In latest standoff with Raj Bhavan, Himachal government withdraws 2 V-C recruitment ads
The advertisements were issued on July 21 by selection committees constituted by Governor Shukla in his capacity as the chancellor of both universities.
The government notification issued by the office of C Paulrasu, Secretary (Agriculture), termed the advertisements 'illegal' and contrary to the spirit of the Constitution. The notification declared the advertisements withdrawn and said any action based on them would be treated as 'null and void'.
The notification also referred to the observation of the office of the Himachal advocate general on this issue. 'This matter was referred to the office of learned Advocate General for the legal opinion. The Advocate General opined 'Section 22 of the University Act under this section Chancellor is an officer of the University. Therefore, his Excellence the Governor while acting as Chancellor is not performing the duties of the 'office of Governor' but as officer of the University, who is bound by the directives/instructions of the government,' the notification stated.
'When the government has requested Chancellor to drop the advertisements till the passing of Amendment Bill (Himachal Pradesh Universities of Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry (Amendment) Bill, 2023), Chancellor is bound by the directions of the Government,' it added.
The Amendment Bill was passed by the Assembly in September 2023 and sent to the Raj Bhavan for the governor's approval. However, the governor returned the draft Bill to the state government, seeking some changes.
'Governor Shukla has gone to Delhi. He is scheduled to return today [Tuesday]. We will be able to make any comment after discussing with him,' a senior officer at Raj Bhavan said.
The Himachal Assembly had passed the Himachal Pradesh Universities of Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry (Amendment) Bill, 2023 (Bill No. 14 of 2023) on September 21 last year and sent it to the governor for assent. The governor returned it with the observation that the Model Act for Higher Agricultural Educational Institutions in India (Revised 2023) should be incorporated for constituting the selection committee. The Bill is likely to be taken up again in the Monsoon Session beginning September 18.
Meanwhile, Governor Shukla set up selection committees on May 15 and June 21 to fill the V-C posts at the two universities. On July 21, the committees issued advertisements for the posts.
According to the three-page notification, the governor's move to issue the advertisements was discussed extensively in the recently held Cabinet meeting under Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu on July 27, following which a decision to withdraw the selection process initiated by the Raj Bhavan was taken.
The notification mentioned that state Agriculture Minister Chander Kumar, in a letter to the Governor's secretariat on July 26, had urged that the process be halted. 'The Legislative Assembly is reconsidering the Amendment Bill, 2023. Therefore, the continuation of the selection process is not only illegal but also against the spirit of the Constitution and democratic values,' he wrote.
In reply, the governor's secretariat noted that the Palampur agriculture university post has been vacant since 2023 and the Nauni horticulture university post since May 2025. It stated that the selection committee was formed strictly under the HP Universities of Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry Act, 1986, guidelines, and the advertisements were issued according to rules.
The Himachal Pradesh government and the Raj Bhavan have locked horns on various issues, including drug abuse in the state, revenue land, etc.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
11 minutes ago
- Economic Times
BJP will go to any extent of immorality to remain in power: Kharge
Mallikarjun Kharge alleged that the BJP is willing to be immoral to stay in power. He claimed irregularities are emerging in elections. Kharge said opposition votes are being cut in Bihar. He criticized the Election Commission's impartiality. Kharge also accused central agencies of being used against opponents. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Friday alleged that the ruling BJP is ready to go to any extent of immorality to remain in power and reiterated that several "irregularities" in elections are emerging across the his Independence Day speech after unfurling the national flag at the Congress headquarters at Akbar Road, he alleged that votes of the opposition are being openly cut in the name of Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar electoral rolls, even as those alive are being declared Congress chief said the "most surprising" thing was that the BJP has had no objection to votes of 65 lakh people being cut. This clearly shows who benefited from the SIR exercise, he said."This is not a fight to win elections but to save India's democracy and protect the Constitution," Kharge said, referring to the Congress' opposition to the SIR exercise."Now the ruling party is ready to go to any extent of immorality to remain in power. Large-scale irregularities are coming to light in elections," he alleged."In the name of Special Intensive Revision, votes of the opposition are being openly cut. Those who are alive have been declared as dead. The impartiality of the Election Commission can be understood from the fact that it is not ready to tell whose votes are being cut and on what basis," he Congress chief also claimed that central investigation agencies like ED and CBI, and the Income Tax department have been used "so openly for political purposes against the opponents that the Supreme Court of the country has to show them the mirror".Kharge claimed that India has lost the special place it earned due to its 'non-alignment policy'."The dream that the heroes of independence saw for this country is going away from us today," he said. PTI
Deccan Herald
43 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Karnataka faces discrimination in distribution of resources from Centre: Siddaramaiah
He also said that there is growing concern that Constitutional bodies like the Income Tax Department, Enforcement Directorate, CBI, and others are not working to uphold the true values of democracy and cooperative federalism as enshrined in the Constitution.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Dismiss debate on EC functioning as ‘hoo-haa', then hail India as ‘robust democracy'
The EC is meant to be an autonomous constitutional body. In June 1949, the Constituent Assembly deliberated on its role and the need to keep it outside the executive's purview. It appointed a committee to deal with what were called Fundamental Rights. That committee recommended that elections to the legislature be regarded as a fundamental right and treated accordingly. Dismissing the intense public debate on the independence and functioning of the EC as 'hoo-ha', while simultaneously hailing India as a 'robust democracy,' reflects a clear ignorance of the very definition of democracy and the critical role the EC plays in preserving and sustaining it. Retired entrepreneur Jaithirth Rao concluded his treatise on the Election Commission of India thus: 'The hoo-ha about the Election Commission, about electoral rolls, and about EVMs suggests that irksome comic relief remains a part of the loud debates of our robust democracy. Perhaps we can also try to find other topics for loud debates.' The House, while recognising the fundamental importance of elections, wanted them to be provided for in another part of the Constitution rather than in the chapter dealing with Fundamental Rights. It affirmed—without any dissent—that in the interest of the purity and freedom of elections to legislative bodies, it was of the utmost importance to free them from any interference by the executive of the day. Accordingly, elections were removed from the category of Fundamental Rights and placed in a separate part containing Article 289, which transferred the superintendence, direction, and control of the preparation of electoral rolls and of all elections to Parliament and the state legislatures to a body outside the executive, to be called the Election Commission. In the final draft of the Constitution, this provision became Article 324. Also read: Not 'One Election', India needs a just election. Step one is an impartial EC Making the EC subservient to the Centre The Supreme Court drew on these deliberations while delivering its judgment in W.P. (Civil) No. 104 of 2015 on 2 March 2023: 'Keeping in view the importance of maintaining the neutrality and independence of the office of the Election Commission to hold free and fair election which is a sine qua non for upholding the democracy as enshrined in our Constitution, it becomes imperative to shield the appointment of Election Commissioners and to be insulated from the executive interference. 'We declare that the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and the Election Commissioners shall be made on the recommendations made by a three-member Committee comprising of the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition of the Lok Sabha and in case no Leader of Opposition is available, the Leader of the largest opposition party in the Lok Sabha in terms of numerical strength and the Chief Justice of India…' The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 does the very opposite, making the EC subservient to the whims of the Prime Minister and Home Minister of the day, thereby endangering the very purpose for which the Commission was constituted. The results are clear: the EC has virtually become an extension of the North and South Block on Delhi's Raisina Hill. This bids farewell to free and fair elections in the 'world's largest democracy.' Evidence of this erosion came in the form of a letter to the EC by the Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG) of former senior civil servants on 11 April 2024: 'The ECI has made no efforts to assuage doubts in the minds of the thinking public and political parties about the integrity of EVMs and the need to use VVPATs effectively to ensure accuracy in the recording of votes. Nor has the ECI been particularly effective in enforcing the Model Code of Conduct to check its misuse, especially by the party in power… In the current elections as well, infractions of the Model Code of Conduct by no less a personage than the Prime Minister have not been acted upon by the ECI even after these were brought to its notice… In spite of the enormous powers vested in it under Article 324 of the Constitution of India, the ECI, in recent years, has exhibited a strange diffidence, especially in dealing with actions that impact the conduct of free and fair elections.' Also read: Listen to Rahul Gandhi. Fake voters should appall you, whichever party you support The shadow of doubt over 2024 elections Such an indictment by a group of former officials—who have direct knowledge and experience in conducting, monitoring, and supervising elections over the years—clearly indicates the decay and degeneration that has set into the EC. And this is not without reason. In August 2024, the Independent Panel for Monitoring Indian Elections (IPMIE) summed up the conduct and integrity of the 2024 parliamentary election thus: 1. Electoral procedure and alleged infractions in vote counting: The absence of adequate cross-verification between EVMs and VVPATs—the insistence on non-counting of VVPATs by design—may have facilitated large-scale, spurious injections of votes during each of the seven phases of voting. 2. Voting registration and allegations of voter exclusion and suppression: State-led voter suppression measures were reported from Gujarat (where hundreds of Muslim fishermen were reportedly struck off from voter rolls), Uttar Pradesh (where dozens of voters in Muslim- concentration villages were reportedly physically assaulted and restrained from voting by policemen), Jammu & Kashmir (where policemen detained party workers and activists unlawfully) and Assam, where around 100,000 residents had in the past been designated as 'doubtful voters' by the ECI. 3. Party financing and abuse of state agencies to deny level playing field: Data relating to electoral bonds appeared to confirm the ruling party's near-monopoly over political financing. 4. Sectarian rhetoric and media coverage: Throughout the election period, the BJP, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, engaged in sectarian rhetoric on a hitherto unprecedented scale. At least 287 instances of hate speeches (including 61 by Modi) have been documented. The BJP's core narrative demonised Muslims (who were referred to as 'infiltrators' and 'jihadis', among other dehumanising terms). 5. Electoral authority: The ECI appeared largely to act like an arm of the government, refusing to take decisive action against violations of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) and of electoral laws by ruling party members. The ECI's conduct throughout the election process reflected a systematic abdication of its constitutional obligation to conduct free and fair elections. Efforts by opposition parties, election watch bodies and citizens groups to address the many concerns to EC, went unheeded. 6. Lack of electoral redress: The performance of India's higher judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court (SC), during the 2024 General Elections to remedy various electoral integrity related grievances was weak and inadequate. Also read: Election Commission can't be a kingdom within a kingdom; it needs central oversight: KM Munshi Undoing of India's electoral democracy To make the EVM system auditable and voter-verifiable, the Supreme Court ordered the introduction of VVPATs in 2013. But in defiance of this order, in February 2018 Chief Election Commissioner OP Rawat directed state chief electoral officers to verify VVPAT slips in only one randomly selected polling station per assembly constituency. This pathetically low 0.3 per cent sample size defeated the very purpose of installing VVPATs in all EVMs — tantamount to non-implementation of the Supreme Court's order. Through bluff, bluster, and false affidavits filed in the Supreme Court, the EC has reduced VVPATs to meaningless bioscopes. Experts say this deliberate denial of verifiability and auditability has facilitated the spurious injection of votes in various constituencies by inflating vote percentages across multiple polling phases. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, as well as in the Haryana and Maharashtra assembly polls, there were astounding mismatches or spikes — ranging from 7 per cent to 12 per cent — between the number of votes recorded immediately after polling and the figures released before counting. These anomalies, now the subject of raging controversy, have been compounded by the EC's failure to provide Form 17C—the ultimate proof of votes polled—to all candidates or their agents. This has triggered the suspicion of a 'stolen mandate'. Adding to this is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar, which looks like a 'panic attack' on the EC that bypassed established training, drafting, and procedural safeguards. The electoral roll revision has no basis in law and was 'invented in haste' to pursue an agenda of disenfranchising millions of voters. The Supreme Court has observed that 'SIR of Bihar's electoral rolls is a contest between Article 324, which empowers the EC to control elections, and the constitutional right of adult suffrage enshrined in Article 326 of the Constitution.' All of this reflects the arrogant and dismal functioning of the EC and its failure to ensure the integrity and fairness of elections, its raison d'être. By its commissions and omissions, the EC has landed itself in a whirlwind and is now facing an existential crisis. This could well be the undoing of India's electoral democracy. M.G. Devasahayam is a retired IAS officer and chairman of People-First. He also served in the Indian Army. He is the author of Emergency and Neo-Emergency: Who will defend Democracy? Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
