logo
Editorial: Chicago has struggled to regain international tourism. Now that's coming true for the entire nation.

Editorial: Chicago has struggled to regain international tourism. Now that's coming true for the entire nation.

Chicago Tribune06-04-2025

Choose Chicago finally has a new head honcho in Kristen Reynolds, formerly the CEO of the tourism agency Discover Long Island. Reynolds will have her work cut out for her and not just because marketing Chicago is a whole lot more complicated than selling Fire Island and the Hamptons.
Even as New York recovered relatively quickly from the pandemic, Chicago has been struggling with international tourism.
Anyone who has been around town for a while can remember the days when there were far more foreign languages being spoken on Michigan Avenue. The challenges are self-evident but we'll tick them off: not enough major new attractions with global heft (like the lost Lucas Museum of Narrative Art); a lack of attention to the retail problems on the Magnificent Mile; lousy sports teams that haven't spawned another Michael Jordan; transit and other transportation challenges; 'teen takeovers' unnerving and sometimes harming tourists; the nagging international perception of Chicago equaling 'bang, bang'; the loss of some key international flights (albeit with the arrival of others); insufficient ignition of the city's massive architectural, historical, cultural and other assets; pandemic hangovers when it comes to the city's famed late-night scene, especially in the Loop; too much distance from international media; too much politically correct spending of tourism money in the 'right' aldermanic wards instead of focusing it on where international visitors really want to go.
All that and a certain culture of self-congratulation at Choose Chicago and a bit of Midwestern myopia, too.
We trust Reynolds, a tourism professional and very much not the political hack we feared, is aware of all of that, as well as the huge and beautiful assets on the other side of the ledger. But, frankly, the problems with international tourism are now far greater than anything specifically to do with Chicago.
Travel and Tour World, a trade publication, reported Wednesday that studies show inbound international travel to the U.S. is likely to decline by 5.5% in spending this year. That might not sound like much but last fall, prior to the election of the most isolationist president in living memory, 2025 was projected as a banner year for the sector, with anticipated spending growth a whopping 16%. Even a 5% decline represents a loss of billions of dollars as international tourists are big spenders.
Tourism World, an international forecasting firm based in Oxford, England, wrote in a research briefing late last month that we can expect to see a 9.4% decline in international visitor arrivals for 2025, led by a 20.2% decline in visitors from Canada. 'This loss includes $6.4 billion of decreased spending in destinations,' Tourism World wrote, 'plus $2.5 billion of lost transportation spending.' That's why airline stocks got hammered this week, including that of Chicago's hometown (at least for now) United Airlines, and why you are likely to see more flight cancellations as airlines recalibrate to meet demand.
Yet worse, the firm appended a note to its March 27 briefing Wednesday, saying the new, worse-than-expected tariffs announced Wednesday would increase 'negative impacts on US inbound travel.'
Why is all this happening? If you have to ask, you have not been paying attention.
Tourism World used the headline, 'Trump Rolls Up Welcome Mat for International Travelers,' and that pretty much says it all.
Crossings at the Canadian-U.S. border have dropped precipitously; 20% fewer Canadians are coming to the U.S., mostly because they're angry at Trump disrespecting their country with his '51st state' nonsense. Tourism World said a majority of Brits now have an unfavorable view of the U.S., as do a majority of Germans, along with French and Danish citizens, all numbers that have shown massive increases since Trump took office.
Plus there are genuine fears now of border detentions. The British press was full of the case of Becky Burke, a clearly benign 28-year-old backpacker who was denied entry to Canada from the U.S. due to the wrong Canadian visa, only then to have U.S. authorities put her in a detention facility where she languished for well over two weeks. While the full details of the case weren't clear, it appears that U.S. agents were worried Burke may have intended to do domestic work for a host family as a way of funding her solo travels, technically against the rules but hardly an egregious or uncommon offense.
Burke may have been careless and broken the rules, but she clearly had no intention to stay stateside and is no dangerous criminal. Stories like her more than two weeks of detention without a clear exit date given (or so her father told the BBC last month) are likely to make young 'gap year' travelers from Europe and Australasia change their minds about a planned U.S. road trip and pick friendlier nations like Canada instead.
Tourists are discretionary travelers and, notwithstanding its magnetic pull, the U.S. has competition for most of what it offers. Bermuda is seeing an explosive growth in Canadian visitors. Other Canadians are headed to Europe in greater numbers than before, at the expense of their North American neighbor.
We'll add that the experiences of 2001 and 2008 teach us that second cities like Chicago are more vulnerable to international flight pullbacks; links to capitals tend to be maintained even in recessions, but without that crucial leisure demand, it's hard to imagine, say, Chicago retaining its typical eight flights a day to London. (American Airlines had already cut its popular daytime flight.)
Foreign governments have been upping their travel warnings, too, especially for transgender travelers, to use one example.
This isn't rocket science: 'Leisure travelers have options,' Tourism World wrote, 'and negative shifts in sentiment toward the US are expected to adversely impact its global market share.'
So welcome to your new gig, Ms. Reynolds. You will have your work cut out for you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline
Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline

Associated Press

time33 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday rejected a bill that could have introduced more complications for a massive carbon-capture pipeline project routed across several Midwestern states, issuing a rare veto in the Republican-controlled statehouse. The legislation was designed by Iowa House Republicans to increase regulations of Summit Carbon Solutions' estimated $8.9 billion, 2,500-mile (4,023-kilometer) project that cuts across Iowa and already has an approved permit in the state. But in the Senate, it exposed a rift within the party over how to protect property rights. It also provoked loud opposition from members of Iowa's powerful ethanol industry, which argued the project is essential for Iowa's agricultural dominance, for farmers and for construction jobs. Even with the relief from Reynolds' veto, Summit will likely have to readjust plans after South Dakota's governor signed a ban on the use of eminent domain — the government seizure of private property with compensation — to acquire land for carbon dioxide pipelines. Summit's permit application was also rejected in South Dakota. The project has permit approvals in Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota but faces various court challenges. The Iowa bill would have prohibited the renewal of permits for a carbon dioxide pipeline, limited the use of such a pipeline to 25 years and significantly increased the insurance coverage requirements for the pipeline company. Those provisions would likely have made it less financially feasible for a company to build a carbon dioxide pipeline. As the legislative session wound down, a dozen Republican senators insisted their leaders bring the House-approved bill to the floor for a vote after several years of inaction. The stalemate ended in a long and divisive debate among the Iowa Senate's Republican supermajority, with senators openly criticizing one another and exposing the closed-door discussions that got them there. The pipeline's many critics have for years begged lawmakers for action. They accuse Summit of stepping on their property rights and downplaying the safety risks of building the pipeline alongside family homes, near schools and across ranches. Lee Enterprises and The Associated Press reviewed hundreds of cases that reveal the great legal lengths the company went to to get the project built. In South Dakota, in particular, a slew of eminent domain legal actions to obtain land sparked a groundswell of opposition that was closely watched by lawmakers in Iowa as well. But as debate in the state Senate seemed inevitable, dozens of Summit employees and leaders and members of the Iowa Corn Growers Association, the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association and labor unions made a big showing as well. The pipeline was proposed to carry carbon emissions from ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota to be stored underground permanently in North Dakota. By lowering carbon emissions from the plants, the pipeline would lower their carbon intensity scores and make them more competitive in the renewable fuels market. The project would also allow ethanol producers and Summit to tap into federal tax credits. Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Executive Director Monte Shaw said in a May 12 statement after the vote that a majority of the Iowa Senate 'turned their back on Iowa agriculture.'

Reynolds discusses British Steel row with Chinese counterpart
Reynolds discusses British Steel row with Chinese counterpart

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Reynolds discusses British Steel row with Chinese counterpart

Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, has discussed the government's move to seize control of British Steel with his Chinese counterpart for the first time. Sky News understands that the fate of the Scunthorpe-based steelmaker was raised during talks this week between Mr Reynolds and Wang Wentai, China's commerce minister, on Monday. A subsequent post on social media by Mr Reynolds confirming the meeting said the pair "discussed deeper UK-China cooperation - especially in services, investment and WTO reform - and building on January's successful Economic and Financial Dialogue to drive mutual growth". Money latest: The business secretary did not refer to British Steel in the post, although officials confirmed that the company was raised briefly during their meeting. It came days after Sky News revealed that British Steel's Chinese owner had hired the leading City law firm Linklaters to explore the recovery of hundreds of millions of pounds it invested in the Scunthorpe-based company before the government seized control of its operations in April. Linklaters advised Jingye Group on its purchase of British Steel in 2021. British Steel's balance sheet bears debts worth close to £1bn, most of which is said to be owed to Jingye in the form of inter-company loans. The government and Jingye had been at loggerheads for weeks over the future of the Scunthorpe plant's blast furnaces. Since Mr Reynolds, the business secretary, moved to commandeer control of the UK's second-biggest steel producer, the government has sourced additional supplies of raw materials to ensure the furnaces' continued operations. Jingye had been preparing to close them - with the loss of thousands of jobs - after seeking £1bn in state aid to facilitate the site's transition to greener steelmaking. Politics latest: Mr Reynolds has indicated that Jingye's shares in British Steel - which has not yet been formally nationalised - are worthless, and that the government does not intend to offer to pay to acquire them. A spokesman for the Department for Business and Trade said: "We are working closely with Jingye and a range of third parties on options for the future, and we will continue work on determining the best long-term sustainable future for the site."

Gorham voters pass school budget despite opposition campaign
Gorham voters pass school budget despite opposition campaign

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Gorham voters pass school budget despite opposition campaign

Jun. 10—Voters handily approved Gorham's $57.5 million school spending plan Tuesday 2,083 to 1,879, a 204 vote margin. The town favored keeping the budget validation referendum in place 2,748 to 1,170. Unopposed on the ballot, voters returned Jaci Reynolds to the School Committee until November. Reynolds was appointed earlier this year to fill a vacancy until the June election. Reynolds garnered 2,579 voted compared to 379 write-ins. Gorham's approved spending plan rises $4 million, or 7.6% over the present $53.5 budget that narrowly survived a recount by two votes a year ago. Resident Ben Tuttle, a founding member of Gorham Watchdogs, spearheaded a opposition campaign against school spending in town. Tuttle created a social media blitz on Facebook, X and Tik Tok and signs posted round town urged a No vote. The School Department countered with a town-wide bulk mailing and widely posted school supporters' signs indicated love for the schools. Gorham has struggled to pass school budgets in recent years. In 2023, Gorham voters rejected two versions of the school budget before approving a third. Last year, the budget was approved on the first try, but by only after a recount determined it passed by two votes. Copy the Story Link

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store