Oman at ESCWA meeting on social development in Algeria
Oman's delegation to the meeting was headed by Dr Laila bint Ahmed al Najjar, Minister of Social Development.
During its sessions, the ESCWA committee discussed topics related to social protection systems in the Arab region as a means of promoting equality. It also underlined the importance of adopting innovative and more comprehensive policies to ensure the sustainability and efficiency of social programmes.
The meeting reviewed ESCWA's efforts in the field of social development, recommendations issued by the Committee at its 15th session, activities of ESCWA 'Intersessional Expert Working Group on Persons with Disabilities' and the organisation's 'Expert Group on Social Protection Reform'.
The session will include the 'Fourth Arab Forum for Equality', which will highlight the ability of social protection systems to address the most serious forms of inequality.
The participation of the Ministry of Social Development in the meeting stems from its commitment to enhance regional cooperation, exchange expertise and support efforts for achieving sustainable development and ameliorate citizens' quality of life. — ONA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Alaska summit wasn't about Ukraine
'When elephants collide, the grass suffers.' But the grass also suffers when elephants whisper. The recent Alaska meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin ended with no ceasefire in Ukraine, despite weeks of hype. That failure was the headline, but it masked the real story. The summit was not about Ukraine; it was about carving up influence, dividing corridors and replaying a century-old script that the Arab world knows too well. The Corridor Behind the Curtain If Ukraine were the real agenda, Alaska would have produced at least a road map for de-escalation. Instead, the unspoken focus was the South Caucasus. The US is advancing the Zangezur corridor, cutting across Armenia to link Azerbaijan with Türkiye and onward to Central Asia. For Ankara and Baku, it's a geopolitical victory; for Iran, it feels like encirclement; for Russia, it signals a slow squeeze on its influence. For Washington, the corridor is a chance to redraw Eurasia's map without firing a shot. For Moscow, tolerating Western-backed routes may be a price worth paying if it gets space to freeze Ukraine on its own terms. Alaska, therefore, was about bargaining over maps, not about saving lives. Sykes–Picot in a New Disguise The Middle East has seen this play before. The Sykes–Picot Agreement of 1916 divided Ottoman Arab lands between Britain and France, planting borders that still bleed. The Yalta Conference of 1945 carved Europe into Western and Soviet zones, condemning Eastern Europe to decades behind the Iron Curtain. The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact of 1939 secretly split Eastern Europe between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, erasing nations from the map overnight. Each case followed the same pattern: great powers publicly spoke of peace, while privately negotiating partitions. Those absent at the table paid the price. Alaska feels like a modern Sykes-Picot this time not with ink on colonial maps, but with corridors, pipelines and digital arteries. Palestine: The Grass Beneath the Bargain Nowhere is the cost clearer than in Palestine. As Palestinians endure genocide, their survival is not at the centre of Alaska's chessboard. Both Washington and Moscow deploy Palestine as rhetoric, not as policy. The Israeli Occupation continues its genocidal campaign with tacit US protection; Russia frames itself as anti-Western but offers no tangible support. Just as Palestine was sidelined in the Sykes-Picot carve-up, it risks being sidelined again in today's global bargains. Unless Arab and Islamic states hardwire enforcement, through humanitarian corridors, sanctions on war crimes, and legal pursuit in the ICJ and ICC, Palestine will remain the perennial victim of great-power 'understandings.' Lessons for the Islamic and Arab World The Alaska summit carries three urgent lessons: 1. Corridors are the new borders. Whether Zangezur or Belt and Road, control over connectivity is control over power. The Arab world must invest in shaping, not just using, trade and energy corridors. 2. Never trust transactional peace. Yalta left Eastern Europe trapped; Sykes-Picot fractured the South West Asia North Africa region (SWANA). Alaska warns that Arab and Islamic states could see their resources and sovereignty treated as bargaining chips. 3. Make Palestine non-negotiable. Empty statements no longer suffice. Pair diplomacy with leverage: Gulf-backed humanitarian supply lines, targeted sanctions against inciters of genocide and Arab-led legal coalitions. Justice for Palestine must become the price of admission in any wider deal. Drawing Our Own Lines Alaska was not about Ukraine any more than Sykes-Picot was about Arab independence. Both were about outsiders scripting the future of others. A century ago, Sykes-Picot drew borders that ignored the will of the people. Today, corridors and resource routes risk becoming the new colonial ink. The Islamic and Arab world cannot allow history to repeat itself. Either we accept being 'the grass' under the feet of colliding elephants, or we become the gardeners, planting our own routes, setting our own rules and ensuring that Palestine is not erased from the map by silence. Alaska is a warning: If we do not draw our own lines, others will draw them for us. Khalid Al Huraibi, The writer is an innovator and an insights storyteller
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
Arab countries reject Israeli settlement plan
Sayyid Badr bin Hamad al Busaidy, Foreign Minister, has condemned the statements made by Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, in a joint statement issued by the foreign ministers of 30 Arab and Islamic countries, as well as the Secretaries-General of the League of Arab States, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The statement strongly denounced Netanyahu's remarks regarding the so-called Greater Israel. The joint statement emphasised that Netanyahu's statements represent a blatant violation of international law and stable international relations. They pose a direct threat to Arab national security, state sovereignty; and regional and international peace. Arab and Islamic countries reiterated their commitment to international legitimacy and the UN Charter, particularly the article prohibiting the use or threat of force. They pledged to adopt policies that promote peace and benefit all countries and peoples by prioritising security, stability and development over control and coercion. Furthermore, the statement condemned the approval by Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich of a settlement plan in the E1 area and his racist rejection of a Palestinian state. These actions were deemed a violation of international law and an attack on the Palestinian people's right to establish an independent state within the 1967 borders. Israel was reminded that it has no sovereignty over the occupied Palestinian territory. The foreign ministers of Arab and Islamic countries also rejected the settlement plan and all illegal Israeli measures, citing Security Council Resolution 2334, which condemns Israeli settlement activities in occupied Palestinian territories. They supported the International Court of Justice's Advisory Opinion, which called for an immediate end to the Israeli occupation and reparations for damages caused. Additionally, the ministers warned against Israeli policies aimed at annexing Palestinian territories and expanding settlements in the West Bank. They highlighted the threats posed to Islamic and Christian holy sites, such as the Al Aqsa Mosque, as well as settler terrorism and the displacement of Palestinians. These actions were seen as fuelling violence and hindering prospects for a comprehensive peace. — ONA
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
Countries issue a joint statement condemning Greater Israel
A joint statement has been issued by the Foreign Ministers of 31 Arab and Islamic countries and the Secretaries-General of the League of Arab States, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and the GCC states. It condemned in the strongest terms the statements made by Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel (the occupying power), which were reported by the Israeli media, regarding so-called "Greater Israel." These statements represent a gross disregard and a blatant and dangerous violation of the rules of international law and the foundations of stable international relations, and constitute a direct threat to Arab national security, the sovereignty of states, and regional and international security and peace. They stress that while the Arab and Islamic states affirm their respect for international legitimacy and the Charter of the United Nations, particularly Article 2, paragraph 4, regarding the rejection of the use or threat of force, the Arab and Islamic states will adopt all policies and measures that frame and consolidate peace, in a manner that achieves the interests of all states and peoples in security, stability, and development, far from the illusion of control and the imposition of the power of force. They also condemn in the strongest terms the approval by extremist Israeli Minister Bezalel Smotrich of the settlement plan in Area 1 and his extremist, racist statements rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state. They consider this a flagrant violation of international law and a blatant assault on the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to establish their independent, sovereign state on the June 4, 1967, lines, with occupied Jerusalem as its capital. They emphasize that Israel has no sovereignty over the occupied Palestinian territory. They affirm their absolute rejection and condemnation of this settlement plan and all illegal Israeli measures, which constitute a flagrant violation of international law and Security Council resolutions, in particular Resolution 2334, which condemns all Israeli settlement activities aimed at changing the demographic composition, character, and legal status of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, the capital of the State of Palestine. They also reaffirm the Advisory Opinion issued by the International Court of Justice, which emphasized the illegality of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territory and the necessity of ending it immediately, eliminating its effects, and providing compensation for its damages. They warn of the danger of Israeli intentions and policies aimed at annexing Palestinian territories, and the continued extremist Israeli government's expansionist settlement approach in the occupied West Bank, including attempts to harm Islamic and Christian holy sites, foremost among them the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque/Al-Haram Al-Sharif, as well as settler terrorism, daily incursions into Palestinian cities, villages, and camps, the systematic destruction of Palestinian refugee camps, and the displacement of Palestinians from their homes. This directly contributes to fueling cycles of violence and conflict and undermines the chances of achieving a just and comprehensive peace in the region. They also warn against relying on ideological and racist illusions, which threaten to intensify the conflict, making it difficult to control its course or predict its outcomes, and threatening regional and international security and stability alike. In a related context, the foreign ministers of the Arab and Islamic countries, the League of Arab States, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation reiterate their rejection and condemnation of the crimes of Israeli aggression, genocide, and ethnic cleansing. They also affirm the ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, while ensuring unconditional access to humanitarian aid to halt the systematic starvation policy used by Israel as a weapon of genocide. This requires an immediate end to the deadly Israeli blockade of the Strip, the opening of Israeli crossings with the Gaza Strip, and holding Israel, the occupying power, fully responsible for the consequences of its crimes in the Gaza Strip, including the collapse of the health and relief system, as the occupying power. They also reaffirm their complete and absolute rejection of the displacement of the Palestinian people in any form and under any pretext, and call on the international community to pressure Israel to halt the aggression and fully withdraw from the Gaza Strip, in preparation for creating the appropriate conditions for implementing the Arab-Islamic plan for early recovery and reconstruction efforts in the Strip Emphasizing that the Gaza Strip is an integral part of the occupied Palestinian territory, and the necessity for the State of Palestine to assume governance responsibilities in the Gaza Strip as well as in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, with Arab and international support, within the framework of the political program of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, and the policy of one system, one law, and one legitimate weapon. In this context, they call on the international community, especially the permanent members of the Security Council, particularly the United States of America, to assume their legal and moral responsibilities and work immediately to compel Israel to halt its ongoing aggression against the Gaza Strip and its dangerous escalation in the occupied West Bank, and to stop the delusional, inflammatory statements issued by its officials. In addition, they call on the international community, especially the permanent members of the Security Council, to assume their legal and moral responsibilities and to work immediately to compel Israel to halt its ongoing aggression against the Gaza Strip and its dangerous escalation in the occupied West Bank, and to stop the delusional, inflammatory statements issued by its officials. They also call on the international community to provide international protection for the Palestinian people, enable them to obtain their legitimate rights, foremost among which is their right to establish their independent, sovereign state on their national soil, and hold accountable the perpetrators of crimes and violations against the Palestinian people. Foreign Ministers include those from Oman, Jordan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Gambia, Indonesia, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Nigeria, Qatar, Pakistan, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Sryia, Turkey, UAE, Yemen, the Secretary-General of the League of Arab States, the Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and the Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation.
