SA faces looming lottery blackout after Pretoria High Court dismisses Ithuba bid
iol South Africa at risk of lottery shutdown after court rejects Ithuba's plea
Image: File
South Africa may soon experience a temporary lottery blackout, following a significant ruling from the Pretoria High Court that dismissed the National Lotteries Commission's (NLC) urgent application to extend Ithuba Holdings' operating licence beyond its impending expiry on May 31.
The court's decision raises serious uncertainty about the future of the national lottery, a vital service that supports numerous community initiatives across the country.
On Thursday, IOL News reported that Ithuba, the current operator tasked with managing the national lottery, is now evaluating its legal options in response to the recent decision taken to award the next operating licence to Sizakhaya Holdings.
Ithuba has voiced its concern that this decision undermines the considerable advancements it has made in creating a locally focused lottery ecosystem, one that prioritises small business growth, job creation, and maximising revenue for charitable causes.
The company expressed particular discontent in a statement released earlier this week, indicating that Tau's decision goes against the principles of localisation and inclusive economic growth detailed in its Request for Proposal.
As a fully South African-owned and Black-empowered entity, Ithuba has heavily invested in the development of an African Central Lottery System that is both owned and designed by South Africans to serve the continent.
'Ithuba Holdings has the necessary infrastructure, financial resources and distribution systems to deliver a seamless, secure and uninterrupted National Lottery,' stated Michelle van Trotsenburg, Ithuba's head of marketing and corporate affairs.
She added, 'Our game portfolio is locally developed, our operational model prioritises economic inclusion, and our reach extends across urban and rural communities, ensuring accessibility for all South Africans from day one.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Judge Omphemetse Mooki presided over the case, pointing out the deficiencies in the NLC's claims. Mooki argued that the commission's assertion indicating that there would be no lottery operator for a full year following Ithuba's exit was exaggerated, stating, 'It would be a surprise to the court that the minister is unable to appoint an operator, on a temporary basis, for a whole year.'
He also emphasised that the minister holds broader discretion in selecting a temporary operator compared to a permanent one, asserting, 'I do not accept that the sky will fall after June 2025 should Ithuba Holdings refuse to sign an agreement to conduct lottery operations as determined in the order of May 21, 2025.' Mooki concluded that the NLC had failed to substantiate its case for the relief sought.
Ultimately, while Mooki acknowledged the urgency of the application, he ruled against it, ordering both the National Lotteries Commission and Ithuba to shoulder the legal costs, including those associated with three counsel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Finance Ghost: The retail lowdown on Lewis, Spar, Pick n Pay and Dis-Chem
There was a flurry of corporate activity in the past week as companies with February and March year-ends looked to get results out before the end of the month. Many companies manage to get results out within two months of the end of the reporting period, with others using the full three months that they are allowed by the JSE. Amongst all the noise, there were several retailers that released important results. As a major source of employment in South Africa and with businesses that everyone can relate to as you can easily visit the stores yourself, this sector is always deserving of attention. Lewis: the pick of the litter The narrative around furniture group Lewis is nothing like it used to be. For years, this was a story of tepid growth and a focus on cost control, with a capital allocation strategy that took full advantage of the benefits of share buybacks. Now, Lewis is behaving like a growth stock with double-digit revenue growth and a colossal jump in Heps of 60.3% for the year ended March 2025. Such has been the extent of share price growth that they didn't do any share buybacks at all in the second half of the financial year! advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Can they keep it up? This is the question on everyone's lips. Somehow, they've managed to boost credit sales (up 12.1% versus cash sales up 3.4%) without sacrificing the quality of the debtors' book. This is a holy grail outcome, as retailers that sell on credit must always consider the benefit of additional sales against the risk of credit losses. So far, so good at Lewis. The market is still wary of how sustainable this growth path is, so investors will be paying a great deal of focus to the next interim period. Spar retreats from Europe – well, mostly With Spar having been through such a terrible time in recent years, it was always unlikely that the pain would end with the disposal of the business in Poland. Things got so bad there that Spar essentially paid someone to take that asset away, with the group incurring debt to recapitalise the business in Poland before selling it for next to nothing. It's the equivalent of begging someone to arrive with a trailer to drag your broken old car off your lawn. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads To add to the headaches, the business in Switzerland had been showing some worrying signs for a while, as food is so expensive in that country that Swiss residents literally cross the border to buy their groceries instead of going to their local retailers like Spar. Risks like these are extremely hard for South Africans to foresee, which is why it's advisable to stick to familiar markets rather than doing business somewhere completely different. Unlike in the case of Poland where they waited until the very end to remove that tumour from the group, Spar has decided to sell the Swiss business. They are also letting go of AWG in southwest England, which came as a surprise as there weren't any obvious concerns around that business. This leaves them with only the businesses in Southern Africa and Ireland going forwards. Of course, there's a difference between simply deciding to sell something and actually getting it sold, so it will be a while until the group is so clean and simple. In the meantime, investors have to suffer through diluted Heps from total operations dropping by between -24% and -34% for the 26 weeks to 28 March 2025. If you look at only the continuing operations, it should be between 0% and -15% lower for the period – still a poor outcome. They have a lot of fixing to do at Spar. Pick n Pay is a reminder that turnarounds are hard Speaking of fixing, there's still a long way to go at Pick n Pay. In fact, with the results for the 53 weeks to 2 March 2025 now out in the wild, the group has noted that they only expect their core Pick n Pay segment to break even by 2028. CEO Sean Summers has agreed to extend his contract until then to help drive that outcome. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads This leaves the group in a situation where the controlling stake in Boxer is doing the heavy lifting, with the plan being to stem the bleeding in Pick n Pay as quickly as they can. There are at last some encouraging signs, like an uptick in like-for-like sales, but Pick n Pay will have to fight every step of the way in a market that is a bloodbath of competition. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads If you dig into the underlying earnings or read the company announcements, just be cautious of getting excited about the trading profit line. Due to silly accounting rules, lease costs (which are obviously substantial for retailers) are actually recognised in net finance costs, which come in below trading profit. In other words, trading profit ignores lease costs, so it's a very flattering view of profitability. This is why Pick n Pay clarifies that their breakeven goal for 2028 is based on trading profit net of lease costs, which is the correct way to look at things. Dis-Chem keeps delivering – but did the market want more? With Dis-Chem's share price closing 6.3% lower on Friday after the release of results for the year ended 28 February 2025, you would be forgiven for thinking that the numbers were weak. Instead, we find Heps growth of 20% and a similar increase in the total dividend for the year. Sure, Dis-Chem is now on a demanding Price:Earnings (P:E) ratio of 24.4x based on latest numbers, but could the market really have been expecting so much more than 20% growth in earnings? In such a case where the share price move isn't easily explained by the earnings, it's best to skip to the outlook section of the announcement to see if there are any clues there. Dis-Chem notes a constrained consumer environment, but we are hearing that story everywhere and it's not exactly anything new. Helpfully, they've also given a sales update for 1 March to 27 May (i.e. about the first quarter of the new financial year) that reflects 8.6% growth in group revenue. This is even better than the 8% full-year growth that they just reported! Comparable pharmacy store revenue has accelerated from 4.1% for FY25 to 4.6% for these past few months. Perhaps the worry was around growth in wholesale revenue to external customers, which slowed down significantly from 22.1% to 13.6%. Still, that really shouldn't be enough to drive a 6.3% drop in the share price. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads This share price dip comes after a strong 30-day performance in the market, so it may be due to profit-taking by punters in response to earnings. Regardless, the underlying business is strong and Dis-Chem has continued to deliver for investors despite the pressure on consumer spending. As local retail businesses go, this is one of the best. DM
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Cannabis Expo shows how private sector is rolling in face of hazy government policy
The Cannabis Expo underlined the energy of private businesses that are forging ahead with investment, sales and job creation in the face of dazed and confused government policy that appears to have been crafted over a bong. Pink Floyd's 'Another Brick in the Wall' blared from the DJ's stage and the sweet aroma of cannabis hung in the crisp autumn air at 10.50 on a Saturday morning. On its second of three days, the Cannabis Expo was in full swing at the Sandton Convention Centre, which bent its rules to allow for a 'smoking' section outside, which was mostly a toking section. Cannabis consumers are generally a laid-back bunch, but the expo underlined the energy of private businesses that are forging ahead with investment, sales and job creation in the face of dazed and confused government policy that appears to have been crafted over a bong. There were more than 100 exhibitors from South Africa and abroad, showcasing — and hawking — everything from edibles to rolling gadgets to water bongs to plant fertilisers. On the main stage, panels discussed subjects such as 'Women & Weed: Wellness, Empowerment and The Female Body', 'Potential Cannabis Commercialisation Benefits', and 'How to Choose The Right Cannabis Product for You'. The times they are a'changin', and tellingly, Farmer's Weekly had a stand. Cannabis is, after all, grown, and if the government could grasp this low-hanging fruit, the agricultural sector could reap a bountiful harvest. But the surging commercial sector for cannabis products is unfolding beneath a haze of legal and regulatory uncertainty. This genie was freed from the bottle by the landmark Constitutional Court decision in 2018 that, in effect, legalised the recreational use of cannabis — as an adult South African, it is your constitutional right to consume cannabis. In May 2024, the Cannabis for Private Purposes Act gave the green light for adults to consume, cultivate and possess cannabis for private use — but it leaves the cannabis commercialisation on display in Sandton this past weekend in the dark. One factor that undermines efforts to get a clear and straightforward policy is the lack of a single industry body to represent commercial cannabis interests. 'The industry itself is not represented. There is not a single industry body that represents every facet of the cannabis industry. This makes it virtually impossible to make representation on behalf of the industry,' advocate Simi Pillay-van Graan, the CEO of Trikar Enterprise Solutions, told Daily Maverick on the sidelines of the expo. That is a clarion call for a Cannabis Council to take up the cudgels. What this means Billions of rands in investment and tax revenue are going up in smoke because of government — read ANC — inertia on what should be a straightforward policy. If you are an adult who consumes cannabis and buys from one of the many retail outlets that are springing up all over the show, the vast majority of your purchases are technically illegal. Buying such products with your card also means that South Africa's banks are involved in illicit sales. Crafting policy to allow for the effective commercialisation of a sector that is already forging ahead is crucial. Brett Pollack, a lawyer who heads Harambe Solutions, told Daily Maverick that the industry was '… moving along ahead of government without the laws in place. So right now we are in a liminal space. We don't have a commercial framework, which is exactly what we need to build an economy out of this.' But an economy — one that is not yet subject to sin taxes for THC consumption — is indeed growing in the shade of perplexing policy. And things are rolling along, in some cases quite literally. At the stand for Pretoria-based Aaptwak Foundation & Club — basically, a cannabis club — Walter Pretorius displayed his skills in the fine art of speed rolling. The rules are simple: the paper can be pre-licked with a filter (if you choose) and everything prepared beforehand. It just has to be smokeable to qualify as complete. He was clearly a practised hand. On his rolling platform, this correspondent watched Pretorius three times over the course of the morning. His first go was a warm-up that took more than six seconds to complete — think of Usain Bolt warming up for the 100m dash. The third time I witnessed Pretorius in action (see video), it took him 3.52 seconds to roll a joint. If you blinked, you might have missed it. Walter also displayed an 80g monster joint that was longer than most of the trout this angling correspondent has caught in a lifetime of fishing. Presumably, that would have taken a little longer than 3.52 seconds to roll. By contrast, government policy on this front is moving at a snail's pace. It is another brick in a wall of what should be a window of transparency with the sunlight shining on a field of dreams. DM
eNCA
5 hours ago
- eNCA
Service providers urged to follow proper channels
JOHANNESBURG - ICASA chairperson, Mothibi Ramusi, has urged telecommunication service providers to use the correct channels when applying for certification. This comes on the back of reports that some South Africans are illegally using Starlink services. The authority has also sent out its teams to conduct physical verifications in the affected areas. Starlink, an American service provider is not authorised or licensed to operate in the country. The satellite internet provider is owned by South African born billionaire, Elon Musk. The tech mogul wants to bring Starlink to SA but faces a major hurdle because of ownership. By law, every national network infrastructure and communications service provider must be 30% owned by historically disadvantaged groups.
