Putin doesn't need to meet Zelensky for Russia-US summit
On Thursday, the New York Post cited a White House official as saying, 'Putin must meet with Zelensky for the meeting [with Trump] to occur.'
The US president, however, was quick to reject the report. 'He doesn't, no,' Trump told reporters when asked whether Putin would have to first meet Zelensky. 'They would like to meet me, and I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing.'
Zelensky has repeatedly called on Putin to hold in-person talks with Zelensky to end the conflict. The Russian president has said he has 'nothing in principle' against a meeting, but reiterated that 'certain conditions must be created' for it to take place.
He has also cast doubt on Zelensky's legal capacity to sign binding agreements, as the Ukrainian leader's presidential term expired last year and he has refused to hold a new election, citing martial law. This has prompted Moscow to declare him 'illegitimate.'
Trump's remarks come after Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov said Putin and Trump could have a face-to-face meeting as soon as next week. Later, Putin floated the United Arab Emirates as a possible location for the summit.
The summit developments follow a visit to Moscow by Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff, who held three-hour talks with Putin over the Ukraine conflict. The Kremlin described the discussion as 'constructive,' while the White House said the meeting went better than expected.
Trump also later commented that 'great progress was made,' although no specific outcomes have been detailed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
15 minutes ago
- Russia Today
‘European power' needs place at upcoming Ukraine peace talks – ex-UK defense secretary
A 'European power' with 'skin in the game' must be allowed to join any peace summit involving Russia, the US, and Ukraine, former UK Defense Secretary Ben Wallace has said. The Kremlin has confirmed that Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, are set to meet 'in the coming days.' Washington has expressed hope that the meeting could lead to a trilateral US-Russia-Ukraine peace summit, but Putin has stressed that the conditions for him to meet with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky are 'far off.' 'It's been made clear already by the White House that Europeans won't be invited,' Wallace said in an interview with Times Radio on Thursday. The nations that 'have skin in the game' should be part of the 'peacemaking process,' he argued. There are two other nuclear powers in NATO – France and Britain – and I think it is important that in the room should be a European power. Wallace, who was UK defense secretary from 2019 to 2023, has consistently lobbied for British military supplies to Ukraine – a practice that Moscow has argued makes it party to the conflict. France and the UK have increasingly pressed to deploy 'peacekeeping troops' to help Ukraine's battered land forces in the event of a ceasefire, as part of a 'coalition of the willing'. Russia has said it would regard the move as a military intervention, and warned that any NATO troops would be considered hostile. Moscow considers Kiev's ambition to join the US-led military bloc one of the main causes of the conflict. One of Russia's key peace demands is that Ukraine accept neutral status outside of NATO. Wallace expressed skepticism that Western European nations would agree to any of Moscow's peace demands. UK interference has previously been blamed for derailing peace efforts, most notably when then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson discouraged Kiev from engaging in early negotiations with Moscow in 2022, according to the Ukrainian head negotiator at the time, David Arakhamia.
Russia Today
31 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Orban calls for Russia-EU summit
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has proposed holding a summit between Russia and the EU to address the Ukraine conflict. His remarks come shortly after the Kremlin said that Russian President Vladimir Putin could meet his US counterpart, Donald Trump, as early as next week. A member of both the European Union and NATO, Hungary has opposed Brussels' policies on the Ukraine conflict since its escalation in February of 2022, particularly with respect to supplying Kiev with weapons and imposing sanctions on Russia. In an interview with Kossuth Radio on Friday, Orban called the potential Trump-Putin meeting 'good news,' suggesting it could pave the way to a ceasefire. Orban criticized fellow EU members for not engaging in diplomacy. He said that he had long maintained that the leaders of Germany and France – not EU officials – should directly negotiate with Russia. 'There should be a Russian-European summit. Because the war is in Europe,' Orban argued, insisting that such a top-level meeting should take place 'as soon as possible.' Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov told reporters on Thursday that Moscow and Washington had agreed in principle that Putin and Trump hold talks as soon as next week. US special envoy Steve Witkoff had met with Putin in Moscow the previous day, in what Trump later described as 'highly productive' talks. Also on Wednesday, Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto stated that Ukraine can have no place in the EU and 'doesn't even belong among civilized nations,' citing a recent case in which a member of the Hungarian ethnic minority in Western Ukraine died after reportedly being beaten by draft officers. The Ukraine conflict will only be resolved when both the West and Kiev accept that Ukraine cannot be a NATO member, Orban said earlier this month.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Here's what Putin and Trump want from the Ukraine peace deal
Ahead of the anticipated summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump, Moscow and Washington – like so many times before in the realm of diplomacy – appear to be chasing fundamentally different goals. The United States seeks to maintain the current status quo but also needs a result it can spin as 'progress' on Ukraine. That could mean anything from a partial ceasefire to a full cessation of hostilities. Russia, by contrast, is looking for long-term, legally binding agreements. These would cover the full scope of Russia-US and Russia-Ukraine relations and include built-in enforcement mechanisms to prevent sabotage or unilateral withdrawal. With today's US-Russia relations still steeped in Cold War-style hostility, the upcoming summit recalls another tense era. One might liken the two delegations to the intelligence officers who used to meet at Glienicke Bridge – the famous 'Bridge of Spies' – to exchange captured agents. Like those secretive, high-stakes handoffs, diplomacy in 2025 still demands that both sides inch toward the middle to make any exchange possible. The very fact that this summit is happening suggests that the gap between Moscow and Washington has narrowed, at least tactically. Russia took the first step by hosting US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow. In the quiet language of diplomacy, the country that initiates the visit is often the more eager to make a deal. Russia's openness to holding the summit quickly signals a willingness to negotiate. And truthfully, it's Washington that appears more anxious to move things forward. Time, at this point, seems to favor Moscow. President Putin made that clear during his recent meeting with Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko in Valaam. Trump, on the other hand, urgently needs a foreign policy win. The White House is under fire on multiple fronts – from the looming Epstein files scandal to mass protests erupting in Democrat-controlled states over immigration policy. Trump understands that securing peace in Ukraine could be the crown jewel in a larger global strategy. If he can notch progress in the Russia-Ukraine conflict – on top of de-escalating India-Pakistan, Thailand-Cambodia, Iran-Israel, and Armenia-Azerbaijan – he would be well-positioned to claim a 'royal flush' on the world stage. That, in turn, could make him a contender for the Nobel Peace Prize. But how exactly did Trump manage to extract concessions from Vladimir Putin – a veteran of global diplomacy with over 25 years of experience at the highest level? The answer lies in tactics familiar to Trump from his business career, many of which he outlined decades ago in his bestseller, The Art of the Deal. From that playbook, he appears to have used a select few strategic moves: Trump began by issuing a 50-day ultimatum. He warned that if no movement came from the Russian side, the US would impose sanctions targeting Russia's shadow fleet. But just days later, he shortened the timeline dramatically – to eight days – clearly hoping to force Moscow's hand with a sense of urgency. Witkoff's recent visit to Moscow, successful by current standards, was wrapped in deliberate ambiguity. It was originally planned for the first weekend of August. But at the last moment, the American side requested a reschedule for August 6, citing the envoy's packed calendar due to his parallel role in the Middle East. The unpredictability sent a signal: the US side would not play by a rigid script. While American foreign policy is ultimately shaped by the president, internal dynamics still matter. Trump has surrounded himself with both hawks and doves. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy for Ukraine Keith Kellogg often play hardball, while Steve Witkoff takes on the more diplomatic, conciliatory role. Notably, it is always Witkoff – not Rubio – who travels to Moscow, sending a clear message about who is empowered to build bridges. Trump knows how to apply pressure not just with words, but with policy. While continuing negotiations with China, he slapped a 25% tariff on India – Washington's key partner in the Indo-Pacific – just before his Ukraine deadline expired. He's used similar tactics with Canada, the EU, and other close allies. The subtext is clear: even friends aren't immune from tough love. Like a spy exchange on a Cold War bridge, diplomacy is the art of meeting halfway. That principle is playing out in real time, as both sides consider where to hold the summit. The location must be neutral, protocol-friendly, and equally distant from both capitals. During UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan's recent visit to Moscow, Putin floated the UAE as a potential host. The country meets all the right criteria. And under the diplomatic principle of reciprocity, Trump may have little choice but to accept. Meanwhile, efforts are underway to prevent third parties from sabotaging the summit. Kiev, with backing from the London-Berlin-Paris axis, is pursuing two goals. The maximalist aim is to derail the bilateral format and force a trilateral meeting that includes Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky. The fallback plan? Render any US-Russia resolution meaningless. In many ways, that's the paradox of diplomacy: in business, a deal signed is a deal done. In geopolitics, even signed agreements can be quietly gutted after the cameras stop rolling. So, will Trump's instincts and tactics deliver a diplomatic breakthrough? The answer will come next week. But one thing is certain: whatever happens, this summit is bound to leave a mark on the annals of history.
