Trump's latest idea is just to pay off everybody to do what he wants
His description sounded a lot like the quid pro quo of a bribe. 'I've got to give to them,' he said, 'because when I want something, I get it.'
In his second term, Trump has moved on to the idea of doing the same thing, but with voters. Since taking office, he's floated several proposals that amount to paying people cash to do what he wants.
It started in January, with an email to federal workers offering to give them full pay and benefits through Sept. 30 without requiring them to work if they resigned immediately.
In April, the administration floated the idea of paying each resident of Greenland $10,000 per year if the island chose to become part of the United States. Later that month, it put forward a vague proposal to pay every American mother a $5,000 cash 'baby bonus' after delivery. Then last week, it announced a policy to offer $1,000 and a flight home to undocumented immigrants who willingly leave the U.S.
In each case, Trump is trying to get something he wants: a smaller federal workforce, Greenland, a higher birthrate, fewer immigrants. But to get that, someone else has to give up something of value: their job, their sovereignty, their sleep, their home. And the alternatives for Trump to achieve those goals are less attractive, ranging from mass firings to mass deportations to war.
I've long thought that more government programs should involve direct cash payments, which cut overhead costs while giving recipients the freedom to decide how best to use the money. And such ideas aren't exactly new: Democratic Sen. Cory Booker has long called for giving each newborn 'baby bonds' that could be cashed in later in life, while then-candidate Kamala Harris pitched a $6,000 tax credit for parents of newborns during her 2024 run.
But those payments were framed as a way to help people who were already doing something, not to provide an incentive for them to do a thing in the first place.
Setting aside the wisdom of such policies for a moment, there's something distasteful about the spirit in which Trump and his Cabinet of billionaires are making these proposals. It has the vibe of a man in an expensive suit slipping the maître d' at a fancy restaurant a $20 to overlook the fact that he doesn't have a reservation.
But it's not just the idea that everything is for sale, that everything has a price — as Trump basically argued to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday. ('There are some places that are never for sale,' Carney said, leading Trump to reply, 'Never say never.') It's also the idea that people can be bought so cheaply.
In 2017, the U.S. Agriculture Department estimated that a middle-class couple would spend $233,610 to raise a child through age 17, not including college tuition and without adjusting for inflation. In 2022, The Brookings Institution, a respected nonpartisan think tank, revisited those calculations and pegged the cost at $310,605 when adjusted for inflation.
When you look at those numbers, Trump's $5,000 bonus seems like a terrible deal. Imagine a salesman offers you the first five months free on a new car that will require you to pay $1,000 every month for the next 17 years, slapping the roof and saying, 'If you sign a long-term contract, I'll give you 1% off!' This is an offer that assumes you are too stupid to do the math.
The other deals are even worse. The payments to Greenland would potentially come from the sale of the island's rare earth minerals, copper, gold, uranium and oil. It's as if Trump had offered to take your home, sell it for parts and then give you some of the money back, all while giving you the kind of treatment he gives Puerto Rico.
As for undocumented immigrants, it's absurd to think people who risked so much to get our freedoms and opportunities would trade all of that for the price of a high-end laptop.
There are a lot of problems with Trump's offers. For starters, these aren't written into law, which means you're relying on Trump's typically unreliable word if you base a life-changing decision on them. From a policy standpoint, they're also expensive without even getting the desired results. The baby bonuses alone would cost $18 billion a year, most of which would go to people who were already going to have kids, which is great for them but probably not sufficient to tip someone into parenthood.
But the biggest problem is that Trump doesn't seem to understand that people care about more than just money. That Trump seems to think anyone would give up a job they love or a country they've made their home for some cash shows how little he shares our values. And that he thinks we would do it for a pittance shows how much he underestimates our intelligence.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump floats plan to legalize undocumented immigrant farmworkers
President Donald Trump on Tuesday floated a plan to grant legal status to undocumented immigrant farmworkers, claiming that foreign-born migrants are 'naturally' better suited than 'inner city' Americans to menial agricultural jobs. In what would be a controversial partial break from his hard-line mass deportation plan, Trump said he wants to allow migrant farmworkers, millions of whom have lived in the country for years or decades, to remain in the U.S. indefinitely. 'In some cases, we're sending them back to their country with a pass back (so when) they're coming in, they're coming in legally,' Trump said in an interview with CNBC. 'We can't let our farmers not have anybody.' Trump used the present tense in the interview, even though no such plan currently exists. Any change to federal immigration laws would normally require congressional action, though Trump might seek to take executive action to achieve his goals, which he portrayed as helping farmers who rely on undocumented immigrant labor. Trump asserted that low-income American citizens are not as well suited to tough and low-paying farm work compared to immigrants, without offering any evidence. 'People that live in the inner city are not doing that work. They've tried, we've tried, everybody tried. They don't do it,' Trump said. 'These people do it naturally. They don't get a bad back.' Trump has spoken for months about creating some kind of legal status for undocumented immigrants who work in the agriculture and hospitality industries, both of which are highly dependent on them. He even briefly approved a pause in immigration enforcement actions aimed at California's vast agricultural heartland in the Central Valley, but it was quickly reversed. Big Ag and giant hospitality firms have lobbied the White House for a reprieve from his much-hyped mass deportation plan, which aims to oust up to 20 million undocumented immigrants from the U.S., regardless of how long they have lived here. The corporate titans, many of whom are also Republican donors, point out that America would have no way of feeding itself or running its restaurants and hotels without undocumented immigrants, a rare point of common ground with progressive advocates for immigrants. Any formal program to carve out a new legal status to groups of undocumented immigrants is likely to spark strong opposition from right-wing hard-liners, who decry such compromises as amnesty for law-breaking illegal immigrants. It's unclear if Trump has the stomach to push through a plan to ease his own immigration crackdown or if his MAGA base would back him if he does. _____
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers
President Donald Trump repeatedly boasted that he has 'the best poll numbers [he's] ever had' in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday morning, even though the majority of Americans disapprove of his performance in the job. Asked whether he would run for a third term in office despite the fact that the US Constitution's 22nd Amendment bars him from doing so, Trump replied 'probably not,' before going on to say he would like to do so. Related: 'I'd like to run. I have the best poll numbers I've ever had. You know why? Because people love the tariffs and they love the trade deal and they love that foreign countries aren't ripping us off anymore. For years they ripped us off, friend and foe,' Trump said, even though voter surveys suggest otherwise. Kernen interjected, clarifying that the president enjoys high support among Republican voters, but not the overall electorate. Trump didn't seem to blink. 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had,' Trump said. 'I have poll numbers where I'm 71%.' 'Those are among Republicans,' Kernen replied. Related: Related: Trump would not relent, insisting Kernen was wrong. Trump also claimed that polls that showed him faring poorly with voters were 'fake.' The source for the figures cited by Trump is unclear. His approval rating currently stands at 44%, according to an average of polls compiled by the New York Times. Related: An issue that has garnered much attention in recent weeks appears to be a thorn in Trump's side as a majority of Americans disapprove of his administration's handling of documents related to the investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to an Economics/YouGov poll conducted late last month. You can watch the whole exchange here. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Eli Lilly stock drops after Trump unleashes 250% pharma tariff warning
Aug 5 - Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) saw its stock dip on Tuesday after President Donald Trump amped up threats to impose massive tariffs on pharmaceutical imports. In an interview with CNBC, Trump floated the possibility of slapping a 250% duty on foreign-made drugs, his steepest proposed rate yet. He plans to start with a small tariff but warned it could rise significantly within 18 months. Trump's goal is to push drugmakers to bring more manufacturing back to the U.S. Amid this pressure, Eli Lilly has already pledged $27 billion to build four new production sites across the country. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with JOBY. Still, that commitment hasn't satisfied Trump, who recently sent letters to 17 pharma companies demanding they cut drug prices by September 29. The mere threat of triple-digit tariffs has rattled the sector. Investors worry that such duties could spike costs for American consumers while squeezing margins for global drugmakers. Analysts say Trump's trade tactics remain unpredictable, but the market isn't taking chances, LLY and other pharma names are already trending lower. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data