Cheque bounce case acquittals can be challenged before district courts from July 7: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court's Registrar (Judicial) has issued a notification intimating lawyers and litigants that the High Court would not entertain petitions to grant leave, to file appeals, from Monday (July 7, 2025) in accordance with a judicial order passed Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan.
While hearing two such leave petitions on June 30, 2025, the judge pointed out the Supreme Court in Celestium Financial versus A. Gnanasekaran (2025) had ruled victims in cheque bounce cases were entitled to file appeals as a matter of right without having to seek the leave of the High Court.
The top court had pointed out the procedure of filing appeals, against acquittal orders passed by judicial magistrates, in the High Court, that too after obtaining its leave, had to be followed only in cases where the private complainants were not the victims in a criminal case.
'A person convicted of a crime has the right to prefer an appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as a matter of right and not being subjected to any conditions. Similarly, a victim of a crime, whatever be the nature of the crime, unconditionally must have a right to prefer an appeal,' the Supreme Court had said.
However, since the top court had not mentioned whether its decision should be given effect retrospectively or prospectively, Justice Ilanthiraiyan decided to give effect to it from July 7, 2025. 'The district courts are directed to entertain the appeals... from July 7, 2025 onwards,' he ordered.
The judge also directed the High Court Registry to circulate his order to all district courts in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Dhankhar rakes up cash at Justice Varma's home, post-retirement jobs to judges and CJI on panel to choose CBI Director
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar raised several questions on Monday about the functioning of the higher judiciary in recent times, raking up the issue of cash found at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma , the practice of having Chief Justice of India on the panel to choose the CBI Director and the post-retirement jobs given to judges. Addressing students of National University of Advanced Legal Studies at Kochi, Dhankhar the country had seen 'turbulent times in the judiciary' in recent times but a big change has taken place since the present chief justice of India and his predecessor took office, ensuring the start of a 'new era of accountability and transparency'. He said the previous two years were 'very disturbing and challenging'. Referring to the recovery of a huge cache of cash found at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma, the Vice President said like the Julius Caesar incident of Ides of March, the Indian judiciary had its own experience on the night of March 14-15. '…. A terrible time! Cash in large amounts was found at the official residence of a judge of the High Court. Now, if that cash was found, the system should have moved immediately and the first process would have been to deal with it as a criminal act, find out those who are culpable and bring them to justice. But so far, there has been no FIR,' Dhankhar said. He underlined that the government is 'handicapped' in the matter as an FIR cannot be registered in view of a judgment of the Supreme Court in early 1990s. While the fire incident happened on March 15, the recovery of cash was reported only on March 21, he added. Live Events 'The world looks at us as a mature democracy where there has to be rule of law, equality before law, which means every crime must be investigated. If the money is so huge in volume, we have to find out: is it tainted money? What is the source of this money? How was it stacked in the official residence of a judge? Who did it belong to?' Dhankhar said. He insisted that since several penal provisions have been violated, the FIR should be registered, and the authorities should go to the root of the matter. 'Our judiciary -in which people's faith is unshakable- its very foundations have been shaken. The citadel is tottering because of this incident,' he said. Parliament is likely to move an impeachment motion against Justice Varma in the forthcoming monsoon session and both the government and the Opposition are on board on the matter. The Vice President also raised eyebrows over the rule of having the Chief Justice of India on the panel that chooses the CBI Director. 'I am aghast that a functionary of the executive like the CBI director is appointed with the participation of the Chief Justice of India. Why? Just think... The CBI Director is not the senior most in the hierarchy. He has above him several layers like CVC, Cabinet Secretary, all secretaries. After all, he is heading a department. Is this happening elsewhere in the world? Can it happen under our constitutional scheme? Why should an appointment of the executive be made by anyone else other than the executive?' he said. The Vice President also emphasized that judges should not be given post-retirement jobs. 'Certain constitutional authorities are not permitted to hold an assignment after their office. This was not specified for judges, because judges were expected to be totally away from it. Now we have post-retirement posts for judges. Further, not all can be accommodated- only some can be accommodated. So, when you can't accommodate all but you accommodate some, there is pick-and-choose. When there is pick-and-choose, there is patronage. It is seriously impairing our judiciary,' Dhankhar said.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Calcutta HC sets aside cancellation of Trinamool MP's medical practioner registration
In another ruling on Monday, the Calcutta High Court ordered that 'tainted or identified ineligible' candidates must be excluded from the recruitment process of more than 44,000 teachers and non-teaching staff in West Bengal government-run-and-aided schools. In his order Justice Saugata Bhattacharya said that if any 'tainted or identified ineligible' candidate has already applied, the application form should be rejected. The High Court clearly stated that the recruitment process should be completed in accordance with the Supreme Court's order. However, the court noted that the recruitment process can be continued keeping in mind the notification issued by the WBSSC on May 30. The court did not interfere with the rest of the notification. Earlier in this year, in a judgment the Supreme Court had annulled over 25,000 school jobs in West Bengal on the ground of illegalities in the 2016 recruitment process. Following orders of the apex court the WBSSC issued a new recruitment notification. But it was alleged that the WBSSC notification of 2025 was against the Supreme Court's order. A case was filed in the Calcutta High Court challenging that notification. The plaintiffs claim that the notification published for over 44,000 vacancies is not legal. The plaintiffs stated that as per the Supreme Court's order, the 2016 'selection' process should be done as per the 'rules' of that year. And there is an order to do so from among the job seekers of 2016. But in this case, it was not followed. They also claimed that the age relaxation issue was not followed as per the order. The plaintiffs further alleged that there was corruption in the 2016 recruitment process. Keeping that case in mind, the Supreme Court ordered that a fresh recruitment should be conducted. As a result, if a fresh selection process is conducted, it should be done as per the 2016 Recruitment Rules. The state and the WBSSC made their argument in the High Court on Monday. They claimed that the Supreme Court's order does not state anywhere that specifically identified 'ineligible' job seekers will not be able to join the recruitment process. However, the court was not satisfied with this argument.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘I am a concerned man… citadel is tottering': Dhankar for FIR into cash recovery at judge's residence
Vice president Jagdeep Dhankhar on Monday said he hoped an FIR will be registered with regard to the recovery of a large stash of cash at a judge's official residence in New Delhi in March this year. Addressing students at National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS) in Kochi, Dhankhar said, 'I am a concerned man. Whether this is an incident in isolation or there are other similar incidents.'' Dhankhar said equality before law means every crime must be investigated. 'If the money is so huge in volume, we have to find out: is it tainted money? What is the source of this money? How was it stocked in the official residence of a judge? It belonged to whom?' 'Find out those who are culpable. Bring them to justice… So far, there has been no FIR. The government at the central level is handicapped because an FIR cannot be registered in view of a judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in the early '90s.'' Observing that several penal provisions are violated in the process, he said, 'I do hope an FIR will be registered. 'We must go to the root of the matter. Our judiciary, in which people's faith is unshakable, its very foundations have been shaken.'' Dhankhar's statement comes amid reports that Justice Yashwant Varma was facing an impeachment in Parliament after an unspecified amount of cash was found at his official residence following a fire in March this year. Justice Varma has denied all allegations and submitted responses to both the Delhi High Court Chief Justice and a Supreme Court-appointed panel. The Vice President likened the recovery of cash from the judge's residence to the 'Ides of March' — a reference to Shakespeare's famous play Julius Caesar and a symbol of looming misfortune. 'Our judiciary faced its own Ides of March on the night intervening March 14th and 15th… There was cash in large quantity at the residence of a judge. I say so because it is now in public domain, officially put up by the Supreme Court… Now the point is, if cash was found, the system should have moved immediately and the first process would have been to deal with it as a criminal act,'' said Dhankhar. He said the 'citadel is tottering' because of this incident and hence the issue must be examined. The Vice President, who said he was of the view that judges should be protected from frivolous litigations, also expressed his concern over the delay in revealing the recovery of the cash. 'Some things are worrisome… It was only after about seven days that we came to know about this ghastly crime.' Referring to judges taking up assignments after retirement, he said, 'Now we have post-retirement posts for judges. Not all can be accommodated…. There is pick and choose. When there is pick and choose, there is patronage. It is seriously impairing our judiciary.''
