Stop clock for Tests, no ball change after use of saliva: New changes to playing conditions approved by ICC
New Delhi: The International Cricket Council (ICC) has approved several changes to playing conditions recently for men's international cricket, including the Boundary Law and one-ball rule in ODIs from the 35th over. While come of these rules have already come into force during the ICC World Test Championship (WTC) 2025-27, the rules for white-ball formats will come in effect from July 2 onwards.
ESPNCricinfo looks at the notable changes introduced across three formats, having reviewed the playing conditions shared by the world cricket governing body with its member bodies recently.
-Introduction of Stop Clock in Tests
A year after the introduction of the rule in limited-overs cricket, the ICC has decided to bring it in red-ball cricket, where slow-over-rates have been a massive problem for years. As per the rule, the fielding side is supposed to start an over within 60 seconds of the last one ending. Two warnings will be given on failure to do so, and another failure would result in a five-run penalty on the bowling team. The warnings will be reset to zero after each block worth 80 overs. The rule has come into effect during the ongoing 2025-27 WTC cycle.
-No mandatory ball change on deliberate usage of saliva
While the saliva ban continues in international cricket since COVID-19, the mandatory ball change by umpires in case of saliva being found on the ball is no longer compulsory. This change is made to prevent teams from changing the balls by deliberately applying saliva to them.
Going forward, the condition of the ball will help in deciding if the ball is to be changed or not. If it appears too wet or these is more shine. This decision has been completely left to the umpires. If the ball starts doing things after umpires saying that application of saliva has not changed its condition, it would not be replaced. The batting team would, however, be given five penalty runs.
-DRS protocol for secondary review after an out decision
Imagine a situation when a batter has been given out caught behind, and he demands a review. The UltraEdge shows the ball brushing the pads without any contact with the bat. With the catch ruled out, the TV umpire checks for second dismissal mode via ball tracking, whether he is lbw or not.
So far, the protocol was, once the batter was given 'not out caught', the default decision for the second mode of dismissal, lbw, would be not out. This means, if the ball tracking led to an "umpire's call" verdict, the batter would remain not out. But in now's updated rule, when the ball tracking is displayed, the original decision label on it would be reading "out" and if the review yields an umpire call, the batter would be ruled out.
-Combined reviews, decisions will be chronological
If in case, there is a player review and an umpire review for separate modes of dismissal on the same ball, "the incidents shall be addressed in chronological order".
Earlier, the TV umpire used to assess the umpire reviews before moving on to the review asked for by a player. Now, the revised playing condition reads, "If the conclusion from the first incident is that a batter is dismissed, then the ball would be deemed to have become dead at that point, rendering investigation of the second incident unnecessary".
So now, if there is an appeal for lbw and run out, the TV umpire would first take up the lbw review since it occurred first. In case batter is out, then the ball would be declared dead and review for run out would not be done.
-Fairness of catch to be reviewed for no-ball
As per Wisden, the TV umpire will check for the fairness of a catch even after a no-ball from the bowler. Earlier, if no ball was signalled by the third umpire, the fairness of the catch was not checked. But now, it will be. If the catch is fair, the batting team will get one extra run for a no-ball, and if it is unfair, the batting team will get the runs taken by the batters.
-Deliberate short run
In case a batter has been caught taking a short run, five runs are shaved off the batting team's total. Now, as per updated rules, if one of the batters does not make their ground deliberately for the sake of stealing an extra run, the umpires would ask the fielding team to decide which batter they want to be on strike. The five-run penalty will continue.
"A deliberate short run is an attempt for batters to appear to run more than one run, while at least one batter deliberately does not make good their ground at one end," Rule 18.5.1 of the playing conditions says. "Batters may choose to abort a run, provided the umpire believes that there was no intention by the batter concerned to deceive the umpires or to score the run in which they did not make their ground," the rule added.
-Full-time playing replacement in domestic first-class cricket
To compensate for the loss of a player who has suffered a serious external injury, the ICC has requested that cricket boards trial a full-time replacement player in their domestic first-class matches. This replacement player will be like-for-like, similar to a concussion substitute. The injury will have to be evident and visible for match officials before a decision is taken. It would not be applicable to hamstring pulls or niggles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
16 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Starc dismisses Lord's repeat as Australia seek to avert rare series loss to West Indies
Bridgetown: Mitchell Starc believes the surface at Kensington Oval won't follow the same trajectory as the one at Lord's during the recent World Test Championship (WTC) final, as Australia aim to set a challenging target and avoid a rare series defeat to the West Indies, reported ESPNcricinfo. Earlier this month at Lord's, both Australia and South Africa struggled with low first-innings scores before conditions eased dramatically on Day 3 under bright skies. Starc himself contributed a half-century in that game, followed by Aiden Markram and Temba Bavuma steering South Africa to a memorable chase. Travis Head and Beau Webster will resume Australia's second innings on Day 3 with a lead of 82. "I think the wicket at Lord's was very flat when the sun came out," Starc said, as quoted from ESPNcricinfo. "I certainly found it easy to bat on. This (one), we've seen these two days, there's so much variable (bounce) there. We saw yesterday on day one the ball shoot low, and then the next over it jumped up and created a wicket. I think that'll probably be the same tomorrow. And some good bowling that creates enough chances," he added. "There was a little bit of a partnership there with Beau and Trav (Travis Head) (27 so far) there at the end, so hopefully that can continue in the morning and then push it as far as we can (with) some lower-order runs and then go from there. I think there's enough chances (being created) as we've seen for the last two days, that you're never quite in and you never know what total is going to be enough," he noted. When West Indies head coach Daren Sammy was asked what target he'd consider chaseable, he joked and said, "I'd love to chase 82. Somebody get a double hat-trick or something." The remark, though light-hearted, came from a visibly frustrated Sammy, who has voiced concerns about umpiring decisions and was left disappointed by his team's fielding lapses. West Indies dropped Sam Konstas twice on zero, taking their total dropped catches in the match to six, five of which came off Shamar Joseph's bowling. Fortunately for the hosts, Konstas managed only 5 before Joseph dismissed him for the second time in the match. "Pretty sure they are going to get a nice bollocking. Not too angry, but for sure, it's an attitude," Sammy said, as quoted from ESPNcricinfo. "The same way you practice your batting and your bowling, fielding and catching become equally important. Catching a slip is a skill. As somebody who fielded there, it's a skill we constantly have to work on, putting time in it," he added. "Good teams will make you pay. So far, it's not been too costly, but this is something that, for us to improve on the goals that we have for this team, is going to continue. Our catching efficiency has to go up," he noted. Despite the missed opportunities, West Indies and especially Shamar Joseph have made an early statement in the series. The pacer has exposed Konstas' vulnerability, dismissing him cheaply twice with scores of just 3 and 5, and making the young batter's second innings particularly uncomfortable. "I think he had three chances and still scored five," Sammy said, as per ESPNcricinfo. "Credit to our boys. The plans that we had against their top order and the areas that the guys bowled at him, made it very difficult. Kudos to Shamar, (because) before the Test started, he did say he's ready for Konstas when they asked about him," he added.
Times of Oman
16 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Daren Sammy raises concerns over TV umpiring after controversial decisions in Barbados Test
Bridgetown: West Indies head coach Daren Sammy has voiced his concerns over the performance of TV umpire Adrian Holdstock during the first Test against Australia in Barbados, following a series of contentious review decisions on Day 2, as per ESPNcricinfo. Sammy reportedly met with match referee Javagal Srinath after the day's play to seek clarification regarding multiple decisions that didn't go in the West Indies' favour. He also expressed his concerns about Holdstock's officiating during the recent ODI series in England, where the South African umpire served as TV umpire in two games and stood on the field in another. Two key moments on the second day left the West Indies camp frustrated. The first was the dismissal of captain Roston Chase, adjudged lbw to Pat Cummins, despite what West Indies believed was clear evidence of an inside edge. The second was the wicket of Shai Hope, who was caught behind by Alex Carey off Beau Webster. The catch was deemed clean after a review by the third umpire. "We are just trying to find some sort of understanding as to what the process is," Sammy said, as quoted from ESPNcricinfo. "We only hope for consistency. That's all we could ask for. When there is doubt in something, just be consistent across the board," he added. "I have noticed, especially with this particular umpire, it's something that for me started in England. It's frustrating. I just ask for consistency in the decision-making," he noted. "Yeah, look, you don't want to get yourself in a situation where you're wondering about certain umpires. Is there something against this team? But when you see decision after decision, then it raises the question. I know he's here for the series. You don't want to go in a Test match having that doubt," Sammy said. "So I want to have that conversation as to the process... so we could be all clear. Because, at the end of the day, you don't want to be going into a Test match not trusting the umpires. And that's not what our team is about. So we're just looking for some clarity as to the decisions," he noted. "You'll have to wait and see for that," when Sammy was asked whether West Indies would be lodging a formal complaint, he said. Speaking on Chase's dismissal, which came just after lunch, breaking a 67-run partnership with Hope, Sammy said, "In our opinion, we saw the ball deviated onto the pad." While Sammy didn't explicitly dispute the decision on Hope's dismissal, he referenced a similar incident from the previous day, when a catch taken by Hope to dismiss Travis Head was ruled not to have carried. "I'm just saying, judge what you see," Sammy said, as quoted from ESPNcricinfo. "If you see the same thing and one is not out, there is even more doubt on the other one than you give it out. Again, I don't know what he's seen but from the images that we've seen, the decisions are not fair enough for both teams. We're all humans. Mistakes will be made. I just want fairness," he added. Australia also had their share of discontent. In the first over of Day 2, they reviewed an lbw call against Chase, convinced the ball had struck the pad first. While initial replays seemed to support their claim, Holdstock judged there was insufficient evidence to overturn the on-field decision. Fast bowler Mitchell Starc later questioned whether the visuals and audio in the replays were correctly synced. "There's been some interesting ones," Starc said, as quoted from ESPNcricinfo. "Obviously, a couple more have gone against the West Indies than us. One for us (against Chase) looked like there was a gap between the bat and the ball, it cost us 40-odd runs, but then a contentious one to then get the wicket," he added. "As players, you can only ask a question. We don't use the technology to make that decision. It sort of felt like, or looked like, that the Snicko and the images were out of sync to some capacity," he noted. Starc also maintained that Head's edge to Hope on the opening day looked out to them. Sammy, mindful of the protocols surrounding criticism of officials, revealed that he had instructed his players not to comment publicly on the decisions after the game. "We know the rules. We know fines going all across the board," he said, as quoted from ESPNcricinfo.
Times of Oman
16 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Stop clock for Tests, no ball change after use of saliva: New changes to playing conditions approved by ICC
New Delhi: The International Cricket Council (ICC) has approved several changes to playing conditions recently for men's international cricket, including the Boundary Law and one-ball rule in ODIs from the 35th over. While come of these rules have already come into force during the ICC World Test Championship (WTC) 2025-27, the rules for white-ball formats will come in effect from July 2 onwards. ESPNCricinfo looks at the notable changes introduced across three formats, having reviewed the playing conditions shared by the world cricket governing body with its member bodies recently. -Introduction of Stop Clock in Tests A year after the introduction of the rule in limited-overs cricket, the ICC has decided to bring it in red-ball cricket, where slow-over-rates have been a massive problem for years. As per the rule, the fielding side is supposed to start an over within 60 seconds of the last one ending. Two warnings will be given on failure to do so, and another failure would result in a five-run penalty on the bowling team. The warnings will be reset to zero after each block worth 80 overs. The rule has come into effect during the ongoing 2025-27 WTC cycle. -No mandatory ball change on deliberate usage of saliva While the saliva ban continues in international cricket since COVID-19, the mandatory ball change by umpires in case of saliva being found on the ball is no longer compulsory. This change is made to prevent teams from changing the balls by deliberately applying saliva to them. Going forward, the condition of the ball will help in deciding if the ball is to be changed or not. If it appears too wet or these is more shine. This decision has been completely left to the umpires. If the ball starts doing things after umpires saying that application of saliva has not changed its condition, it would not be replaced. The batting team would, however, be given five penalty runs. -DRS protocol for secondary review after an out decision Imagine a situation when a batter has been given out caught behind, and he demands a review. The UltraEdge shows the ball brushing the pads without any contact with the bat. With the catch ruled out, the TV umpire checks for second dismissal mode via ball tracking, whether he is lbw or not. So far, the protocol was, once the batter was given 'not out caught', the default decision for the second mode of dismissal, lbw, would be not out. This means, if the ball tracking led to an "umpire's call" verdict, the batter would remain not out. But in now's updated rule, when the ball tracking is displayed, the original decision label on it would be reading "out" and if the review yields an umpire call, the batter would be ruled out. -Combined reviews, decisions will be chronological If in case, there is a player review and an umpire review for separate modes of dismissal on the same ball, "the incidents shall be addressed in chronological order". Earlier, the TV umpire used to assess the umpire reviews before moving on to the review asked for by a player. Now, the revised playing condition reads, "If the conclusion from the first incident is that a batter is dismissed, then the ball would be deemed to have become dead at that point, rendering investigation of the second incident unnecessary". So now, if there is an appeal for lbw and run out, the TV umpire would first take up the lbw review since it occurred first. In case batter is out, then the ball would be declared dead and review for run out would not be done. -Fairness of catch to be reviewed for no-ball As per Wisden, the TV umpire will check for the fairness of a catch even after a no-ball from the bowler. Earlier, if no ball was signalled by the third umpire, the fairness of the catch was not checked. But now, it will be. If the catch is fair, the batting team will get one extra run for a no-ball, and if it is unfair, the batting team will get the runs taken by the batters. -Deliberate short run In case a batter has been caught taking a short run, five runs are shaved off the batting team's total. Now, as per updated rules, if one of the batters does not make their ground deliberately for the sake of stealing an extra run, the umpires would ask the fielding team to decide which batter they want to be on strike. The five-run penalty will continue. "A deliberate short run is an attempt for batters to appear to run more than one run, while at least one batter deliberately does not make good their ground at one end," Rule 18.5.1 of the playing conditions says. "Batters may choose to abort a run, provided the umpire believes that there was no intention by the batter concerned to deceive the umpires or to score the run in which they did not make their ground," the rule added. -Full-time playing replacement in domestic first-class cricket To compensate for the loss of a player who has suffered a serious external injury, the ICC has requested that cricket boards trial a full-time replacement player in their domestic first-class matches. This replacement player will be like-for-like, similar to a concussion substitute. The injury will have to be evident and visible for match officials before a decision is taken. It would not be applicable to hamstring pulls or niggles.
