
Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan announces major restructure, confirms job cuts and new work from office mandate
One of the most significant steps is Intel's plan to flatten its organisation. With some teams reportedly eight or more layers deep, Tan said the company needs to eliminate unnecessary bureaucracy and empower top performers. 'I've been surprised to learn that, in recent years, the most important KPI for many managers at Intel has been the size of their teams,' he stated. 'Going forward, this will not be the case.'advertisementThese structural changes will unfortunately lead to job losses. 'There is no way around the fact that these critical changes will reduce the size of our workforce,' Tan confirmed. The job cuts are expected to begin in Q2 and continue over the coming months.Alongside restructuring, Intel will also reduce administrative burden by eliminating non-essential meetings and streamlining internal processes. OKR requirements and Insights reporting will be made optional, and the company aims to simplify time-consuming corporate tasks such as training and documentation.Another major change is coming to Intel's hybrid work policy. From September 1, employees will be required to work from the office at least four days a week. 'When we spend time together in person, it fosters more engaging and productive discussion and debate,' Tan wrote.The CEO ended his message on an optimistic note, stating, 'We have opportunities ahead that most people don't get in their careers. I'm talking about the opportunity to fundamentally reinvent an industry icon.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan Mends Ties With Trump Amid Chip Industry Pressure
Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan Mends Ties With Trump Amid Chip Industry Pressure | Vantage with Palki Sharma Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan has managed to turn a public clash with U.S. President Donald Trump into praise — just days after Trump demanded his removal. Following a White House meeting, Trump called Tan an 'amazing story' and signaled closer cooperation. The reversal comes as Intel struggles to catch up with AI chip leader Nvidia and aims to regain PC market share. Tan's quick public alignment with Trump echoes moves by other tech CEOs, including Nvidia's Jensen Huang, who recently secured a deal to sell chips to China in exchange for a 15% revenue share with Washington. The episode highlights the balancing act U.S. tech leaders face in navigating politics, policy, and global markets. See More


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
View: Could Silicon Valley's Indian CEOs get the Intel treatment?
By Mihir Sharma According to President Donald Trump , the rise of Intel Corp.'s CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, is 'an amazing story.' That's as much payoff as Tan can expect from his emergency meeting with Trump, who last week had demanded he 'resign, immediately' because he was 'highly CONFLICTED.' We don't know if Intel will be able to convince the administration to view its CEO with less disfavor. Some in Washington are concerned about Malaysian-born Tan's long history supporting and investing in the Chinese tech sector. And questions about how Intel intends to live up to government controls on the export of high-end technology under his leadership are, given this history, not unreasonable. Nevertheless, it's a problematic precedent. That should worry Silicon Valley's powerful Indian diaspora in particular. Take a step back and ask yourself: Is there anything inherently questionable about a tech firm appointing a CEO with an eye for innovative and effective startups? At his venture capital firm Walden International, Tan invested in more than 100 Chinese companies, including an early bet on Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. Normally, this would be a count in his favor. The problem is a fear, both in Washington and in Silicon Valley, that the US and Chinese tech ecosystems are not complements but rivals. This wasn't the case in 2001, when Walden put money in SMIC. But it's certainly the general feeling today. Indian tech leaders have managed to escape similar scrutiny precisely because the tech scene here is seen as providing low-end support to US industry, not high-value competition. But how long will that be true? And what happens if it changes? New Delhi is not happy being a supporting player in the AI revolution. The country has begun to stockpile chips — compute capacity has passed 34,000 GPUs in May, according to government officials — and has already selected national champions it intends to support. Given the relative dynamism of India's startups, its tech sector will at some point produce a few success stories that challenge the dominance of US companies. That's good news for Indians. But it might make things more difficult for Indian-Americans in Silicon Valley. Across corporate America, but particularly in Big Tech, people of Indian descent have been disproportionately successful as leaders, more so perhaps than their colleagues of Chinese heritage. Think of Alphabet Inc.'s CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft Corp.'s Satya Nadella, Adobe Inc.'s Shantanu Narayen and IBM Corp.'s Arvind Krishna, for example. As Intel's troubles following its choice of Tan demonstrate, this might partly be because their home nation is not considered a strategic competitor to the US. That image is slowly changing in the Trump era. Indians in Silicon Valley have already discovered that things are bit harder now. H1-B visas, for example, are a political hot-button issue, and provided the first wedge in the relationship between Trump and Elon Musk. Trump has already made it clear that he doesn't want his backing of Big Tech to mean any jobs for Indians: 'Many of our largest tech companies have reaped the blessings of American freedom while building their factories in China, hiring workers in India and stashing profits in Ireland,' he said at a tech summit last month, adding: 'Under President Trump, those days are over.' So far, corporate leaders have not had to answer any questions about their distance from the sector back home. But the political environment will get more difficult to navigate as India's tech companies achieve greater autonomy and efficiency, and the Trump administration reworks policy. The 50% tariff rate that New Delhi has been threatened with reveals how the president's mind works: He may not see India's trajectory as fundamentally different from China's, and his mercantilist soul rebels at the thought of collaborating with a future rival. An age of economic nationalism and competitive industrial policy will always be tough on cosmopolitan minorities. 'Dual loyalty' accusations gain no traction in an age of prosperous globalization, but have a long and dark history when populists seize power and turn back the clocks. The diaspora should not look at Tan's attempts to win over Trump with satisfaction or superiority. They might be next. Nor should they assume that they'll always be able to avoid similar accusations. The only reason they haven't faced them so far is that nobody thought their connections back home could ever be a problem. Here's the hard truth: India's success will mean the end of Silicon Valley's Indian-American golden age. (This is an opinion piece by Bloomberg. Views expressed are the author's personal.)


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Yes, the USA NEEDS INTEL, as Intel is the only American company…, says former Intel CEO Craig Barrett
FILE - The Intel logo is displayed on the exterior of Intel headquarters in Santa Clara, Calif., Jan. 12, 2011. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File) Former Intel CEO Craig Barrett has outlined an urgent $40 billion rescue plan for the struggling chipmaker, arguing that America's semiconductor independence depends on immediate customer investment as the company faces mounting pressure over its current leadership's China ties. "Yes, the USA NEEDS INTEL, as Intel is the only US company capable of providing state of the art logic manufacturing," Barrett wrote in an exclusive Fortune commentary published Monday. "Neither Samsung or TSMC plan to bring their state of the art manufacturing to the US in the near term." Barrett's intervention comes as President Trump demands current CEO Lip-Bu Tan 's resignation over alleged conflicts of interest with Chinese companies, while four former Intel board members call for splitting the company in two. Cash-rich customers must fund Intel's semiconductor revival by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Back Pain Treatments That Might Surprise You! Back Pain Treatment | Search Ads Undo Barrett proposes that eight major Intel customers – including Nvidia , Apple , and Google – each invest $5 billion to secure America's chip manufacturing future. "Intel is cash poor and can't afford to invest in the capacity needed in the future to replace TSMC or even a reasonable fraction of TSMC capacity," he stated in the Fortune piece. The former CEO dismissed current leadership's cautious approach to new technology investment. "The current Intel CEO's comments about not investing in new technology (14A) until customers sign up is a joke," Barrett wrote. "To win in this space you need to be the leader in technology not the follower." Barrett argued that major tech companies should invest for "domestic supply, second source, national security, leverage in negotiating with TSMC" benefits, suggesting the government could catalyze action with tariffs on advanced semiconductor imports. Trump administration could impose chip import tariffs The rescue plan envisions presidential intervention through trade policy. "IF THE USG GETS ITS ACT TOGETHER, they catalyze the action with a 50% (or whatever number Trump picks) tariff on state of the art semi imports," Barrett wrote, comparing potential semiconductor protection to existing steel and aluminum tariffs. Barrett criticised calls from "four former wise board members" to split Intel before allowing customer investment, calling such restructuring an unnecessary complication. "Be serious. There are many company interactions that involve both supply and competition," he argued in the Fortune commentary. His proposed timeline is aggressive: "POTUS and DoC can set the stage, the customers can make the necessary investments, the Intel Board can finally do something positive for the company, and we stop writing opinion pieces on the topic." In a surprising development, President Trump appears to have softened his stance on Intel's current leadership. After initially demanding CEO Lip-Bu Tan's "immediate" resignation over alleged China conflicts, Trump posted Monday that his White House meeting with Tan was "very interesting" and called the executive's career "an amazing story." The president announced that Tan and cabinet members would continue discussions next week, suggesting a more collaborative approach to addressing Intel's challenges. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now