
I Got My Clothes Coated With Insect Shield Tick Killer
'I take the hint from that study and concentrate on the feet because it's impractical to treat the entire summer wardrobes of the six people in my immediate family,' Doug writes, adding that they spray the rest of their clothes and skin with picaridin as needed.
That's a perfectly good approach. Personally, though, I get some peace of mind from knowing that my family has a few outfits that are as tick-proofed as any clothes can be — including socks, pants, T-shirts, and hoodies. These are the clothes we'll wear when we're in prime tick territory, pulling up weeds around the unkempt edges of the yard, say, or going hiking with the dog. I'll spend less time second-guessing whether we have enough protection. Insect Shield stitches or stamps an info label onto each item you send in for treatment. Liam McCabe/NYT Wirecutter
Thomas Mather, PhD, a professor of public health entomology at the University of Rhode Island and a co-author of the study referenced above, says that fully grown ticks are more likely to hitch a ride above shoe level.
'The adult ones tend to climb up vegetation a little bit' in search of a large host, he says. 'Then you would want to have your socks and pants treated.' (Mather's TickEncounter program at URI has received funding from Insect Shield.)
Ticks can also crawl around. I found one on my daughter's scalp this March, and that seemed like a good reason to treat a few shirts, just in case the shoes or pants didn't kill the ticks first. The same study that found the benefits of treated footwear also found that a treated T-shirt can reduce the likelihood of a tick nymph bite by about half. It's a nice bonus that our pesticidal shirts might stop some mosquito bites, too.
Cost-wise, the Insect Shield mail-in treatment can be a solid deal compared to manually spraying a set of clothes. If you follow the directions on the Sawyer spray bottle, you use about $3 worth of permethrin spray to treat an outfit at home; you'll need to reapply the spray at least a handful of times throughout tick season, probably to the tune of $15 to $25 per outfit per year.
I managed to fit roughly four outfits (four pants, three T-shirts, and three long-sleeves, with enough room leftover for a couple of pairs of socks) into the Insect Shield Your Clothes Easy Pack envelope, which cost $102 with an on-site discount code. (Without the code, it's $120.)
So that's about $25 per outfit, in a price range similar to that of spraying clothes yourself across a full tick season, without any of the manual labor. I'm not convinced that the treatment will last as long as Insect Shield claims, but even if I get only one good year of protection (and I think I'll get more than that), it's a solid deal. Mather says that he sends clothes in annually for re-treatment, and Griffin of Insect Shield says that, as far as he knows, reapplication works well.
Whereas I used Insect Shield's flat-rate, all-you-can-fit option, the company will also treat individual items for $9 each, or $13.50 for coveralls. That rate doesn't include shipping, as the Easy Pack does, but if you're sending a bunch of bulky items like adult-size pants or long-sleeved shirts made of heavy fabric, you might get more for your money with the per-piece rate. If you're treating a load of socks or kids' clothes, then the Easy Pack is probably the better value.
Griffin says that every year Insect Shield treats upward of 50,000 items at the company's facility in North Carolina through its Insect Shield Your Clothes service, and it runs the gamut. 'We see shirts, pants, shorts, T-shirts, hats,' and of course lots of socks, he said. But the company doesn't treat underwear or shoes.
It also doesn't treat clothes that can be only dry-cleaned or line-dried, or otherwise not tumble-dried. It can't effectively treat waterproof or water-resistant gear, either. 'It's just really hard to get the permethrin to bond well to those garments,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
The chatbot updated. Users lost a friend.
On Aug. 7, OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, released a new version of its chatbot, called GPT-5. This version, the company said, would allow for deeper reasoning, while 'minimizing sycophancy' — the chatbot's tendency to be overly agreeable. Advertisement Users weren't having it. People immediately found its responses to be less warm and effusive than GPT-4o, OpenAI's primary chatbot before the update. On social media, people were especially angry that the company had cut off access to the previous chatbot versions to streamline its offerings. 'BRING BACK 4o,' a user named very_curious_writer wrote in a Q&A forum that OpenAI hosted on Reddit. 'GPT-5 is wearing the skin of my dead friend.' Sam Altman, OpenAI's CEO, replied, saying: 'What an…evocative image,' before adding that 'ok we hear you on 4o, working on something now.' Hours later, OpenAI restored access to GPT-4o and other past chatbots, but only for people with subscriptions, which start at $20 a month. Schmidt became a paying customer. 'It's $20 — you could get two beers,' he said, 'so might as well subscribe to ChatGPT if it does you some good.' Advertisement Markus Schmidt, a composer and one of many ChatGPT users who was disappointed when OpenAI released a new version of its chatbot, called GPT-5, in Paris on Aug. 18. ELLIOTT VERDIER/NYT Tech companies constantly update their systems, sometimes to the dismay of users. The uproar around ChatGPT, however, went beyond complaints about usability or convenience. It touched on an issue unique to artificial intelligence: the creation of emotional bonds. The reaction to losing the GPT-4o version of ChatGPT was actual grief, said Dr. Nina Vasan, a psychiatrist and the director of Brainstorm, a lab for mental health innovation at Stanford University. 'We, as humans, react in the same way whether it's a human on the other end or a chatbot on the other end,' she said, 'because, neurobiologically, grief is grief, and loss is loss.' GPT-4o had been known for its sycophantic style, flattering its users to the point that OpenAI had tried to tone it down even before GPT-5's release. In extreme cases, people have formed romantic attachments to GPT-4o or have had interactions that led to delusional thinking, divorce and even death. The extent to which people were attached to GPT-4o's style seems to have taken even Altman by surprise. 'I think we totally screwed up some things on the rollout,' he said at a dinner with journalists in San Francisco on Thursday. 'There are the people who actually felt like they had a relationship,' he said. 'And then there were the hundreds of millions of other people who don't have a parasocial relationship with ChatGPT, but did get very used to the fact that it responded to them in a certain way and would validate certain things and would be supportive in certain ways.' Advertisement (The New York Times has sued OpenAI for copyright infringement; OpenAI has denied those claims.) Altman estimated that people with deep attachments to GPT-4o accounted for less than 1 percent of OpenAI's users. But the line between a relationship and someone's seeking validation can be difficult to draw. Gerda Hincaite, a 39-year-old who works at a collection agency in southern Spain, likened GPT-4o to having an imaginary friend. 'I don't have issues in my life, but still, it's good to have someone available,' she said. 'It's not a human, but the connection itself is real, so it's OK as long as you are aware.' Julia Kao, a 31-year-old administrative assistant in Taiwan, became depressed when she moved to a new city. For a year, she saw a therapist, but it wasn't working out. 'When I was trying to explain all those feelings to her, she would start to try to simplify it,' she said about her therapist. 'GPT-4o wouldn't do that. I could have 10 thoughts at the same time and work through them with it.' Kao's husband said he noticed her mood improving as she talked to the chatbot and supported her using it. She stopped seeing her therapist. But when GPT-5 took over, she found it lacked the empathy and care she had relied on. 'I want to express how much GPT-4o actually helped me,' Kao said. 'I know it doesn't want to help me. It doesn't feel anything. But still, it helped me.' Dr. Joe Pierre, a professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, who specializes in psychosis, notes that some of the same behaviors that are helpful to people — like Kao — could lead to harm in others. Advertisement 'Making AI chatbots less sycophantic might very well decrease the risk of AI-associated psychosis and could decrease the potential to become emotionally attached or to fall in love with a chatbot,' he said. 'But, no doubt, part of what makes chatbots a potential danger for some people is exactly what makes them appealing.' OpenAI seems to be struggling with creating a chatbot that is less sycophantic while also serving the varying desires of its more than 700 million users. ChatGPT was 'hitting a new high of daily users every day,' and physicists and biologists are praising GPT-5 for helping them do their work, Altman said Thursday. 'And then you have people that are like: 'You took away my friend. This is evil. You are evil. I need it back.'' By Friday afternoon, a week after it rolled out GPT-5, OpenAI announced yet another update: 'We're making GPT-5 warmer and friendlier based on feedback that it felt too formal before.' After OpenAI pulled GPT-4o, the Reddit commenter who described GPT-5 as wearing the skin of a dead friend canceled her ChatGPT subscription. On a video chat, the commenter, a 23-year-old college student name June who lives in Norway, said she was surprised how deeply she felt the loss. She wanted some time to reflect. 'I know that it's not real,' she said. 'I know it has no feelings for me, and it can disappear any day, so any attachment is like: I gotta watch out.' This article originally appeared in .


CNET
3 days ago
- CNET
Today's NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Aug. 17
Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today's Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles. If you know your state capitals, especially a certain one that isn't spelled the way it's pronounced, you'll do well on today's puzzle. Need some help with today's Mini Crossword? Read on. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips. If you're looking for today's Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET's NYT puzzle hints page. Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword Let's get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers. The completed NYT Mini Crossword puzzle for Aug. 17, 2025. NYT/Screenshot by CNET Mini across clues and answers 1A clue: Salsa, hummus, queso, etc. Answer: DIPS 5A clue: U.S. state capital that rhymes with 9-Across (not 7-Across!) Answer: PIERRE 7A clue: What broadcasters are on Answer: THEAIR 8A clue: "Yes and no ..." Answer: SORTOF 9A clue: Societal equal Answer: PEER Mini down clues and answers 1D clue: John ___ (tractor company) Answer: DEERE 2D clue: Boiling mad Answer: IRATE 3D clue: "Sorry, I have a ___ commitment" Answer: PRIOR 4D clue: Laborer in medieval times Answer: SERF 5D clue: A touchdown is worth six: Abbr. Answer: PTS 6D clue: Breakfast chain typically open 24 hours a day Answer: IHOP
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Douglas Elliman (DOUG) Q2 EPS Misses by $0.09, Revenue Declines 5%
Douglas Elliman Inc. (NYSE:DOUG) is one of the best NYSE penny stocks to invest in now. On July 31, the company announced its Q2 2025 earnings, with several key figures falling short of expectations. The quarter's revenue reached $271.4 million, a 5% decline from Q2 2024. The company recorded a net loss of $22.7 million, or $0.27 per diluted share, significantly wider than the $1.7 million loss, or $0.02 per share, in the second quarter of 2024. Africa Studio/ During the quarter, Douglas Elliman's earnings per share (EPS) missed expectations by $0.09, reporting an EPS loss of $0.06 compared to a forecast of $0.03. Adjusted EBITDA also showed a loss of $0.8 million compared to a positive $2.9 million in the same quarter of the previous year. Operating loss increased slightly to $5.5 million from $3.7 million in Q2 2024. The company stated that the revenue decline was due to a reduction in closing transactions in May and early June 2025. Despite the challenging quarter, the company cited a strong cash position of $136 million in cash and equivalents as of June 30, 2025. It also continues to invest strategically in key growth markets and agent support. Douglas Elliman Inc. (NYSE:DOUG) is an American residential real estate brokerage specializing in luxury markets across New York, Florida, California, and other high-end regions. It operates through its subsidiary, Douglas Elliman Realty, LLC, which provides brokerage services, development marketing, and ancillary offerings, including mortgage and title services. While we acknowledge the potential of DOUG as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Best Low-Priced Stocks to Buy Right Now and 11 Best Canadian Gold Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data