
As PKK Lays Down Arms, Iraq Emerges As Power Broker
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
At the entrance to a cave northwest of Sulaymaniyah in Iraq's Kurdistan Region, PKK fighters threw their weapons into a fire in a ceremony that marked the end of their decades-long armed struggle against the Turkish state. The symbolic act followed the group's public announcement of disarmament and was attended by representatives of most Kurdish factions.
Since 1984, the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party) has waged an insurgency against the Turkish state that has cost over 40,000 lives and transformed borderlands into militarized zones. Now, with incarcerated PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan's blessing—and a surprising political overture from Turkey's far right—the PKK has unilaterally moved to disarm. Last October, Devlet Bahçeli, leader of the far right Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) and a close ally of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, stunned observers by suggesting in Parliament that Öcalan could be considered for parole if he formally renounced violence and dismantled the PKK.
A fighter with the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) puts his weapon into a pit during a ceremony in Sulaymaniyah, in Iraq's autonomous Kurdistan region, on July 11, 2025.
A fighter with the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) puts his weapon into a pit during a ceremony in Sulaymaniyah, in Iraq's autonomous Kurdistan region, on July 11, 2025.
SHWAN MOHAMMED/AFP via Getty Images
Iraq was a significant behind-the-scenes mediator and its involvement may prove decisive in determining whether this will bring a permanent end to a decades-long conflict. Concerns center on interference from remaining factions unimpressed by the terms, or by regional spoilers. For now, however, arrangements seem to be holding as all sides work to reach a final agreement.
Iraqi Mediation
The move was welcomed in Iraq, where Turkish cross-border operations against the PKK had long provoked public anger in a country fiercely protective of its sovereignty and deeply resentful of foreign incursions. With the PKK now signaling demobilization, Baghdad sees an opportunity to reassert authority in the north, ease regional tensions, and reestablish security—especially with elections in November, where the government is eager to project stability and assertiveness.
A statement issued by Iraq's President Abdul Latif Rashid on the PKK's disarmament called it "an important and historic step toward ending decades of armed conflict and repeated security violations that have cost countless civilian lives," adding that it "paves the way for a more stable and secure future, strengthening the prospects for peace and constructive cooperation across the region."
In recent weeks, Turkish delegations have held consultations with President Rashid and other Iraqi officials to ensure his close involvement in the process, aiming to coordinate with all key stakeholders in Iraq, including both Kurdish and Iraqi intelligence services, as well as political and tribal factions, during what is seen as a critical three-to-four month window.
The stakes are high. As one senior Turkish official put it: "If anything happens in this window—anything—it can derail everything."
Not the First Time
Across the board there is palpable—if guarded—optimism that the process will not be interrupted. This isn't the first time the PKK has declared a ceasefire. A similar peace deal was announced in 2013, but collapsed in 2015 amid renewed violence and a surge in Turkish ultranationalism.
What distinguishes this attempt, however, is how it has been framed both to PKK cadres and to the broader public, not as a surrender, but as a negotiated agreement. While the terms of the deal have not been made public, the deal calls for a mutual transition rather than unilateral capitulation.
But for some, the opacity surrounding the process is cause for alarm. There's no roadmap, no amnesty law, and no clarity on what Öcalan may have been promised. That ambiguity feeds both hope and skepticism.
Still, Erdoğan's speech following the PKK's symbolic disarmament ceremony surprised even skeptical Kurds, as it appeared to embrace the vision of Kurds as equal partners within the Turkish state, reviving the kind of grand, unifying narrative that has long been absent from Turkish politics.
"When we—Turks, Kurds and Arabs—formed an alliance, the thunder of our horses brought cool breezes from the Chinese Sea to the Adriatic," Erdoğan said to AK Party members. "Remember ... from the galloping of our horses, peace spread across the lands."
The Hard Work of Peace
With clear political reforms insofar as language rights, cultural protections, and inclusive political representation, disarmament has the potential to be transformative rather than merely symbolic.
Whether Iraq can seize this moment to reaffirm its sovereignty, strengthen internal cohesion, and burnish its credentials as a credible mediator will determine if it can step beyond the role of a battleground for others' conflicts and emerge as a stabilizing force in the region's long and difficult path to peace.
The PKK disarmament, despite the risks, is one of the few bright spots in today's Middle East. From Tehran to Tel Aviv, the region is encountering greater instability than ever before. Between Israel's bombing of Gaza, Syria, and Iran, and the ongoing humanitarian disasters in both Gaza and Yemen, it is hard to find any evidence of promise. While it may be too early to rule out interference by some minor groups, the PKK-Turkey agreement may be the one glimmer of hope in the region. It will remain incumbent upon Turkey, the PKK, and Iraq to remain committed to the just and peaceful ending of the 40-year conflict.
Tanya Goudsouzian is a Canadian journalist based in Baghdad. She has covered the Middle East and Afghanistan since 2000.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Michelle Obama on Opening Up About Life With Barack—'It Can Feel Dangerous'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. In a new interview, former first lady Michelle Obama spoke out about the "messy" and "complicated" aspects of life with her husband, former President Barack Obama, noting that sharing those details with the public "can feel dangerous." Newsweek reached out to Michelle Obama's representative via email on Wednesday for comment. Why It Matters The Obamas married on October 3, 1992, and share two daughters: Malia, 27, and Sasha, 24. Earlier this year, the couple faced divorce rumors, leading Michelle to address the speculation on several occasions. The rumors first began when she didn't attend former President Jimmy Carter's state funeral or President Donald Trump's inauguration in January. Most recently, Barack appeared on the podcast his wife co-hosts alongside her brother, Craig Robinson, and they poked fun at the rumor mill. When the couple greeted each other with a kiss, Robinson joked, "Wait, you guys like each other?" "She took me back!" Barack teased, to which Michelle said, "Now don't start." "It was touch and go for a while," he playfully added. Then-President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama commemorate the 14th anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks at the White House on September 11, 2015. Then-President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama commemorate the 14th anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks at the White House on September 11, 2015. Kevin Dietsch-Pool/Getty Images What To Know In an interview with Parents magazine published on Tuesday, the former first lady spoke out about revealing personal aspects of her life on IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson. "It's so easy for us to curl up into this protective instinct and not talk about the messy or more complicated bits of our lives," Obama said. "It can feel dangerous to expose those imperfect parts of ourselves. But over the years, I have learned that it's really the opposite." She said that when it came to parenting their daughters during his presidency, "Barack and I did everything we could to give our girls as normal of a life as possible." "When we were at the White House, we made sure they were doing things like making their beds every morning and as they got older, getting summer jobs. Once we left the White House, their lives slowly began to inch a little closer toward normalcy," the Becoming author said. "But the truth is, their circumstances have been extraordinary in so many ways—and that forced them to learn critical skills like discipline, flexibility, and determination to go after what they really wanted. And now here we are." Malia and Sasha are still "under more scrutiny than others their age," she said. Still, "they've learned to roll with the punches." "I'm always so impressed by how they handle it—with grace, resolve, and charm. These days, more than anything, I can't wait to see how they surprise us next." What People Are Saying On a recent episode of IMO, Michelle Obama spoke out about a parenting hack she and her husband currently use as empty nesters: "Barack and I, we are all about creating what we call 'the attractive nuisance.' We want to, you know, make it so that you want to be back here. There's that period when they leave in their early 20s, and they're just like, 'Bye! We're living our lives, and we're so happy to be sleeping on a dirty mattress and in college.' They're just now getting to the point where they hang around just a little, a couple of days longer, because the tub is clean and there are bath salts." What Happens Next IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson airs new episodes on Wednesdays on platforms like Spotify, YouTube and Apple Podcasts.


Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
ZIP Code Change Could Become US Law
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Two bills designed to help smaller municipalities generate more local revenue have successfully passed through the U.S. House of Representatives and may soon be signed into law by President Donald Trump. The bipartisan bills, HR 3095 and HR 672, introduced by Republican Representatives Lauren Boebert of Colorado and Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, respectively, would assign distinct ZIP codes to 80 communities across the country. HR 3095 was passed in a 278-121 vote, with 31 representatives not voting. HR 672 was passed unanimously. Why It Matters The ZIP code system was introduced in the U.S. in 1963, and while they're most commonly known for helping with mail deliveries, codes also help with emergency response planning, economic development and insurance assessments. Boebert has said cities without unique ZIP codes "have their sales tax revenue, insurance rates, mail delivery rates, and response times for first responders negatively impacted." The congresswoman said the legislation would "address these issues and directly improve the quality of life for Coloradans and Americans living in these communities." Stock image/file photo: A woman checking her mail. Stock image/file photo: A woman checking her mail. GETTY What To Know Boebert's bill, if signed into law, would affect 66 communities without unique ZIP codes across 19 states. The communities are listed below: California Canyon Lake Hidden Hills Industry North Tustin Tehachapi Colorado Castle Pines Centennial Cherry Hills Village Frederick Greenwood Village Highlands Ranch Keystone Lone Tree Mountain Village Mt. Crested Butte Severance Silver Cliff Sterling Ranch Superior Telluride Florida Coconut Creek Deerfield Beach Lighthouse Point Oakland Park Parkland Wilton Manors Illinois Burr Ridge Indiana Carmel Noblesville Westfield Zionsville Kentucky Camargo Louisiana Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Montz Minnesota Quartzite Township Springwater Township Nevada Grass Valley New Hampshire Swanzey New Jersey Kinnelon New York Flanders Glendale Riverside Pendleton Wheatfield North Carolina Weddington Ohio Green Oklahoma Hochatown South Carolina Goose Creek Mauldin Texas Fairview Fate Heath Josephine Murphy Northlake Parker Sargent Virginia Fairlawn Wisconsin Caledonia Franklin Glendale Greenfield Rochester Village of Harrison Village of Mount Pleasant Village of Somers HR 672 would create unique ZIP codes for the following 14 areas: California Eastvale Colorado Castle Pines Silver Cliff Connecticut Scotland Florida Hollywood Miami Lakes Ocoee Iowa Urbandale Wisconsin Franklin Greenfield Village of Caledonia Village of Mount Pleasant Village of Somers Wyoming Mills What People Are Saying Republican Representative Lauren Boebert of Colorado said in a news release: "Zip code reform is not a partisan issue; it's a unifying, fundamental need for the municipalities that have been denied their own zip code and have dealt with public safety issues, mail delivery problems for seniors and veterans, business permitting challenges, and the loss of revenue that leads to cutting public services. It's time for the Senators who represent the many communities in this bill to step up and deliver this bill to President Trump's desk." Democratic Representative Joe Courtney of Connecticut, who sponsored HR 672, said following the vote: "The people of Scotland [Connecticut] face the serious consequences of having six ZIP Codes for a town of less than 1,600 people. Delivery of Social Security notices and checks, Medicaid information, prescription medications, and absentee ballot applications are disrupted day in day out. Residents have paid their taxes to the wrong town and sent their children to the wrong school." What Happens Next Both bills are set to be reviewed by the Senate. If they pass, they will head to the White House to be signed into law.

35 minutes ago
Iraqi governor resigns after deadly mall fire
BAGHDAD -- The governor of an Iraqi province where a fire in a shopping mall killed more than 60 people resigned Wednesday. The fire last Wednesday tore through a newly opened shopping center in the town of Kut in Wasit province. While an investigation is ongoing, officials and residents have said that lack of safety measures in the building exacerbated the tragedy. Provincial Gov. Mohammed al-Miyahi said he had resigned 'in honor of the blood of the martyrs, as they are in need of a gesture that may soothe part of their deep wounds, and in loyalty to them and to the people of this province.' The provincial council elected a new governor, Hadi Majid Kazzar. The fire had sparked widespread public anger, with families of the victims demanding the governor's dismissal and that others responsible for negligence be held accountable. They asserted that the blaze was the result of a long history of administrative corruption and weak oversight. Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani had sent an official request to Prime Minister Mohammad Shia al-Sudani calling for the governor's dismissal, and the Cabinet decided in a session Tuesday to refer al-Miyahi to the investigation. Al-Miyahi previously said that the building owner did not implement fire safety measures and had not applied for required permits, and that legal complaints had been filed against the owner and shopping center owner. Poor building standards have often contributed to tragic fires in Iraq. In July 2021, a blaze at a hospital in the city of Nasiriyah that killed between 60 to 92 people was determined to have been fueled by highly flammable, low-cost type of 'sandwich panel' cladding that is illegal in Iraq. In 2023, more than 100 people died in a fire at a wedding hall in the predominantly Christian area of Hamdaniya in Nineveh province after the ceiling panels above a pyrotechnic machine burst into flames.