
Qatar-Affiliated Journalists And Islamic Scholars Criticize Call To Disarm Hamas Issued By UN High-Level International Conference For Implementation Of Two State Solution: It Is A 'Betrayal Of Allah,'
Calling on Hamas to disregard the calls for its disarmament, the writers underlined that the rights of the Palestinian people will only be achieved through force. One member of the Doha-based Qatar-supported International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS) even republished an Islamic ruling stating that relinquishing the weapons of the resistance in Gaza would constitute "betrayal of Allah, the Prophet Muhammad, and the Muslims," as well as "collaboration with the enemy."
It is notable that this criticism is being voiced in Qatar even though Qatar itself participated in the international conference, and was even one of the countries that approved its concluding statement. This appears to be another example of Qatar's doublespeak and attempts to present itself to the West as a peace-seeking country, despite its consistent support for terrorism, Hamas, and the October 7 attack.[3]
Moreover, the opposition to calls for Hamas's disarmament from individuals affiliated with Qatar echo the opposition expressed in recent months in Qatari media to these same calls that were raised in ceasefire talks in Qatar. For example, Jaber Al-Harmi, editor of the Qatari government daily Al-Sharq, called on Hamas to retain its weapons so they can be used to defeat Israel just as the Taliban defeated the U.S. and the West.[4] Similarly, in June, hundreds of Islamic scholars from across the Muslim world, among them members of the Qatar-supported IUMS, signed a petition granting religious approval for Hamas's operations and the October 7 attacks and rejecting demands for Hamas's disarmament.[5]
This report will present examples of criticism by Qatar-affiliated individuals of the UN High-Level International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution and of the conference's call for Hamas's disarmament – including a repost by one of them of a recent MEMRI TV clip of senior Hamas official Ghazi Hamad stating that Hamas will never give up its weapons.
Fatwa By Member Of Qatar-Supported International Union Of Muslim Scholars (IUMS): The Call To Disarm The Resistance Is "A Betrayal Of Allah"
As calls were voiced to disarm Hamas, IUMS member Muhammad Al-Saghir wrote on his X account on August 4, 2025: "[What is] the reason for demanding that the resistance surrender its weapons now? And [what is] the shari'a law, which is the basis of the Hamas movement [that refuses to surrender its arms]?[6] ..." In the post, he provided a link to a fatwa he had issued in March 2025 describing the call to disarm the resistance in Gaza "a betrayal of Allah."[7]
The fatwa to which he linked stated: "... To obtain and prepare strength in all its forms – that is the way to prevent aggression by the unbelievers against Muslim countries, to defend their lands, their blood and their honor, and to prevent the enemies of Allah from expanding into other areas in the countries of the Muslims...
"According to shari'a, a Muslim, whether ruler or a subject, is prohibited from demanding of the resistance that it surrender its weapons, due to the inherent danger this would pose to the country and to the Muslims, as we have explained. Any ruler who calls for this... is betraying Allah, His Prophet, and His believers; is plotting against the resistance and the holy places; [and] is supporting the enemy and striving to achieve what it wants. It is forbidden to take action to disarm it [the resistance]. The Muslim scholars have forbidden this in the past, when their texts determined that it is forbidden to reconcile with the infidels if that reconciliation does not embody preferential benefit to Muslims or if it is not crucial...
"The call to disarm the resistance, or the call to the resistance to surrender its arms, is a betrayal of Allah, His Messenger, and the Muslims, because maintaining these weapons is a binding obligation, as this is the appropriate way to protect the land, the holy places, the assets, and honor...
"It is forbidden for any Muslim country to respond or to agree to these Zionist or American wishes. Anyone who calls to disarm the resistance in exchange for political promises is considered a collaborator with the enemy [and] a traitor to his Islamic nation and its rights, and is loyal to the enemies of Allah. Allah the Exalted said: 'Oh believers, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you – then indeed, he is [one] of them. Surely Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people [Quran 5:51].'
"It is forbidden for the inhabitants of Palestine, in particular the jihadi fighters, to agree to surrender their weapons, because of the great corruption that will ensue as a result. This [corruption] includes people's expulsion [from their homes], giving the Zionists control over our countries and our holy places, and the actualization of what they wish for from the war..."[8]
Muhammad Al-Saghir's post (Source: X.com/drassagheer, August 4, 2025)
Qatar University Lecturer: "Do Not Listen To The Swindler" Who Calls For Disarmament
Another IUMS member, Muhammad Al-Mukhtar Al-Shinqiti, also a Qatar University lecturer, wrote on his X account: "Do not listen to the swindler who urges you to lay down the weapons of the resistance, for he hopes that the enemy will kill you. Listen to the words [of Allah] the Creator and wiser than all: '... And let them be vigilant and armed. The infidels would wish to see you neglect your weapons and belongings, so they could launch a sweeping assault on you... [Quran 102:4]."[9]
In another post, Al-Shinqiti wrote: "As Iran races against time to create a nuclear weapon that will grant it steadfastness and strategic resilience to face the Zionist-American anarchy in the region, 22 Arab countries demand, from an international platform, that the simple weapons of the Palestinian resistance should be surrendered... Shame on you!!!"[10]
Senior Al-Jazeera TV Presenter: Whoever Thinks Disarmament Will Stop The Resistance Is Deluded
Senior Al-Jazeera TV presenter Jamal Rayyan posted on his X account: "Whoever thinks disarmament of the resistance will stop it is deluded, for as long as there is an occupation here, the resistance will emerge from here."[11] In another post, Rayyan appeared to oppose the Arab countries' condemnation of the October 7 attack in the conference's concluding statement. He wrote: "Jerusalem and Palestine are the criteria for the lost honor. October 7 was a rehearsal for the restoration of this honor."[12]
Post by Jamal Rayyan (Source: X.com/jamalrayyan, July 30, 2025)
Editor Of Qatari Daily: Rights Will Only Be Achieved By Force
Jaber Al-Harmi, editor of the Qatari government daily Al-Sharq, which has previously expressed its opposition to Hamas's disarmament,[13] wrote on his X account: "[They, i.e. the Western countries] demand of the oppressed that they throw away their weapons, and [they] support the oppressors with [the supply of] all sorts of weapons. [This is] a world that recognizes only the strong. [Their] talk of justice is [intended] only to stupefy [us]. Rights are taken and protected only by force."[14]
Qatari Journalist: Only Hamas Understands The Problem – So The Entire World Seeks To Disarm And Vilify It
On his X account, Al-Sharq journalist Abdullah Al-Amadi downplayed the importance of the conference and expressed his support for Hamas's path: "Over 100 countries convene at the UN to discuss this arrangement or [perhaps better described as] the elimination of the Palestinian problem by means of a two-state solution: [In other words,] a fat-free Palestinian state, a demilitarized one without prestige unable to say its piece, to be administered by [Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud] Abbas and his gang, and another full-fat Zionist [country] that [the countries of] the East and the West will support with weapons and other things, to be administered by war criminals!!..."
Al-Amadi also said in the post that the U.S. had boycotted the conference and assessed that it would not accept the conference's recommendations, expressed doubt about France's and the UK's intentions regarding the recognition of a Palestinian state, and added : "The Arabs want very much to eliminate the [Palestinian] issue, and the other Islamic countries are no different and are concerned only with their own affairs. The sole body that understood the source of the problem and the basis of the conflict is Hamas – and so the entire world works together to disarm it and to sully its good name in every way and by every means."[15]
Several days later, Al-Amadi reposted on his X account a MEMRI TV clip of an Al-Jazeera interview with senior Hamas member Ghazi Hamad that aired on August 2, 2025. In it, Hamad stated, "The weapons constitute the Palestinian cause. Our weapons equal our cause" and added that Hamas "will not surrender our weapons" and that the October 7 attack had led to the recognition of a Palestinian state.[16]
Al-Amadi's repost of the MEMRI TV clip of Al-Jazeera's interview with Ghazi Hamad (Source: Abdulla_Alamadi, August 3, 2025)
To view the MEMRI TV clip of Ghazi Hamad, click here or below:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Shafaq News
4 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq to begin first phase of Development Road
2025-08-11T18:16:05+00:00 Shafaq News — Baghdad On Monday, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani instructed the Transport Ministry to complete all requirements for launching the first phase of the $17B Development Road, starting with rehabilitation of the al-Faw–Fishkhabur railway. In a statement, al-Sudani underscored the project's strategic role in connecting Iraq to regional and global trade networks, citing strong interest from partners outside the Middle East. Officials examined detailed rail alignments to maximize operational efficiency, discussed financing the initial segment in next year's budget, and addressed key connection points along the corridor. The meeting also noted the World Bank's readiness to fund the first phase and modernize Iraq's railways. Anchored in the south by the Grand Faw Port—set to be the Middle East's largest— the corridor's early works include five berths, a 62 km access road, a submerged tunnel, and a container yard, all scheduled for completion by late 2025. Iraq's accession to the UN-backed TIR Convention has already halved freight transit times between Europe and the Gulf, reinforcing the project's economic potential. The Development Road is a planned 1,200 km freight and passenger corridor linking the Grand Faw Port in Basra to Turkiye and onward to Europe by rail and highway. It aims to cut transit times between Asia and Europe, boost Iraq's transit revenues, and spur industrial and urban growth along its route.


Shafaq News
4 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Amnesty International: Gaza war deadliest conflict for journalists
Shafaq News – Gaza The ongoing conflict in Gaza has claimed more journalists' lives than any other recent war, Amnesty International stated on Monday, condemning what it described as Israel's deliberate targeting of journalists in an airstrike on their media tent in Gaza City. In a strongly worded statement, the organization said, "Anas al-Sharif [Al-Jazeera correspondent in Gaza] and his colleagues were the eyes and voice of Gaza. Despite starvation, exhaustion, the threat of death, and the pain they endured, they continued their courageous reporting from the front lines." Amnesty added that no modern conflict has seen such a high toll among journalists, describing the ongoing situation in Gaza as a "genocide against Palestinians." The organization called for an "independent and impartial investigation" into the killing of Palestinian journalists and demanded justice and compensation for their families. "The international community must act urgently to stop the genocide being committed by Israel," the statement concluded. Earlier, Gaza's Government Media Office reported that five journalists were killed in an Israeli strike on their tent near al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. Al Jazeera confirmed the deaths of its journalists Anas al-Sharif, Mohammad Qreiqa, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammad Noufal, and Moamen Alouwa in the same attack. The Israeli military later claimed responsibility for targeting al-Sharif, accusing him of leading a Hamas-affiliated cell and alleging involvement in "terrorist activities," including promoting rocket fire against Israel. Al-Sharif had previously denied those allegations, stating he had no political affiliations and that his sole mission was "to report the truth from the ground as it is, without bias." Amnesty strongly condemns Israel's deliberate killing of journalists in an air strike on a media tent in occupied Gaza al-Sharif and his colleagues have been the eyes and voices of Gaza. Starved and exhausted, they continued to bravely report from the frontlines,… — Amnesty International (@amnesty) August 11, 2025


Memri
5 hours ago
- Memri
Gaza Political Activist Jamil Abdul-Nabi: October 7 Was A Miscalculated Step That Destroyed Our People; Hamas Is A Complete Failure, It Must Disband And Disappear From The Palestinian Scene
Gaza political activist and former Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) official Jamil Abdul-Nabi said in an August 9, 2025 interview with Al-Arabiya Network (Saudi Arabia) that resistance should not be driven by emotions or by impulses of vengeance. He said that in Gaza today, Hamas's support has dropped to less than 1 in 100 or even 1 in 1,000, and that anti-Hamas sentiment is growing. Referring to October 7 as a "miscalculated step" that led to "the destruction of our people," Abdul-Nabi said that an apology is not enough and that Hamas must "pay for its sins" by disappearing from the Palestinian scene. He said Hamas must declare that it is disbanding, because it has failed in resistance, in governance, and in war. He also criticized Hamas official Ghazi Hamad, whom Abdul-Nabi knew from prison, where they shared a cell for a year, for saying "Even if they kill 10,000, 20,000, or 100,000 of us..." in a cavalier tone, as if speaking about a handful of dollars. Interviewer: "Was October 7 a sin committed by Hamas?" Jamil Abdul-Nabi: "Absolutely. Resistance should not be driven by emotions. It should not be impulsive or vengeful. Resistance that is not driven by clear political goals is futile and might become nihilistic. [...] "Reckless resistance can lead us to disaster, and this is what happened on October 7. Resistance must consider the outcome, the consequences. [...] "I'm not exaggerating when I say that throughout the Gaza Strip, not even one of every 100 – or even 1000 – people I come across are supporting Hamas now. Today, the position of people in the Gaza Strip is much more anti-Hamas than what Hamas believes, because they are the ones who have paid the real price, and they are familiar with the real outcome of this war. "Hamas's rhetoric, my dear brother... Every statement by Hamas leaders turns into joke material among the Gazans here. [...] "What happened happened. We cannot go back in time. [Hamas] took this miscalculated step, which led to the destruction of our people, so at the very least, you should make us feel that it has some regrets. [...] "Apology is not enough. Hamas needs to bear the responsibility and pay for its sin. For me personally, the price cannot be anything less than the disappearance of Hamas from the Palestinian scene. Enough. Hamas needs to be gone. Hamas needs to declare that it is disbanding, because it has failed. Hamas failed in resistance, failed in governance, failed in war, and failed in everything. [...] "Hamas's insistence to double down on its rhetoric makes us feel that our tears mean nothing to this movement. We are zero to them. [...] "When [Ghazi] Hamad says: 'Even if they kill 10,000, 20,000, or 100,000 or us...' What is this? What is he talking about? How can he be so cavalier when talking about people's lives? What does Ghazi Hamad think of the Palestinian people? Is he talking about a handful of dollars? [...] "Should Hamas be held accountable? Yes, it should. The Palestinians, like any nation, have the right to hold their leaders accountable when they expose them to danger of such scope. It is inconceivable that a tragedy like this will pass, and we will not have the right to call to account the people who brought this tragedy upon us. Inconceivable. Future will tell whether we can hold Hamas accountable or not. "It could be that we will not be able to do this, but when I say that Hammas must leave – that's the minimal [requirement]. At the very least, Hamas should leave us, because it has failed in leading the Palestinian cause, failed in leading the resistance, failed in governing [Gaza], failed in everything. People who fail need to step down."