logo
Time Is Money, Speed Limit Reversal Reflects That

Time Is Money, Speed Limit Reversal Reflects That

Scoop01-07-2025
ACT Transport spokesperson Cameron Luxton is welcoming the reversal of speed limit reductions as part of the Government's July 1 changes.
'Whether you're a tradie, a parent, or a courier - time is money. From today, speed limits across the country will revert to previous levels, and on some roads built to handle it, limits will increase to 110 km/h,' says Mr Luxton
'Lowering speed limits caused immense frustration for motorists and reduced productivity. These changes respect people's time without compromising safety.
"ACT campaigned vigorously against snail-pace speed limits. Our volunteers put up signs all over the country after listening to the frustrations of New Zealanders. Being made to drive at comical speeds was insulting.
'ACT made raising speed limits a condition of coalition. Now, Kiwi motorists can look forward to making up for lost time, while being treated like adults again.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government Moves To Strip Protections For Water Quality
Government Moves To Strip Protections For Water Quality

Scoop

timean hour ago

  • Scoop

Government Moves To Strip Protections For Water Quality

The Environmental Law Initiative says last-minute Government amendments would gut core protections for New Zealand's rivers, lakes, and streams. Minister Chris Bishop today released an amendment to the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill, consisting of changes that were never scrutinised by a Select Committee. "They include sweeping changes to section 70 of the Resource Management Act that will make it easier for polluters to continue damaging our most degraded waterways — and to start degrading clean ones," says ELI's Senior Researcher, Anna Sintenie. For decades, New Zealand law has set clear bottom lines for water quality — limits on oil slicks, foams, scums, suspended materials, colour changes, odour, farm animal drinking safety, and harm to aquatic life. The new amendments would: Allow regional councils to permit ongoing pollution where rivers are already degraded, including where there, conspicuous colour changes, or rendering of water that unsafe for livestock drinking. Completely remove the prohibition on discharges that create floatable or suspended materials, enabling councils to allow new pollution even in pristine waters. 'These are not minor tweaks — they are the removal of safeguards that have been in place for decades, and developed over generations,' says Sintenie. 'Where pollution has gone too far, the answer is to fix the pollution, not change the law so it becomes legal.' Industry lobby groups, including DairyNZ and Federated Farmers, previously asked for these changes during the Select Committee process, and were turned down. The Government is now handing them back these concessions at the eleventh hour, without public scrutiny. 'It is a conspicuous example of how far vested interests are controlling this Government. 'This is not democracy, and it is certainly not law making for the public good.' says Sintenie. The amendments to section 70 apply to proposed plans notified before, on, or after amendment comes into effect, including plans that are subject of an appeal and or ongoing court proceedings. ELI has taken a series of legal proceedings tackling what is says is unlawful allowances of nitrogen pollution to freshwater. 'The Government has introduced an amendment that will lock in pollution in some of our dirtiest rivers and open the door to new degradation elsewhere. "New Zealanders expect their government to protect freshwater, not weaken the rules to appease polluters,' says Sintenie.

Plan to seize Gaza City tipped Australia's hand on state recognition
Plan to seize Gaza City tipped Australia's hand on state recognition

1News

time8 hours ago

  • 1News

Plan to seize Gaza City tipped Australia's hand on state recognition

Israel's plan to take over Gaza City helped spur Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state, the Prime Minister has revealed. Anthony Albanese on Monday confirmed Australia would join the UK, France and Canada in recognising Palestine at a United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York in September, following mounting pressure to take action to support the suffering people of Gaza. While the Federal Government had previously insisted that the recognition of Palestine was a matter of "when, not if", the announcement was a shift from those comments made less than two weeks prior. This was because Australia's decision was partially fuelled by the Israeli Government's decision on Friday to approve a plan to seize Gaza City, Albanese said. "We make assessments based upon the totality of what is before us," he told reporters in Melbourne on Tuesday. ADVERTISEMENT "The other thing that is occurring is... the decision by the Israeli Government to double down on its military solution... with the decision that they've made to go in and to occupy Gaza City. "We have seen too many innocent lives being lost. "The international community is saying that we need to stop the cycle of violence." In late July, Albanese stressed he would not be "driven by a time frame" on the recognition issue. But less than a week later, Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed Australia was co-ordinating with other countries on the issue amid concerns "there will be no Palestine left to recognise". Recognition could be used to "isolate Hamas" — a line the Government has continued to lean on — she added, referring to the designated terrorist group that controlled Gaza and was in a fight to the death with Israel. Senator Wong has said practical steps for recognition would be tied to commitments made by the Palestinian Authority, which exercised partial civil control in the West Bank. ADVERTISEMENT The commitments included assurances that Hamas would play no role in any future government. More than 140 of the 193 United Nations member states already recognised Palestine. Australia Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni has warned recognition was "nothing but a veneer that allows Israel to continue brutalising Palestinians". Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the decision "does not deliver a two-state solution, it does not improve the flow of aid, it doesn't support the release of the hostages and it certainly doesn't put an end to the terrorist group Hamas". Former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison, whose government controversially recognised West Jerusalem as Israel's capital before Labor reversed the decision, branded any recognition of Palestine as a "hollow gesture". The crisis in Gaza began when Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and taking about 250 hostage. Israel's military response has since killed more than 61,000 people, according to Gaza's health authorities. ADVERTISEMENT French President Emmanuel Macron praised Australia's decision. But Israel said recognition would be counterproductive to peace in the Gaza Strip and its demands for the release of the remaining hostages. More than two million Palestinians faced severe food insecurity, based on UN projections. Israel has denied the Gazan population was suffering or dying from starvation, even though it throttled the flow of aid to Gaza for months, international human rights groups have said.

Christopher Luxon Shrugs Off Polls Showing Tight Electoral Race
Christopher Luxon Shrugs Off Polls Showing Tight Electoral Race

Scoop

time8 hours ago

  • Scoop

Christopher Luxon Shrugs Off Polls Showing Tight Electoral Race

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has shrugged off two polls showing a tight electoral race, promising to stay the course with the coalition's plan to fix the economy. The Taxpayers' Union-Curia poll on Monday showed Labour overtaking National as the most popular party and no clear path to power for either side. TVNZ's 1News-Verian poll was more forgiving to the coalition parties, returning them to government. But it also saw Luxon sink to just 20 percent as preferred prime minister, a two-year low. On his way into a morning caucus meeting on Tuesday, Luxon told reporters the polls would not be a topic of conversation in the meeting, nor should they be. "No, no, not at all," he said. "I'm not focused on polls or talking about myself. What I'm focused on is New Zealanders and making sure we've got the right long term economic plan in place." Luxon said his MPs continued to be provided internal polling through "a regular process" and discussed them "from time to time" in line with "normal practice". Asked whether he was meeting his own high standards, Luxon said the government was dealing with a challenging international environment. "We've inherited a really difficult recession," he said. "It's a very difficult time, but we are very, very clear minded and very, very focused on fixing the economy." Luxon said global confidence had been knocked by the United States' tariff regime but New Zealand had to "power through that". The faltering economy and cost-of-living crisis featured in both polls as key concerns for voters. Recently, the Auckland Chamber of Commerce has advocated a cut to the corporate tax rate, while the Taxpayers' Union is calling for an emergency mid-year Budget. Luxon previously dismissed such calls, and on Tuesday, he maintained the coalition's current focus on manufacturing and construction was the right approach. "We are doing everything we can. If you think about $6 billion worth of infrastructure projects starting before Christmas, that is a lot of jobs, it's a lot of tradies." He also pointed to relief on the horizon with the Reserve Bank expected to deliver further interest rate cuts this year. What's the alternative? Speaking on Tuesday morning, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the polls demonstrated New Zealanders were losing faith in National's ability to deliver on its promises. He accepted, however, that Labour had more work to do, given neither poll had returned the party to the Beehive. Asked whether the party's support was helped or hindered by Labour's lack of policy, Hipkins said the government "would desperately love more things to attack". "We'll put further policy out there, but my focus right at the moment is holding the government accountable for their promises." Any comprehensive fiscal plan would have to wait till after next year's Budget, he said, but Labour's tax policy would be released this year. Hipkins said a final decision on tax had yet to be resolved but: "consensus is emerging." He repeatedly refused to give any details, including whether the proposal would be revenue neutral or possible parameters. "I've always said that I don't think the family home should be taxed, but I'm not announcing a policy that we haven't announced." National's campaign chairperson Chris Bishop said it was very easy for Labour to insist life should better when they had no policy solutions to offer themselves. "Life's easy when you're able to throw rocks from the side. Actually, we're the ones... in the arena, making the tough decisions across planning, across education, across infrastructure, across red tape, across fiscal policy to get this economy back on track." Bishop said the poll numbers reflected a "tough winter" but stressed that the election was not until next year: "People want the economy to be fixed. And I get that. But there is no silver bullet." He said any talk of replacing Luxon as leader was "just silly". Luxon: Palestine question is "not a race" Luxon declined to say whether the caucus would discuss the question of Palestinian statehood on Tuesday, but acknowledged there would be "nuances and differences" within the team. Foreign Minister Winston Peters on Monday confirmed Cabinet would come to a formal decision in September over whether to recognise a state of Palestine at an upcoming United Nations summit. All three opposition parties have castigated the government for failing to make a decision, pointing out that New Zealand is now out-of-step with its like-minded partners: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and France. But Luxon said the complex question needed careful consideration. "It's not a race," Luxon said. "It deserves a serious weighing up of our position, and that's exactly what we're going to do." Luxon declined to say whether he would be comfortable with either coalition partner opting to "agree-to-disagree" on the decision. "I'm not going to get into hypotheticals... It's all very easy to jump to a bumper-sticker outcome or decision and not think through the consequences." Pressed on what conditions could be attached, Luxon said he would not presuppose a position but made clear Hamas would have to release hostages and disarm: "There is absolutely no role in any future Palestinian state for a terrorist organization like Hamas."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store