders at a time when Starmer appears to want to take back control. It's giving up control.'
Another Labour MP in the Red Wall said: 'Anything that remotely resembles freedom of movement needs to be treated with utmost caution. The politics is very delicate on youth mobility'.
Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, told The Telegraph this week that he would scrap Sir Keir's Brexit deal if he was elected prime minister.
'The PM thinks he will get away with this surrender deal, but he underestimates how strong Brexit feeling still is in the Red Wall,' he said. 'The whole reset is an abject surrender from Starmer and politically something he will come to regret.'
Meanwhile, Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, echoed his language, saying the deal would mean 'getting free movement by the back door. This isn't a reset, it's a surrender.'
This is about getting the best for Britain
By Nick Thomas-Symonds
Our trade agreements with India and the US boosted business, unlocked investment and saved British jobs. They show that – through these tough times – the decisions this Government has taken has made the UK a country people want to do business with.
A third agreement in as many weeks is within our grasp on Monday. Why do we need this? Put simply, our post-Brexit Tory trade deal with the EU isn't working.
Labour is determined to deliver. For British families, who face not only higher energy bills but longer queues on holiday, and whose safety is compromised by a lack of cooperation with neighbouring countries. For supermarkets, whose lorries are left waiting up to 16 hours for lengthy inspections, while the food inside them goes off. For the farmers, who face endless red tape just to export to our nearest and biggest trading partner.
Businesses that drive the economy often find themselves paralysed by the current rules. On Friday, business leaders called for practical steps forward as the current agreement is 'not fit for purpose'. If our big retailers are feeling the pinch, then many of our smaller businesses have been delivered a knockout punch.
It is our right as an independent, sovereign nation to chase down the benefits of free trade. It is our duty to working people to make sure that it delivers for them.
But trade is not the only thing on the table at the UK-EU Summit. We will fill the gaps left by the Tory deal, which had nothing in it to tackle illegal migration and weakened our ability to tackle organised crime. It's right we control our borders with measures to make our streets safer, cut migration and tackle international gangs.
And instead of being at the mercy of Vladimir Putin, more control and stability within our energy supplies could secure lower bills into the future.
We'll cover the absence of security and defence cooperation, something the Tories failed to take seriously and refused to negotiate.
We aren't interested in rehashing old ideologies or fights. The world has moved on.
When I'm walking down Blaenavon High Street – the town where I grew up – in the shadow of its historic industrial might, I know the people around me are interested in what this Labour Government delivers for them on Monday. How do we ease their cost of living, how do we make their streets safer?
That is who I've had in mind when working towards this agreement. That's why we've negotiated hard to get a package that is in their interest, and in the national interest.
Under Keir Starmer's leadership, we have been guided by cool heads and pragmatism – this Government prefers striking agreements over striking poses. Driven by the ambition to get nothing less than the best for the UK – and willing to step away if anything failed to meet our red lines.
The interests of British people have been our priority throughout these negotiations, but in an uncertain world standing side by side with the EU on solid foundations to tackle the challenges we face will benefit us all.
So on Monday, we have the chance to agree a strategic partnership with the EU that strengthens our borders, cuts our bills and boosts our jobs. Britain back on the world stage – and back in the service of working people.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
The government must ensure the promise of free childcare is delivered
Takeup of the government's offer of free childcare has been one-quarter higher than predicted, which has prompted some voices in the sector to warn of its imminent 'collapse', because it is unclear how the planned expansion of the scheme in September will be funded. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, in an exclusive interview with The Independent, says the unexpectedly high numbers signing up for the scheme is a 'good problem to have'. There is no doubt that there is a problem, however. The higher takeup meant that the Department for Education spent £2bn on the scheme in the last financial year, covering most of the first year of the Labour government, rather than the planned £1.6bn. That gap was covered by additional funding announced in the spending review in March, but as we report today, the Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that the gap will continue to widen as the scheme expands. The next expansion will happen in September, when working parents with children aged nine months and older will be offered 30 hours a week of 'free' childcare. Of course, the care is not 'free' in that it has to be paid for by taxpayers generally – on the grounds that helping the parents of young children to work is a public good. As Ms Phillipson puts it: 'If people are able to work, or work a few more hours, that helps us all as a society as well and it gets economic growth going.' The funding of the scheme will continue to be under pressure, but the most important fact about the scheme so far is that it has not collapsed. The Independent was among those voices warning that it had been underfunded by the Conservative government, but to its credit the new government has increased the money available. The finances of the scheme may be stretched, and many childcare providers continue to say that they cannot recruit enough staff at the wages they can afford, but the gloomier warnings of chaos and thousands of parents left without places have not yet been borne out. It is crucial to remain vigilant as the scheme expands so that remains the case. At the insistence of Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor in the previous government, the scheme was designed to start small, with a limited offer of free hours to older children, before expanding gradually to provide full coverage. This September's expansion is the final stage of that planned rollout, which so far has gone more smoothly than we expected. If the last stage is a stretch too far and some parents cannot immediately find the places they want, that would be a blow to the government's ambitions. Ms Phillipson is right that the problem facing the scheme in its final phase is the problem of success. The higher-than-expected demand means additional pressure on the public finances in the later years of this parliament – pressure that coincides with other increased demands on Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, from slow growth, higher interest rates and a government U-turn on disability benefits spending. Providing greater access to free childcare is a good policy that will help working families. Its success and ambition should be applauded. The government must now make sure that its expansion is a success.


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU chief von der Leyen heads to Scotland for trade talks with Trump
BRUSSELS/EDINBURGH, July 26 (Reuters) - EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen headed to Scotland on Saturday ahead of a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday afternoon, commission spokespeople said, as EU officials said the two sides were nearing a trade agreement. Trump, in Scotland for a few days of golfing and bilateral meetings, told reporters upon his arrival on Friday evening that he was looking forward to meeting with von der Leyen, calling her a "highly respected" leader. He repeated his view that there was a 50-50 chance that the U.S. and the 27-member European Union could reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to "make a deal very badly". If it happened, he said it would be the biggest trade agreement reached yet by his administration, surpassing the $550 billion accord agreed with Japan earlier this week. The White House has released no details about the planned meeting or the terms of the emerging agreement. The European Commission on Thursday said a negotiated trade solution with the United States was within reach, even as EU members voted to approve counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods in case the talks collapse. To get a deal, Trump said the EU would have to "buy down" that tariff rate, although he gave no specifics. EU diplomats say a possible deal between Washington and Brussels would likely include a broad 15% tariff on EU goods imported into the U.S., mirroring the U.S.-Japan deal, along with a 50% tariff on European steel and aluminum. The broad tariff rate would be half the 30% duties that Trump has threatened to slap on EU goods from August 1. It remains unclear if Washington will agree to exempt the EU from sectoral tariffs on automobiles, pharmaceuticals and other goods that have already been announced or are pending. Combining goods, services and investment, the EU and the United States are each other's largest trading partners by far. The American Chamber of Commerce in Brussels warned in March that any conflict jeopardized $9.5 trillion of business in the world's most important commercial relationship.


The Sun
20 minutes ago
- The Sun
Asylum seekers are still getting money on taxpayer-funded credit cards after being granted refugee status
ASYLUM seekers are still receiving money on taxpayer-funded credit cards even after being granted refugee status. A probe has been launched after we uncovered cases of migrants saying they were still getting the handouts - despite rules stating payments must stop once leave to remain is granted. It piles fresh pressure on the Home Office, which is already facing questions over the ASPEN card scheme after it emerged thousands of attempts were made to spend the cash in gambling venues. 1 One migrant wrote in a Facebook group: 'I was granted refugee status in January 2025. I'm still getting money on my ASPEN card… do I need to inform the Home Office or will it stop automatically?' Another user replied: 'I know someone else this happened to. But he had payments for a whole year. 'He did not touch the money as the Home Office could ask you to refund if you are not entitled to this.' Another admitted they are getting payments for dependants who have gone home. When asylum seekers arrive in the UK, they are typically housed in fully catered hotels and receive £9.95 a week on their ASPEN card, rising to £49.18 a week if they are later moved to self-catered accommodation. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'The Home Office rules state that – when an individual ceases to qualify for support – their subsistence payments will automatically end, and their card will be cancelled, after a short transitional period. 'As part of our investigation into the functioning of Aspen cards, we will look into any instances where cards have not been cancelled as intended, and take whatever action is necessary to correct any faults.' The Tories last night insisted it was 'further evidence' Labour has 'lost control of the immigration system'. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'We have seen luxury hotels provided for illegal immigrants, record ever numbers crossing the channel, rapes and sex offences being committed by asylum seekers, taxpayers' money being used to fund gambling by illegal immigrants and now we find they can't even switch the payment cards off when they should. 'This system has become a complete farce. No wonder it costs billions each year. It is an insult to taxpayers that illegal immigrants get better treatment than they do.' Reform UK's Richard Tice also let rip: 'We keep being told that there is no waste in government yet it's clear to see taxpayers are being taken for a ride by asylum seekers. 'The solution to this is simple. If you stop the boats, you stop the benefits and the enormous costs that are associated with illegal crossings. Only Reform will do this.' The wider investigation into ASPEN card misuse began earlier this week, after a Freedom of Information request by PoliticsHome revealed more than 6,500 gambling-related transactions had been attempted by asylum seekers in the past year. Although online gambling was blocked, migrants were able to use the cards in physical sites such as casinos, slot machine arcades and lottery retailers. In some cases, they withdrew cash in or near gambling venues. There are currently around 80,000 ASPEN card users in the UK.