Porter County moves to define ‘barndominium' housing category
'As a principal, we don't object to these,' said Porter County Director of Development & Storm Water Management Mike Jabo. 'They can be quite attractive, but they can also be quite large.'
He gave a presentation that included artist renderings of a variety of barndominiums, both small and large, and started off by dashing the fallacy that they are pole barns. 'That's false too,' Jabo said. 'It can be metal. It can be stone. It can be wood.
'We're trying to compare these things with the footprint they consume,' he added. 'The UDO (Unified Development Ordinance) is very silent on these kind of structures.'
Porter County Building Commissioner Mike Haller said the popularity of barndominiums rises and falls with the state of the economy. He said he tends to field calls from young people looking to build housing for less, but in the end the finished product rarely costs less than traditional housing. 'They're very nice. They're very safe,' he told the commission.
Jabo and Haller said Porter County has only approved around seven barndominiums so far.
Under the proposed ordinance chapters 2, 5, and 12 of the UDO would be amended to give guidelines on barndominiums in the General Agriculture (A1), Prime Agriculture (A2), and Rural Residential (RR) districts in unincorporated Porter County. After considerable discussion, during which the eight plan commission members present were each given the opportunity to raise questions, concerns, and comments, it was agreed to recommend the proposed ordinance in its draft form.
Porter County Attorney Scott McClure stressed that the label of barndominium was technically unimportant as the percentage of the structure given over to storage was the true classifying characteristic. The proposed ordinance reads, 'The attached non-residential utility space of the structure that is greater than fifty percent (50%) of the total structure footprint is considered to be a Barndominium.'
It also explains that the residential portion of the barndominim is typically characterized by large, open space with high ceilings. Minimum setbacks in the A1, A2, and RR districts will be 100 feet at the front, sides, and rear, while barndominiums adjacent to residential districts R1, R2, R3, R4, or RL will have setback requirements of 200 feet on adjacent sides of the structure. 'The farther away you are from something, the shorter it looks,' Jabo explained.
Minimum lot size is as set forth in districts A1 and A2 and a minimum of five acres in RR districts. Minimum lot width as proposed is 250 feet and maximum height as proposed is 35 feet with the typical exceptions for agriculture districts. The non-residential utility space portion of the structure may not exceed 75% of the total footprint and garage or indoor vehicle parking is not included in the residential portion of the calculation.
Plan Commission members were concerned with a few issues: aesthetics, how modifications to barndominiums or even existing traditional residential structures might surpass the 50% limit, and residents attempting to run businesses out of barndominiums. 'The aesthetics was a question,' said Board of Commissioners Vice President Ed Morales, R-South, who sits on the Plan Commission, 'but with the 100 ft. setback I think it's a good first step.'
'I like the 50/50,' added Plan Commission President Rick Burns of the living to storage ratio. 'I don't think we should go over 50%.'
Member Pamela Mishler-Fish was concerned that as barndomiums changed hands they might become appealing to those looking to run businesses where they live. 'It could be a totally different situation than what it started out as,' she said.
Fellow commission member Craig Kenworthy was skeptical on that front. 'How do you tell somebody, 'You can't run a business'? That gets really muddy to me.'
Haller said nine times out of 10, people running businesses do so from a separate structure. 'I probably know of one that's attached to the house,' he said.
Commission member Luther Williams asked if a homeowner could house horses in a barndominium and McClure confirmed that was an acceptable use.
The proposed ordinance and the commission's recommendation for approval now moves on to the Board of Commissioners for consideration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome
Across large parts of London, architects and developers face a common conundrum. On one hand, they need to create contemporary, state-of-the art buildings that maximize a site's potential. On the other hand, they also need to be acutely sensitive to historic cityscapes, or risk being either denied planning permission or facing accusations of ruining the city.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can AvalonBay's Portfolio Strength Offset Development Setbacks?
AvalonBay Communities AVB is well-poised to gain from healthy renter demand for its residential properties in the high barrier-to-entry regions of the United States. The company's efforts to leverage technology to drive margin expansion seem encouraging. Strategic buyouts and development projects, backed by a healthy balance sheet position, augur well for long-term growth. However, elevated rental unit supply in select markets and high-interest expenses raise concerns. Moreover, the company is witnessing delayed development month, AvalonBay reported a second-quarter 2025 core FFO per share of $2.82, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.80. The figure also climbed 1.8% from the prior-year quarter's tally. The quarterly performance reflected favorable same-store residential revenue and operating expense performance. AvalonBay has revised its full-year 2025 outlook, reflecting higher same-store net operating income (NOI), offset by the delayed occupancies' impact on development NOI. What Is Aiding AvalonBay Communities? AvalonBay owns high-quality assets in top U.S. markets, focusing on metro areas with strong job growth, high homeownership costs and vibrant lifestyles. This positions it to earn superior long-term risk-adjusted returns. Its well-diversified portfolio includes both urban and suburban communities. In 2025, management expects same-store residential revenues to grow between 2.3% and 3.3% year over enhance its overall portfolio quality, AvalonBay has carried out several strategic acquisitions over the years. AvalonBay expects its current 73% suburban submarket allocation to achieve the 80% target, while the current 12% expansion region allocation to reach a target of 25%. The company is also disposing of non-core assets for capital recycling. Moreover, AVB's growth over the intermediate term is likely to be supported by its increased development deliveries. In 2025, management is planning development starts of around $1.7 billion. In the next few years, the developments underway upon completion and stabilization are expected to fuel FFO and net asset value growth. AvalonBay has a healthy balance sheet with ample liquidity, positioning it well to capitalize on long-term growth opportunities. As of June 30, 2025, this residential REIT did not have any borrowings outstanding under its $2.25 billion unsecured credit facility. The company has a well-laddered debt maturity schedule with a weighted average year-to-maturity of 6.8 years. In the second quarter of 2025, its annualized net debt-to-core EBITDAre was 4.4 times, and unencumbered NOI was 95%, providing scope for tapping additional secured debt capital if required. Moreover, balance sheet flexibility is preserved for future opportunities, with around 103% match-funded on current development underway in the second quarter of 2025. The investment-grade credit ratings of 'A3' from Moody's and 'A-' from S&P render it access to the debt market at favorable dividend payouts are arguably the biggest enticement for REIT investors, and AvalonBay has consistently paid dividends each year since it went public in 1994. In February 2025, concurrent with its fourth-quarter earnings release, AVB increased its first-quarter 2025 dividend to $1.75 per share from $1.70 paid in the prior quarter. This represented a hike of 2.9% from the prior payout. Moreover, backed by healthy operating fundamentals and a solid financial position, we expect the dividend rate to be sustainable in the coming years. What Is Hurting AVB? The struggle to lure renters is likely to persist, as supply volume remains elevated in a few markets where the company operates. Moreover, the company is witnessing delays in its development deliveries, resulting in lower occupancy and higher concessions in markets like Denver and Maryland, in particular, pushing its NOI has a substantial debt burden, and its total debt was approximately $8.71 billion as of June 30, 2025. Interest expenses increased 13.5% year over year to $64.8 million in the second quarter of 2025. US Apartment Market and Residential REITs in Q2 The U.S. apartment market remained impressively resilient in the second quarter of 2025, absorbing more than 227,000 units between April and June, a robust second-quarter figure. According to RealPage data, annual absorption surpassed even the peak leasing surge of 2021 and early 2022, defying a backdrop of slowing job growth, weak business sentiment and broader economic signaled good for residential REITs like AvalonBay, Equity Residential EQR and Essex Property Trust, Inc. ESS. Elevated absorption suggests that the renter appetite for professionally managed apartments is solid despite broader macro Residential reported second-quarter 2025 normalized FFO per share of 99 cents, which met the Zacks Consensus Estimate. The figure improved 2.1% from the year-ago quarter. Results reflected a rise in same-store revenues and physical occupancy on a year-over-year basis. The company increased its guidance for 2025 normalized FFO per share. Essex Property Trust Inc. reported second-quarter 2025 core FFO per share of $4.03, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.99. The figure also improved 2.3% from the year-ago quarter. Results reflected favorable growth in same-property revenues and NOI. However, higher same-property operating expenses and interest expenses partly acted as a dampener. ESS raised its full-year 2025 guidance at the midpoint for core FFO per Anything related to earnings presented in this write-up represent funds from operations (FFO) — a widely used metric to gauge the performance of REITs. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) : Free Stock Analysis Report Equity Residential (EQR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
A talk with an apartment turnaround specialist
This story was originally published on Multifamily Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Multifamily Dive newsletter. ParkMerced may be the poster child for this current wave of multifamily loan issues. The property, the largest residential community in San Francisco, comprises a 152-acre development located in the city's southwest corner. It includes 3,221 apartments, 11 12-story buildings and 1,493 garden-style units. In all, around 8,000 people live there. Shop Top Mortgage Rates A quicker path to financial freedom Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership However, ParkMerced's size hasn't spared it from financial challenges. In March, the loan backing the property went into receivership. Douglas Wilson Cos. was enlisted to fix the asset, which had been owned by Robert Rosania, the founder of San Francisco-based apartment investor Maximus. Wilson's San Diego-based real estate services firm plans to invest more than $70 million in initial capital improvements to address immediate health and safety issues and to stabilize the community. It will also preserve the entitlements of ParkMerced's current redevelopment plan for future developers. Douglas Wilson will focus on repairing and replacing health and safety deficiencies, including inoperable elevators, interior and exterior lighting issues, water intrusion and mold problems. It brought along Brick + Timber, an affiliate of the San Francisco-based real estate firm Ballast, to manage the community. 'There are just a lot of cleanup issues because the prior ownership had been capital-starved for some years, and they had kind of hidden a lot of sins under the rug,' Douglas Wilson, chairman and CEO of the company, told Multifamily Dive. However, ParkMerced is far from Douglas Wilson's only turnaround. The firm is regularly contacted by lawyers and lenders dealing with problem loans across various asset classes, including apartments, hotels, offices and even operating companies. 'We're busier in the last four months than we've been in 15 years, meaning since the Great Recession,' Wilson told Multifamily Dive in June. Here, Wilson talks with Multifamily Dive about the problems he's seeing in the apartment market, the time it takes to turn around a distressed property and the trouble spots for distress. This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity. DOUGLAS WILSON: A lot of these projects, apartments and other properties, were underwritten in 2017, 2018 and 2019, and their capital stack was put together with all of these assumptions moving forward. Many of those had short-term debt, typically five years or less. When the pandemic occurred, the music stopped and costs obviously began to rise due to supply chain issues and other problems. There was so much liquidity pumped into the system by governments around the world that we suddenly found ourselves emerging from an interest rate environment that had been very low for about a decade. We had a whole generation of developers and operators who thought that was normal. Then, suddenly, costs increase by 30%, and interest rates rise to counteract the inflation. You can have these nice class A apartment buildings. But when they came up for new loans in the last 18 months, the capital markets have not supported them. Values have gone down, but the loans are not out there to replace the existing debt. Now, a lot of these lenders were extending and pretending loans. But in the last six to nine months, we're seeing people say, 'Hey, we've got to get our hands on this problem. We've got to get a resolution.' Most of these owners are out of money. Their equity is already gone, and therefore, their incentive to stick around is not great. We absolutely are seeing newer properties, and I think that's a trend that's going to continue. There is one in Washington, D.C., that's only five years old. It's not an old property. There is one in LA that was just completed a few months ago. We're seeing some of these newer assets, which were built and were underwritten some time ago. Now, they've got to come up with replacement financing. With some of these newer ones, it's a matter of operating as efficiently as we can. Let's bring in a new third-party manager. We're not a management company. We're a strictly professional advisor that comes in and hires the best and brightest locally, with the skill set on the ground in those markets, because it's a local business. It depends. ParkMerced has a lot of heavy lifting to do. We're doing a very aggressive capex repositioning, we brought in new management and we're rebranding it. We're doing a lot of hard work so we can improve the asset value. And so that'll go on for a couple of years, most likely. Normally, they'd be at least a year, because a year goes by very quickly. We need enough time to be able to step in and bring in the right new management at the local level to oversee the process, reposition the asset, enhance its value, maybe complete some construction and clean up some entitlements. There may also be liens on the property. So I would say a year is a minimum. Two years is probably an average. Let's say we've got to be selective, but we haven't seen one that bad yet. In our world, not everything is pretty. So we understand what it takes to make these corrections. But we will be thoughtful about the projects we do because we have to be selective. There's only so much you can do. Denver has its issues that we're seeing. These smaller markets also have their issues. We've got a small deal in Abilene, Texas. It has 40 units, and half of them are occupied. It's got a lender that we have a relationship with. So, we went in and hired local management in Abilene with a construction management firm that could actually fix and turn these units. We've been in there about nine months, and it's leased up to like 85%. We'll get it up to 90% pretty soon. Then, it has value to sell. When we first got involved, it didn't. Click here to sign up to receive multifamily and apartment news like this article in your inbox every weekday. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
