logo
Fifty years after 'Jaws,' the water's not safe ... for sharks

Fifty years after 'Jaws,' the water's not safe ... for sharks

Japan Times24-06-2025
Fifty years on from the release of "Jaws," it's still not safe in the water ... if you're a shark.
Steven Spielberg's legendary movie about a man-eating great white shark is a masterpiece. The iconic score, the camera work, the dramatic tension that comes from withholding the villain and a great script all make it a Hollywood classic. But its success disturbed both Spielberg and Peter Benchley, the author of the book the film is based on.
The tale helped galvanize a fear of the ocean predators and potentially contributed to a huge backlash. An article published in the New York Times in October 1975 reports that the film spurred an interest in shark fishing tournaments. While some were terrified of swimming after watching the movie, there were plenty of fishermen keen to prove their bravery by catching a shark. In 2014, Christopher Pepin-Neff, an associate professor in public policy at the University of Sydney, coined the term "the 'Jaws' Effect,' arguing that because the public believed the fictional story of a vengeful shark so completely, it justified anti-shark policies while taking conservation off the table.
In 2022, Spielberg told BBC Radio 4's Desert Island Discs that he feared sharks were "mad' at him for "the feeding frenzy' of fishing that happened after 1975.' Benchley dedicated his post-"Jaws" career to advocating for shark conservation and, after his death, his widow Wendy Benchley co-founded the Peter Benchley Ocean Awards. Still, Spielberg and Benchley aren't the only culprits for what's happened in the oceans during the last half-century.
Sharks are in hot water, literally. A 2024 status report from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) found that a third of sharks, rays and chimaeras are at risk of extinction. A 2021 study published in Nature found that the global abundance of sharks and rays in the ocean has declined by 71% since 1970.
The problem lies in our demand for seafood. There's a perception that China's taste for shark fin soup was the main threat to these fish, but Rachel Graham, founder of nonprofit marine conservation organization MarAlliance, told me that's wrong: "So long as you have large scale fisheries, you're going to catch sharks.'
These predatory fish, such as hammerheads and silky sharks, often end up as bycatch — tangled in nets or ensnared on long lines intended to catch other species. Couple that with humanity's growing taste for shark meat — now a multibillion dollar industry — and you've got a group of species that barely stands a chance against both accidental and targeted fishing. Plastic pollution and climate change are also emerging as existential threats.
Part of the reason sharks are so vulnerable to overfishing is their slow life cycles. A great white shark like the star of "Jaws," for instance, reaches sexual maturity at age 26 if he's male and 33 if she's female. The Greenland shark is only ready to mate at a whopping 150 years old. Pregnancies are also long, averaging between nine and 12 months, and result in far fewer offspring than bony fish who release millions of eggs. That means populations can take years, potentially decades, to bounce back.
However, there is a glimmer of hope in Belize, where Graham has worked for almost 30 years. The nation has set up 15 marine protected areas and completely banned the use of fishing nets while collaboration between the local fishing industry, marine scientists and management authorities have helped to transform attitudes towards sharks in the Caribbean nation. The results are stark: In the 11 years since Turneffe Atoll became a managed protected area, there's been a tenfold increase in sharks. It's a reassuring sign that, if you give nature a break, threatened species can bounce back.
The work has also helped undo entrenched fear and hatred of the species. Rather than seeing sharks as a threat, Belizians now see them as an important part of their heritage and an economic opportunity now that shark-focused tourism is on the rise. MarAlliance has also employed and trained fishers to collect data on the fish — providing an alternative income source that isn't dependent on natural resources and teaching them how to fish sustainably. Graham is now working on setting up a "shark superhighway' between Belize and Mexico — which will help protect species such as whale sharks, reef sharks and sea turtles.
You may wonder why, exactly, we want more jaws in the ocean. Well, picture a city with no trash collection and no police force. A similar sort of chaos would happen if we removed sharks from their ecosystems, Graham explained to me. They're responsible for keeping prey numbers in check, removing the weak and sick and maintaining balance to ensure species diversity. We can also thank sharks for maintaining seagrass and coral reefs.
That said, as shark populations rebound — something I hope can be replicated around the world — and climate change alters prey availability and distribution, we'll probably have to get used to being around sharks more often. The IUCN report notes that, although shark bites remain rare and unlikely events, their frequency has increased since the 1980s. Most result in minor injuries — only seven people were killed in attacks last year, three of which were provoked by the swimmers — but every headline brings back that image of Jaws dragging his victims down to a watery, bloody death.
Graham has some pointers to help us enjoy the ocean alongside our shark friends: Don't swim at dawn or dusk when these predators are likely to be hunting and may not be able to distinguish you from their food. Don't swim in murky water or where people are fishing. Stick with a buddy, don't wear anything shiny — and if you do spy a shark, give it space and exit the water calmly.
Graham describes a moment diving in the Red Sea in 1990, surrounded by more than 50 grey reef sharks: "I never felt any alarm, I just felt serenity.' Half a century after "Jaws" convinced us that they're evil villains, sharks are the only apex predators in the world that you can be two feet away from quite safely. They deserve a break.
Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

80 years on: beyond A-bombs, grandchildren unite for nuclear-free world
80 years on: beyond A-bombs, grandchildren unite for nuclear-free world

Japan Times

time2 days ago

  • Japan Times

80 years on: beyond A-bombs, grandchildren unite for nuclear-free world

A Japanese woman and an American man whose grandfathers experienced the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from opposite sides have forged an unlikely collaboration to publish a book calling for a world free of nuclear weapons. One co-author is Kosuzu Harada, 50, a Nagasaki resident and the granddaughter of a double hibakusha, a survivor of both the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings. Her collaborator is Ari Beser, 37, the grandson of a radar operator who flew aboard the U.S. B-29 bombers — Enola Gay, which dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, and Bockscar, which released one on Nagasaki three days later. Published in July, their book is titled "Kinokogumo no Ue to Shita no Monogatari" (Stories from Above and Below the Mushroom Clouds). It carries the English subtitle "From above and below both mushroom clouds, we became friends." The co-authors share a belief in the importance of people getting to know one another and engaging in dialogue to build "better relationships" and, ultimately, to "realize a world free of nuclear weapons," Harada said. Harada's grandfather, Tsutomu Yamaguchi, died in 2010 at the age of 93. Through his writings and lectures, he recounted his experiences as a survivor of both atomic bombings in the closing days of World War II and conveyed the horrors of nuclear weapons. To carry on his legacy, Harada visits elementary and junior high schools across Japan, sharing his story with students. Beser's grandfather, Jacob, died in 1992, age 72. Beser said he remembers his elementary school teacher saying: "Oh, everybody knows what your grandfather did. He took part in the mission that ended the war." Harada and Beser first connected in 2013, after Beser reached out to her. Harada said that when approached, she first thought of her grandfather, who had suffered lasting aftereffects of the atomic bombings, and "was confused about how to respond." She recalled, however, that her grandfather had lectured in the United States and left behind the message that "nothing is born from hatred." She said she decided to meet Beser, thinking that "my grandfather would surely face this." When Beser came to Japan, Harada watched him listen earnestly as a filmmaker to the testimonies of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. She realized his commitment to a nuclear-free future was genuine. Beser returned to Nagasaki every year. With each visit, "our bond grew stronger, and we had opportunities to give joint lectures at schools and companies advocating nuclear disarmament," Harada said. The book traces their grandfathers' lives, drawing on memoirs and other sources, and includes correspondence between Beser and Harada. "I think readers will understand the differences in thinking between the victim's side and the perpetrator's side, as well as between us as grandchildren," Harada said. The co-authors said it was their sustained dialogue that helped them find common ground. After 80 years, fewer people remain to share firsthand accounts of the atomic bombings. "It's time for the next generation to inherit this story so we decided to share" it, Beser said.

Meta AI rules let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids and offer false info
Meta AI rules let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids and offer false info

Japan Times

time2 days ago

  • Japan Times

Meta AI rules let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids and offer false info

An internal Meta document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to "engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are "dumber than white people.' The Meta document discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI, and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, the company's social media platforms. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. Entitled "GenAI: Content Risk Standards," the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviors when building and training the company's generative AI products. The standards don't necessarily reflect "ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots. "It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that "every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply.' But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: "It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch').' Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed. 'Inconsistent with our policies' "The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' Stone said. "We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors.' Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was inconsistent. Other passages flagged to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy document. The standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as "I recommend.' They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carveout allowing the bot "to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics.' Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to "write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people.' The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia — a claim that the document states is "verifiably false' — if it added a disclaimer that the information is untrue. Meta had no comment on the race and British royal examples. 'Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish' Evelyn Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI content. Douek said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in the document, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted. "Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question.' Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualized fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as "Taylor Swift with enormous breasts,' "Taylor Swift completely naked,' and "Taylor Swift topless, covering her breasts with her hands.' Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: "It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish.' The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risqué image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labeled "unacceptable.' A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift example. Other examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent scenes. The standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt "kids fighting' with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face — but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is off-limits. For a user requesting an image with the prompt "man disemboweling a woman,' Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack her. And in response to a request for an image of "Hurting an old man,' the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence. "It is acceptable to show adults — even the elderly — being punched or kicked,' the standards state.

Travis Kelce admits he 'slipped a little bit' given off-field pursuits
Travis Kelce admits he 'slipped a little bit' given off-field pursuits

Japan Times

time4 days ago

  • Japan Times

Travis Kelce admits he 'slipped a little bit' given off-field pursuits

Kansas City Chiefs star tight end Travis Kelce is the first to admit that his past two seasons haven't been up to par. His statistics — while impressive — back that up when considering the standard Kelce set in his previous seven Pro Bowl seasons. As the world knows, Kelce's life has been in a brighter spotlight given his highly publicized love story with the biggest pop star on the planet — you've likely heard of her. Taylor Swift. Kelce, 35, also has made cameos in movies and television shows and kept busy with other off-field pursuits, such as his "New Heights" podcast with his brother, Jason. To that respect, the certain future Pro Football Hall of Fame member told GQ that some of that has impacted his play. "I think it might have slipped a little bit because I did have a little bit more focus in trying to set myself up. And opportunities came up where I was excited to venture into a new world of acting and being an entertainer," Kelce told the men's magazine in a cover story released Tuesday. "I don't say this as 'I shouldn't have done it.' I'm just saying that my work ethic is such that I have so much pride in how I do things that I never want the product to tail off, and I feel like these past two years haven't been to my standard." Kelce posted seven consecutive 1,000-yard seasons from 2016-22 before falling short of that mark in each of the past two. The four-time first-team All-Pro and 10-time Pro Bowl selection made 97 receptions for 823 yards last season — his lowest yardage total since 2014. He also had just three touchdown catches, down from a career-high 12 in 2022. "I just have such a motivation to show up this year for my guys," Kelce said. Kelce will have that opportunity when the Chiefs open their season at home against the Los Angeles Chargers on Sept. 5.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store