Tesla's UK subsidies under scrutiny after Trump announces car tariffs
Tesla 's substantial UK taxpayer subsidies have come under renewed scrutiny following Donald Trump 's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on imported vehicles to the US.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the government is reviewing its electric vehicle transition rules, amid calls for reciprocal tariffs on Tesla imports.
The Liberal Democrats have advocated for tariffs on Tesla, citing owner Elon Musk 's support for the US president.
"Given Musk's significant backing of Trump, imposing tariffs on Tesla imports would be a fitting response," a party spokesperson said.
Data published by analysts Tussell in January revealed Tesla has benefited from £188 million in UK taxpayer subsidies since 2016, primarily through the plug-in car grant scheme.
This scheme offers financial incentives for purchasing low-emission vehicles.
Ms Reeves told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'We don't want to get into a trade war, but we are looking at the zero emission vehicle mandate, which is, I think, why some of that money goes to Tesla, and looking at how we can better support the car manufacturing industry in the UK.
'We announced in the budget last year, I think, around £2 billion for an automotive fund as part of our modern industrial strategy.
'But look, we are working intensely with the US to try to come to an agreement ahead of these tariff increases next week. Let's see how that goes.'
A 25 per cent tax on vehicles and vehicle parts imported to the US will come into effect on April 2.
Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: 'Our car industry is being left at the mercy of Trump and his destructive trade war.
'We should be preparing to respond if needed including through Tesla tariffs that hit Trump's crony Elon Musk in the pocket.'
Mr Musk said tariffs will 'affect the price of parts in Tesla cars that come from other countries', adding that the 'cost impact is not trivial'.
This was in response to a post on social media platform X – which he owns – which claimed Tesla 'could benefit the most' from tariffs on US imports.
the newly established Department of Government Efficiency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
38 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Donald Trump vetoed Israeli plan to kill Iran's supreme leader
The Israelis informed the Trump administration in recent days that it had developed a credible plan to kill Mr Khamenei. After being briefed on the plan, the White House made clear to Israeli officials that Mr Trump was opposed to the Israelis making the move. The Trump administration is desperate to keep Israel's military operation aimed at decapitating Iran's nuclear program from exploding into an even more expansive conflict and saw the plan to kill Mr Khamenei as a move that would enflame the conflict and potentially destabilise the region. Asked on Sunday about the plan during an interview on Fox News Channel's Special Report with Bret Baier, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not directly address whether the White House rejected the plan. 'But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we'll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States,' Mr Netanyahu said. Mr Netanyahu's office declined to comment on the reports. Mr Trump's rejection of the proposal was first reported by Reuters. It comes as the president issued a stark warning to Iran against retaliating on US targets in the Middle East while also predicting that Israel and Iran would 'soon' make a deal to end their escalating conflict. Mr Trump in an early morning social meeting posting said the United States 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran' as Israel and Iran traded missile attacks for the third straight day. 'The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight. If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before. However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and… — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 15, 2025 Iran, however, has said that it would hold the US, which has provided Israel with much of its deep arsenal of weaponry, for its backing of Israel. Israel targeted Iran's Defence Ministry headquarters in Tehran and sites it alleged were associated with Iran's nuclear program, while Iranian missiles evaded Israeli air defences and slammed into buildings deep inside the country. Mr Trump said: 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US armed forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' Hours later, the US president took to social media again to predict that 'Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal'. The US president made the claim that he has built a track record for de-escalating conflicts, and that he would get Israel and Iran to cease hostilities 'just like I got India and Pakistan to' after the two countries' recent cross-border confrontation. Mr Trump also pointed to efforts by his administration during his first term to mediate disputes between Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia. 'Likewise, we will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran!' Mr Trump said. 'Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!' The growing conflict between Israel and Iran is testing Mr Trump, who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine and build a foreign policy that more broadly favours steering clear of foreign conflicts. Mr Trump has struggled to find an endgame to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. And after criticising President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Mr Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. His administration's push on Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the US and other world powers reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement in 2015 that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Mr Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday about the growing Israel-Iran conflict, and he is set to travel to Canada for Group of Seven leaders summit where the Mideast crisis will loom large over his talks with the leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan and the European Union.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Macron sends blunt Trump a message as he lands in Greenland ahead of G7
French President Emmanuel Macron delivered a blunt message to Donald Trump by stopping in Greenland Sunday en route to the G7 – a massive territory the U.S. president says the nation 'needs.' Macron stopped in Nuuk, the same city visited by Donald Trump, Jr. and Vice President JD Vance in separate stops that alarmed some locals who favor moves toward independence or continued association with Denmark. And the French president, eager to flex his own as a European leader as Trump pulls back rhetorically from European allies and pivots away from Ukraine, did not hold back in his public comments. 'I don't think that´s something to be done between allies,' Macron said on a brief visit where he met Danish PM Mette Frederiksen and Greenland's PM Jens-Frederik Nielsen. 'It´s important to show that Denmark and Europe are committed to this territory, which has very high strategic stakes and whose territorial integrity must be respected,' Marcon added. Macron's visit comes as Trump prepares to land in a country where locals are equally adamant against his call to make Canada the 51st U.S. state. ''I don't think he's playing around. I think he has intent around it. I think I think he's smart enough to know that we need them more than they need us, and he's willing to do whatever it takes,' local electrical contractor Curtis Reynard told the Daily Mail. With great powers scrambling for influence in the Arctic, Macron has also said the deep seas are not 'up for grabs.' Trump has been blunt in his claims about the need to obtain Greenland, which has stores of rare earth minerals under its permafrost and a strategic location between North America and Europe. 'We need Greenland for national security and international security,' Trump said in late March as the situation escalated. 'So we'll, I think, we'll go as far as we have to go,' Trump added. 'We need Greenland. And the world needs us to have Greenland, including Denmark. Denmark has to have us have Greenland. And, you know, we'll see what happens. But if we don't have Greenland, we can't have great international security.' 'I view it from a security standpoint, we have to be there,' said Trump. Last week, Denmark's parliament approved U.S. military bases on Danish soil, explanding a 2023 agreement. Denmarks PM has said Greenland 'will never, ever be a piece of property that can be bought by just anyone.' And early this year amid the pressure Denmark said it would pour $2 billion into Arctic defense. Last week Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers the U.S. had plans to invade Greenland or Panama if necessary. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth said under questioning at a hearing. 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth added. The remarks prompted pushback from Alaska Senate Repulbican Lisa Murkowski. She told the Daily Mail she didn't 'think the Trump administration would like to buy Greenland once they realize what the price of Greenland would be.' Macron's trip comes after Trump and first lady Melania Trump viwed U.S. military might during a 250th anniversary Army parade that fell on Trump's birthday. It was during a trip to France to watch Bastille Day celebrations with Macon that Trump got the idea for a parade in DC.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
PM confident Trump will back Aukus submarine deal despite US review
Sir Keir Starmer has said he has "no doubt" that a major trilateral defence deal between the UK, Australia and the US will prove a success, despite the Donald Trump administration carrying out a review of the pact. Announced in 2021, Aukus involves the three nations building a new generation of nuclear-powered attack submarines and cooperating in other areas of advanced defence technology. The deal will also see Australia buy three Virginia-class submarines from the US ahead of the new vessels being built. That provision has led some in Washington, to question the deal on the grounds that the US may need those submarines if it finds itself in a war with China over Taiwan. Among those sceptical voices is Elbridge Colby, an official at the US defence department who is heading Washington's review of the deal. However, speaking to reporters ahead of the G7 leaders' summit in Canada, Starmer remained confident that the deal would go ahead as planned. "Aukus is really important. We're fully committed to it," the prime minister said, adding that it is "not unusual for an incoming government to do a review of project like that". The PM pointed to the UK's own review of the pact, led by Sir Stephen Lovegrove, adding: "I'm 100% committed to it, I'm pretty clear about that." Trump's 'America first' agenda has fuelled fears that the US could pull out, but asked if he was confident the president would end up backing it, Starmer said: "Yeah, I think so. "It's a really important project, so I don't have any doubt that this will progress." Asked if Britain would be able to contribute to the Washington review, Starmer said it is a matter for the US administration, a spokesperson for the PM said. Earlier this week, the Liberal Democrats said the US' decision to launch a review of Aukus had 'thrown another grenade into our security partnership'. The party urged Starmer to meet the Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese to 'develop contingency plans' should America withdraw from the partnership. Helen Maguire, the party's defence spokeswoman, said: 'Even in the face of an imperial Putin and the rising threat posed by China, this White House simply can't be relied upon to support our collective defence.'Our national security demands that we ramp up talks with our Commonwealth friends and work to plug the gap that the US is threatening to leave in European and global security.'However, last month, the new US ambassador to London used his first major speech in the job to back Stephens told an audience in Parliament that the US was 'proud to stand alongside Britain and Australia, two of our closest allies, as we deepen our collaboration to respond to a changing world'.
