Cheque bounce case acquittals can be challenged before district courts from July 7: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court's Registrar (Judicial) has issued a notification intimating lawyers and litigants that the High Court would not entertain petitions to grant leave, to file appeals, from Monday (July 7, 2025) in accordance with a judicial order passed Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan.
While hearing two such leave petitions on June 30, 2025, the judge pointed out the Supreme Court in Celestium Financial versus A. Gnanasekaran (2025) had ruled victims in cheque bounce cases were entitled to file appeals as a matter of right without having to seek the leave of the High Court.
The top court had pointed out the procedure of filing appeals, against acquittal orders passed by judicial magistrates, in the High Court, that too after obtaining its leave, had to be followed only in cases where the private complainants were not the victims in a criminal case.
'A person convicted of a crime has the right to prefer an appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as a matter of right and not being subjected to any conditions. Similarly, a victim of a crime, whatever be the nature of the crime, unconditionally must have a right to prefer an appeal,' the Supreme Court had said.
However, since the top court had not mentioned whether its decision should be given effect retrospectively or prospectively, Justice Ilanthiraiyan decided to give effect to it from July 7, 2025. 'The district courts are directed to entertain the appeals... from July 7, 2025 onwards,' he ordered.
The judge also directed the High Court Registry to circulate his order to all district courts in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
High Court verdict on batch of petitions filed in 2006 Mumbai train blasts today
More than 19 years after the Mumbai train bombings on July 11, 2006, the Bombay High Court is scheduled to pass the judgement on 11 appeals filed by the state as well as the convicts in the case on July 11, 2006, major explosions at seven locations on Mumbai's suburban rail network in a span of 11 minutes claimed 189 lives and injured 827 13 accused were arrested, 15 others were declared wanted, some allegedly in Pakistan. The Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) invoked the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), filing the chargesheet in November 2006. In 2015, the trial court convicted 12 accused, five of whom were sentenced to death, while the remaining seven were sentenced to life per the law, the state government then filed a petition in the High Court seeking confirmation of the death sentences. The accused also filed appeals challenging their convictions and the state had filed for confirmation of death sentences in 2015, the appeals were filed between 2019 and spite of the appeals being filed, they remained unheard of for a long time as the evidence was voluminous and one division bench of the High Court had to dedicatedly hear only this the appeals came up before many benches but could not be heard. Finally, one of the convicts in the case, Ehtesham siddiqui, filed a plea seeking expeditious hearing of the that, a special bench was constituted which heard the appeals for almost six months and wrote the judgements for the last six months.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Mumbai
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
HC seeks action report as 24 parole jumpers remain absconding in CG
Raipur: As of May 5, 2025, two out of 26 accused released on parole were arrested, leaving 24 at large, according to information from the five Circle Jails in Chhattisgarh. Similarly, information from seven districts indicated that out of 15 accused released on short-term bail as of May 5, 2025, none were arrested despite police efforts. In an affidavit submitted to the Chhattisgarh High Court, police officials informed they are making sincere efforts to arrest the remaining accused. The High Court is closely monitoring the status of prisoners who jumped bail or parole and are currently absconding. During a recent hearing, the court noted an affidavit filed by the Director General of Police (DGP), Chhattisgarh, detailing efforts to apprehend these individuals. The affidavit stated that the Head of Police Force is daily monitoring the status of accused persons who were released on short-term bail or parole but have not surrendered. Necessary instructions have been issued to all Range Inspector Generals of Police, including Rail, and the Superintendents of Police in various districts. These districts include Raipur, Mahasamund, Gariaband, Durg, Bemetara, Balod, Bilaspur, Janjgir-Champa, Korba, Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Raigarh, Sakti, Surguja, Jashpur, Surajpur, Balrampur, Jagdalpur, Kondagaon, and Dantewada. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo They have been directed to take measures for arresting the remaining absconders. A fresh instruction was issued by the Police Headquarter, Chhattisgarh, on June 9, 2025, reiterating the directive to all authorities to take necessary steps for the arrests and submit information by July 14, 2025, along with a list of absconding accused. The High Court has scheduled the next hearing for Sept 15, by which date the Director General (Prisons), Chhattisgarh, has been asked to file an affidavit providing the current status. In March, 2025, High Court had directed the Director General of Police (DGP to file an affidavit detailing the arrest status of 46 prisoners who were absconding after being released on short-term bail and parole. The affidavit revealed that out of an initial 83 absconding accused, 63 were still at large as of Jan 29, 2025. The court had previously directed the Registrar (Judicial) to register a separate PIL concerning the efforts made by police authorities to apprehend these individuals. The new DGP, who assumed office in Feb 2025, succeeding Ashok Juneja, had stated in the affidavit that immediate action was taken to comply with the court's directives. On Feb 4, 2025, a special drive was launched, and instructions were re-issued to all Range Inspector Generals of Police (including Rail) and Superintendents of Police in districts such as Raipur, Mahasamund, Gariaband, Durg, Bemetara, Balod, Bilaspur, Janjgir-Champa, Korba, Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Raigarh, Sakti, Surguja, Jashpur, Surajpur, Balrampur, Jagdalpur, Kondagaon, Dantewada, and Bijapur. These officials were directed to arrest the absconding accused and produce them before the concerned trial courts. The DGP's affidavit further stated that daily monitoring of the arrests of these absconding prisoners is being carried out. As per information received from seven districts, three accused from Raipur, Bemetara, and Dantewada, who were absconding after short-term bail, have been arrested and produced before the trial courts. Sixteen such accused remain at large.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump administration condemned for opposing Washington child abuse law; senator says 'children will continue to suffer'
Donald Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) has inserted itself into a contentious legal battle with the state of Washington over a recently passed law, SB 5375, that mandates reporting for child abuse, even from the clergymen who discover it under the seal of confession. The Washington law was signed into effect by Governor Bob Ferguson in May of this year but has been beset by a number of legal challenges from religious advocacy groups, as well as local representatives of the Catholic church, who oppose it on the grounds of religious freedom. Donald Trump's administration has made it clear it stands firmly against the Washington law as well, with Attorney General Pam Bondi launching a First Amendment probe against the legislation. This has culminated in the DOJ formally intervening in the lawsuit between the Seattle, Spokane and Yakima Catholic dioceses against the Washington Governor's office, known as Etienne v Ferguson. This Friday, Judge David G. Estudillo granted a preliminary injunction blocking the law's enforcement. Advocates for stronger laws against child abuse have spoken out against this development, with Senator Noel Frame saying, 'Children will continue to suffer because religious leaders they trust are not reporting when children tell them they are being hurt.' JUST IN: A federal judge has barred Washington state from enforcing a law that would have required priests to report evidence of child abuse learned during Trump administration had intervened on the side of the Catholic Trump's Department of Justice opposes child abuse law Donald Trump's Department of Justice is working to invalidate Washington state's law as part of a broader conservative agenda to protect religious institutions. Weighing in on the Etienne v Ferguson lawsuit, the DOJ claimed that the law "deprives Catholic priests of their fundamental right to freely exercise their religious beliefs, as guaranteed under the First Amendment". A federal judge has ruled that Catholic priests in Washington state cannot be required to report child abuse or neglect they learn about through confession after the Trump administration intervened in their favor. Child abuse has been a recurring stain on the Catholic church's reputation ever since the church was embroiled in scandal after scandal throughout the 1990s and 2000s. Advocates of the Catholic church have claimed that the church has reformed as a consequence and can police itself, but these arguments have repeatedly been called into question in recent investigations such as the 2018 Pennsylvania grand jury report. The case will likely escalate to the Supreme Court The legal battle regarding Washington's child abuse law is likely to be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court. Given that Donald Trump himself has appointed the majority of the Supreme Court justices, there is considerable pessimism on the law's ability to hold up to legal challenges.
