
Starmer will give 16-year-olds the vote – but they aren't studying politics
Analysis by The Telegraph shows that the take-up of politics-related subjects at GCSE has remained significantly lower than others, such as religious studies, over the past five years.
Around three per cent of teenagers are thought to have taken a politics-related GCSE this summer, according to provisional entry data from the Department for Education (DfE).
Separate figures obtained by The Telegraph show that teaching staff are ill-equipped to provide lessons on the subject to 16-year-olds.
Just nine teachers across the whole of England who offered lessons on government and politics to GCSE pupils last year had a relevant post A-level qualification in the subject, according to official data released through Freedom of Information laws.
Last month, ministers confirmed that they would lower the voting age in Britain by two years.
Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, said Labour would make its manifesto pledge law by the end of this Parliament, meaning 16-year-olds would be able to vote at the next general election.
Experts have called for that to be matched with better politics teaching in schools amid concerns over a lack of political engagement among young people and an over-reliance on social media content.
The DfE does not publish specific participation data for the government and politics GCSE because entries are so low that it is categorised along with other social sciences.
Citizenship studies
Pupils can also take a separate GCSE in citizenship studies, which is a mandatory part of the national curriculum and is taught in the same vein as personal, social, health and economic education.
Take-up of overall social sciences has grown by a quarter since 2021, with 50,025 pupils sitting GCSEs this summer in one or more of those subjects – which also include psychology and law. But individual figures for politics are thought to make up a very small portion of those numbers.
The Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA), a Northern Irish exam board that is one of the only ones to offer the government and politics GCSE, has recorded just a handful of students taking the subject over the past few years.
Data provided to The Telegraph showed that 205 pupils sat the CCEA's government and politics GCSE in 2021, with the figure rising to 313 last year.
The figures are eclipsed by the popularity of other optional subjects at GCSE, with nearly 292,000 students studying geography and more than 240,000 taking religious studies.
Entries for citizenship studies GCSE have remained similarly low, having barely moved over the past five years despite an increase in the 16-year-old population. Around three per cent of students sat an exam in the subject last year, with the figure expected to stay roughly the same this summer.
The Government is facing calls to make politics a more fundamental part of the national curriculum in England to better equip children with the skills they need for adult life.
Last year, Labour appointed Prof Becky Francis, an education expert, to lead an independent review into the current curriculum and assessment model, which will publish its findings in the autumn.
An interim report by Prof Francis, published earlier this year, said the review had 'heard consistently from children and young people and their parents that they want more focus' on subjects such as 'financial education, careers knowledge and politics and governance'.
However, a Government source told The Telegraph there were no plans to make politics a compulsory GCSE subject or to broaden teaching on the topic, even with 16-year-olds set to get the vote.
They instead pointed to the existing citizenship part of the national curriculum, which includes teaching on the UK's political system and democracy, as well as modules on the justice system, police and public money.
Schools are required to offer citizenship lessons, but there is no minimum number of hours mandated for the subject and many schools stop teaching it by Year Nine. By contrast, schools must teach a minimum of two hours of physical education each week.
Rollout has also been criticised as patchy, with just 42 per cent of teachers in England saying their schools provided regular citizenship lessons in 2023, according to a poll by the Institute For Public Policy Research think tank.
Data from the school workforce census, obtained by The Telegraph through freedom of information requests, also showed a dearth in qualified politics teachers at GCSE level – they are instead concentrated on A-level pupils.
There were 17 teachers across the whole of England offering politics lessons to pupils in Years Seven to Nine last year who had a post-A-level qualification in the subject, with the figure dropping to just nine for pupils in Years 10 and 11.
The number of qualified teachers then swelled to 1,342 for pupils in Years 12 and 13, with politics generally taken more seriously as a subject at A-level.
The DfE did not provide similar data for qualified teachers offering GCSE lessons on citizenship studies, but figures show that fewer than a fifth of those teaching all age groups had a degree in a relevant subject last year.
Overall GCSE results this summer are expected to be broadly similar to those seen last year, when more than a fifth – or 21.8 per cent – of all entries were awarded the top grades.
However, pupils could face tougher competition for sixth form places this year after the Government hit private school fees with VAT for the first time from Jan 1, 2025.
It is expected to spark a scramble for places at top state-funded schools, with a rise in the 16-year-old population set to add to pressure.
Prof Lee Elliot Major, a social mobility expert at the University of Exeter, told the PA news agency: 'Competition for the most selective sixth forms will be fiercer than ever, with fears over VAT on private schools likely driving more families to seek out places in the state sector.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government borrowing less than expected in July in boost for Reeves
Government borrowing in the UK slowed to a lower-than-expected £1.1 billion in July, providing some relief for Chancellor Rachel Reeves in the run-up to the autumn budget. The Office for National Statistics said the figure, which was £2.3 billion less than the same month a year earlier, is the lowest July borrowing figure for three years. It came after a rise in self-assessed income tax and national insurance payments helped increase tax receipts for the month. July borrowing was lower than the £2 billion figure predicted by a consensus of economists. Borrowing for the first four months of the financial year stood at £60 billion, £6.7 billion more than during the same period last year. ONS deputy director for public sector finances Rob Doody said: 'Borrowing this July was £2.3 billion down on the same month last year and was the lowest July figure for three years. 'This reflects strong increases in tax and national insurance receipts. 'However, in the first four months of the financial year as a whole, borrowing was over £6 billion higher than in the same period in 2024.' The figures come after warnings the Chancellor may need to raise taxes again in the budget in order to plug a black hole of up to £51 billion in the public finances. Chief secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said: 'We're investing in our public services and modernising the state, to improve outcomes and reduce costs in the medium term. 'Far too much taxpayer money is spent on interest payments for the longstanding national debt. 'That's why we're driving down government borrowing over the course of the parliament – so working people don't have to foot the bill and we can invest in better schools, hospitals and services for working families.'


Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Governments have 'failed white working-class students' and Britain is falling behind as a result, Bridget Phillipson claims
Governments have ' failed white working-class students,' the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has said. As pupils wait in great anticipation for GCSE results day this Thursday morning, she warned that four-fifths of children from white working-class backgrounds struggled with basic English and maths skills. Ms Phillipson said that as a result, Britain is falling behind as the UK's productivity suffers and so does the economy. In 2024, only 19 per cent of white British, working-class children achieved a strong pass in maths and English GCSE and has been a trend in data since 2017. 'It's appalling, and I won't stand by and watch those numbers continue to grow. It's not just the life chances of those children that are being damaged – it's also the health of our society as a whole. Swathes of human capability and productivity lost. 'Fewer than one in five of all white British children on free school meals are leaving school with the maths and English skills to succeed in work and life. 'This data goes back to 2017. Alarmingly, it looks almost identical today to how it did then,' she said writing for The Telegraph. The Education Secretary added efforts to overcome the problem would focus on increasing school attendance as poor performance among white working-class pupils is thought to be closely linked to high absence levels. Officials fear that failure to provide young people with the skills they need to succeed in life will only further deplete Britain's already low productivity levels and could lead to less people entering work and more on benefits. It comes as a study from the Institute for Government (IfG) suggests ethnicity may be a factor in how badly poverty impacts on educational attainment. The think tank said disadvantaged white pupils have 'particularly poor educational outcomes' in terms of attainment in Year 6 Sats. Official data showed only 3 per cent of British white pupils from low income families attend a top university – one of the least successful groups. Last week, Ms Phillipson said it was a 'national disgrace' that so many white working class children were 'written off' and failed to achieve their potential. The IfG report referenced previous research which found this demographic is overrepresented in rural and coastal areas where there is 'lower funding… higher teacher vacancies, longer travel times and worse digital infrastructure'. The report adds: 'Factors from children's home environments, such as varying aspirations among parents from different ethnic backgrounds, also likely play a role.' The report examined the councils in England and identified the 'bottom fifth' for performance of disadvantaged pupils. It found the vast majority of these had 'above average shares' of white children within their population of disadvantaged pupils. On average nationally, 67 per cent of disadvantaged primary school pupils are white. The think tank has said tackling high absence rates – particularly among disadvantaged pupils – 'will be key' to narrowing educational inequalities. A Department for Education spokesman said: 'Tackling the baked-in inequalities in our education system will take time, but through our Plan for Change this government is taking action against the root causes that we know are holding young people back. 'We are driving high and rising standards for every child through the expert-led Curriculum and Assessment Review, new RISE teams and strengthened school accountability. 'This comes alongside work to tackle disadvantage including expanding free school meals, rolling out free breakfast clubs and revitalising family services in every local authority. 'But we know there is more to do, which is why we will bring about the reforms needed through our Schools White Paper later this year to create an education system where every child can thrive, regardless of their background.'


New Statesman
16 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Would embracing Rejoin save Labour?
Illustration by Gary Waters / Ikon Images Would a pledge to rejoin the EU rescue Labour at the polls? Don't be silly. Labour's low popularity is a consequence of the following: voters' looser loyalty to parties; the government's similarity to the one voters booted out with gusto last year; and little relief from a still-present crisis in the cost of living. Immigration dominates the discourse right now, but the signal is the high cost of living. Not only is this pulling Labour back, it's driving Reform ahead. There are suggestions, though the government has not announced anything, that the party could rejuvenate its base by promising to rejoin the European Union. But to think making such a pledge or even reopening the debate – and the wounds – would achieve this rings hollow. I get it. Such a pledge could, in theory, rally and unite the most Remain-minded. Labour is currently leaking almost one in ten supporters to the Liberal Democrats. And Remain voters did plump for Keir Starmer's party last year. And Rejoin is the plurality option right now. But Remain-minded voters are not single-minded in their politics. Ukip was the harbinger of the EU referendum, though Ukip primarily got its votes, not for bashing the Brussels Bureaucracy, but for anticipating the country on immigration and filling that 'sod the lot of 'em', anti-mainstream party vacancy left by the Lib Dems when they joined the coalition government. To Britain's Remain voters, it's not Rejoin or nothing. At best, a pledge would rouse some shifting to the Lib Dems, or lead to indifference. It would be a gain of a few hundred thousand votes – a few percentage points in the opinion polls. Also, a vow to rejoin can't be done in isolation. It won't come without consequences. It would incur a sacrifice in air-time on something else. And I don't just mean time on the TV. I mean time spent developing what limited impressions voters have of the Labour Party and its government. The promise, and its media coverage, would indicate Labour was shifting its priorities, was playing a tune that voters do not want to hear. There would be gross gains for Labour in putting Rejoin on the ballot. But there would be net losses at the ballot box. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Rejoin may be the preference of the median Briton. But it's not the priority of the median Briton. An effective campaign understands when to go in hard on its comfort issues. Rejoin is a comfort issue. This is no time for comfort issues. At a moment when the cost of living is the highest priority, Rejoin is not relevant to the needs of those who need Labour most. It is not yet totally associated with the cost of living – as seen above, in the data point that shows those 'just about managing' are most against returning to the EU. Because many Britons have moved on from the Leave/Remain divide, including Reform voters who do not rank defending Brexit highly as a motivating issue, the optics of the 'usual suspects' arguing for the 'usual solutions' suggests why voter cynicism is as great – if not greater – than in the immediate aftermath of the MPs' expenses scandal. July polling by BMG suggests that, when asked if they preferred to rejoin or stay out, most want in. That includes almost a fifth of Reform voters. And a quarter of Labour supporters who want to stay out. If Labour was to reopen the wounds of 2016 it would threaten the shaky, now hollowed, but nonetheless victorious coalition that gave it the benefit of the doubt in 2024. I was in Brussels in June, speaking about the future of UK-EU relations and public opinion, on both sides of the Channel. On the (delayed) flight over, I was having a muse. Do these Brussels bigwigs want to know whether the UK's voters are clamouring to Rejoin? I prepared some notes. But during the sessions nothing about it came up. I asked the thinkers in the room why Brussels isn't interested in whether Britons want to come back? The truth was this: in their eyes, it's not going to happen. Not for this generation of politicians or thinkers. Trading experts are resigned to the status quo. Academics in the know are resigned to it. They all know Rejoin is not on the agenda. Unravelling the new relationship after unravelling EU membership is not for one-term parties. Only when there is a cross-party consensus on the issue will the serious players take Rejoin seriously. We are nowhere near that. Putting Rejoin on the ballot is the stuff of unserious people. It's something for another decade. [See also: The Epping ruling deepens Labour's immigration nightmare] Related