‘Why did it happen?': Month after Air India plane crash, families of victims continue to look for answers
On June 15, the airline activated a helpdesk in Ahmedabad to process claims for the interim compensation of Rs 25 lakh to the families of each of the deceased and to the lone survivor, Air India has said in a statement.
A statement quoting an airline spokesperson said Friday, that as on July 10, 'Air India has released interim compensation to 92 families of the passengers, and those deceased at the accident site to help them meet their immediate financial needs.'
The documents related to 66 others have been verified and the interim compensation is being released 'progressively to their families,' the statement said. A month after the crash, The Indian Express spoke to a few families that lost their loved ones on June 12.
She was 24 and recently married
In January, the Rajpurohits celebrated the wedding of their 24-year-old daughter Khushbu with much fanfare. She was supposed to fly to London to join her husband Vipul Singh, her first trip after exchanging vows. Instead, it was Singh who flew down to Ahmedabad and got busy with formalities for his dead wife, says Ravi Dadhich, Khushbu's uncle. Her family had come down from Jodhpur, Rajasthan, to Ahmedabad to see Khushboo off. As the family was returning, they heard the news of the plane crash and came back to Ahmedabad.
'Khushbu's husband Vipul and her parents are still struggling to come to terms with the loss and are not ready to talk much about it,' said Dadhich. 'Khushbu's parents have not been keeping well. Her father had to be hospitalised once after he complained of breathlessness. The entire family is still very disturbed,' Dadich added.
'Our son-in-law Vipul is still here. He had gone once or twice to Ahmedabad to complete some formalities with Air India,' he added. With the compensation money that they would get, the family plans to do something in Khushbu's memory, said Dadich.
Waiting for the Black Box to speak
Pramukh Nanda, founder and director at leading automobile dealer Cargo Motors Ahmedabad Pvt Ltd, his wife Neha, and younger son Prayash were among those killed in the air crash. They were travelling to London to attend the convocation of their older son Pratham, 22, at Nottingham Trent University.
A month on, the family has decided to wait for the outcome of the investigation before making any move.
'We have been advised by our legal counsels to wait till the report of the black box is out. Though US-based law firms have contacted us for taking up the case against the airline and aircraft companies, we have not responded to them as we have our own legal experts based in the US and the UK,' Pranav Nanda, Pramukh's younger brother, told The Indian Express Friday. Pratham, the only survivor from the family of Pranav's elder brother, is now learning to run his father's business. Till the crash, Pranav and Pramukh's parents used to stay with their older son. Since Pramukh's death, Pranav has been staying with his parents. The family is yet to file for claims from Air India.
'Why did this happen? We want to know'
Questions abound at the sprawling Bopal home of the Sonis, another business family from Ahmedabad, who lost three members in the crash that left two brothers orphaned.
Ahmedabad-based entrepreneur Trupti Soni lost her brother Swapnil (45), his wife Yoga (44), and her sister-in-law Alpa (55). The trio was on a family trip to receive Alpa's husband Nishit who was about to complete his 22,000-km road trip from Ahmedabad to London, and would have reunited with his family on June 13. Swapnil and Yoga's sons, aged 19 and 9, are now left without parents.
'There has not been a single day we have been able to forget the incident. It is Swapnil's birthday today. The family decided to plant and mass distribute saplings as Swapnil was very fond of plants,' Trupti shared.
Soni told The Indian Express, 'We are going ahead with the litigation, with the (help of) US-based legal team, against Boeing. We have discussed the case with the law firm which has experience in aviation suits on behalf of the victims of earlier crash incidents. We are of the opinion that with the involvement of big players and international governments, the data may be manipulated. It is a fair question which all the families are right in raising — Why did it (the crash) happen? If not satisfied with the report, we will also seek an independent inquiry.'
The Sonis, too, have not submitted the compensation claim form by Air India. 'Since there is a clause of indemnity, which we need clarity on, we are not going ahead with the claim,' Soni told The Indian Express.
The Air India has shared forms seeking information about the passengers and their kin, among other details.
The interim compensation being offered is in addition to the Rs 1 crore support announced by Tata Sons.
The airline has said it was reaching out to those who were injured and the families of those who lost their lives on the ground 'to initiate the compensation process for them.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Who is Sanjay Kumar Singh? Meet the top crash investigators probing Air India tragedy
A five-member team led by seasoned aircraft accident investigator Sanjay Kumar Singh has been appointed to investigate last month's fatal crash of the Air India plane in Gujarat's Ahmedabad, which claimed 260 lives. Forensic experts and DGCA officials searching for evidence at Air India Plane crash site in Ahmedabad on June 13. (HT File) The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) released its preliminary report on Friday evening. On June 12, an Air India Boeing 787-8 aircraft operating flight AI 171 to London Gatwick crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, plummeting into a medical hostel complex. The crash killed 241 of the 242 people onboard and 19 on the ground. One passenger survived the tragedy. AAIB Director Sanjay Kumar Singh, 56, is serving as the Investigator-in-Charge, while Jasbir Singh Larhga is the chief investigator, as mentioned in the AAIB report. The probe team also includes three officials from the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA): Deputy director Vipin Venu Varakoth, assistant director Veeraragavan K, and air safety officer Vaishnav Vijayakumar. Meet the investigation team Who is Sanjay Kumar Singh? Currently director at AAIB, Sanjay Kumar Singh brings 15 years of experience in aircraft accident investigation. He has overseen 15 major investigations and processed over 300 incident classifications, according to a PTI news agency report. With a background in Mechanical Engineering (Aeronautical Specialisation) and an MBA, Singh has over 25 years of operational and advisory experience in Air Force machinery assets, the report mentions. Jasbir Singh Larhga Jasbir Singh Larhga has been with AAIB for a decade and was involved in major air crash investigations, including the 2020 Air India Express Kozhikode crash, the 2016 Jet Airways skidding incident in Goa, and a 2019 taxiway mishap in Mangalore, the report said. A former DGCA official described him as 'an efficient and hardworking person.' Vipin Venu Varakoth Based in Mumbai, Vipin Venu Varakoth is an assistant director of air safety at DGCA with over 14 years of experience. His past roles include air safety officer. Veeraragavan K Currently assistant director of air safety at DGCA in Maharashtra's Mumbai, Veeraragavan K previously served in Delhi for nine years. Veeraragavan K also worked as an analysis engineer with Tata Consultancy Services in Chennai. Vaishnav Vijayakumar An air safety officer with DGCA, Vaishnav Vijayakumar has been part of several aircraft accident and incident investigations. The preliminary investigation report into the deadly Air India crash was released late Friday night, revealing details of the final moments of the ill-fated AI171 flight. The report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) said that both engines on the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner lost thrust shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad on June 12 — because the aircraft's fuel control switches had been turned off. The report also included a tense exchange between pilots extracted from the cockpit voice recordings recovered from the black box. In the first few, which were also the final, seconds of the flight one pilot asked the other, 'Why did you cut off the fuel?' The response came, 'I did not do so,' according to the AAIB report. The report based its finding on the data recovered from the Air India Boeing 787-7 plane's black boxes — combined cockpit voice recorders and flight data recorders.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
AI 171 Report Crashlands
AI 171 Report Crashlands Amit Singh Jul 13, 2025, 20:26 IST IST Inquiry is disservice to airlines flying Dreamliners. It's also slanted so that attention focuses not on possible technical problems but, minus any real evidence, on pilots On June 12, an Air India Boeing 787 took off from Ahmedabad and crashed moments later, killing all but one of its occupants. Exactly a month later, the official preliminary report was released. While it provides a basic sequence of events, it fails to answer the most critical question: When did the engines stop producing thrust? This isn't a technical debate. It's the key to understanding what went wrong, and who or what was responsible. Instead of offering clarity, the report quietly steers readers toward the idea of pilot error, without saying it outright. This subtle shift leaves many, especially those unfamiliar with aviation systems, assuming the pilots made a mistake. That assumption is both dangerous and unfounded.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Air India plane crash: Understanding the role of fuel control switches
The Air India AI171 crash highlights the critical role of fuel control switches, which caused a dual-engine failure just after takeoff, leading to the tragic loss of 260 lives Deepak Patel New Delhi What Are Fuel Control Switches? Fuel control switches on the Boeing 787 are critical cockpit levers that control whether fuel flows to the aircraft's engines. Each engine has its own switch, located at the base of the throttle levers on the central control pedestal. These switches can be set to two positions: RUN, which allows fuel to flow to the engine, and CUTOFF, which stops fuel supply and shuts down the engine. To prevent accidental activation, the switches are spring-loaded and require a two-step action: the pilot must pull the switch outward and then rotate it. This deliberate motion ensures that the switches cannot be bumped or moved unintentionally. Pilots typically operate the fuel control switches during two key phases: at engine start-up on the ground and during engine shutdown after landing. Outside of these routine phases, the switches are used only in very specific in-flight emergency situations—such as an engine fire, severe engine damage, or other serious malfunctions—when the crew needs to quickly cut off fuel to prevent further hazard. According to the preliminary crash report made public by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Saturday, both fuel control switches on Air India flight AI171 moved from the RUN to the CUTOFF position three seconds after the aircraft became airborne from Ahmedabad on 12 June. This simultaneous transition led to the immediate loss of thrust in both engines. With no engine power and little altitude, the aircraft was unable to maintain lift and crashed within seconds into the BJ Medical College hostel compound, resulting in 260 fatalities. The report does not clarify whether the switches were physically moved by a pilot or changed state due to a mechanical or electrical issue. Regardless of the cause, the result was an uncommanded and complete engine failure at the most critical phase of flight—right after takeoff—when altitude and time were limited. What Pilots Are Trained to Do — and Why Time Ran Out In the event of an engine shutdown, pilots are trained to refer to the Quick Reference Handbook (QRH), a manual kept in the cockpit that outlines step-by-step procedures for handling emergencies. For dual engine failure, the QRH instructs the crew to stabilise the aircraft's glide path, confirm the failure, and attempt an engine restart. This includes checking switch positions, verifying fuel flow, and initiating relight procedures using both airspeed and electrical power. On the Boeing 787, the relight process also depends on minimum altitude and airspeed thresholds being met. In the case of AI171, the dual-engine power loss occurred just after takeoff—at extremely low altitude and within seconds of becoming airborne. According to the preliminary report, the pilots did attempt to restart the engines and were able to relight the left engine. However, by that time, the aircraft had already lost critical speed and altitude, leaving little margin for recovery. The plane did not gain enough thrust to climb or stabilise, and crashed into the BJ Medical College hostel compound seconds later. Although the crew followed emergency protocols under extreme time pressure, the conditions left no meaningful window to complete the full QRH checklist or regain control of the flight.
