Hershey, Nestle, other cocoa companies defeat appeal of child slavery lawsuit
A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected a proposed class action by eight Malian citizens who sought to hold Hershey, Nestle and five other companies liable for child labour on Ivory Coast cocoa farms.
In a 3-0 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found no causal connection between the plaintiffs' forced labour and the defendants' alleged venture to obtain 'cheap cocoa harvested by enslaved children.'
The plaintiffs said they were required to live in squalor and threatened with starvation if they did not work, after being approached by unfamiliar men who falsely promised paying jobs.
They sued under a federal law protecting children and other victims of human trafficking and forced labour.
Circuit Judge Justin Walker, however, said the plaintiffs alleged at most they worked in areas that supplied cocoa to the defendants, which buy an estimated 70% of Ivorian cocoa, rather than specific farms that supplied the cocoa.
'Is there a 'possibility' that at least some of the importers sourced cocoa from those farms? Yes,' Walker wrote. 'But is it 'plausible'? Not on this complaint.'
Other defendants included privately-held Cargill, privately-held Mars, Mondelez International MDLZ.O, Barry Callebaut BARN.S and Olam International.
Mali and the Ivory Coast share a border in West Africa. A trial judge ruled for the defendants in June 2022.
Terry Collingsworth, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said his clients were 'extremely disappointed' and considering their legal options.
'The court rewarded the chocolate multinational defendants ... for concealing their cocoa supply chains, such that former child slaves are unable to link a specific company to the Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) farms where they were enslaved,' he said.
In March 2024, the same court dismissed a similar lawsuit seeking to hold five major technology companies including Apple AAPL.O and Tesla TSLA.O liable for child labour in cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Collingsworth represented the plaintiffs in the cobalt case.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New YorkEditing by Alexandra Hudson)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Nestle announces vitamins business review after sluggish sales growth
LONDON - Nestle has launched a review of its underperforming vitamins business that could lead to the divestment of some brands, it said on Thursday, after reporting its first-half sales volumes grew more slowly than analysts expected. Shares in Nestle, the world's biggest food producer, fell to a six-month low in early market trade and were 4.7% lower by 0950 GMT. As the economic downturn globally has squeezed customers and driven them to cheaper alternatives, the Swiss-based maker of KitKat chocolate bars, Nespresso coffee and Maggi seasoning has found it harder to sell its branded projects. Thursday's results add to investor pressure on CEO Laurent Freixe to revive the company's share price and sales. Since his appointment in August last year, Nestle's share price has lagged rivals, including Unilever and Danone. The Swiss company on Thursday maintained its 2025 outlook, saying it expects organic sales growth to improve. It estimated an underlying trading operating profit margin at or above 16%, including the negative impact from tariffs and current FX rates. Nestle's Vitamins, Minerals and Supplements business generates around 1 billion Swiss francs (US$1.26 billion) in annual sales, Nestle said. VMS is part of Nestle's wider Nutrition and Health Science division, which accounted for a little more than 16% of group sales in the first half and recorded a decline in real internal growth - or sales volumes - of 0.8%. 'We have launched a strategic review of our underperforming mainstream and value brands, including Nature's Bounty, Osteo Bi-Flex, Puritan's Pride, and U.S. private label, which may result in the divestment of these brands,' Nestle said. Freixe said Nestle would focus on its global premium VMS brands and that a potential divestment of the others could happen in 2026. 'To us, the highest potential is at the premium end,' Freixe told reporters. Growth disappoints Nestle said that first-half organic sales growth, which excludes the impact of currency movements and acquisitions, rose 2.9% in the six months through June, just above the average of analysts' forecasts of 2.8%. But real internal growth, or RIG, was 0.2%, below the consensus forecast of 0.4%, reflecting softer demand as customers balk at price increases. Total reported sales decreased by 1.8% to 44.2 billion Swiss francs, compared to analyst expectations of 44.6 billion francs, a drop Nestle attributed in part to the negative impact of 4.7% from foreign exchange as the Swiss franc has strengthened this year. Nestle's 2.7% price increases were above the average analyst estimate of 2.5%. 'The headline will be the negative RIG of -0.3% in Q2 when most investors were positioned for a positive number,' Barclays analysts said in a note. 'This will be seen as a bit disappointing.' Despite the 'negative surprise' in Nestle's Health Science unit, Vontobel analysts said the overall results would likely reassure investors that Nestle is on the long road to recovery. Reporting by Alexander Marrow and Oliver Hirt; editing by Barbara Lewis, Reuters
Winnipeg Free Press
3 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Hershey and other chocolate makers hike prices as cocoa remains near record highs
Here's the good news: The Hershey Co. says it's not raising prices for Halloween candy this year. But here's the bad news: Hershey and other chocolate makers are continuing to hike prices, saying a volatile cocoa market gives them no choice. Hershey, the maker of Reese's, Whoppers, barkThins and other chocolate candies, said Wednesday that it will be raising U.S. retail prices later this fall. In some cases, pack sizes will get smaller; in others, list prices will rise. The average price increase will be in the low double-digit percentages. 'This change is not related to tariffs or trade policies. It reflects the reality of rising ingredient costs including the unprecedented cost of cocoa,' Hershey said in a statement. Hershey stressed that the price increases won't apply to products specially packaged for Halloween. On Tuesday, Swiss chocolatier Lindt said it raised prices by 15.8% in the first half of this year. The company said it was able to offset some of the higher cost of cocoa with long-term contracts but had to pass much of it on to consumers. 'The development of the global chocolate market in the first half of 2025 was a continuation of what we saw in 2024, with cocoa prices remaining close to record highs,' said Adalbert Lechner, Lindt's CEO, in a conference call with investors. Cloetta, a Swedish confectionary company, told investors last week that it raised chocolate prices in the second quarter. And Nestle raised U.S. prices for products like Toll House chocolate chips in the spring. Cocoa prices have more than doubled over the past two years due to poor weather and disease in West Africa, which supplies more than 70% of the world's cocoa. Cocoa futures, which are binding contracts for a specific quantity of cocoa, stood at $7,380 per metric ton on Wednesday, according to the International Cocoa Organization, which releases a daily average of prices in London and New York. That's down from December's peak of $11,984, but it's still 121% higher than two years ago. And the situation remains volatile. According to the International Cocoa Organization, prices surged in early June on concerns about production in Ivory Coast but eased on optimistic forecasts for production in Ghana and Latin America. They rose again in late June after heavy rains in West Africa, which could worsen the outbreak of diseases that harm crops. 'It's almost a bit dangerous to comment on this because it's changing so fast,' Cloetta Chief Financial Officer Frans Ryden said last week in a conference call with investors. 'This is something that's moving hugely up and down all the time.' Meanwhile, prices have been rising on store shelves. The average unit price of a chocolate bar in the U.S. in July 2021 was $2.43, according to Nielsen IQ, a market research company. As of last week, it was $3.45, a 41% increase. That's hurting customer demand. Nielsen said unit sales of chocolate fell 1.2% in the year ending July 12. Tariffs could also impact U.S. prices. President Donald Trump threatened a 21% tariff on cocoa and other products from Ivory Coast in April, for example, but then paused the tariffs' implementation. The National Confectioners Association is asking the Trump administration to protect cocoa from tariffs. The group says the U.S. imports nearly $4.4 billion in chocolate, cocoa and candies each year, and the association's members export nearly $2 billion in American-made chocolates and candy annually.
The Market Online
3 days ago
- The Market Online
TAKEOVER SPECULATION! Barrick Mining, Evotec, Desert Gold
Just like the high prices, takeover speculation in the gold sector is also continuing. Desert Gold (TSXV:DAU) is repeatedly mentioned as a candidate. With its exciting acquisition in West Africa, the explorer has diversified and made itself even more attractive to a large corporation. Perhaps Barrick? The heavyweight is currently focusing on its ore mines and selling smaller projects. It could then expand again in the gold sector, and Desert certainly fits in regionally. In the biotech sector, Evotec has long been rumored as a takeover candidate. Following the latest revenue warning, this is likely the only hope for investors to achieve short-term returns. Or was the price slide exaggerated? This article is disseminated in partnership with Apaton Finance GmbH. It is intended to inform investors and should not be taken as a recommendation or financial advice. Desert Gold: 2 Aces for rising prices When it comes to takeover candidates in the gold sector, the name Desert Gold (TSXV:DAU) keeps coming up. In recent weeks, the West Africa-focused explorer has made itself even more attractive to one of the major gold producers through its own acquisition. Exciting news is expected in the coming weeks. That could finally push the stock out of its sideways movement. Desert is currently trading at CAD 0.08, which corresponds to a market capitalization of around CAD 20 million. Analysts at GBC Research estimate the fair value to be CAD 0.425. There should be some long-awaited news about the flagship SMSZ project in Mali in the coming weeks: The Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for a mine is expected. Given current gold prices, this should be extremely positive. Desert could then ramp up production within a few months and become a gold producer in 2026 – unless it is acquired before then. With the acquisition of 90% of the Tiegba Gold project in Côte d'Ivoire, the Company has another ace up its sleeve since this year. The country has developed into one of the most stable and investor-friendly mining regions in West Africa. As with SMSZ, Tiegba is also located in the vicinity of numerous gold companies, which are likely to keep an eye on its progress. Tiegba covers an area of 297 km². Only 20% of the concession area has been explored in detail so far. The potential is correspondingly great. The heart of the project is a gold-in-soil anomaly measuring 4.2 km long and 2.1 km wide. Historical samples showed 50 to over 200 ppb gold. The upcoming tests will now determine the depth of the gold deposit. Barrick Mining: Focus on copper for now, but what next? Barrick is also a potential buyer for both Desert Gold projects. Even if the Company is currently on the selling side for a change. First, let's take a look at the stock: After a rapid rise from EUR 16 to EUR 19 within four weeks, Barrick Mining's stock has settled down somewhat. Similar to the gold price. However, with Barrick, one must stop looking only at the gold price. That is why the name change makes sense. The renaming of Barrick Gold to Barrick Mining underscores the realignment. Gold remains central, but copper is gaining in importance. CEO Mark Bristow aims to position the Company as a diversified metal producer in the long term, with copper as a second pillar. A key project on this path is Reko Diq in Pakistan, one of the world's largest undeveloped copper-gold deposits. After long delays, preparations are now underway for production to start in 2028/2029. Investments are also being made in Zambia. The Lumwana mine is to be expanded at a cost of several million USD and copper production doubled to around 240,000 tons. Parallel to the copper expansion, Barrick is divesting projects that no longer align with its new strategic direction. Instead of capital-efficient, high-cost mines, Barrick wants to focus on large, high-margin deposits with long-term potential. Among the candidates for sale is the Hemlo mine in Canada. The long-established gold mine has been an integral part of the North American portfolio for decades, but has been suffering from declining ore grades and rising operating costs for some time. The sale process has been officially launched and, according to Bloomberg, Discovery Silver is close to acquiring Hemlo. There could be news by August 11, 2025, at the latest, when Barrick will report on developments for the second quarter. Evotec: Revenue forecast cut Evotec will likely need a takeover to see rapid share price gains. This has now become clear once again. On Monday, the German biotech company's shares lost almost 17% after a revenue warning. Evotec announced that revenue for the current year will be between EUR 760 million and EUR 800 million. The previous forecast was EUR 840 million to EUR 880 million. Last year, revenue amounted to EUR 797 million. The Company cited lower-than-expected revenues in its core business, specifically in the Shared R&D segment, as the reason for the adjustment. R&D expenses are expected to be between EUR 40 million and EUR 50 million, and thus remain unchanged. This also applies to the adjusted EBITDA forecast of EUR 30 million to EUR 50 million (2024: EUR 22.6 million). The medium-term outlook has also not been adjusted. By 2028, Evotec aims to increase its annual revenue by an average of 8% to 12% and to increase its EBITDA margin to more than 20% during this period. Evotec CEO Dr. Christian Wojczewski: ' We are on track to achieve sustainable, profitable growth. The strong demand for higher-margin business areas reflects the strength of our platforms and confirms the decisions we have made in terms of focus, partnerships, and capital efficiency. While some areas of our business continue to operate in a challenging market environment, the implementation of our 'Priority Reset' and our new strategy gives us confidence that we are well positioned to achieve our long-term goals .' Based on the announcement, the share price decline appears somewhat exaggerated. On the other hand, the low growth prospects within the new strategic direction had already been criticized in recent months. Barrick Mining does not appear to be interested in acquisitions at this time. The focus on large ore projects and the sale of smaller mines seems logical. There is likely to be a lot of activity at Desert Gold in the coming weeks. The Company has acquired an exciting project, and the PEA for its flagship project should pique the interest of investors and potential buyers. Against this backdrop, the stock appears undervalued. At Evotec, on the other hand, investors can probably only hope for a quick return through a takeover. Conflict of interest Pursuant to §85 of the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG), we point out that Apaton Finance GmbH as well as partners, authors or employees of Apaton Finance GmbH (hereinafter referred to as 'Relevant Persons') may hold shares or other financial instruments of the aforementioned companies in the future or may bet on rising or falling prices and thus a conflict of interest may arise in the future. The Relevant Persons reserve the right to buy or sell shares or other financial instruments of the Company at any time (hereinafter each a 'Transaction'). Transactions may, under certain circumstances, influence the respective price of the shares or other financial instruments of the Company. In addition, Apaton Finance GmbH is active in the context of the preparation and publication of the reporting in paid contractual relationships. For this reason, there is a concrete conflict of interest. The above information on existing conflicts of interest applies to all types and forms of publication used by Apaton Finance GmbH for publications on companies. Risk notice Apaton Finance GmbH offers editors, agencies and companies the opportunity to publish commentaries, interviews, summaries, news and the like on These contents are exclusively for the information of the readers and do not represent any call to action or recommendations, neither explicitly nor implicitly they are to be understood as an assurance of possible price developments. The contents do not replace individual expert investment advice and do not constitute an offer to sell the discussed share(s) or other financial instruments, nor an invitation to buy or sell such. The content is expressly not a financial analysis, but a journalistic or advertising text. Readers or users who make investment decisions or carry out transactions on the basis of the information provided here do so entirely at their own risk. No contractual relationship is established between Apaton Finance GmbH and its readers or the users of its offers, as our information only refers to the company and not to the investment decision of the reader or user. The acquisition of financial instruments involves high risks, which can lead to the total loss of the invested capital. The information published by Apaton Finance GmbH and its authors is based on careful research. Nevertheless, no liability is assumed for financial losses or a content-related guarantee for the topicality, correctness, appropriateness and completeness of the content provided here. Please also note our Terms of use. Stockhouse does not provide investment advice or recommendations. All investment decisions should be made based on your own research and consultation with a registered investment professional. The issuer is solely responsible for the accuracy of the information contained herein. For full disclaimer information, please click here .
