Trump administration urges states to limit what can be bought with food stamps
(Reuters) -The Trump administration is calling on states to request waivers that would bar food stamp recipients from buying soda and other processed foods with their benefits, according to a Thursday op-ed by U.S. health and agriculture secretaries, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Brooke Rollins.
The secretaries, in the USA Today op-ed, promised more shared initiatives to further the Make America Healthy Again agenda promoted by Kennedy and backed by President Donald Trump.
Kennedy and Rollins said the Departments of Health and Human Services and Agriculture were pursuing reforms to the nation's largest food aid program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and called on all governors to submit waivers to restrict what SNAP recipients can buy.
"We will encourage taxpayer dollars to go toward wholesome foods, such as whole milk, fruits, vegetables and meats," the secretaries wrote.
More than 41 million low-income people receive SNAP benefits, which are administered by the USDA.
The call for waivers is the latest chapter in a years-long debate over whether SNAP recipients should be able to use their benefits to buy soda or other processed foods. Critics of restrictions, including some Democrats, see them as stigmatizing.
Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen on April 7 sent a letter to Rollins indicating the state would request a waiver to prohibit SNAP recipients from buying soda and energy drinks with their benefits, according to a state press release.
West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey in late March signed a similar letter of intent at an event with Kennedy, according to a state press release.
There is little evidence that SNAP recipients consume significantly more soda than non-SNAP households. A 2016 USDA study found that soda was the top commodity category purchased by SNAP households and the No. 2 commodity for non-SNAP households, with the difference accounting for less than 1 cent per dollar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
18 minutes ago
- Fox News
About 600 CDC workers terminated after court clears part of Trump admin restructuring plan
Print Close By Danielle Wallace Published August 21, 2025 Approximately 600 employees at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been terminated, Fox News Digital has confirmed. It comes as part of a major restructuring of the Department of Health and Human Services announced in March. At the time, HHS said the CDC would decrease its workforce by approximately 2,400 employees, "with a focus on returning to its core mission of preparing for and responding to epidemics and outbreaks." A spokesperson for the American Federation of Government Employees told Fox News that roughly 600 CDC employees were receiving final termination notices this week and that the cuts "are across the agency, including the Division of Violence Prevention, EEO, FOIA, the Office of Financial Resources, the offices of the chief information and chief operating officers, and more." The CDC confirmed the roughly 600 recent layoffs, pointing to the March announcement that also said the restructuring would involve the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) – responsible for national disaster and public health emergency response – transitioning to the CDC to enhance coordination of response efforts. HHS noted the CDC decrease would only be 1,400 including the individuals coming over from ASPR – approximately 1,000 individuals. KENNEDY'S HHS TERMINATES CALIFORNIA SEX ED GRANT AFTER IT REFUSES TO DROP 'RADICAL' GENDER LESSONS Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is leading the restructuring of his department as part of President Donald Trump's initiative to "Make America Healthy Again." "We aren't just reducing bureaucratic sprawl. We are realigning the organization with its core mission and our new priorities in reversing the chronic disease epidemic," Kennedy said in a statement at the time. "This Department will do more – a lot more – at a lower cost to the taxpayer." On April 1, HHS officials sent layoff notices to thousands of employees at the CDC and other federal health agencies, part of the department's sweeping overhaul. Many have been on administrative leave since then – paid but not allowed to work – as lawsuits played out. A federal judge in Rhode Island last week issued a preliminary ruling that protected employees in several parts of the CDC, including groups dealing with smoking, reproductive health, environmental health, workplace safety, birth defects and sexually transmitted diseases. The ruling did not protect other CDC employees, and layoffs are being finalized across other parts of the agency. The terminations were effective as of Monday, employees were told. The Associated Press reported that affected projects included work to prevent rape, child abuse and teen dating violence. The laid-off staff included people who have helped other countries to track violence against children — an effort that helped give rise to an international conference in November at which countries talked about setting violence-reduction goals. MEDICAL GROUP GOES AGAINST CDC, RECOMMENDS COVID SHOTS FOR YOUNG KIDS "There are nationally and internationally recognized experts that will be impossible to replace," Tom Simon, the retired senior director for scientific programs at the CDC's Division of Violence Prevention, told the AP. The latest cuts come less than two weeks after a man fired at least 180 bullets into the CDC's campus and killed a police officer. Kennedy has been pushing other policy changes at the CDC. In May, Kennedy announced that the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women had been removed from the CDC-recommended immunization schedule. The CDC currently advises what it calls "shared clinical decision-making" for children aged 6 months to 17 years who are not moderately or severely immunocompromised. This means the decision is left up to individual discussions between families and their healthcare providers, but the vaccine is not treated as routine. Kennedy made the decision in June to fire all 17 members of the CDC's independent advisory council on vaccines and named eight replacements in a step he said was aimed at "restoring public trust in vaccines." Earlier this week, the HHS secretary blasted the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for going against CDC guidance to recommend that all children 6 to 23 months old receive a complete COVID-19 vaccine series. Kennedy shared a screenshot from the pediatricians' association's website, which thanks pharmaceutical companies Merck, Moderna, Pfizer and Sanofi as its top corporate donors. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "These four companies make virtually every vaccine on the CDC recommended childhood vaccine schedule. AAP is angry that CDC has eliminated corporate influence in decisions over vaccine recommendations and returned CDC to gold-standard science and evidence-based medicine laser-focused on children's health," Kennedy wrote. Fox News' Leah Crawley and the Associated Press contributed to this report. Print Close URL
Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Swing-state gov slams Trump plan to nix mail-in voting: He ‘can sign whatever the hell he wants'
President Donald Trump took heat from a major swing-state governor and potential 2028 Democratic presidential contender who scoffed Wednesday at the idea of eliminating mail-in balloting by fiat. "Donald Trump can sign whatever the hell executive orders he wants to sign and make a show out of whatever he wants, but he can't change the Constitution with an executive order," Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said at a press conference in Harrisburg. "The Constitution gives the authority to set our election rules to the states," Shapiro said. "Let me remind you that it was just about five years ago that a bipartisan majority in the House and in the Senate passed mail-in voting. And [since] that time, millions of people have voted by mail," Shapiro said. He was referring to Act 77 of 2019, which several Republicans supported but later accused Democrats and left-leaning judges of substantially altering post-hoc. Shapiro said Pennsylvania has enjoyed "free and fair" elections – and added that Trump has both won and lost the commonwealth in contests throughout his political career. "For him to try and put more misinformation out there, to stoke more division and fear amongst people who want to exercise their constitutional right to pick the leaders in their communities and in their commonwealth – that is just cynical and wrong." Shapiro said any Trump order will have "no bearing" on Keystone State elections, and that he will support county election officials in all 67 counties in permitting mail-in voting. Former Pennsylvania House Speaker Bryan Cutler, R-Lancaster, lambasted the bipartisan mail-in-vote law Shapiro referenced – accusing Democrats and the popularly-elected Pennsylvania Supreme Court of "diluting" it from its original purpose. "Only one party [worked to] eliminate security safeguards, and delay the timelines for elections," Cutler said in an LNP column, adding the Democrat-controlled high bench "unconstitutionally acted to change the law for receiving and counting ballots [and] allowed for drop boxes … and stripped the security provisions for mail-in ballots." On Monday, Trump foreshadowed changes to the election system, pledging to "lead a movement to get rid of mail-in ballots." Trump wrote on Truth Social he would sign an executive order in that regard to "help bring honesty to the 2026 midterm elections," and said states are "merely agent[s]" for the federal government.
28 minutes ago
Iowa Democrats consider bringing back lead off caucuses, even if it means going 'rogue' in 2028
DES MOINES, Iowa -- Just days before national Democrats gather for their annual summer meeting, Iowa's state party officials on Thursday said it was a mistake for the party to have abandoned Iowa in the 2024 early nominating calendar and opened up the possibility of going rogue the next time around. In 2022, President Joe Biden ordered a shake-up of the 2024 election calendar, moving South Carolina's primary ahead of contests in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada. The move forced Iowa Democrats to ditch the five-decade, first-in-the-nation caucus where community members publicly signal their support for a candidate, a process that was plagued with problems in 2020. The state party's criticism came with an open threat of defying the national party's orders in 2028 as Iowa Democrats look to bring the once-competitive, Midwestern state back on the radar of a party questioning its values, direction and future leaders. 'It was a big mistake in the Biden calendar to know that Iowa Republicans are going first here in this state and that, as Democrats, we sat and watched all this attention and the millions of dollars being spent in the state without those kinds of resources to push back on the Republican agenda," said Rita Hart, state party chair. 'That did not help us here in Iowa and it did not help us long term for the national Democratic cause.' Hart said that would be reflected in her own response to the state party's new survey, designed to solicit feedback from Democrats across the state on the priorities for 2028, including on the tradeoffs of the traditional caucus process and potential threats from the Democratic National Committee. Officials in the traditionally four early-voting states — and many others — are readying themselves to campaign for top billing, even though it's likely still two years before the Democratic National Committee actually solidifies the order. Iowa Democrats said Thursday that Ken Martin, chair of the Democratic National Committee, might unveil the process for states to make their 2028 pitch at next week's biannual meetings. Democratic officials said they expect to have preliminary conversations next week. But Iowa's Scott Brennan will no longer be a member of the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee, which deals with the nominating process. That leaves Iowa without a seat at the table for the first time for the better part of 25 years, Brennan said. Brennan, former state party chair, said Iowans are 'rule followers by nature' but reiterated Thursday that last cycle's process was not fair as he conveyed his own wishes for 2028: "Full speed ahead and damn the DNC." Last year, Iowa Democrats held caucuses eight days before any other state's contest, as is required by Iowa law. But Democratic voters had cast their 2024 presidential preference ballots by mail, with results released that March on Super Tuesday alongside other states. Meanwhile, New Hampshire rebelled in 2024, holding an unsanctioned primary in January, but the DNC ultimately dropped its threat to not seat the state's national convention delegates. Even as the Iowa Democratic Party considers going forward with a first-in-the-nation contest once again, it will still come with logistical questions. The survey includes questions on how the party should handle issues of inclusion and accessibility for the process, which has historically required participants to be registered with the party and physically present, sometimes for hours, in the evening during the heart of the Midwest winter. While Hart said the survey is designed to better understand Iowa Democrats' values to guide their approach to 2028, she suggested there are 'too many moving pieces' to say now how that approach will look. For now, 2028 prospects are making visits to the historically early states, including Iowa. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz reemerged after the 2024 election loss with a town hall in Des Moines in March; Biden's Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who performed well in the 2020 Iowa caucuses, stopped by a VoteVets Action Fund gathering in May; and Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona spoke to hundreds in eastern Iowa earlier this month. Brennan seemed to suggest Iowa Democrats' future is simple. 'The fact of the matter is is that Iowa law requires that we be a caucus,' he said, "and I think we intend to be a caucus.'
