New model helps conservationists predict wildlife responses to climate change: study
The model was tested in the Peruvian rainforest. - AFP
SYDNEY: A team of international researchers has developed a powerful new tool to help conservationists predict how wildlife will adapt to climate change and interact with new ecosystems.
The study offered a more targeted approach to protecting biodiversity, according to a press release on Friday (May 30) from Australia's Monash University that led the research.
As rising global temperatures force many species to shift from their traditional habitats, conservationists face the challenge of predicting how these species will interact with new environments and the species already living there, the press release said.
The new model addresses this challenge by offering a comprehensive framework to forecast both habitat suitability and species interactions in shifting ecosystems, it said.
Lead researcher Matthias Dehling from Monash University's School of Biological Sciences said the model seeks to tackle a key challenge in conservation, the limited data available for many species, particularly regarding their interactions with other species.
"The model addresses that problem by borrowing data and observations from similar species to model where a species will occur and with which species they will interact," Dehling said, adding that this is particularly valuable in scenarios involving species translocation, rewilding efforts, or managing the impact of invasive species.
Unlike traditional methods that separately model environmental preferences and species interactions, this new model integrates both, using biological traits such as size and beak shape to anticipate how species might behave in novel ecosystems, said the study published in Ecology Letters.
The model was tested in the Peruvian rainforest and is now set for use in conservation efforts in New Zealand and possibly Antarctica, according to the project in partnership with New Zealand's University of Canterbury and Bioprotection Aotearoa, as well as Germany's Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries. - Xinhua
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
2 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Polar bear biopsies to shed light on Arctic pollutants
The predator bolted but soon slumped into the snowdrifts, its broad frame motionless beneath the Arctic sky. 01 Jun 2025 06:00pm Despite years of exposure, Svalbard's polar bears showed no signs of emaciation or ill health, according to the team. - AFP photo NORWAY - With one foot braced on the helicopter's landing skid, a veterinarian lifted his air rifle, took aim and fired a tranquiliser dart at a polar bear. The predator bolted but soon slumped into the snowdrifts, its broad frame motionless beneath the Arctic sky. Belgian toxicologist Laura Pirard works on biopsy samples of polar bear adipose tissue in a laboratory onboard the science icebreaker vessel Kronprins Haakon in the Svalbard archipelago. - AFP photo The dramatic pursuit formed part of a pioneering research mission in Norway's Svalbard archipelago, where scientists, for the first time, took fat tissue biopsies from polar bears to study the impact of pollutants on their health. The expedition came at a time when the Arctic region was warming at four times the global average, putting mounting pressure on the iconic predators as their sea-ice habitat shrank. "The idea is to show as accurately as possible how the bears live in the wild -- but in a lab," Laura Pirard, a Belgian toxicologist, told AFP. "To do this, we take their (fatty) tissue, cut it in very thin slices and expose it to the stresses they face, in other words pollutants and stress hormones," said Pirard, who developed the method. Moments after the bear collapsed, the chopper circled back and landed. Researchers spilled out, boots crunching on the snow. One knelt by the bear's flank, cutting thin strips of fatty tissue. Another drew blood. Each sample was sealed and labelled before the bear was fitted with a satellite collar. Scientists said that while the study monitors all the bears, only females were tracked with GPS collars as their necks are smaller than their heads -- unlike males, who cannot keep a collar on for more than a few minutes. Arctic lab For the scientists aboard the Norwegian Polar Institute's research vessel Kronprins Haakon, these fleeting encounters were the culmination of months of planning and decades of Arctic fieldwork. In a makeshift lab on the icebreaker, samples remained usable for several days, subjected to controlled doses of pollutants and hormones before being frozen for further analysis back on land. Each tissue fragment gave Pirard and her colleagues insight into the health of an animal that spent much of its life on sea ice. Analysis of the fat samples showed that the main pollutants present were per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) -- synthetic chemicals used in industry and consumer goods that linger in the environment for decades. Despite years of exposure, Svalbard's polar bears showed no signs of emaciation or ill health, according to the team. The local population has remained stable or even increased slightly, unlike parts of Canada, where the Western Hudson Bay group declined by 27 percent between 2016 and 2021, from 842 to 618 bears, according to a government aerial survey. Other populations in the Canadian Arctic, including the Southern Beaufort Sea, have also shown long-term declines linked to reduced prey access and longer ice-free seasons. Scientists estimate there are around 300 polar bears in the Svalbard archipelago and roughly 2,000 in the broader region stretching from the North Pole to the Barents Sea. The team found no direct link between sea ice loss and higher concentrations of pollutants in Svalbard's bears. Instead, differences in pollutant levels came down to the bears' diet. Two types of bears -- sedentary and pelagic -- feed on different prey, leading to different chemicals building up in their bodies. Changing diet With reduced sea ice, the bears' diets have already started shifting, researchers said. These behavioural adaptations appeared to help maintain the population's health. "They still hunt seals but they also take reindeer (and) eggs. They even eat grass (seaweed), even though that has no energy for them," Jon Aars, the head of the Svalbard polar bear programme, told AFP. "If they have very little sea ice, they necessarily need to be on land," he said, adding that they spend "much more time on land than they used to... 20 or 30 years ago". This season alone, Aars and his team of marine toxicologists and spatial behaviour experts captured 53 bears, fitted 17 satellite collars, and tracked 10 mothers with cubs or yearlings. "We had a good season," Aars said. The team's innovations go beyond biopsies. Last year, they attached small "health log" cylinders to five females, recording their pulse and temperature. Combined with GPS data, the devices offer a detailed record of how the bears roam, how they rest and what they endure. Polar bears were once hunted freely across Svalbard but since an international protection agreement in 1976, the population here has slowly recovered. The team's findings may help explain how the bears' world is changing, and at an alarming rate. As the light faded and the icebreaker's engines hummed against the vast silence, the team packed away their tools, leaving the Arctic wilderness to its inhabitants. - AFP More Like This
New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Trump to withdraw Musk's ally as nominee to head NASA
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said Saturday he was withdrawing his nomination of tech billionaire Jared Isaacman, a close ally of Elon Musk, to lead space agency NASA. Trump said last December, before returning to office, that he wanted the online payments entrepreneur and the first private astronaut to conduct a spacewalk to serve as the next head of NASA. But on Saturday, he said on his Truth Social platform that "after a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA." "I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be Mission aligned, and put America First in Space." Featured Videos Earlier, the New York Times had reported the move was coming, quoting unnamed sources as saying the decision had come after the president learned Isaacman had donated money to prominent Democrats. Asked about that report, the White House had told AFP in an email that it was "essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump's America First agenda." "The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute President Trump's bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars," it said. The nomination shakeup appears to be a snub of billionaire Musk, who on Friday stepped back from his role leading Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk reportedly lobbied directly with the president for Isaacman, who has had significant business dealings with Musk's SpaceX, to get the top NASA job, raising questions of possible conflicts of interest. As the news surfaced, Musk stressed on X that "it is rare to find someone so competent and good-arted". The 42-year-old founder and CEO of Shift4 Payments has emerged as a leading figure in commercial spaceflight through his high-profile collaborations with SpaceX. He made history last September by stepping out of a Crew Dragon to gaze at Earth from the void of space while gripping the spacecraft's exterior, during the first-ever spacewalk carried out by non-professional astronauts. - AFP
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Too much work changes the brain... literally
Scientists find that working long hours produces significant physical changes in the brain, but are still unsure of what that means precisely. — AFP We all know that working long hours is detrimental to our personal well-being. But scientists now think that it may alter the structure of our brains. A South Korean study, recently published in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine , sheds new light on the risks of overwork. It reveals structural alterations in the brain of people working more than 52 hours a week. Like many working people, you may have already extended your day at the office long after your colleagues have left, perhaps to answer emails or finish an urgent task. But at what cost? This habit, deeply rooted in many professional cultures, is gradually undermining personal well-being. It feeds chronic stress and weakens mental and physical health, to the point of disrupting the very functioning of the brain. These are the findings of a team of researchers from Chung-Ang and Yonsei Universities. Analysing the effects of overwork on the human brain, they conducted a study involving 110 professionals, mostly from the healthcare sector. The participants were divided into two groups: the first comprised 32 people working 52 hours or more a week, and the second, 78 people with standard working hours. Brain imaging revealed clear differences in grey matter volumes, particularly in areas associated with executive function and emotional regulation. The results are striking: the scientists found a significant increase in grey matter in certain brain regions, as a possible physical effect of burnout. The middle frontal gyrus, which plays a role in attention, memory and advanced cognitive functions, showed a 19% increase in volume in the most overworked workers. Other areas were also affected, such as the superior frontal gyrus, involved in planning and decision-making, and the insula, which is essential for self-awareness, emotional management and interpreting social context. The study authors state in a press release that 'the observed changes in brain volume may provide a biological basis for the cognitive and emotional challenges often reported in overworked individuals'. What exactly does this increase in grey matter volume mean though? For now, the answer remains unclear. 'While the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the exploratory nature of this pilot study, they represent a meaningful first step in understanding the relationship between overwork and brain health,' the researchers say. For the time being, it is impossible to determine whether these changes are directly caused by overwork, whether they pre-exist it, or whether they are reversible. Although the study sample is small – consisting exclusively of South Korean healthcare workers – the results form part of a worrying trend. In 2021, a joint study by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) attributed over 745,000 deaths a year to overwork. The link between long working hours and cognitive decline is now well documented. At a time when trials of the four-day week are multiplying, these conclusions serve as a wake-up call. 'The results underscore the importance of addressing overwork as an occupational health concern and highlight the need for workplace policies that mitigate excessive working hours,' the researchers warn. Concrete measures like legislation, public policy and time limits, need to be considered to protect workers in the long term. The message is clear: if you're feeling tired, distracted or emotionally frazzled, it could be more than just a slump; it could be your brain sounding the alarm. – AFP Relaxnews
