
Woman says she was charged tip for Lyft ride in Chicago despite never authorizing one
Woman says she was charged tip she never authorized for Chicago Lyft ride
Woman says she was charged tip she never authorized for Chicago Lyft ride
Woman says she was charged tip she never authorized for Chicago Lyft ride
A frustrated customer recently reached out to CBS News Chicago, saying she had some unauthorized charges after taking a rideshare.
She said she was not getting answers until CBS News Chicago stepped in to help.
The rideshare customer made it very clear that her frustration is not over the amount of money that was charged, but rather that she was charged at all without her permission.
Jill, who asked that her last name not be used, said she took a Lyft early Sunday morning from O'Hare International Airport back to the city.
"Right out the gate we are just flying around, swerving, speeding all the way down the Kennedy and to my home," she said. "I was kind of scared."
Jill said Lyft ride was a white-knuckle thrill ride in all the wrong ways.
"A couple hours later, I noticed there was a tip that was attached to the receipt — which made no sense to me, because I made sure to specifically not tip the guy," said Jill.
On top of the fare, Jill was charged $5.56 for a tip that she said was never authorized.
"It was for a very small amount, but that wasn't the point," Jill said. "It was an unauthorized charge to my account."
Jill has been a Lyft customer for a decade. The company considers her a five-star rider and a top tipper.
But she said there was no way the driver she had on Sunday morning was getting anything extra.
"It would be like going to a restaurant, having your waiter dump everything on you, be rude and all that — and you still tip him," said Jill. "Nobody would do that."
Lyft repeatedly denied issuing Jill a refund for the tip, citing company policy.
"No one offered to investigate it. They just kept saying, 'Policy, policy, policy — sorry, no refund,'" said Jill. "This is not an isolated incident from what I've, you know, reviewed online."
Online, some riders with both Lyft and Uber said they too have been charged for tips they never approved. In response to Jill's tip dispute, a spokesperson for Lyft claimed Jill had previously sent the default tip percentage as 18%
"During a Lyft ride and in the Lyft app's settings menu, there is an opt-in feature to enable a tip percentage as default," Lyft said. "Lyft does not preselect tips unless the rider explicitly consents to default tipping"
"That's not a way to treat a customer," Jill said.
Jill disputes Lyft's claim, and said she does not opt in to default tipping.
After CBS News Chicago reached out, Jill was notified late Wednesday afternoon that she would be refunded not just for the top, but for the entire ride. Jill also asked Lyft to cancel her account.
A Lyft representative told Jill in part by email:
"At this time, we have issued a full refund of the ride, including the tip. I have also sent an updated receipt to your email address.
"Additionally, I can confirm your account is currently in the process of being deleted. Please note that this process may take up to 45 days, per our Privacy Policy. Learn more at: lft.to/privacy.
"I have escalated the tipping issue to the appropriate teams for further review. While I can't confirm if this is some sort of glitch in our system, we appreciate you for bringing it to our attention nonetheless. Our Safety team has taken the appropriate action against the driver. I personally will ensure your interactions with previous agents are reviewed and corrective action taken place."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 2025 WSOP collusion 'scandal' and investigation, explained
The World Series of Poker has had its occasional controversies over the years with some wild moments that made headlines. This time? A 2025 WSOP event might be a scandal. Here's what we know: Their $1,500 Millionaire Maker event was down to two players, with James Carroll up on Jesse Yaginuma. But it was Yaginuma who ended up with the bracelet and a cool $1.26 million. Advertisement That's not the controversy. Here's what could be that's led to an investigation, per ESPN: "Many of the hands won by Yaginuma came in the form of raises or reraises that were continually not contested by Carroll. Viewers of the event's livestream, including a number of professional poker players, began to speculate that Carroll was chip dumping to Yaginuma -- intentionally losing hands to build up his opponent's stack -- so that the two could split some portion of the prize money." Is that collusion? Let's dive in further: What are the WSOP rules about collusion? Per the Las Vegas Review-Journal: WSOP rule 40b states: 'Collusion is defined as any agreement between or among two (2) or more Participants to engage in illegal or unethical acts against other Participants. Collusion includes, but is not limited to, acts such as: chip dumping; soft play; sharing card information with another Participant; sending or receiving signals from or to another Participant; the use of electronic communication with the intent to facilitate collusion; and any other act that Host Properties deem inappropriate.' What did WSOP say about the investigation? So the prize money and bracelet haven't been given out yet. Why would the two players collude in a WSOP event? There's some speculation over a prize from ClubWPT Gold: a player could win an additional $1 million if they won a WSOP event and a "ticket" from a poker summer event. Yaginuma had one of those tickets, so maybe Carroll was trying to help him out? What did the poker players say about the collusion allegations? Per Yaginuma told us there was no heads-up deal in his post-win interview, though the two did meet. "No, not really. We talked for a little bit about poker, but yeah, that was about it." This article originally appeared on For The Win: WSOP collusion investigation, explained over Millionaire Maker ending
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman who attacked two teens in Jacksonville road rage case could be deported
A woman was on trial Thursday for attacking two teenage girls in a 2024 road rage incident in Jacksonville. The encounter was recorded by one of the victims. This all happened near Christ's Church Academy in Jacksonville. In the video of the incident, the woman on the left is Jessica Goncalves. You can see and hear Goncalves and one of the teenage victims yelling at each other. It doesn't take long before it gets physical. Seconds later, you can see Goncalves grab one of the girls by her sleeve and yank her forward. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< The two then become physical with one another and call each other crazy. Goncalves then lunges at the person recording the encounter and grabs her phone away. Action News Jax is not identifying the victims because of their age. Goncalves is charged with two counts of battery. During Thursday's trial, both victims testified on the stand. 'She grabbed my phone out of my hand and pushed me,' said one of the victims. [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] 'The first time it was as she was approaching me, she had put her arms out and she had touched my chest,' said the second victim. The defense tried to make the argument that the girls also attacked Goncalves. 'So you want this court to believe that here you are with your friend, some lady as you describe, gets out of the car, comes over this way, takes your phone. You end up on the ground. You don't touch her, you don't kick her, you don't punch her,' said Robert Slama, Jessica Goncalves' attorney. 'I did not,' replied one of the victims. An ICE spokesperson confirmed with Action News Jax that Goncalves is not in the country legally, and the outcome in this case could lead to an even larger legal issue for her. An ICE spokesperson sent us a statement that reads: Jussica Luana Goncalves is an illegalalien from Brazil who was encountered by the U.S. Border Patrol on May 1, 2021, near Otay Mesa, California. She was charged with inadmissibility per the Immigration and Nationality Act as an alien present without admission or parole and released on her own recognizance. On Feb. 16, 2025, 287(g)-designated immigration officers encountered Goncalves at the Duval County Jail in Jacksonville, Florida, after she was arrested for child abuse without great bodily harm. She has a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement immigration detainer and, upon completion of local charges, will be turned over to ICE. [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter] Action News Jax clarified with the spokesperson that he meant to say February 2024. In court, Goncalves' lawyer Robert Slama argued that the trial was happening as a way to get Goncalves deported. 'You're aware that she's an immigrant, correct?' asked Slama to one of the victims. 'Yes,' said the victim. 'Is it your goal, last question for her to be deported?' Slama asked the victim. 'No,' the victim replied. Goncalves was found guilty of two counts of battery. Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Michigan Capitol security under review after Ted Nugent brings gun through detector
LANSING — Rock musician and outdoorsman Ted Nugent brought a prohibited gun through Capitol security when he testified before a committee June 25, officials said. Some observers noticed Nugent appeared to be armed when he testified before the House Natural Resources and Tourism Committee in opposition to certain state hunting regulations. State Rep. Laurie Pohutsky, D-Livonia, a member of a House Oversight subcommittee that was meeting jointly with the natural resources committee, said in a June 26 post on Instagram that "pretty early on" in Nugent's testimony "we recognized that he was carrying a gun." Members flagged House sergeants, who took no immediate action, Pohutsky said. She said she decided to post on social media about the incident because she wants answers as to what happened and assurances the issue of Capitol security is being taken seriously. "It's obviously not acceptable," she said. Shanon Banner, a spokeswoman for the MSP, said June 27 that Nugent was screened at the north entrance of the Capitol June 25 by walking through weapons detection equipment that all visitors are required to pass through. "The weapons detection system functioned correctly and alerted to a possible weapon; however, the trooper staffing the entry point did not see the alert until after Mr. Nugent left the screening area," Banner said. "Upon completing his meeting, MSP personnel contacted Mr. Nugent and notified him of the weapons policy," Banner said. "We are still evaluating how the weapons detection alert was missed and will be following up to ensure this does not happen again." The MSP security failure occurred as MSP Col. James Grady, who is facing criticism from troopers, command officers and Republican lawmakers over a number of issues, is expected to testify July 1 before the House Oversight Committee, in connection with the committee's investigation into MSP leadership, according to Rep. Jay DeBoyer, R-Clay Township, the committee chairman. Under rules set by the Michigan Capitol Commission in 2021 and 2023, carrying firearms is mostly banned in the Capitol, with a few exceptions for law enforcement, security and sitting lawmakers with concealed carry permits. A phone message and email left June 27 with Nugent's Michigan office seeking comment were not immediately returned. Contact Paul Egan: 517-372-8660 or pegan@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Ted Nugent brings gun into Michigan Capitol