Police warn against 'threatening' behaviour during President Trump's visit to Scotland
A senior police officer has warned against "abusive" and "threatening" protests in the run up to President Trump's five day visit to Scotland.
Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond urged protestors to stay within the law as she said the priority will be for the US president to have a 'peaceful and safe' visit.
Known as Operation Roll, the exact numbers of police involved have not been revealed but it is expected to require Police Scotland's entire cadre of police liaison officers.
The White House confirmed Trump will visit his golf courses in Aberdeenshire and Ayrshire between July 25 and 29.
He will meet Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and First Minister John Swinney during his private trip.
The visit is likely to result in widespread protests, following similar demonstrations during his last visit to Scotland.
Speaking to journalists on Tuesday, Bond encouraged protest groups to discuss their plans with police ahead of the visit.
She said: 'As you can imagine, it is a large-scale, complex operation, but actually that's something that Police Scotland is immensely experienced at doing.'
The policing plan involves local, national and specialist officer from Police Scotland as well as other forces.
She added: 'The key very much is to make sure the President of the United States can come, enjoy a peaceful and safe visit to Scotland and ensure Police Scotland is able to maintain delivery of services to the rest of the community within Scotland over the period of his visit.'
Police are working on the assumption there will be protests in Ayrshire, Aberdeen, Glasgow and Edinburgh, she said.
Bond said Police Scotland will take a 'proportionate' approach to ensure people can protest safely, with the force offering to engage with demonstrators ahead of time on a 'no surprises' basis.
However she said there is nothing at this stage to give her 'specific concern' about violence.
Scottish Police Federation are 'being resolved'.
The organisation, which represents rank and file officers, said workforce agreements around health and safety may be breached.
Asked for her message to those considering disruptive protest, she said ' Police Scotland fully recognises people's right to peaceful protest… 'We would wish to make sure we can balance those rights against against the impact on communities, on public safety.
'I would appeal to people obviously to stay within the bounds of peaceful protest.
'I'd be really clear however that abusive, threatening behaviour, any activity that's intended to disrupt events or in any way that poses a risk to public safety is not legitimate protest and will potentially require an intervention by policing.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump introduces new wave of tariffs
The Trump administration announced a new trade policy and tariff plan, setting different rates based on a country's trade balance with the US. Goods from countries with a trade surplus will face a 10 per cent tariff, while those with a trade deficit will be subject to at least a 15 per cent tariff. More than a dozen nations with the highest trade deficits, including Syria (41 per cent) and Switzerland (39 per cent), will face tariffs exceeding 15 per cent. The tariff on Canadian goods increased from 25 per cent to 35 per cent, with the White House citing Canada's "continued inaction and retaliation." The new policy, initially set for 1 August, has been delayed until 7 August to allow US Customs and Border Protection time to implement the changes.
STV News
20 minutes ago
- STV News
Has ban on XL Bully dogs made Scots safer?
It's been one year since Scotland introduced restrictions on XL Bully dogs following a series of high-profile attacks that shocked the nation. But 12 months on, has the legislation improved public safety? Those on both sides of the ban don't think so, with owners of the breed saying it has caused chaos and confusion. Meanwhile, others believe the ban should be extended to other breeds. Rose was just five years old when she was mauled by a dog near her home. It wasn't an XL Bully but a smaller, similar breed. STV News Rose was left scarred by the attack. Gillian Dempster, Rose's mum, told STV News: 'There was a lot of blood. I was checking her head and her ear was detached from the back of her scalp. 'She also had lacerations under her eye that were quite bad. She had lacerations under her lip and to the front of her lip. 'She had lost two teeth and her body was full of scratches.' STV News Gillian Dempster. Rose needed surgery. Her physical wounds have healed, but the psychological trauma lingers as she's now fearful around dogs. Gillian believes the current ban on XL Bullies doesn't go far enough and should be extended to include other dangerous breeds. On the other side of the argument is Kerryanne Shaw, who rescued Bilbo just before the ban came into force in Scotland last year. She says the law has been poorly implemented, causing confusion for responsible owners and unfairly targeting the breed. 'It's targeting the wrong people and the wrong dogs,' said Shaw, who is chairwoman of All Bullie Charity Rescue. STV News Kerryanne Shaw. She added: 'They are seen as status symbols, so they are used for the wrong reasons. This is where we're seeing lots of attacks. 'Until we start to tackle that and the irresponsible breeders, who aren't breeding well-tempered dogs, healthy dogs, then we're not going to make any difference. 'We're still seeing owners coming to us and asking 'do you think my dog meets the criteria?'. People just don't have a full grasp of the legislation, so we're dealing with a lot of chaos and confusion.' XL Bullies are the first breed in more than 30 years to be added to the UK's banned list. Under the law, they can't be bred, sold, or rehomed, and must be muzzled and kept on a lead in public. Owners must also have their dogs microchipped, neutered, and insured to qualify for exemption. Enforcement falls to Police Scotland, but officers say they're under-trained, under-resourced, and stretched thin. STV News David Threadgold, chair of the SPF, said: 'Our officers are being asked to handle aggressive or distressed dogs without proper training or facilities. 'It's putting people at risk and it's not sustainable.' The latest data shows a sharp rise in dog attacks over the last two decades, with nearly four times as many hospital admissions now than in the late 90s. There has been a slight drop following the July ban. But some fear another breed – like the Cane Corso – will simply become the new so-called 'status' dog and question whether the legislation will have any meaningful long-term impact. Animal welfare groups, including the Scottish SPCA, agree the problem isn't breed, but behaviour. The Scottish Government says it's working with police local authorities and others to make sure these legal safeguards to support responsible ownership are effectively implemented. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
What John Swinney gets right about Scottish independence
He came, he saw, he putted. Donald Trump's visit to Scotland was the expected whirlwind – a golfing trip during which he fitted in some diplomacy (if that's the right word with this president) with the leaders of the EU, the UK and Scotland. Trump clearly enjoyed himself, to the extent that he suggested he could become first minister once he's done with the US and the rest of the world. That joke raised quite the entertaining vision, as did his description of Scotland as a land of 'no crime, no muggings. You don't have people being hit over the head when they are not looking with a baseball bat, they're not pushed into a subway.' Not at the five-star Turnberry resort, anyway. John Swinney had two chances to beard Trump, at a dinner and then at a head-to-head, and spoke to him about whisky tariffs and the ongoing crisis in Gaza. For all Trump's unpopularity, meeting the leader of the free world is the kind of moment that elevates any first minister. The far left carps, as the far left does, but Swinney was right to take his opportunity. He behaved like a grown up. That, so far, has been the mark of Swinney's time in office. These things are relative, but he has been a moderating force, dragging his party back to the centre ground after the leftist administrations of Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf. Much of his attention is on fixing the NHS – he has a plan, and we will see whether it bears fruit (it had better). There is also a focus on growing the economy. To many, these are obvious priorities for government activity, but it has not always been like that in Scotland. There is a limit to how long any SNP leader can get away with talking about anything other than independence, of course, and the First Minister is as committed to his party's raison d'etre as the most passionate activist. It is his life's work, and even his moderation is merely a means of achieving that goal. Whatever an SNP government does, it is always based on what it thinks will best advance the cause of breaking up the UK. True to form, Swinney has now unveiled the latest strategy for getting to indy. There have been so many of these in recent years that voters are understandably confused about what the offer is. A de facto referendum, 60 per cent backing for separation in the polls over a sustained period, a majority of Scottish seats for the SNP at Westminster – each has been proposed as a route since the turn of the decade. None has lasted. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Swinney has, in effect, returned to 2011. That was when Alex Salmond won a surprise overall majority at Holyrood, providing the legitimacy and momentum that led David Cameron to accede to the 2014 referendum. The SNP is going back to the future. The First Minister said that, once again, securing a majority in Edinburgh is the way to a second referendum. There are 129 seats at Holyrood, meaning the party would have to win 65 of them. The alleged transformation of Scotland that would come with independence 'only happens if we have that referendum and we only get that referendum if a majority of SNP MSPs are elected next May,' Swinney said. He insists independence will be at the heart of his party's election campaign, but it's hard to see his strategy as anything other than kicking the can down the road. That's certainly how the hardliners are viewing it, lining up to criticize the FM's approach as weak and defeatist. Alex Neil, a former SNP health secretary and a critic of the administration, said it was 'more about trying to save the SNP's bacon'. This is probably true, but that does not mean it lacks sense. Swinney has an election to win, which would take the Nats into their third consecutive decade of governance, and he will not do so with alarming promises of constitutional upheaval whatever the outcome. Sturgeon tried that, and it helped do for her. Voters – or most of them – are not looking at next May as a chance to refight the independence battles. They are worried about the cost of living, the state of the health service, jobs, transport and other policy areas that impact their day to day lives. They are nervous about the international climate, and are seeking security. They are fed up with politicians of all stripes. They are exhausted by the indy permawar, and would appreciate a break from all politics having to be squeezed through that funnel. Swinney's mature approach is to understand this, and to attempt to meet the electorate on its preferred terrain. A wise leader knows which fights to pick, and when. This is not the moment for William Wallace and saltire face-paint and screams of 'freedom'. It is not the time for 'one last push'. The SNP will not win 65 seats next May. It will be an unprecedentedly divided parliament, with Reform joining its ranks. There will be a minority administration, which will be formed by either the Nats or Labour. Swinney's independence plan is really an attempt to draw as much of the separatist support to the SNP, away from the Greens and Alba, so maximizing his party's performance. For the independence movement, if its members would only accept it, this is a time to regroup, rethink, and play a longer game. The First Minister, at least, seems to see this clearly. [See more: Maga zealots want to redraft the Civil Rights Act] Related
