Trump's latest idea is just to pay off everybody to do what he wants
When he ran for president in 2016, Donald Trump bragged that he donated to politicians because that meant they would return his calls when he needed something.
His description sounded a lot like the quid pro quo of a bribe. 'I've got to give to them,' he said, 'because when I want something, I get it.'
In his second term, Trump has moved on to the idea of doing the same thing, but with voters. Since taking office, he's floated several proposals that amount to paying people cash to do what he wants.
It started in January, with an email to federal workers offering to give them full pay and benefits through Sept. 30 without requiring them to work if they resigned immediately.
In April, the administration floated the idea of paying each resident of Greenland $10,000 per year if the island chose to become part of the United States. Later that month, it put forward a vague proposal to pay every American mother a $5,000 cash 'baby bonus' after delivery. Then last week, it announced a policy to offer $1,000 and a flight home to undocumented immigrants who willingly leave the U.S.
In each case, Trump is trying to get something he wants: a smaller federal workforce, Greenland, a higher birthrate, fewer immigrants. But to get that, someone else has to give up something of value: their job, their sovereignty, their sleep, their home. And the alternatives for Trump to achieve those goals are less attractive, ranging from mass firings to mass deportations to war.
I've long thought that more government programs should involve direct cash payments, which cut overhead costs while giving recipients the freedom to decide how best to use the money. And such ideas aren't exactly new: Democratic Sen. Cory Booker has long called for giving each newborn 'baby bonds' that could be cashed in later in life, while then-candidate Kamala Harris pitched a $6,000 tax credit for parents of newborns during her 2024 run.
But those payments were framed as a way to help people who were already doing something, not to provide an incentive for them to do a thing in the first place.
Setting aside the wisdom of such policies for a moment, there's something distasteful about the spirit in which Trump and his Cabinet of billionaires are making these proposals. It has the vibe of a man in an expensive suit slipping the maître d' at a fancy restaurant a $20 to overlook the fact that he doesn't have a reservation.
But it's not just the idea that everything is for sale, that everything has a price — as Trump basically argued to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday. ('There are some places that are never for sale,' Carney said, leading Trump to reply, 'Never say never.') It's also the idea that people can be bought so cheaply.
In 2017, the U.S. Agriculture Department estimated that a middle-class couple would spend $233,610 to raise a child through age 17, not including college tuition and without adjusting for inflation. In 2022, The Brookings Institution, a respected nonpartisan think tank, revisited those calculations and pegged the cost at $310,605 when adjusted for inflation.
When you look at those numbers, Trump's $5,000 bonus seems like a terrible deal. Imagine a salesman offers you the first five months free on a new car that will require you to pay $1,000 every month for the next 17 years, slapping the roof and saying, 'If you sign a long-term contract, I'll give you 1% off!' This is an offer that assumes you are too stupid to do the math.
The other deals are even worse. The payments to Greenland would potentially come from the sale of the island's rare earth minerals, copper, gold, uranium and oil. It's as if Trump had offered to take your home, sell it for parts and then give you some of the money back, all while giving you the kind of treatment he gives Puerto Rico.
As for undocumented immigrants, it's absurd to think people who risked so much to get our freedoms and opportunities would trade all of that for the price of a high-end laptop.
There are a lot of problems with Trump's offers. For starters, these aren't written into law, which means you're relying on Trump's typically unreliable word if you base a life-changing decision on them. From a policy standpoint, they're also expensive without even getting the desired results. The baby bonuses alone would cost $18 billion a year, most of which would go to people who were already going to have kids, which is great for them but probably not sufficient to tip someone into parenthood.
But the biggest problem is that Trump doesn't seem to understand that people care about more than just money. That Trump seems to think anyone would give up a job they love or a country they've made their home for some cash shows how little he shares our values. And that he thinks we would do it for a pittance shows how much he underestimates our intelligence.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stocks sell off, oil surges as Israel strikes Iran
SINGAPORE/LONDON (Reuters) -Israel launched large-scale strikes against Iran on Friday, saying it had attacked nuclear facilities and missile factories and killed a swathe of military commanders in what could be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran building an atomic weapon. U.S. President Donald Trump suggested that Iran had brought the attack on itself by resisting U.S. demands in talks to restrict its nuclear programme, and urged it to make a deal, "with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal". Washington said it had no part in the operation, however. MARKET REACTION: U.S. stock futures fell 1.5%, oil prices jumped and gold rallied. The U.S. dollar rallied. QUOTES: JAMES ROSSITER, HEAD OF GLOBAL MACRO STRATEGY, TD SECURITIES, LONDON: "This is a flight-to-safety event. But markets are struggling a bit and in the fixed income space you have an oil-price shock that is inflationary and so you should see markets expecting an even more hawkish Fed. On the other hand, you have the flight-to-safety, which should push bond yields lower." "On the dollar side, it seems like a cleaner move." "The U.S. was very quick to come and say 'this (the Israeli strike) has nothing to do with us' and then we have Trump's comments. He's still clearly pushing for the Iranian to talk. There are these talks that have been scheduled for Sunday." MATT SIMPSON, SENIOR MARKET ANALYST, CITY INDEX, BRISBANE: "Israel's 'pre-emptive' strike on Iran has sent volatility surging during Asian trade on Friday. Traders are now on edge over the prospects of a full-blown Middle East conflict, given Iran had already warned it would target Israel's nuclear facilities if attacked first. "It's now a question of when Iran will respond, not if. And that will keep uncertainty high and volatility elevated. ""Crude oil has since broken above its June 2022 bearish trendline, with a move to the highs around $78 or even the $80 now within easy reach. The question now is whether this is a typical geopolitical knee-jerk reaction from markets, which results in lots of hype with no delivery. Or if the US really is on the brink of navigating a Middle East war." CHRISTOPHER WONG, CURRENCY STRATEGIST, OCBC, SINGAPORE: "USD rebounded this morning, alongside other safe-haven proxies, including CHF, JPY and gold on geopolitical escalation. Not surprisingly, risk proxies including AUD, KRW traded on the backfoot. Geopolitical noises may temporarily distort USD downtrend and temporarily weigh on risk proxies especially heading into the weekend." JESSICA AMIR, MARKET STRATEGIST, ONLINE TRADING PLATFORM MOOMOO, SYDNEY: 'We've seen equities stalling for some time, and it just appears that this is the catalyst that will probably send equities down lower. Stocks are up 30% globally, and you've got the MSCI World Index at a record, so there's room for fat to be taken off the table. 'What's going to continue to soar higher is, obviously, the defensive sectors, so utilities, energy, and also defence (companies) themselves. 'The (Middle East) region is a huge supplier of oil and obviously there's now the thinking that some of that supply could be cut off at a time when we've got demand really starting to pick up.' HIROFUMI SUZUKI, CHIEF FX STRATEGIST, SMBC, TOKYO: "The situation in the Middle East has further deteriorated, and the heightened geopolitical risks are being strongly felt in the FX market. With the rise in risk-off sentiment, the Japanese yen is likely to be bought. The USD/JPY exchange rate is seeing the 140 yen level, observed in April, as a potential support level." TONY SYCAMORE, ANALYST, IG, SYDNEY: "I thought Israel might give Iran the benefit of the doubt ahead of weekend talks with the U.S., but they've obviously decided to go it alone. "While details are sparse regarding the targets, risk asset markets are not in the mood to wait and find out. "This morning's alarming escalation is a blow to risk sentiment and comes at a crucial time after macro and systematic funds have rebuilt long positions and investor sentiment has rebounded to bullish levels. While we await further news and a potential response from Iran, we are likely to see a further deterioration in risk sentiment as traders cut risk seeking positions ahead of the weekend." KARL SCHAMOTTA, CHIEF MARKET STRATEGIST, CORPAY, TORONTO: "Traders are scurrying for safety as reports of a strike on Iran cross the wires, but details on the scale and magnitude of the attack remain scarce and moves have been relatively limited thus far." CHARU CHANANA, CHIEF INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, SAXO, SINGAPORE: "The geopolitical escalation adds another layer of uncertainty to already fragile sentiment. "The key question now is whether this marks a brief flare-up or the beginning of broader regional escalation. If the situation de-escalates quickly, markets may retrace some of the initial moves. But if tensions rise — particularly with any threat to oil supply routes — the risk-off mood could persist, keeping upward pressure on crude and haven assets." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Chicago Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
As legal fight over National Guard plays out, Kristi Noem vows to continue President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown
LOS ANGELES — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to carry on with the Trump administration's immigration crackdown despite waves of unrest across the U.S. Hours after her comment Thursday, a judge directed the president to return control to California over National Guard troops he deployed after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown, but an appeals court quickly put the brakes on that and temporarily blocked the order that was to go into effect on Friday. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. Chicagoans continue protests against Trump and ICE Thursday as demonstrators rally across USThe federal judge's temporary restraining order said the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded President Donald Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. Gov. Gavin Newsom who had asked the judge for an emergency stop to troops helping carry out immigration raids, had praised the order before it was blocked saying 'today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test' and had said he would be redeploying Guard soldiers to 'what they were doing before Donald Trump commandeered them.' In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump thanked the appeals court Friday morning. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now,' he said. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the president acted within his powers and that the federal judge's order 'puts our brave federal officials in danger. The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief.' The developments unfolded as protests continued in cities nationwide and the country braced for major demonstrations against Trump over the weekend. Noem said the immigration raids that fueled the protests would move forward and agents have thousands of targets. 'This is only going to continue until we have peace on the streets of Los Angeles,' she said during a news conference that was interrupted by shouting from U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who was forcibly removed from the event. Newsom has warned that the military intervention is part of a broader effort by Trump to overturn norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. He also said sending Guard troops on the raids has further inflamed tensions in LA. So far the protests have been centered mostly in downtown near City Hall and a federal detention center where some immigrants are being held. Much of the sprawling city has been spared from the protests. On the third night of an 8 p.m. curfew, Los Angeles police arrested several demonstrators who refused orders to leave a street downtown. Earlier in the night, officers with the Department of Homeland Security deployed flash bangs to disperse a crowd that had gathered near the jail, sending protesters sprinting away. Those incidents were outliers. As with the past two nights, the hourslong demonstrations remained peaceful and upbeat, drawing a few hundred attendees who marched through downtown chanting, dancing and poking fun at the Trump administration's characterization of the city as a 'war zone.' Elsewhere, demonstrations have picked up across the U.S., emerging in more than a dozen major cities. Some have led to clashes with police and hundreds have been arrested. The immigration agents conducting the raids in LA are 'putting together a model and a blueprint' for other communities, Noem said. She pledged that federal authorities 'are not going away' even though, she said, officers have been hit with rocks and bricks and assaulted. She said people with criminal records who are in the country illegally and violent protesters will 'face consequences.' 'Just because you think you're here as a citizen, or because you're a member of a certain group or you're not a citizen, it doesn't mean that you're going to be protected and not face consequences from the laws that this country stands for,' she said. Noem criticized the Padilla's interruption, calling it 'inappropriate.' A statement from her agency said the two met after the news conference for about 15 minutes, but it also chided him for 'disrespectful political theater.' Padilla said later that he was demanding answers about the 'increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions' and only wanted to ask Noem a question. He said he was handcuffed but not arrested. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers throughout the Los Angeles community,' he said. The administration has said it is willing to send troops to other cities to assist with immigration enforcement and controlling disturbances — in line with what Trump promised during last year's campaign. Some 2,000 Guard soldiers were in the nation's second-largest city and were soon to be joined by 2,000 more, along with about 700 Marines, said Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who is in charge of the operation. About 500 of the Guard troops deployed to the Los Angeles protests have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations, Sherman said Wednesday. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers, but any arrests must be made by law enforcement. With more demonstrations expected over the weekend, and the possibility that Trump could send troops to other states for immigration enforcement, governors are weighing what to do. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors earlier signed a statement this week calling Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power.' There have been about 470 arrests since Saturday, the vast majority of which were for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police department. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries.


Chicago Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Israeli strikes on Iran lead to new test of President Donald Trump's ability to deliver on ‘America first' agenda
WASHINGTON — Just hours before Israel launched strikes on Iran early Friday, President Donald Trump was still holding onto tattered threads of hope that a long-simmering dispute over Tehran's nuclear program could be resolved without military action. But with the Israeli military operation called 'Rising Lion' now underway — something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says will go on for 'as many days as it takes' — Trump will be tested anew on his ability to make good on a campaign promise to disentangle the U.S. from foreign conflicts. Israel attacks Iran's nuclear and missile sites, prompting Iranian drone-strike retaliation'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal,' Trump said in a Friday morning social media post. 'I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done.' The administration's first reaction to the Israeli assault came not from Trump, but from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is doubling as Trump's national security adviser. He sought to make clear that the U.S. was 'not involved' and that the Republican administration's central concern was protecting U.S. forces in the region. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense,' Rubio said in a statement. 'President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' As Israel stepped up planning for strikes in recent weeks, however, Iran, had signaled that the United States would be held responsible in the event of an Israeli attack. The warning was issued by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even as he engaged in talks with Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. On Thursday, just hours before the strikes, Trump made the case that there was still time for diplomacy — but it was running out. The White House had even planned to dispatch Witkoff to Oman on Sunday for the next round of talks with Araghchi. It wasn't immediately clear how the strikes would affect plans for those discussions. But Trump on Friday urged Iran to make a nuclear deal 'before there is nothing left and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.' 'No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE,' Trump added. Trump is set to meet with his National Security Council in the Situation Room on Friday to discuss the tricky path ahead. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., offered rare words of Democratic praise for the Trump administration after the attack 'for prioritizing diplomacy' and 'refraining from participating' in the military strikes. But he also expressed deep concern about what the Israeli strikes could mean for U.S. personnel in the region. Iranian officials made clear that they intended to retaliate with decisive action after the Israeli strikes targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz and the country's ballistic missile program, as well as top nuclear scientists and officials. 'I cannot understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike at this juncture, knowing high level diplomatic discussions between the United States and Iran are scheduled for this weekend,' Kaine said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said the U.S. Senate 'stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas.' Trump in the hours before the attack still appeared hopeful that there would be more time for diplomacy. The president, in an exchange with reporters, again urged Iran to negotiate a deal. He warned that a 'massive conflict' could occur in the Middle East without it. He later took to social media to emphasize that his 'entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran.' As long as there was a chance for an agreement, Trump said of Israel, 'I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it.' But it was clear to the administration that Israel was edging toward taking military action against Iran. The State Department on Wednesday directed a voluntary evacuation of nonessential personnel and their families from some U.S. diplomatic outposts in the Middle East. 'I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning, and missiles are flying into their buildings. It's possible. So I had to do it,' Trump explained. Before Israel launched the strikes, some of Trump's strongest supporters were raising concerns about what another expansive conflict in the Mideast could mean for the Republican president who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to either of those conflicts and to make good on two of his biggest foreign policy campaign promises. And after criticizing President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. The push by the Trump administration to persuade Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' The way forward is even more clouded now. 'No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy,' Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and an ally of the Trump White House, posted on X Thursday. 'I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.' Jack Posobiec, another prominent Trump supporter, warned a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' 'Trump smartly ran against starting new wars, this is what the swing states voted for — the midterms are not far and Congress' majority is already razor-thin,' Posobiec added in a posting on X. Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East program at Defense Priorities, said the job ahead for Trump and his team is to protect U.S. forces who are highly vulnerable to Iranian retaliation. 'Israel's strike on Iran must not become the United States' war,' Kelanic said. 'The U.S. public overwhelmingly opposes another military engagement in the Middle East for good reason — an open-ended military campaign in Iran would risk repeating the catastrophic mistakes of the 2003 war in Iraq, which inadvertently strengthened Tehran's influence there.'