Biden speaks publicly for first time since cancer diagnosis
Former President Biden made a public appearance Friday for the first time since his cancer diagnosis earlier this month, speaking at a Delaware ceremony in honor of Memorial Day.
Biden's remarks came after a series of tough weeks for him, which have featured two new books containing accusations that his cognitive abilities were slipping toward the end of his presidency, topped off by his diagnosis of an aggressive form of prostate cancer that has spread to his bone.
But Biden could also be back in the spotlight after the release of audio from his 2023 interview with special counsel Robert Hur, who was investigating Biden's handling of classified and sensitive documents. The transcript of the interview had already been released last year, but the audio recording wasn't made public until this month.
After the audio's release, House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) announced that the committee plans to hold hearings on a 'cover up' concerning Biden's mental acuity and his use of the autopen to sign executive orders and pardons.
Comer said Wednesday that he's 'open' to bringing Biden in to testify before the committee on these topics.
But Biden didn't reference any of the developments during his speech in New Castle, focusing on honoring those who served in the armed forces and calling for a defense of democracy. He also noted that Friday marks the 10th anniversary of the death of his son, Beau, who served for a year in Iraq and died from brain cancer in 2015.
'We come together to remember the debt we owe to the American military,' he said. 'The military is the solid spine of our nation.'
Biden referenced the division that dominates U.S. politics, but he said those who serve don't 'wear a uniform that says I'm a Democrat or I'm a Republican' but 'I'm an American.' He said each generation of the United States has needed to fight to maintain democracy, and it must continue.
'Today, let's renew our pledge to honor our heroes… not only with our words but with our deeds,' he said.
Biden previously spoke to a local news outlet last Friday at Connecticut's Bradley International Airport as he was visiting for his grandson's graduation. Despite the cancer diagnosis, Biden said he was feeling 'great.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
12 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions
Biden argued that hospitals — including states with near-total bans — needed to provide emergency abortions under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. That law requires emergency rooms that receive Medicare dollars to provide an exam and stabilizing treatment for all patients. Nearly all emergency rooms in the U.S. rely on Medicare funds. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which investigates hospitals that are not in compliance, said in a statement on Tuesday that it was rescinding the Biden-era guidance. The agency, however, will continue to enforce the law, 'including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.' Advertisement But CMS added that it would also 'rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions.' The Biden administration sued Idaho over its abortion law that initially only allowed abortions to save the life of the mother. The federal government had argued before the U.S. Supreme Court last year that Idaho's law was in conflict with the federal law, which requires stabilizing treatment that prevents a patient's condition from worsening. Advertisement The U.S. Supreme Court issued a procedural ruling in the case last year that left key questions unanswered about whether doctors in abortion ban states can terminate pregnancies when a woman is at risk of serious infection, organ loss or hemorrhage.
Los Angeles Times
13 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump administration revokes guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it would revoke guidance to the nation's hospitals that directed them to provide emergency abortions to women when they are necessary to stabilize their medical condition. That guidance was issued to hospitals in 2022, weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court upended national abortion rights in the U.S. It was an effort by the Biden administration to preserve abortion access for extreme cases in which women were experiencing medical emergencies and needed an abortion to prevent organ loss or severe hemorrhaging, among other serious complications. An Associated Press investigation last year found that, even with that guidance, dozens of pregnant women were being turned away from emergency rooms, including some who needed emergency abortions. Biden argued that hospitals — including states with near-total bans — needed to provide emergency abortions under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. That law requires emergency rooms that receive Medicare dollars to provide an exam and stabilizing treatment for all patients. Nearly all emergency rooms in the U.S. rely on Medicare funds. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which investigates hospitals that are not in compliance, said in a statement Tuesday that it was rescinding the Biden-era guidance. The agency, however, will continue to enforce the law, 'including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.' But CMS added that it would also 'rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions.' The Biden administration sued Idaho over its abortion law that initially only allowed abortions to save the life of the mother. The federal government had argued before the U.S. Supreme Court last year that Idaho's law was in conflict with the federal law, which requires stabilizing treatment that prevents a patient's condition from worsening. The U.S. Supreme Court issued a procedural ruling in the case last year that left key questions unanswered about whether doctors in abortion-ban states can terminate pregnancies when a woman is at risk of serious infection, organ loss or hemorrhage. Seitz writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
58% of U.S. imports exempt from Canada's retaliatory tariffs, says new report
Almost 60 per cent of imports from the United States hit by Canadian counter levies are now eligible for relief, representing a 'significant dilution of Canada's tariff response,' says a new report. Oxford Economics Ltd. estimated that 58 per cent of U.S. imports subject to retaliatory tariffs could be eligible for temporary relief from $96 billion in duties, which many economists had warned would lead to rising inflation and slowing economic growth. 'While this (new estimate) is higher than our initial estimate of an effective reduction in Canada's counter tariffs to nearly zero, it's still a significant dilution in Canada's tariff response that will lessen the hit to the economy and rise in prices from the trade war,' Tony Stillo, Oxford director of Canada Economics, and economists Michael Davenport and Sebastian Herrador-Guzman said in the report. They now believe that more than $20 billion of the $60 billion in non-automotive products hit with Canadian counter tariffs are eligible for relief until Oct. 16, though there remains a 'degree of uncertainty about what qualifies.' However, the 12-month tariff relief on Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement-compliant vehicles for automakers that continue to produce and complete planned investments in Canada 'appears more clear-cut,' they said, adding they believe the $36 billion in automotive counter tariffs imposed on April 9 are likely 'fully exempt.' 'A large portion of primary and fabricated metals products are eligible for relief – a significant reprieve for Canadian manufacturers,' they said. Most counter-tariffs on consumer products such as food, alcohol, appliances, furniture, clothing, and computers remain. Oxford's latest estimates are a significant change from its report in early May that suggested Ottawa was dropping tariff relief on U.S. imports to 'nearly zero' with some exceptions. 'More clarity on tariff relief eligibility lowers our initial estimate that nearly all counter tariffs were effectively paused for six months,' the economists said. Canada's retaliatory tariffs started on March 4 when it imposed a 25 per cent levy on $30-billion worth of U.S. consumer goods, eventually ramping that up to include aluminum and steel, non-CUSMA-compliant autos and American content in CUSMA-compliant vehicles. Ottawa on March 4 also issued its first order that allowed importers to request tariff relief on a case-by-case basis. In April, the government expanded the 'pool of products' eligible for relief before providing more clarity on the rules in a May 20 release. What is the 'TACO' trade and why is Trump so upset about it? Stillo, Davenport and Herrador-Guzman think the updated May 20 notice remains open to interpretation, particularly for goods related to health care, public health, public safety and national security. The federal government's latest order said companies in those sectors can seek tariff relief. It also covers imports of goods used in manufacturing, processing and food and beverage packaging. • Email: gmvsuhanic@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
