Retailers call for urgent national action on high street crime
High Streets UK, a group that represents 5,000 UK businesses, is calling for ring-fenced funding for police to protect key shopping destinations.
The body includes members from business improvement districts in Aberdeen, Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Leeds, Liverpool, London and Newcastle.
Dee Corsi, chair of High Streets UK and chief executive of founding member New West End Company, said: 'Flagship high streets are engines of the local and national economy, drivers of tourism, and anchors for communities. But without urgent national action on crime, they are at serious risk.
'We have welcomed the Government's renewed focus on retail crime in particular.
'But we must go further and faster to tackle all types of crime affecting high streets, having a devastating effect on businesses and communities, tarnishing the UK's global reputation, and jeopardising tourism and investment.'
According to the most recent official statistics, the number of shoplifting offences recorded by police in 2024 surpassed 500,000 for the first time.
Ms Corsi said it is critical for additional funding for policing in the upcoming spending review to be ring-fenced for key high streets.
'The UK's flagship high streets are important cultural and economic centres – with High Street UK locations generating over £50 billion in economic value every year – yet growing complex challenges around crime and anti-social behaviour put these locations at risk,' she said.
'Take London's West End – the internationally renowned home to Oxford Street, Bond Street and Regent Street is an important driver of jobs, investment, and tourism, contributing 3% of the capital's economic activity.
'Despite this, continued underfunding of policing has left it facing real issues including anti-social behaviour, shop theft and organised business crime.
'Through the collective voice of High Streets UK, we are calling for the Government to recognise the value of these locations – as economic hubs, anchors for community, and tourism destinations – by ring-fencing dedicated police support.
'Failing to do so puts growth, and flagship high streets, at serious risk.'
High Streets UK held its second quarterly meeting on Wednesday, drawing up four key points that it is urging the Government to tackle.
Ms Corsi added: 'At our Safer High Streets Forum, we shared our frontline experience of the international criminal gangs, business crime, prolific offenders and anti-social behaviour affecting our high streets – none of which can be meaningfully tackled with the current systems and resources in place.'
High Streets UK has called for boosted police numbers around high streets, separately measuring performance for the specific areas.
It wants immediate jail terms for those who breach criminal behaviour orders, quicker sentencing for crimes linked to retail, and a focus on repeat offenders.
And it is calling for national measures to tackle organised crime that affects high streets including begging gangs, and the creation of a national framework for businesses to report crime.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
How could Labour shake up the property tax system in the Budget?
Radical new ways to tax property are reportedly being considered by the Treasury ahead of the next autumn budget as chancellor Rachel Reeves looks to bolster public finances. Plans to overhaul stamp duty and council tax, as well as a 'mansion tax' to cover the sale of high-value homes, are all on the table, sources have said in recent days. Ms Reeves is understood to have asked officials to calculate how these new 'proportional' taxes would work in the UK, all of which would aim to target wealth more directly. The overhaul would see a national property tax replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes. Council tax could also be replaced with a local property tax, helping to boost ailing local authority finances. Another speculated plan would see capital gains tax payable by the seller on high-value properties. Under current rules, everyone is exempt from the levy when selling their primary residence. Here's how the plans would change the UK tax landscape. How would the 'mansion tax' work? In the UK, capital gains tax is payable on the sale of most high-value assets. This includes property, stocks and possessions worth over £6,000. Under current rules, a homeowner does not generally need to pay capital gains tax on the sale of a property which has been their primary residence during the time they have owned it. This would change under the proposed plans when the value of the property of the house being sold is worth £1.5 million or more, although this threshold is said to be under consideration. The way capital gains tax works for property sales sees sellers required to work out the 'gain' they have made on the asset. This is usually the difference between what they paid for the property and the amount they sold it for. If this is above, or takes the seller above, their capital gains tax allowance – £3,000 every year – they will need to report and pay the tax. For higher or additional rate income tax payers, the rate is 24 per cent. For those on the basic rate, it's 18 per cent. Several property experts have reacted negatively to the idea. Colleen Babcock, Rightmove's property expert, said: "In essence, this would predominantly be a tax on the most expensive areas of London and the South East. 'The London market is already feeling the effects of taxation more acutely than other parts of England, and this is likely to deter some moves at the upper end.' Meanwhile, Laith Khalaf, head of investment analysis at AJ Bell, said: 'A mansion tax set at a high level would naturally cause people to worry it was just the thin end of the wedge, and the next time the government needs a bit of money they could just lower the threshold.' What is stamp duty and how could it change? Under current rules, stamp duty is a levy paid by the buyer of residential property, varying based on the price of the property and whether it is their first purchase. The amount owed is slightly different depending on who is buying, as first-time buyers are given stamp duty relief and benefit from lower rates. In 2023/24, the levy brought in £11.6 billion for the government. The plans to replace the tax have reportedly drawn on the findings of a report from centre-right think tank Onward, published in August last year. Their recommended policy would see a new tax introduced on the sale of a property when it is worth above £500,000. This levy would be proportionate to the property's value, and paid at a rate set by HMRC. It would be payable by the new owner of the property, only on the amount above £500,000. This would mean the owners of a property worth just over the threshold would pay a 'trivial' amount, according to the report. Could council tax be replaced? Another mulled concept would see council tax replaced with a new local property tax, complementing the 'national' property tax. It will be a tax on property value paid by the owner, the Onward report explains, and at a rate set by each local authority. This should be levied on values up to a cap of £500,000 in a bid to ensure that the richest areas are not able to set far lower rates than those with less valuable properties. This would address a key criticism of the council tax system - that how properties are valued is unfair and inaccurate. The 'band' of council tax that all properties pay is based on values last evaluated in the 1990s, which have become drastically outdated in many places. The local property tax concept would instead see tax liable on properties based on their value at the last point they were sold, meaning valuation would be regularly updated. However, both of the proposed taxes have been criticised as a tax that will disproportionately hit people living in areas where property prices are higher. The effect would be particularly acute in London, said chair of Martyn Gerrard Estate Agents Simon Gerrard, who told The Independent that it would amount to a 'London tax'. He said: 'Rightmove's latest figures for August show that the average price of a property in London is now £666,983. Upping taxes for properties over £500K is not making the wealthy pay their fair share, it's a tax on ordinary Londoners.'
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Denmark to abolish VAT on books in effort to get more people reading
Denmark is to stop charging VAT on books in an attempt to get more people reading. At 25%, the country's tax rate on books is the highest in the world, a policy the government believes is contributing to a growing 'reading crisis'. The culture minister, Jakob Engel-Schmidt, announced on Wednesday that the government would propose in its budget bill that the tax on books be removed. The move is expected to cost 330m kroner (£38m) a year. 'This is something that I, as minister of culture, have worked for, because I believe that we must put everything at stake if we are to end the reading crisis that has unfortunately been spreading in recent years,' Engel-Schmidt told the Ritzau news agency . 'I am incredibly proud. It is not every day that one succeeds in convincing colleagues that such massive money should be spent on investing in the consumption and culture of the Danes.' Other Nordic countries also charge a standard rate of 25% VAT, but it does not apply to books. VAT on books in Finland is 14%, in Sweden 6% and in Norway zero. Sweden reduced its VAT on books in 2001, resulting in a rise in book sales, but analysis found they were bought by existing readers. 'It is also about getting literature out there,' said Engel-Schmidt. 'That is why we have already allocated money for strengthened cooperation between the country's public libraries and schools, so that more children can be introduced to good literature.' A total of 8.3m books were sold in shops and online in Denmark in 2023, according to the national statistics office. The country's population is just over 6 million. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion The most popular genre was books for the very young, picture books and activity books and the second-most popular was crime, thrillers and suspense novels. If prices do not fall as a result of the measure, Engel-Schmidt said he would reconsider whether it was the right course of action. 'I will of course monitor how prices develop. If it turns out that abolishing VAT only means that publishers' profits grow and prices do not fall, then we must consider whether it was the right thing to do,' he said.
North Wales Chronicle
41 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Key questions answered on potential rail fares rise
Fare rises are a controversial issue. Here, the PA news agency answers 10 key questions about what could happen. – When will train fares rise? Fares are likely to increase next year, on dates to be determined. This year, prices rose in England and Wales on March 2, and in Scotland on April 1. – Who determines how much more expensive my train ticket will be? The cap on regulated fare rises in England, Scotland and Wales is controlled by the UK, Scottish and Welsh governments respectively. – Which tickets are regulated? Some season tickets, off-peak return tickets and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. Here's our response to the news that RPI hit 4.8% last month, the figure the Government usually uses to set the following year's annual rail fare rise. This year the fare rise was RPI+1%…could a 5.8% fare rise be on the cards for 2026? — Campaign for Better Transport (@CBTransport) August 20, 2025 – What about unregulated fares? These fares are set by operators, but rises are expected to be similar as their finances are closely controlled by governments. – What was the increase in regulated fares in England this year? It was capped at 4.6%, which was one percentage point above Retail Price Index (RPI) inflation in July 2024. – What will be the cap if that formula is used to set next year's increase? 5.8%. – What has the Department for Transport said? There will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year, and no decisions have been made on 2026 rail fares. – What about public transport campaigners? Railfuture recently warned a 5.5% increase would be 'outrageous', while Campaign for Better Transport urged the Government to 'deliver a more affordable rail network'. – Is there any way of avoiding the rise in fares? Savvy commuters renewed their season tickets in the days before the annual increase. – Any other tips on limiting the cost of train travel? Passengers can save money by getting a railcard, travelling off-peak, and booking in advance – although these options are not available for many journeys, particularly those made by commuters.
