logo
North Portland ralliers: ‘We are not a Sacrifice Zone'

North Portland ralliers: ‘We are not a Sacrifice Zone'

Yahoo05-05-2025

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — People who live in this region understand that, at some point, a major earthquake will rock the area. Most of the time, talk about damage is centered on the major infrastructure and bridges that connect various parts of Portland.
But the 20,000 people who are residents on the St. Johns Peninsula in North Portland are saying loud and clear, 'We are not a sacrifice zone.'
Donna Cohen, who founded the , led the dozens of people who gathered Sunday to shine a spotlight on the fact they would be cut off and stranded from even a small quake.
'We are connected to Portland by 4 small bridges that are over 110 years old,' Cohen told KOIN 6 News. 'PBOT has evaluated these bridges and told us they are all going to collapse even in a minor earthquake. In fact, they may collapse before. One of them is already weight restricted.'
Portland is America's cleanest metro area
She said the other sides of the peninsula will liquefy, damaging all the structures and roads. Their only way out would be over Columbia Boulevard or Lombard Avenue. But there's a problem.
'They are not emergency routes because they go over the railroad cut. The bridges will collapse, we will be trapped, blocking about 20,000 people, workers and residents in the Rivergate Industrial area who will be trapped here after the earthquake.'
But it gets worse, Cohen said.
'We live across from the which is where 90% of Oregon's fuel is stored,' she said. 'If the CEI hub ruptures – which it probably will – a toxic cloud could very well come across here and we will have no escape. So this is really a dire, life-and-death situation.'
Cohen and her group, supported by , support written by . That bill provides '$5 million so that we could start planning for a new bridge over the railroad cut at Columbia Boulevard,' she told KOIN 6 News.
But it's stuck in the Transportation Committee and her group is urging lawmakers to move it along to Ways and Means and then pass it before this legislative session ends.
Frederick, who was at the Sunday rally, said elected officials are beginning to see how important this issue is.
'We have now started to see that we have to be ready for emergencies and we need to know how to deal with emergencies and make sure people are safe,' Frederick said. 'These folks see that. They're making their voices known. That's the key element.'
The current
KOIN 6 News will continue to follow this issue.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bill shielding Oregonians from utility rate increases by Big Tech heads to Kotek
Bill shielding Oregonians from utility rate increases by Big Tech heads to Kotek

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bill shielding Oregonians from utility rate increases by Big Tech heads to Kotek

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – A bill passed the Oregon legislature on Thursday, aiming to shield Oregonians from taking on increased utility rates from Big Tech facilities in the state. House Bill 3546, known as the Protecting Oregonians With Energy Responsibility (POWER) Act, would hold companies behind facilities such as data centers or cryptocurrency operations, responsible for their own utility bills, If signed into law, the bill would create a separate pricing system for energy users who demand more than 20 megawatts, or roughly the same usage as a small city, according to the Democratic Majority Office. Tillamook opens first owned-and-operated facility outside of Oregon 'Data centers play an important role in our growing technology needs in the United States, and they need to pay their fair share for infrastructure required to meet their energy needs, rather than passing the costs on to residential ratepayers,' said Senator Janeen Sollman (D – Hillsboro, Forest Grove & Rock Creek), a chief sponsor of the bill. 'Large energy users have the potential to place significant strain on the grid, especially in regions where energy capacity is already stretched thin.' 'The cost to serve certain large energy users is spilling on to other ratepayers,' added Rep. Pam Marsh (D – Southern Jackson County), a chief sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives. 'This bill will help state regulators assign these high costs to the data centers and crypto mining entities that are consuming the energy.' The Democratic lawmakers note that industrial users currently pay about eight cents a kilowatt hour while households are charged more than double the rate at 19.6 cents per kilowatt hour. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'The bill helps protect everyday users, like families and small businesses, from paying the costs that big businesses are running up,' said Sen. Deb Patterson (D – Salem), who co-sponsored the POWER Act. 'Household budgets are stretched far enough as they are. They shouldn't be covering corporate costs, too.' The POWER Act passed the Senate in an 18-12 vote on Tuesday, with the Oregon House of Representatives concurring for the bill's final passage on June 5. The bill now heads to Oregon Governor Tina Kotek's desk for signature. When the bill was introduced in the House, Rep. David Brock Smith (R-Port Orford) raised concerns that the bill would discourage tech companies from growing their presence in Oregon. Drug trafficker sentenced to 15 years in prison after largest meth bust in Oregon history In his letter – which was supported by industry advocates such as the Data Center Coalition along with unions IBEW 48, IBEW 280 and UA 290 – Brock Smith said, 'data centers strengthen grid reliability through infrastructure investments and help stabilize residential electricity rates by providing consistent demand. The current proposed legislation, with its misaligned regulations, threatened these widespread community benefits and could discourage future development that supports our digital economy.' The bill comes as large technology companies are facing two growing demands to raise their energy supply for artificial intelligence and data centers, while meeting long-term goals of cutting greenhouse gas emissions, as reported by the Associated Press. AI uses 'vast amounts of energy,' said, noting a 2024 report from the United States Department of Energy estimated that the electricity needed for data centers in the U.S. tripled in the last decade and is anticipated to double or triple again in 2028, when tech companies could consumer 12% of the nation's energy. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Crater Lake superintendent steps down amid staffing cuts under Trump admin
Crater Lake superintendent steps down amid staffing cuts under Trump admin

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Crater Lake superintendent steps down amid staffing cuts under Trump admin

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – The superintendent of Crater Lake National Park announced his decision to resign from the post — citing concerns over staffing shortages after the Trump administration's efforts to slash the federal workforce. Sixty-four-year-old Kevin Heatley took on the superintendent role in January, he explained in an interview with the Washington Post, published Monday. But less than five months later, Heatley accepted a buyout offer from the administration to leave the position. 'It is really not an easy decision and not something I take lightly to walk away from Crater Lake,' Heatley told the Washington Post. 'But I'm tired of waking up at 3 in the morning and not being able to fall back asleep because I'm concerned about how I'm going to navigate the latest staffing communiqué.'Heatley explained that staffing shortages have persisted for years at Crater Lake National Park, but issues have intensified since President Donald Trump took office and implemented a federal hiring freeze, even though some seasonal workers were later exempted from the freeze. The former superintendent noted that low staffing almost led Crater Lake to cancel its annual cycling event, Ride the Rim, but at the last minute, regional travel bureau Discover Klamath offered 40 volunteers for the event. 'That's not a sustainable model for running an organization — or a park,' Heatley told the Washington Post. Retired football star Jason Kelce gives shoutout to 'incredible' Oregon restaurant In the meantime, Heatley told the Post, 'I'll still stay involved in natural resources,' adding, 'And I'll continue to support Crater Lake however I can, even if it's just as a volunteer.' Heatley's resignation comes after Interior Secretary Doug Bergum directed national parks in early April to 'remain open and accessible,' as reported by the Associated Press. Park advocates, on the other hand, questioned how parks could comply with the directive after workforce reduction efforts under the Trump administration. The AP reported in April that the park service has lost around 1,500 permanent employees since the beginning of 2025, noting the Trump administration initially restored 50 positions and hired some seasonal workers 'following an uproar over an aggressive plan to downsize the agency.' Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now According to AP, more workers were offered their jobs back in March, following a judge's order, but some workers decided to leave their government jobs, and others were placed on administrative leave. In a statement to KOIN 6 News on Friday, a National Park Service spokesperson said, 'We are working closely with the Office of Personnel Management to ensure a prioritization of fiscal responsibility for the American people. While we do not comment on internal personnel matters, we remain committed to ensuring the continued success of Crater Lake National Park and to providing a world-class experience for all visitors. Our focus remains on protecting our public lands, supporting our staff, and upholding the mission of the National Park Service. A transition plan is in place, and we are confident in the team's ability to maintain high standards of stewardship and service during this period.' As reported by the Washington Post, Interior Secretary Bergum previously reassured Congress that national parks are adequately staffed. Tillamook opens first owned-and-operated facility outside of Oregon However, the Park Service's workforce has seen a sharp decline since Trump's inauguration, the Post said, citing internal Interior Department data from advocacy group National Parks Conservation Association. On May 21, in the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on interior, environment and related agencies, stating that around 26,500 people work in the park system. However, as of May 13, the Park Service employed 18,066 employees, the Washington Post reports. The staffing level marks a near-16.5% decrease in Park Service staff since fiscal year 2023, the Washington Post reported, noting the decrease includes staff who accepted buyout offers, deferred resignations, early retirements and fired probationary workers who chose not to return after a judge reinstated their positions. A spokesperson for Crater Lake National Park told KOIN 6 News they cannot comment on personnel matters, noting Deputy Superintendent Sean Denniston — who has been with Crater Lake since 2015 — is now in charge of the park. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

'Elon is going to get decimated:' How Trump's feud with the world's richest man might end
'Elon is going to get decimated:' How Trump's feud with the world's richest man might end

USA Today

timea day ago

  • USA Today

'Elon is going to get decimated:' How Trump's feud with the world's richest man might end

'Elon is going to get decimated:' How Trump's feud with the world's richest man might end Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives his thoughts on Elon Musk amid clash on bill President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of his "big, beautiful bill" with disappointment as Musk responded on X. WASHINGTON — If history is any guide, and there is a lot of history, the explosive new falling out between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk is not going to end well for the former White House advisor and world's richest man. The political battlefield is littered with the scorched remains of some of Trump's previous allies who picked a fight with him or were on the receiving end of one. Lawyer Michael Cohen. Political advisor Steve Bannon. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Defense Secretary James Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. John Bolton, John Kelly and Chris Christie, to name just a few. 'If what happened to me is any indication of how they handle these matters, then Elon is going to get decimated,' said Cohen, the former long-term Trump lawyer and fixer who once said he'd 'take a bullet' for his boss. Musk, he said, "just doesn't understand how to fight this type of political guerilla warfare." 'They're going to take his money, they're going to shutter his businesses and they're going to either incarcerate or deport him,' Cohen said of what he thinks Musk will suffer at the hands of Trump and his administration. 'He's probably got the White House working overtime already, as we speak, figuring out how to close his whole damn thing down.' Cohen had perhaps the most spectacular blow up, until now, with Trump. He served time in prison after Trump threw him under the bus by denying any knowledge of pre-election payments Cohen made to a porn actress to keep her alleged tryst with Trump quiet before the 2016 election. More: President Trump threatens Elon Musk's billions in government contracts as alliance craters Cohen felt so betrayed by Trump that he titled his memoir 'Disloyal,' but the Trump administration tried to block its publication. Cohen ultimately fought back, becoming a star witness for the government in the state 'hush money' case and helped get Trump convicted by a Manhattan jury. Some suffered similar legal attacks and other slings and arrows, including Trump taunts and his trademark nasty nicknames. Trump vilified others, casting them into the political wilderness with his MAGA base. When Sessions recused himself from the Justice Department's investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, Trump savaged him, calling his appointment a 'mistake' and lobbing other epithets. Sessions resigned under pressure in 2018. When he tried to resurrect his political career by running for his old Senate seat in Alabama, Trump endorsed his opponent, who won the GOP primary. After firing Tillerson, Trump called the former ExxonMobil chief lazy and 'dumb as a rock.' Trump still taunts Christie, an early supporter and 2016 transition chief, especially about his weight. Trump also had a falling out with Bannon, who was instrumental in delivering his presidential victory in 2016 and then joined the White House as special advisor. 'Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my Presidency,' Trump said in 2018, a year after Bannon's ouster from the White House. 'When he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind.' Trump's Justice Department even indicted Bannon in 2020 for fraud, though the President pardoned him before leaving office. One of Trump's biggest feuds was with Bolton, whom he fired as his national security advisor in 2019. Trump used every means possible to prevent his book, 'The Room Where it Happened,' from being published, Bolton told USA TODAY on Thursday. That included having the U.S. government sue his publisher on the false premise that Bolton violated a nondisclosure agreement and was leaking classified information, Bolton said. Bolton said Musk is unlike most others who have crossed swords with Trump in that he has unlimited amounts of money and control of a powerful social media platform in X to help shape the narrative. Musk also has billions in government contracts that even a vindictive Trump will have a hard time killing, as he threatened to do on Thursday, without significant legal challenges. Even so, Bolton said, "It's going to end up like most mud fights do, with both of them worse off. The question is how much worse the country is going to be off."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store