Fringe venue under fire over mixed-sex toilets
The venue has been accused of breaking the law, after it added a disclaimer below the female bathroom sign – which told attendees to 'use whichever toilet best fits your identity or expression'. While the men's toilets featured a similar note, the cubicles themselves were reportedly still labelled 'gents'. This is despite the Supreme Court ruling prompting new guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which says that although it is not compulsory for public services to have single-sex facilities, it could be indirect discrimination against women if the only toilets available are mixed sex.
The landmark case was brought to the Supreme Court by women's rights campaign group For Women Scotland – after its argument (that the definition of women in the Equality Act referred to biological sex) was rejected by two Scottish courts. Susan Smith of the organisation told the Telegraph about the latest Fringe furore: 'This is plainly unlawful. You can't have a sign like that. You can either have a mixed sex space or a single sex space. It's not possible to have both at the same time. It's either one or the other.' Helen Joyce of charity Sex Matters added: 'Organisations that fail to get this right risk enabling sexual harassment and ultimately being sued.' Oo er.
Will Underbelly push back? Stay tuned…
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
37 minutes ago
- The National
SNP's conference agenda must let us debate routes to independence
Malcolm Smith's Sunday National letter (Scottish Government has a moral obligation to break the law) makes the related point that the SNP have missed major opportunities to make a break with Westminster with the backing of the Scottish people. He goes on: 'There is no guarantee that a constitutional crisis and rift with London would be successful. It doesn't have to be. It has only to be the spark that will set a fire under the people of Scotland and shed the SNP of their establishment image.' READ MORE: John Swinney dismisses SNP members' rival independence plan The policy proposal in my recent letters to The National is all about lighting just such a spark – one legitimate in our own legal and constitutional traditions – that can gain support from a majority of Scots. The main options that have been put forward as 2026 SNP manifesto offers of routes to independence are essentially only three: 1) As before, if a majority of our MSPs are elected then Holyrood will ask Westminster for a Section 30 'permission' for a referendum on independence; 2) Say that Holyrood 2026 is some sort of plebiscite election on independence; 3) Say we will assert competency over Scottish constitutional matters if elected. The last option is that of the resolution put forward by Newington and Southside branch SNP as A Manifesto for Scotland's Right to Decide, and reads: 'Conference recognises that the policy of seeking a Section 30 order from the UK Government to hold a referendum on Scotland's constitutional future has proven ineffective. More fundamentally, it undermines Scotland's sovereign right to decide and contributes to the gap between public support for independence and support for the SNP. 'Conference reaffirms that referendums on how Scotland is governed, when held under mandate by the Scottish Parliament, must not be subject to an external veto. Sovereignty lies with the Scottish people, not Westminster. 'Therefore, Conference agrees that the SNP shall put in their manifesto for the 2026 Scottish Parliament election, that if a majority of SNP and other pro-independence MSPs are returned to Holyrood in 2026, they will bring forward a bill to assume responsibility for constitutional affairs as directed by the people of Scotland. This will include the right to hold referendums on increased powers and independence – driven by the will of the people.' READ MORE: Richard Walker: Indy plans are like buses – you wait ages for one and then ... There is also a short supporting statement attached to this that expands on what is implied here. I have been in touch with some of the spokespersons for the SNP branches involved in submitting a motion on the second, 'independence election', option and have been invited to attend their meeting in Perth tomorrow. I am happy to do so and look forward to lively and respectful debate on the respective merits of the resolutions. At a meeting in Portobello last Thursday, I handed over a copy of the Newington Resolution and its supporting statement to John Swinney. John said he would get back to me with his response to this specific motion. Disappointingly, he has not yet done so. The provisional agenda for SNP conference is due to appear today. It is vital for full and open debate on our manifesto offer for next year that all three of the main differing options are in that provisional agenda for consideration of support from branches and possible amendments. Mike Wallace Edinburgh
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
How Kate Forbes managed to avoid 'good riddance' comments
On Monday, the MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch confirmed she would not seek re-election. She has criticised the Scottish Parliament's creche facilities as she juggled the demands of parenthood and a high-profile government job. Her decision to step down was fuelled by a desire to spend more time with her family. The Deputy First Minister told The Herald's political editor Andrew Learmonth she had no regrets about announcing she would step aside. Her statement was released on August 4 - the day of her daughter Naomi's third birthday. But it coincided with extreme weather across the country. Read more: Speaking during the Fringe show, she said: "The news broke not just on her third birthday, but it broke in the throes on Storm Floris. 'So at about 11am, just after making the news the power went off completely. The WiFi broke. A mobile phone mast went down which meant there was no 4G and no mobile connectivity at all and despite going from my office back home to see if it was any better, I was totally cut off from about 11am and had no idea how anybody had responded to the news until about eight o'clock the next morning. 'It was quite blissful really. It saves you sort of scrolling through social media and allowed me to avoid all the good riddance comments as well.' Storm Floris caused widespread disruption across Scotland, with around 950 homes still without power in the aftermath. Ms Forbes revealed she had initially intended to make the announcement on Friday, August 8 – but her appearance at The Herald's Unspun Live prompted her to bring the news forward. 'Such is my affliction for The Herald, I thought imagine announcing something the day after a big set piece like this,' she joked, adding: 'That would have been a little bit unfair.' She told the audience she did not have the 'heart' to 'essentially say goodbye' to Naomi every Monday morning for several days a week for another five years. At the final night of @heraldscotland Unspun Live, @_KateForbes tells political editor @andrewlearmonth she's not a quitter as she opens up about an incident where she was quizzed by someone on her views on wind farms when her daughter had clearly hurt herself — Hannah Brown (@HannahMargBrown) August 7, 2025 Ms Forbes, who spent a significant period of her childhood in India, recently visited the country with her family over the summer. It was here she made the decision to step aside. She said: 'What did change over the summer was taking some time out, taking some leave, having a break and reflecting on what next six years looks like. 'It's one thing to feel how difficult it is to balance all these competing demands, and then it's another to voluntarily sign up for another five years.' Read more: While in India this summer, the Deputy First Minister and her family visited an orphanage, with children ranging from ages four to 16. 'I was just so overwhelmed at the realisation that these kids – these really precious kids – didn't have something that my daughter did have and that my absence from home so often was a serious matter,' she said. 'I realised that in voluntarily signing up for another five years, I was choosing to essentially say goodbye to her every Monday morning and say hello again hopefully on a Friday night, on a good week. Sometimes on a Saturday night and sometimes leaving on a Sunday night. 'I just didn't have the heart to do that for another five years.' 'To voluntarily choose to essentially outsource my daughter's upbringing was a sacrifice too far. 'And so whilst it was a really difficult decision and I don't want to let people down and I'm conscious of the impact it has on my own patch. 'I came back from India mid-July thinking that I knew what I needed to do.' She also said she had been 'weighing' up a number of decisions and had been trying to make the balance work for three years. You can listen to the full special series of The Herald Unspun Live at the Fringe here.
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
SNP rules out proposed £6bn of tax rises to pay for flagship minimum income guarantee
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have insisted they have 'no plans' to hike tax to pay for a flagship minimum income guarantee (MIG) policy despite an independent report they commissioned signalling Scots could face up to £4 billion of increases. The Scottish Government said it was 'taking the time to consider' recommendations of how to fund the policy, after an SNP manifesto commitment to 'begin work to deliver a minimum income guarantee'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad St Andrew's House is the Scottish Government's headquarters, based in Edinburgh. | TSPL A MIG would provide 'a universal guarantee of financial security achieved through an income floor beneath which no-one would be allowed to fall'. But a report drawn up by WPI Economics on behalf of the Scottish Government's minimum income guarantee group has pointed to huge rises to income tax and council tax to pay for the policy. The Scottish Government's own estimates suggest a MIG could cost around £8bn and as much as £10bn, with the total proposed tax changes amounting to more than £6bn each year, including almost £4bn from devolved taxes. Some of the changes would require the devolution of additional financial powers from Westminster to Holyrood or working in co-operation with the UK government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish Government's expert group has suggested that 'by 2036, we can move to an interim minimum income guarantee payment in Scotland, set at the level of the relative poverty line'. The Scotsman previously revealed the Scottish Government spent £1.3 million on the report to investigate how the policy could be implemented. One measure recommended in the report, which would lower the personal allowance for Scottish income tax to £7,570, would cost the public £2.7bn and increase bills for every single taxpayer by £950. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Other proposed tax rises include increasing council tax by up to 22.5 per cent above inflation, taxing income at 42p for every pound earned over £40,000 and applying Scottish income tax to dividends and savings. The paper stresses there 'are options open to the Scottish Government to increase available additional revenue without needing to increase tax rates', including 'changes to the fiscal framework with the rest of the UK and ensuring the introduction of a MIG supports wider economic growth as a means to organically grow existing tax receipts'. But the report warns 'these approaches are unlikely to generate the additional revenue needed to fund the longer term ambitions of a MIG'. The document adds: 'The short-term focus should be on a full consideration of what additional revenue could be raised from existing tax powers. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It is possible that significant additional revenue could be raised by changes to Scottish income tax and council tax using existing powers. However, there are short-term political difficulties around utilising existing revenue-raising powers.' Scottish Conservative social security spokesperson, Alexander Stewart, said: 'These staggering tax rises proposed by an SNP talking shop would pile further misery on hard-working Scots. Alexander Stewart MSP 'The public are already suffering with £1.7bn worth of tax rises from SNP ministers – yet all the while public services have deteriorated. Every single taxpayer in Scotland could be hit with an eye-watering £950 bill if these tax rises were to be implemented. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The fact these tax rises would not even be able to cover the enormous £8bn bill required to implement a minimum income guarantee should worry Scots that further tax hikes will be necessary too. 'After squandering taxpayers' money on a report even nationalists knew was doomed to fail, John Swinney should immediately rule out this multi-billion-pound tax bombshell and drop the SNP's minimum income guarantee plans for good.' SNP Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville. Picture: JeffA Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'These are proposals of an independent group, not the Scottish Government. We are taking the time to consider their recommendations before responding, taking into account affordability in the current financial context.
