The JBL Charge 6 is here! But how does it compare to the Charge 5?
One of the best Bluetooth speakers around now has a sequel. The Award-winning JBL Charge 5 has been riding high in our list ever since launch, earning the coveted spot of 'best overall'. Given the calibre of the competition, that's an impressive feat.
Now a new model has entered the fray: the Charge 6. It promises everything we loved about the 5, with a bigger sound, more bass and a few new features.
So which should you buy? Read on to see what's new.
Bad news: it looks like the Charge 6 is getting a price rise. While the Charge 5 cost £160 / $180 / AU$199 at launch, the Charge 6 is priced at £170 / $199 / AU$TBC.
But there is a silver lining. The Charge 5 regularly goes on sale, so the Charge 6 is likely to do the same (eventually, at least).
Because the Charge 5 is now end of life, even bigger discounts are likely – at time of writing, it sells for around £120 / $120 / AU$200, which is very close to its lowest price ever. Eyes peeled.
The Charge 5 and 6 might look very similar, but there are some subtle differences.
The button layout for starters. The Charge 6 moves the power and Bluetooth buttons from the top for a more simplified layout.
It also has a new detachable carry strap for lugging it around, complete with clip bits on the top of the speaker.
Not all the design improvements are purely aesthetic. The Charge 6 gets a boost to IP68, up from the IP67 of the Charge 5. That means the 6 is completely dust-tight, and more waterproof than the 5.
But the Charge 6 retains a lot of what made the 5 such a great speaker. Its rubberised underbody still has diagonal anti-slip lines to keep it steady on a surface. It also has the same chunky rubberised ends, which JBL claims will help it survive a 1m drop onto a concrete floor.
The Charge 6 has some new features, too.
You can now play lossless hi-res audio via the USB-C port, though we're still waiting to hear the exact sampling rates that it will support.
The general sound quality should also be improved. That's thanks to JBL's 'AI Sound Boost', which analyses sound waves in realtime and optimises the speaker's audio without introducing any distortion – bigger sound and deeper bass is the promise. Though of course we'll be the judge of that, come review time.
The Charge 6 has an upgraded subwoofer, which should give a deeper bass response. And it promises 28 hours of run time per charge, over the Charge 5's 20 hours.
Like its predecessor, the Charge 6 can be used to juice up a mobile or tablet on the go. Hence the 'Charge' moniker.
Audio-sharing protocol Auracast also comes as standard. This lets you daisy chain numerous speakers together wirelessly for a much bigger sound.
The Charge 5 has plenty to like about it. The bass driver and 20mm tweeter help create the Award-winning sound, while wireless connectivity comes courtesy of Bluetooth 5.1.
There's no Auracast, but the Charge 5 does have PartyBoost, which does much the same thing, but uses more power and connects to a lesser variety of devices.
We haven't reviewed the Charge 6 yet, so can't comment on how it sounds. But given its sonic enhancements, it promises to sound even better than its Award-winning predecessor.
Which sounds very good indeed. We praised the Charge 5's agile, energised performance, describing it as "an expansive mix for a portable speaker of this size."
It can do bass oomph as well as any speaker in its category, but it's also skilled at bringing out the more delicate elements of a track. In a word: brilliant.
We can't wait to put the Charge 6 through its paces to see how it compares.
The JBL Charge line has long ranked among the best Bluetooth speakers money can buy, so a new model is very welcome news.
With a tweaked design, supposedly beefed up sound quality and new features, the Charge 6 looks like a no-brainer against the outgoing Charge 5.
But of course, the newer device is more expensive, especially given the Charge 5's recent discounts. If you can't stretch to the Charge 6, the Charge 5 will make a fine stand-in.
We'll update this article once we've reviewed the Charge 6.
MORE:
Read our JBL Charge 5 review
JBL Charge 5 vs Flip 6: what's the difference?
The best Bluetooth speakers around
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
2 hours ago
- CNET
Never Lose Your Keys Again With 4 Find My-Powered Item Trackers for Just $6 Each
Apple's AirTags are among our favorite Bluetooth item trackers, but at $29 each, they get expensive, fast. If you want to put one on your keys, one in your bag and maybe another in your wallet, that's a cool $87 right off the bat. But right now, you can get a pack of four IKT air trackers for just $24. That works out to just $6 each, which is a bargain in anyone's books. This pack of four trackers includes two white and two black, and they all have a way for you to hang them on your keychain right out of the box. You can't say that about AirTags. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. IKT says that these trackers support Apple's Find My app, so you need to be in Apple's ecosystem to use them. They're also waterproof and feature a replaceable battery that should last up to a year without any attention. It's worth noting that while these trackers do support Find My, they don't have all the same features as AirTags. The main thing you'll miss is support for accurate tracking when you get closer to the item you're looking for -- there is no ultra wideband support here. That being said, at just $6 each, you really can't go wrong. Why this deal matters Losing your stuff should be a solved problem in 2025, and with these trackers, it can be. At just $6 each, they're a great way to track just about anything. And with four in a pack, you can track all of your most important stuff, too.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Intel's new Core Ultra 120 will be DOA if stores sell them at anything like these prices
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. I'm a big fan of little, cheap processors for gaming, so when Intel stealthily announced the specifications for its six-core, 12-thread Core Ultra 120/120F processors, I was really looking forward to seeing them on retailers' shelves. Unfortunately, the first prices for them have just dropped, and Raptor Lake Regurgitated is anything but cheap, weighing in nearly three times more than an equivalent AMD chip. The first I learned of the Intel Core Ultra 120 was from a post on X by user Momomo_us. Delving into Intel's processor database tells us everything we need to know about the new CPU: it's a Raptor Lake-based chip but with all its E-cores completely disabled. That means you just get six P-cores, with 12 threads in total. Add in a boost clock of 4.5 GHz, 18 MB of L3 cache, and a 65 W base power limit, and you've got Intel's version of a Ryzen 5 9600X. Except you haven't, because while the 9600X uses AMD's latest Zen 5 architecture, the Core Ultra 120 is actually a marginally faster Core i5 12400. Yes, that's right: it's Alder Lake, not Raptor Lake. The telltale clue is the fact that the total L2 cache is 7.5 MB—1.25 MB per core—whereas a true Raptor Lake chip would sport 12 MB (2 MB apiece). This means that the 120 is really Intel's version of the Ryzen 5 5500. So Intel has taken some duff old chips from 2022 and repackaged them as something new. I honestly have no problem with that, as long as the price reflects the aged architecture and the total lack of E-cores. Well, thanks to another post by Momomo_us on X, it would seem that somebody at Intel forgot to look up what cheap means. I don't know what distributor the user has listed, but at $246.01 for the Core Ultra 120 and $216.66 for the iGPU-less 120F, there's a snowball's chance in hell that I'd recommend anyone to buy one at these prices. You can pick up a slower-but-still-six-core Ryzen 5 5500 is a mere $73 at Amazon. I don't care how good Intel's P-cores are; there's no way that they're worth three times more than AMD's Zen 4 cores. To make matters worse, you can get a Core i5 12400 for $144 at Amazon. Hopefully, those distributor prices are just placeholders and not the final price tags, because if they are, Intel isn't going to shift a single one of them. Shame really, as I'd hope that Intel's plans for its E-coreless Raptor Lake chips were going to involve something cheap and gamer-friendly. What we've actually been 'treated' to is a pile of regurgitated tat. Gosh, aren't we the lucky ones?
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
I just tried the new Samsung DeX on the Galaxy Z Flip 7 to replace my laptop — here's the good and the bad
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Last year when Samsung launched its foldable phones, it was a no-brain decision on which one I wanted to make my new daily driver. Since it offered support for Samsung DeX, I chose the Galaxy Z Fold 6 without hesitation over the Galaxy Z Flip 6. In fact, I even managed to ditch my laptop for 2 weeks with the Z Fold 6. Samsung has long neglected to bring DeX to its flip-style phones, but that all changed this year with the reveal of the Galaxy Z Flip 7 — and I couldn't be more thrilled about it. Ever since the first Flip, I've been wanting to use one as my daily driver, but no support for DeX was a big dealbreaker. In my Galaxy Z Flip 7 hands-on, I say how it feels like perfection due to the bigger upgrades it's been given over previous years. I've been testing out the new Samsung DeX for the last few days now, so here's the good and bad about it. The Good Samsung DeX has been a long time coming for the Galaxy Z Flip line, so needless to say I'm stoked for its arrival. First and foremost, Samsung DeX on the Galaxy Z Flip 7 supports either a wired or wireless connection. I'd recommend the former since I've seen some latency issues whenever I connected it to my Amazon Fire TV OMNI. Just like DeX running on other new phones, like my Galaxy S25 Ultra and Galaxy Z Fold 6, I get access to that PC-like desktop experience that lets me run multiple apps simultaneously. It makes me almost as productive as using my Windows 11 laptop, complete with the ability to have apps running side-by-side with one another. When I do this, I can even resize one of the windows and the other will dynamically adjust to fill out the rest of the screen. Image 1 of 3 Image 2 of 3 Image 3 of 3 Apart from the new set of wallpapers included with this version of DeX, which is running on top of One UI 8, there's nothing visually or functionally different. The bottom left corner of the task bar has buttons for the home, back, and recent apps; the middle packs buttons for the apps panel, pinned apps, and opened apps; and the icons on the right lets me access different settings. I've even connected my Galaxy Z Flip 7 to my Xreal Air 2 Pro glasses for that private experience when I'm in a public space. The beauty of Samsung DeX in this particular situation is that I can continue to use DeX even when my phone's turned off. Unlike the traditional screen mirroring feature in many of today's best phones, it's a totally separate experience from my phone — so I can even watch something on Netflix without the need to keep my phone on. The Bad As much as I'm thankful for the utility that Samsung DeX brings to my Galaxy Z Flip 7, I was hoping for Samsung to bring new features and changes. Just not long ago, Google revealed how it was building a desktop mode for Android 16 with help from Samsung, but it doesn't influence the DeX experience on the Galaxy Z Flip 7. Considering how it's running One UI 8 on top of Android 16, I was hoping for bigger changes with the experience. Unfortunately, the bad thing about DeX on the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is that Samsung does nothing to refine it — and I think it's a big missed opportunity — much like the sentiments I had when I tried DeX on the Galaxy S25 Ultra earlier this year. Image 1 of 3 Image 2 of 3 Image 3 of 3 Samsung's the only one who's really offering this kind of feature, even though Motorola has something similar with its Smart Connect feature in some of its phones like the Razr Ultra (2025). The difference is that DeX can run through a wired connection, whereas Smart Connect is exclusively a wireless one. One particular feature I was hoping to see would be something along the lines of Snap Layouts with Windows 11, which would allow for better snapping between the open windows. You're only able to snap two windows at one time, leaving others to float on their own. This continues to be my biggest criticism about DeX because it has the potential to make me more productive if it could do this, but it doesn't. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. Bottom Line Despite the lack of anything new, Samsung DeX on the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is a big deal. Although I'm disappointed by the lack of innovation around it, there's still time for Samsung to work on it with subsequent updates. It's one of those features you can't appreciate until you begin to use it and realize how much it can satisfy your daily routine. More work is obviously needed before it can totally replace my laptop, but I can tell you from experience how helpful it is to use as a fallback. I like to travel as light as possible, and given the compact size of the Galaxy Z Flip 7 over the Z Fold 7, it proves a point that you can still have the power of a computer in your pocket. More from Tom's Guide Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Honor Magic V5: Which foldable will win? iPhone 17 Air — here's what Apple could learn from Samsung's thin phone releases Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7: 5 reasons to buy (and 3 reasons to skip)
