logo
Russia fires over 100 drones at Ukraine as Kremlin dismisses transport chief after travel chaos

Russia fires over 100 drones at Ukraine as Kremlin dismisses transport chief after travel chaos

Independent5 days ago
Russia fired more than 100 drones at civilian areas of Ukraine overnight, authorities said Monday, as the Kremlin dismissed the country's transport chief after a weekend of travel chaos when Russian airports grounded hundreds of flights due to the threat of Ukrainian drone attacks.
At least 10 civilians were killed and 38 injured, including three children, in Russian attacks over the previous 24 hours, Ukrainian officials said.
Russia recently has intensified its aerial strikes on civilian areas after more than three years of war. Over the past week, Russia launched some 1,270 drones, 39 missiles and almost 1,000 powerful glide bombs at Ukraine, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Monday.
Russia's bigger army is also trying hard to break through at some points along the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620 miles) front line, where Ukrainian forces are severely stretched.
The strain of keeping Russia's invasion at bay, and the lack of progress in direct peace talks, has compelled Ukraine to seek more military help from the U.S. and Europe.
Zelenskyy said on Saturday that Ukraine had inked deals with European allies and a leading U.S. defense company to step up drone production, ensuring Kyiv receives 'hundreds of thousands' more this year.
'Air defense is the main thing for protecting life,' Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram on Monday.
That includes developing and manufacturing interceptor drones that can stop Russia's long-range Shahed drones, he said.
Extensive use of drones has also helped Ukraine compensate for its troop shortages on the front line.
One person was killed in the southern city of Odesa, 27 were injured in northeastern Kharkiv and falling drone debris caused damage in two districts of Kyiv, the capital, during nighttime drone attacks, Ukrainian authorities said.
Russian short-range drones also killed two people and injured two others in the northern Sumy region, officials said. Sumy is one of the places where Russia has concentrated large numbers of troops.
Also, nine people were injured and seven killed in the eastern Donetsk region, regional Gov. Vadym Filashkin said. He didn't specify the type of weapons used.
Meanwhile, Russia's Defense Ministry said Monday that its troops shot down 91 Ukrainian drones in 13 Russian regions overnight, as well as over the Black Sea and the Russian-annexed Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea.
The Kremlin dismissed Transport Minister Roman Starovoyt on Monday, an order published on the Kremlin website said.
The announcement did not give a reason for Starovoyt's dismissal. Over the weekend, hundreds of flights were canceled or delayed at Moscow's Sheremetyevo and St. Petersburg's Pulkovo airports. Other airports in western and central Russia also faced disruptions because of Ukrainian drone attacks.
___
___
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer's migrants return deal a ‘publicity stunt' that won't win back voters, top pollsters warn
Starmer's migrants return deal a ‘publicity stunt' that won't win back voters, top pollsters warn

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Starmer's migrants return deal a ‘publicity stunt' that won't win back voters, top pollsters warn

Sir Keir Starmer 's much-lauded 'one in, one out' migrant return deal with Emmanuel Macron is a 'publicity stunt' that won't win back voters, Britain's leading pollsters have warned. Professor Sir John Curtice, Lord Robert Hayward and Luke Tryl have suggested that the small scale of the agreement, which will only see a tiny fraction of those arriving on small boats returned to France, will have little or no impact on the prime minister's dwindling popularity because of record low trust in the government. The problem was underlined on Thursday when more than 700 migrants arrived on small boats just hours before the announcement of the deal, which will reportedly see only 50 returned a week, although ministers have refused to discuss specific numbers. It comes as new polling reveals concerns about the government's wider migration policy, with polling of Labour party members, seen by The Independent, showing opposition to Sir Keir's plans to crack down on legal migration as well. According to a Survation poll of 1,304 Labour Party members for LabourList, 53 per cent oppose plans to only allow migrants the right to apply for citizenship after 10 years of being in the UK on a work visa, up from five years. Only 36 per cent supported it. The measure is a key part of bringing down legal migration, along with banning the overseas recruitment of care workers. But it highlights splits within the Labour Party over both the plans for legal and illegal migration, with some on the left unhappy with the deal, which will see the UK accept the same number of asylum seekers with family or strong ties to the UK back. The focus on tackling both legal and illegal migration has been part of a strategy to tackle the loss of votes to Nigel Farage's Reform UK. The most recent Techne UK poll for The Independent put Reform up one point to 29 per cent, seven points ahead of Labour, who were down one on 22 per cent. Reflecting on whether the migrants return policy will impress voters, Prof Curtice said: 'I would be surprised if it were to have a 'significant' impact.' Lord Hayward, a Tory peer and highly respected pollster, said the announcement was 'a publicity stunt', adding: 'The deal will have no impact really. There are so many questions about the plan.' He also noted that the real problem for Sir Keir and his government is a record low level of confidence in the government. 'I think the figure for net confidence level may be at or on a par with the worst ever,' he added. Only 23 per cent expressed confidence in Sir Keir's government, according to the Techne UK poll, compared to 63 per cent not confident, giving an overall rating of -40. Meanwhile, Luke Tryl, director of the More in Common think tank, said the glimmer of hope for the government would be images of migrants who had come to the UK on small boats being returned to France. On Friday, more than 350 migrants cross the English Channel, according to the Home Office. Mr Tryl said: 'I suspect this deal, in of itself, wouldn't make much of an impact. But if it is seen like 'this is happening', and I think particularly once people see people actually being removed, I think that is going to be something that has the potential to be quite powerful.' However, he said that the small boats crisis and the rising number of people coming across the English Channel illegally - currently at over 21,000 and 53 per cent higher than this time last year - was seen 'as evidence that the government has lost control'. Mr Tryl added: 'We have around seven in 10 people saying the government isn't in control, and as I say, Channel crossings are one of the most visible signs of that.' He noted: 'It's interesting, they've avoided the 'stop the boats' language used by Rishi Sunak. I think they've been quite sober about this, which I think is good, given where public expectations are. 'But there is no doubt that Channel crossings are a major motivator of support for Reform. They define the immigration debate. If you ask people the priority between tackling small boats and levels of migration overall, 74 per cent say the priority is small boats.' There is some disquiet on the left of the Labour Party that plans to open 'safe and legal routes' for asylum seekers are no longer part of the discussion as Sir Keir 'obsesses' about the rise of Nigel Farage's Reform. One senior figure on the left of the party said: 'We need to zoom out a bit more to have that perspective. I don't at all think it will be enough to satiate Reform and those demanding a very hard line approach. 'The conversation needs to be broadened out to proper discussion on safe legal pathways and migrants working whilst claims are processed.' Another leftwing MP described the left of the party as 'wounded' with recent announcements and suggested that the question is 'whether MPs have the stomach for a coup' against the prime minister. But one cheerleader for the announcement with France is Labour's MP for Dover and Deal, Mike Tapp, whose constituency sees most of those arriving via small boats, has been calling for much tougher action. He said: 'Massive strides have been made in tackling the small boat crisis. What will Reform do? They'll continue to fall apart. This, combined with record deportations and removals and taking down criminal gangs with counter terror powers - will make a difference.' The government has been contacted for a response.

Reeves to stop green groups from blocking defence investment
Reeves to stop green groups from blocking defence investment

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Reeves to stop green groups from blocking defence investment

The Chancellor will announce plans to stop environmental activists blocking investment in defence in a major speech next week. Banks and pension funds currently follow environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards drawn up by private firms, which are meant to measure their impact on wider society. But pension giants and banks have been criticised for allowing these rules to restrict how much they invest in defence companies, on the basis that the firms do not promote social good. Rachel Reeves plans to bring ESG ratings under the powers of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), to ensure there is only one set of rules in future. The Treasury is expected to lay out secondary legislation later this year to facilitate the change. The new rules will benefit defence companies by making it clear that investors must take into account their positive role in keeping Britain secure. A Treasury source told The Sunday Telegraph: 'Rachel has always been clear that supporting the defence industry is consistent with ethical investing. 'If opaque ESG ratings are getting in the way of private investment, that has to change.' Officials are said to be looking to raise the profile of the Defence Investors' Advisory Group, and believe this would be a good opportunity to do so, a City source said. The group, which will be comprised of venture capital and private equity firms, will support defence start-ups and advise on how best to generate investment. In addition, the Ministry of Defence is expected to devise a financial services strategy by March 2026. A government consultation last year concluded that requirements for transparency around ESG ratings would support 'greater investor awareness of the defence industry's role'. 'Ill-considered anti-defence rules' It comes after Sir Keir Starmer vowed to spend at least 5 per cent of the UK's GDP on national security by 2035, including core defence spending rising to at least 2.5 per cent by April 2027, and 3 per cent by 2034. In March, more than 100 MPs and peers signed an open letter to the UK's finance industry urging it to 'sweep away ill-considered anti-defence rules' that limit investments in the arms industry. The letter said: 'We must rethink ESG mechanisms that often wrongly exclude all defence investment as 'unethical'.' Signatories include high ranking military figures including Baron Robertson of Port Ellen, the former general secretary of Nato, and Baron West of Spithead, a former Admiral in the Royal Navy. Aviva, Royal London and the National Employment Savings Trust (Nest) were among pension giants to restrict defence investment on ethical grounds. Later that month, António Simões, the chief executive of major pension firm Legal & General, said that defence companies should be considered ethical investments because countries need to be able to defend themselves. He said: 'There's no reason in principle why investing in defence companies cannot be consistent with responsible investing. 'Governments should promote peaceful and inclusive societies but countries also may need to defend themselves. This is a UN-type of principle. We've always said that defence companies, including UK defence companies, can be invested in.' Around £17 billion is invested in ESG funds in Britain. These ethical funds boomed in popularity after Covid with nearly 3,000 launched between 2020 and 2023 globally, attracting $600 billion of investment. Concerns have been raised that funds with ESG labels do not return as much for investors. Investors in actively managed 'green' funds would have seen their money underperform the average UK equity market by 3.8 per cent a year between the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2025, analysis by SCM Direct found in February.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store