logo
2006 Mumbai train blasts case: Supreme Court stays Bombay HC verdict acquitting all 12 accused

2006 Mumbai train blasts case: Supreme Court stays Bombay HC verdict acquitting all 12 accused

Indian Express24-07-2025
The Supreme Court is hearing the Maharashtra government's plea challenging the Bombay High Court verdict acquitting all 12 convicts in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts, which killed 189 people.
Seeking an urgent hearing in the matter, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, had informed a bench presided by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, 'It's a serious matter from the government's point of view… There is an element of urgency.'
On Monday, the Bombay High Court overturned the September 2015 judgment of a special court designated under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA), which had sentenced five convicts to death and given life term to seven in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts.
The convicts have already spent over 18 years in jail.
While the special court acquitted one person, the state government had not filed an appeal before the high court against the same. One person died while in prison.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will present our case before SC in solution-oriented manner: Saini
Will present our case before SC in solution-oriented manner: Saini

Indian Express

time18 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Will present our case before SC in solution-oriented manner: Saini

The Haryana government has decided to put forth its stance in front of the Supreme Court on August 13 on the contentious SYL standoff with Punjab. Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini said this after coming out of a meeting on the SYL issue with Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Singh Mann. Union Jal Shakti Minister C R Patil chaired the meeting. Later speaking to media persons in New Delhi, Saini said that 'a significant step forward was taken during the meeting on the ongoing dialogue over water sharing between Haryana and Punjab. The talks were held in a cordial and cooperative atmosphere'. 'The issue has been under discussion for a long time, and earlier deliberations held on July 9 had already indicated a positive shift. This time, we have moved a step further. The discussions were held in an even more constructive environment. Haryana will present its case in a positive and solution-oriented manner before the Supreme Court on August 13. We are confident that a fair and favourable resolution will be achieved,' Saini added. In response to a question, the CM said that the Indus Waters Treaty is a separate subject, and in that context, Rajasthan will also be entitled to its share of water. From Haryana's side, Rajesh Khullar (Chief Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister), Anurag Rastogi (Additional Chief Secretary, Irrigation and Water Resources Department), and other senior officers accompanied Saini to the meeting.

UCC panel meets CM Patel, likely to submit report by month-end
UCC panel meets CM Patel, likely to submit report by month-end

Indian Express

time18 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

UCC panel meets CM Patel, likely to submit report by month-end

The five-member committee, led by retired Supreme Court Judge Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, met Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel to update him on its progress in assessing the need for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) and drafting a law for its implementation. The committee, formed by the Gujarat government, briefed the CM on its work advancements on Tuesday. Sources told The Indian Express that the committee's term ends on August 31 and it is likely to submit a report by that time without seeking further extension. 'The committee is likely to submit its report by August end when its term is ending. The panel is unlikely to seek further extension,' sources added. After the report is submitted, sources said, the Gujarat government is expected to form a sub-committee to take formal action on its assessment. Recently, the Gujarat High Court had rejected a petition seeking directions to reconstitute the panel to include minority members, upholding the state government's right to constitute it. Apart from Desai, the four other members of the committee include retired IAS officer C L Meena, advocate R C Kodekar, former vice chancellor Daxesh Thakar and social worker Geetaben Shroff. During Tuesday's meeting, Law Minister Rushikesh Patel and Minister of State for Home, Harsh Sanghavi, were also present along with senior officials of the state government such as additional chief secretary to the Chief Minister, M K Das, Secretary to the Chief Minister, Vikrant Pande, and in-charge law secretary Upendra Bhatt among others. The committee was formed by CM Patel in February this year.

Driver's murder: YSRCP MLC's wife moves Andhra Pradesh high court over investigation notices
Driver's murder: YSRCP MLC's wife moves Andhra Pradesh high court over investigation notices

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Driver's murder: YSRCP MLC's wife moves Andhra Pradesh high court over investigation notices

Vijayawada: Lakshmi Durga, the wife of YSRCP MLC Ananta Uday Bhaskar (alias Ananta Babu), has moved the high court challenging the notices issued by the investigating officer in the case involving the murder of Subrahmanyam, the MLC's former driver. She sought directions to quash the notices issued under section 160 of CrPC as part of further investigation of the case. The counsel for the petitioner argued that the notices issued to Lakshmi Durga are contrary to the directions issued by the high court, which categorically said the investigation officer should conduct only a further investigation, not a reinvestigation of the case. However, in the absence of placing any new material on record, issuing notices to Lakshmi Durga would be a reinvestigation, not a further investigation, the counsel argued. Arguing on behalf of the police, public prosecutor Menda Lakshmi Narayana said the petition is infructuous as the notices have already been issued to others and statements have been recorded. He said there have been many judgements by the Supreme Court where the apex court said the investigation officer can summon anyone as part of further investigation of the case. He sought time to submit the details of Supreme Court orders setting forth judicial precedence in the matter. Considering the arguments, Justice Venkata Jyotirmayi Pratapa posted the matter for further hearing to Thursday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store