Gavin Newsom says Alcatraz will reopen the ‘same day Trump releases the Epstein files'
A spokesperson dismissed the idea previously touted by the president, following a visit to the island by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and embattled U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday.
'Pam Bondi will reopen Alcatraz the same day Trump lets her release the Epstein files. So, never,' Izzy Gardon, Newsom's director of communications, told SFGATE.
The visit by the two cabinet officials comes two months after Trump mulled over the idea of reopening the historic prison, announcing on Truth Social in May that he had directed the FBI and Homeland Security to look into the idea.
Democrats have blasted the idea, including California Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, who called it Trump's "stupidest initiative yet."
Administration sources told Axios that converting Alcatraz into a functioning prison could come with a $2 billion price tag.
The visit to San Francisco may have come as a welcome break for Bondi, who has been mired in controversy since the contentious release of the Epstein Files last week, which has caused a schism in the MAGA movement.
Hardline supporters of Trump, both in and out of government, reacted with outrage after Bondi's office announced that – contrary to popular conspiracy – there was no so-called 'client list' belonging to the disgraced financier.
The ongoing fallout has also been latched onto by the Democrats. As well as his snarky comments on Thursday, Newsom has also referenced the president's attempts to continue as normal.
On Wednesday, in response to a post by Trump about the possible use of cane sugar in Coca-Cola products, Newsom wrote: 'Oh thank god! I've totally forgotten about the Epstein files now!'
However, despite the president's own personal frustration, he seemingly bowed to pressure on Friday, announcing that he would allow Bondi to release grand jury testimony on the 'Epstein files.'
'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!' he wrote.
In a follow up post, Trump added: 'If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had Garland and Comey in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watch: Mike Johnson claims Trump's approval rating is at 90%
This is the moment Mike Johnson claimed Donald Trump 's approval ratings are 'skyrocketing'. The House Speaker made the remarks during an interview with CNBC on Friday (July18). Johnson declared that while Trump is 'the most attacked political figure in the history of American politics,' he is also the most 'resilient'. 'And you see at the same time, his approval ratings are skyrocketing,' the Speaker continued. 'CNN had a story, I think a day or two ago, he was at a 90% approval rating. There's never been a president that high.' Trump's current approval rating stands at 44%, according to a Morning Consult poll released Monday (14 July).
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Maga and Jeffrey Epstein: the truth about Donald Trump and conspiracy theories
Donald Trump has thrived on conspiracy theories – 'birtherist' lies that Barack Obama was born outside the US; the lunacies of the Q-Anon movement; false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him. All centred on the idea that the 'deep state' was lying to, and thus cheating, ordinary people. Mr Trump was their tribune. It's hard not to feel schadenfreude now that he's at the sharp end of a theory that he at times encouraged and allies eagerly pushed: claims that the prison death of the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein might not be suicide after all, and that wealthy and well-connected associates were trying to hush up connections to the financier. Mr Trump's attorney general, Pam Bondi, promised that 'truckloads' of documents would help reveal the truth and claimed that a client list was 'sitting on my desk right now'. Then, abruptly, the department of justice said that the financier's death was not murder, that no more files on the investigation against him would be released, and that there was no list of 'clients'. The administration says that Ms Bondi was referring to general files on the case. In short: many of those who promoted the idea that vast, vile secrets were being concealed now claim that there are no secrets at all – with no clear explanation for their volte-face. The result has been uproar in the Maga movement, with far-right politicians and media figures including Marjorie Taylor Greene, Laura Loomer and Alex Jones among the unsatisfied. Mike Johnson, speaker of the House and a key ally, said that the justice department should 'put it out there'. Mr Trump attempted to dismiss the story as 'boring', before attacking his own supporters as 'weaklings' for '[buying] into this 'bullshit''. Then, hours after a Wall Street Journal report that he sent a 'bawdy' letter to Epstein – which he denies – he told Ms Bondi to seek the release of grand jury testimony on the sex-trafficking case. Epstein's crimes are fact, not a 'hoax', and it's also fact that he had repeated contact with high-profile figures, including Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Mr Trump himself – who once remarked of the financier: 'Terrific guy … It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' The files need not suggest, let alone confirm, any wrongdoing to embarrass anyone mentioned in them: highlighting the association is enough. At the heart of all Maga conspiracies lies another kernel of truth: that the rich and powerful often get away with exploiting vulnerable people through connections to the state. Yet Trump voters fail to see how that relates to the administration's broader actions. They are unmoved by his reverse Robin Hood budget legislation, which snatches from the poor to give to billionaires – like those in his cabinet. It's less visceral than Epstein's crimes, and its brazenness may, counterintuitively, make it less viral. Many on the right blame imaginary weather modification, rather than the global heating caused by fossil fuel dependence, for Texas's deadly floods. Conspiracy theories give those who feel powerless a sense of power; of knowing something that others can't see. Even so, the truth revealed by the Epstein scandal – that ordinary Americans are deeply angry at the unfairness and abuses created by elites – is worth heeding, and demands a better political and economic response.
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Murdoch-Trump rift opens over Epstein – but don't expect a decisive break
Threats to sue. Angry calls to editors. Public denunciations. In the wake of the Wall Street Journal's story claiming Donald Trump contributed to a 'bawdy' letter to the convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein – featuring a drawing of a naked woman's silhouette around a typewritten personal message – the president's relationship with the outlet's proprietor, Rupert Murdoch, appears on the surface to have deteriorated from temperamental to terminal. Just a few days ago, the 94-year-old mogul was spotted among the president's high-profile guests at the Fifa Club World Cup final. Following the publication of the article, however, Murdoch now finds himself on the president's lengthy list of media opponents threatened with court action. In an unprecedented environment in which a sitting president regularly takes direct aim at the media, there have been numerous claims of big outlets making decisions that make life easier for their billionaire owners. Yet the Journal published the Epstein allegations even after Trump picked up the phone to its British editor, Emma Tucker, to demand that she ditch the story. Trump also claims Murdoch himself was approached to stop the article, to no avail. According to some media watchers, it is the latest sign that Murdoch is taking a different approach to Trump's return than some of his fellow billionaire moguls. Even before the Epstein story dropped on Thursday, Murdoch's Journal continued to criticise Trump from the right over some of his early decisions. In January, its editorial page took aim at his unconditional pardon for many of those who stormed the US Capitol on 6 January 2021. It also accused Trump of 'pleasing China's Xi Jinping above a law passed by Congress' with what it described as the 'illegal' suspension of a law forcing TikTok to break from ByteDance, its Chinese owner. It has also criticised Trump for launching new family crypto tokens. It wasn't that long ago, either, that Murdoch was Trump's guest in the Oval office. Even then, however, tensions were on display. Trump brought up his disagreements with the Journal, which had recently dubbed his tariff battle with Canada and Mexico as 'the dumbest trade war in history'. It has led some to regard Murdoch's Journal as representing a political band on the right aware of Trump's political draw, but sceptical about his economic effects – particularly around the use of tariffs as a constant weapon in his international dealings. Yet the Journal's critical stance on aspects of Trump's presidency is far from proof of a decisive break between Murdoch and the president. Murdoch's Fox News – the cash cow of his media businesses and a powerhouse in the Maga world – continues to provide supportive content. The Epstein letter story was relegated to an opinion piece low down on the network's online homepage on Friday morning. And those who have watched Murdoch's career closely over the decades tend to conclude that, ultimately, his decisions are driven by business. With the Journal appealing to economically hawkish Trump sceptics on the right and Fox News continuing to serve up content for Trump supporters, Murdoch finds himself at the helm of a media empire on the right with all bases covered. The episode also highlights that, just a few months into Trump's second coming, internal pressures are pulling at the threads of big players in the Maga media. Already, influential pro-Trump personalities – most notably Tucker Carlson and Laura Loomer - have protested at the lack of action around releasing all documentation relating to Epstein. Others stick to Trump's line that the existence of extensive files related to the disgraced financier is a 'hoax'. The saga appears to confirm Murdoch's status as a different beast from some of the more recent arrivals to media ownership, developing a skin as thick as rhinoceros hide in his decades making and breaking political careers. As the veteran media writer Ben Smith has put it: 'If you want to be a mogul, as the Murdochs have learned over the decades, you can't make yourself quite that easy to bully.'
