Russian drone attacks on Ukraine hit all-time record in July
Russian attacks have killed hundreds of Ukrainian civilians since June.
A combined missile and drone attack on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv early Thursday killed 31 people, including five children, said rescuers.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said Friday that he wanted peace but that his demands for ending the nearly three-and-a-half year invasion were "unchanged".
Those demands include that Ukraine withdraw from territory it already controls and drop its NATO ambitions forever.
"The main thing is to eradicate the causes that gave rise to this crisis," Putin told reporters alongside Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko.
"We need a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries," Putin said.
- Flowers for the children -
In Kyiv, residents held a day of mourning for the 31 killed on Thursday, most of whom were in a nine-storey apartment block torn open by a missile.
AFP journalists at the scene on Friday saw rescue workers pulling bodies from the debris.
Iryna Drozd, a 28-year-old mother-of-three, was laying flowers at the site to commemorate the five children killed.
The youngest, whose lifeless body was found early Friday, was two years old.
"These are flowers because children died. We brought flowers because we have children. Our children live across the street from here," she told AFP.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who announced rescue operations had ended on Friday, said later that only Putin could end the war and renewed his call for a meeting between the two leaders.
"The United States has proposed this. Ukraine has supported it. What is needed is Russia's readiness," he wrote on X.
- 'We can wait' -
Putin made no mention of a possible meeting with Zelensky in his comments to reporters Friday, and suggested Kyiv was not ready for further negotiations.
"We can wait if the Ukrainian leadership believes that now is not the time," he said.
He said Russian troops were advancing "along the entire front line", and that Moscow had started mass producing "Oreshnik" -- a nuclear-capable, hypersonic missile that Moscow first fired on Ukraine last year.
The Kremlin has consistently rejected a ceasefire in Ukraine, saying in July it saw no immediate diplomatic way out of its nearly three-and-a-half year invasion.
US President Donald Trump on Thursday condemned Russia's actions in Ukraine, suggesting that new sanctions against Moscow were coming.
"Russia -- I think it's disgusting what they're doing. I think it's disgusting," Trump told journalists.
Trump also said he would send his special envoy Steve Witkoff, currently in Israel, to visit Russia next.
On Tuesday, the US leader issued a 10-day ultimatum for Moscow to halt its invasion, now in its fourth year, or face sanctions.
- 'Depraved' -
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas described Thursday's attacks as "depraved" on Friday and posted a picture of the bloc's flag at half mast.
"More weapons for Ukraine and tougher sanctions on Russia are the fastest way to end the war. Getting more air defenses to Ukraine fast is our priority," she added in a post.
Zelensky has been appealing to allies for more air defence systems and on Friday, Germany said it would soon start delivering two more US-made Patriot launchers to Ukraine.
Germany has already delivered three Patriot systems to Ukraine since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022.
bur-cad/mmp/jj
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
24 minutes ago
- ABC News
Federal politics live: Albanese and Macron speak about Gaza and agree to meet at UN summit
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has discussed the war in Gaza with French President Emmanuel Macron during a phone call overnight. The pair have agreed to meet again on the sidelines of a UN summit in New York, which France intends to use to recognise Palestinian statehood. Follow our live blog.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Netanyahu reportedly considers full takeover of Gaza
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has met with senior security officials to finalise a new strategy for the war in Gaza, with Israeli media reporting he is leaning towards a complete military takeover of the strip.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Legal stoush between Russia and Australia over embassy site near Parliament House reaches the High Court
There may be a touch of the Cold War in the air in Canberra today as Russia and Australia go into battle in the High Court over a new embassy. The dispute is over a law passed in 2023 which cancelled Russia's lease on the block, which is only 300 metres from Parliament House. At the time, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the law was needed on national security grounds. But a Russian spokesperson characterised it as a hostile action, showing "Russophobic hysteria". Now, the fight has arrived at the High Court of Australia. It all began nicely enough in 2008 when the Australian government granted the lease on the site to Russia to build a new embassy. The site is in the so-called "dress circle" around Parliament House in Canberra's leafy Yarralumla, near the Canadian, British and Chinese diplomatic missions. The new embassy was to replace Russia's low-profile building in Griffith, and would have included residential buildings as well as a large pool. But after what Russia says was a dispute with a builder, and then COVID-19 delays, the main embassy buildings had still not materialised. That triggered moves by the National Capital Authority to revoke the lease, creating a sticky legal and diplomatic situation, especially after Russia won a case in the Federal Court. Parliament stepped in in 2023, passing the law in a bid to head off the dispute, after advice from security agencies. Professor of International Law at the Australian National University, Don Rothwell, said nothing like this had happened in Canberra before. He said advances in technology may have been a factor in the decision to make the law. "The way in which embassies can eavesdrop on various activities of government, including Parliament House, has ... enhanced in recent years," Professor Rothwell said. Russia has fought the case all the way. A Russian diplomat even occupied the site for a time, refusing to leave so Australia could take control of the block. Today lawyers for Russia will tell the High Court the law is not valid because under the constitution, the parliament doesn't have the power to make such legislation. Russia has taken particular aim at the claim the law was necessary on national security grounds. "There is no evidence that the plaintiff was planning an internal attack such that termination of the lease was for the purpose of protecting Australia from an internal attack," the Russian submissions to the High Court say. But the Commonwealth submissions rely on the fact that "specific advice" was received about the nature of the construction that was planned and the capacity the location of the site would provide the Russian mission. "Parliament's power is at its zenith when it legislates to protect its own security, because if parliament cannot ensure the security of the very place where it meets then it cannot ensure a practical precondition to the exercise of Commonwealth legislative power," the Commonwealth submissions to the High Court said. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation advice on which the legislation was based has not been revealed to the High Court, because it is protected by public interest immunity. The Russians have told the High Court if they should lose on the first argument, and the law is found to be valid, they are entitled to "just terms" for the loss of the site. The Commonwealth said in its submissions the termination of the lease is far removed from the usual acquisition of property which attracts such compensation. "The constitutional conception of 'just terms' does not extend to requiring a foreign state to be compensated for actions … in order to address the risk of that foreign state interfering with Australia's democratic institutions," the submissions said. Professor Rothwell said that "the key question here is whether or not the termination of the lease is actually an acquisition of property for those purposes". He said Russia's pursuit of the case was probably a matter of principle. "Ultimately a good outcome for Russia could be that the Commonwealth is ordered to pay them certain compensation with respect to the question of the acquisition of this property." In the meantime Professor Rothwell said the current case had put other diplomatic missions on notice. "They are also aware of the fact that when they occupy an embassy — or in this case, they're seeking to build a new embassy — [that] they very much have to work with the Australian government and their principal interlocutor as the Department of Foreign Affairs," Professor Rothwell said. For the moment, the site remains vacant. It may be a prime position, but finding the right tenant is a whole other exercise.
