Hunting for Burmese pythons is best done in the dark
To combat this invasive species, the state sponsors a popular annual hunting contest in an effort to cull the population and works with various groups to catch the snakes. Scientists are also experimenting with finding the snakes with the environmental DNA that they leave behind. Now, University of Florida scientists have statistically analyzed data collected Burmese python contractors to figure out the most efficient way to remove the reptiles. The findings are detailed in a study recently published in the journal Scientific Reports.
Burmese pythons are considered generalist predators. They can eat pretty much anything and numerous species–including large deer–have been found in their gut during necropsies. They also eat protected and threatened Florida species including the wood stork and Key Largo woodrat. They can consume meals equivalent to 100 percent of their body mass. However, there have been no reported human deaths from wild-living Burmese pythons in Florida.
'Pythons disrupt food webs, altering predator-prey dynamics and reducing populations of key native species,' Alex Romer, a study co-author and a quantitative ecologist at UF/IFAS Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, said in a statement. 'By refining removal strategies, we're working to give native wildlife a chance to adapt and persist.'
The data was collected between May 2020 and April 2022 and the team analyzed a total of 4,092 surveys from python contractors totaling over 16,000 hours of effort in finding and containing the snakes. They looked through the data to see if factors like time of day or temperature impacted the chance of successfully removing a python. The team also analyzed whether the most surveyed areas in the state aligned with the highest python removals. This way, state officials can pinpoint regions where few contractors are catching a lot of pythons, indicating that more contractors should be working in these spots to remove more snakes.
The analysis indicated two regions where efforts to remove pythons could be bolstered with more surveying. The western edge of Big Cypress National Preserve in the south central portion of the state and a stormwater treatment area in Palm Beach County to the east.
The team also identified the optimal conditions that appear to improve survey outcomes.
Python surveys are most successful and efficient from May through October–Florida's wet season. A drop of barometric pressure the day before also increases the likelihood of a successful python survey.
The most efficient time to look for pythons is between the hours of 8 p.m. and 2 a.m. Surveying overnight generally yielded better results, except during periods of extreme cold. In Florida, this occurs when daily air temperatures reach 50 degrees Fahrenheit or lower.
[ Related: Burmese pythons stretch their mouths even wider than we thought possible. ]
Boats, canoes, kayaks, and airboats can also enhance survey effectiveness.
According to the team, this data can inform new guidelines for state and local governments for successful detection and removal efforts. It also highlights the importance in citizen science, the data was collected as part of the SFWMD Python Elimination Program. The project trains individuals from all backgrounds to safely locate and contain pythons.
'Managing pythons is an enormous effort, undertaken by Floridians deeply invested in restoring the intricate ecological processes that define the Everglades,' said Romer. 'This work is about safeguarding one of the world's most unique ecosystems—not just for today, but for generations to come.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
14 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Citizen scientists are accelerating ecology research, study says
It's a testament to the power of citizen science -- and it's not an isolated occurrence, according to a new study, which documents how scientists are harnessing iNaturalist data. Since iNaturalist was founded in 2008, observations submitted to the platform have been incorporated into more than 5,000 peer-reviewed papers, with references exploding in recent years, the scientists found. More than 1,400 such articles were published in 2022 -- 10 times as many as just five years earlier and a publication rate of nearly four studies per day. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up A photo provided by Brittany Mason, a data management analyst at the University of Florida, shows a butterfly she documented. BRITTANY MASON/NYT Advertisement The data has helped scientists identify new species, track the spread of invasive organisms, pinpoint critical habitats, predict the effects of climate change and explore animal behavior, among other things. 'INaturalist is really pervasive throughout the biodiversity research,' said Corey Callaghan, an ecologist at the University of Florida and an author of the paper, which was published in BioScience on Monday. 'It is fundamentally shaping the way that scientists think about research and think about designing studies and think about answering questions about biodiversity.' INaturalist users submit photos or audio recordings of the plants and animals they observe, along with the date, time and location. Anyone in the iNaturalist community can suggest an identification for the organism in the observation. If two-thirds of these suggestions agree, and the submission passes the platform's data quality review, the observation is classified as 'research grade,' and sent to a global biodiversity database available to scientists. Advertisement The emergence of the platform has coincided with the rise of smartphones equipped with high-quality cameras and audio recorders. The iNaturalist data set has grown exponentially in recent years. As of 2024, it contained more than 200 million observations collected by 3.3 million users. 'We're seeing this massive growth in data, and it's allowing us to study things globally and across a lot of taxonomic groups that would be challenging with small professional studies,' said Brittany Mason, a data management analyst at the University of Florida and an author of the study. A photo provided by Brittany Mason shows a smartphone with photos of snakes she documented. BRITTANY MASON/NYT Through May 2024, the researchers had identified 5,250 papers that used iNaturalist data. The papers encompassed observations on more than 600 plant, animal and fungal families observed in 128 countries. In many published papers, scientists drawing upon iNaturalist observations have analyzed basic data on the presence and absence of particular species: Where and when had certain plants and animals been observed? But even this seemingly simple data can shed light on many different processes and phenomena. In a 2023 paper, for instance, researchers used iNaturalist data to determine that the geographic range of the jaguarundi, a Latin American wildcat, no longer matched the map drawn up by experts. The cats seemed to have retreated from some former territory in Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay. The same sort of basic observational data has been used to detect the spread of invasive shrubs in New York and New Jersey, document how Australian megafires have influenced biodiversity and predict how climate change might affect critically endangered gibbons. Advertisement Over the past few years, an increasing share of papers have gone beyond basic presence and absence data to analyze the content of user-submitted photos. 'The iNaturalist imagery is a really rich data source,' Mason said. 'And it seems like researchers are starting to pick up on this.' (Machine learning is also making it more feasible for scientists to analyze large image collections.) Researchers have used iNaturalist images to analyze color variations in butterflies and snakes, compare the flower preferences of native and nonnative bees and document the diets of birds in the Andes. Still, the authors stress, data from iNaturalist, which has a variety of limitations, will never be a substitute for expert observations and professionally trained field biologists. Data from the platform can complement and accelerate the research that trained scientists are doing, they said. And Callaghan wants iNaturalist's users to know that the time and effort they're putting in is paying dividends. 'Keep doing what you're doing,' he said, 'and who knows where the future is going to take us with these data.' This article originally appeared in
Gizmodo
15 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Robo-Bunnies Are the Latest Weapon Against Florida's Invasive Pythons
Invasive Burmese pythons are a scourge upon South Florida. These massive snakes are one of the region's most pernicious pests, posing a significant risk to local biodiversity as they chow down on native wildlife. Burmese pythons were introduced to Florida through the exotic pet trade in the 1970s and are now among the state's top predators. Researchers and conservationists have been working to wrangle the python problem through capture and kill programs but have faced significant challenges. These elusive snakes are masters of camouflage that thrive in semi-aquatic, densely vegetated environments like the Everglades, making it difficult to find them. Now, a team of wildlife ecologists at the University of Florida has developed a new method for luring them out of their hiding places: robo-bunnies. Yes, you read that right. According to a UF statement, assistant professor and ecologist Chris Dutton ripped the stuffing out of 40 plush bunny toys and filled them with motors, heaters, and solar panels to make them mimic real marsh rabbit prey. The robo-bunnies are designed to trick pythons into thinking they're the real deal—or should we say, the real meal. They look like rabbits, move like rabbits, and even exhibit a living rabbit's body temperature. 'We want to capture all of the processes that an actual rabbit would give off,' said Dutton's colleague Robert McCleery, a UF professor of wildlife ecology and conservation who is leading the project, according to The Palm Beach Post. Previous studies showed that live rabbits placed in pens attract about one python per week on average, but it requires too much work to care for multiple rabbit pens spread out across the Everglades, The Palm Beach Post reported. Robo-bunnies require far less maintenance, offering a much less labor-intensive way to lure pythons into the open. Dutton and McCleery began testing their solar-powered, remote-controlled rabbits this month, placing them in pens in various parts of South Florida. Each robo-bunny is equipped with a motion-sensor camera that alerts researchers when a python approaches. If proven effective, this method could make it much easier for wildlife experts to capture these snakes. In recent years, Florida has taken aggressive steps to reduce the python population in the Everglades, including incentivized removal efforts such as the 2024 Florida Python Challenge. During this competition, more than 850 participants eliminated nearly 200 destructive pythons from public lands in South Florida. The grand prize winner, Ronald Kiger, removed 20 pythons and won $10,000. 'Every python that is removed and eliminated is making a difference to protect the Everglades and South Florida's diverse and native wildlife,' the South Florida Water Management District states. These invasive predators pose a significant threat to the Everglades ecosystem, reducing prey that panthers, raptors, bobcats, and other native predators rely on as primary food sources, the district adds. Dutton and McCleery's clever new lure may eventually help reduce the Burmese python's ecological impact, but first, they need data to show that it works. McCleery told Gizmodo that he expects to have that data by November. If the robo-bunnies' lifelike motion and body heat can't fool the snakes, the researchers plan to add rabbit scent to make them even more convincing, according to The Palm Beach Post.
Gizmodo
a day ago
- Gizmodo
Your Nature Photos Are Doing More Science Than You Think
With a smartphone in hand, anyone can be a naturalist. Apps like iNaturalist have surged in popularity over the last 15 years, with millions using them to document wildlife around the world. A new study shows that these observations contribute a deluge of data to scientific research. Use of iNaturalist has skyrocketed since its launch in 2008. This citizen science database now contains more than 200 million observations logged by over 3 million users globally, according to research published Monday, July 28, in the journal BioScience. This study is the first to comprehensively quantify how everyday people are contributing to biodiversity science through iNaturalist, coauthor Corey Callaghan, a global change ecologist at the University of Florida, told Gizmodo. He and his colleagues conducted a review of thousands of research articles, finding that the number of peer-reviewed studies using iNaturalist data surged more than tenfold in the last five years. 'Beyond documenting where species occur, the photos uploaded to iNaturalist offer a rich source of biological information—capturing habitat, species coloration, behavior, and more,' lead author Brittany Mason, data management analyst in Callaghan's research group, told Gizmodo in an email. 'Researchers are increasingly using this imagery data as a valuable source of ecological and behavioral data.' The rise of iNaturalist has ushered in a new era of citizen science. This free app—available for both iOS and Android—allows users to record wildlife observations and share their data with research partners such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Unlike some other apps that use AI to identify species, iNaturalist relies on its vast community of users for this task. 'Humans need to confirm the identification in order for it to go to research grade,' Callaghan said. This collaborative approach produces a wealth of rigorously vetted data that scientists can use to support their research. 'Many iNaturalist contributors aren't scientists by training, but the platform's user-friendly design empowers anyone to meaningfully participate in scientific discovery,' Mason said. Over 3.5 million iNaturalist users are now helping researchers track species ranges, detect invasive species, monitor climate impacts, and even discover new species, according to Callaghan. In 2011, for example, a user in Columbia documented this century's first confirmed record of the Columbian Weasel—an extremely rare species. No one had ever photographed one alive before, and this iNaturalist user's observation contributed to a 2019 study of its distribution in protected areas. The review shows that iNaturalist data have become pervasive in scientific literature, appearing in papers from 128 countries for over 638 taxonomic families. In the face of a global biodiversity crisis, there is an urgent need for cost-effective and efficient methods to document and assess the status of species, the authors state. As of 2022, 211 plant and animal species had gone extinct in the U.S. alone, and 2,288 were threatened or endangered, according to the Center for Sustainable Systems at the University of Michigan. As individuals, it's easy to feel powerless in a situation like this. This study shows, however, that citizen science is playing an increasingly important role in efforts to monitor, protect, and conserve species. The exponential growth of iNaturalist observations over the past several years has 'fundamentally shifted' the landscape of biodiversity research, Callaghan said, and it doesn't appear to be slowing down anytime soon. 'Thinking about what's coming five, ten years from now—it's mind-boggling,' Callaghan said. 'We still don't know the potential.
