logo
Most parents skip the flu jab for their children. Is that a bad idea?

Most parents skip the flu jab for their children. Is that a bad idea?

The bulk of influenza infections occur in children; they are also the main transmitters of the virus within the community. One study of 29 countries, including Australia, found 19 per cent of flu cases were in children under four.
Consider this study from Hong Kong that tracked the spread of flu through households: kids under 18 were up to 2.8 times more likely to pass on the virus than adults, and they were more likely to catch it. Children seem to shed more copies of the virus (including before they show symptoms); they also tend to have closer contact with adults. They are also less likely to wash their hands, and more likely to put things in their mouth.
Why? Principally because they are immune-naive: their bodies have not had time to train on influenza. An adult has an arsenal of antibodies to several different strains of the flu. A young child has nothing beyond any left-over antibodies from their mother.
'They are new in the world, and they are getting infected with a lot of different viruses,' says Professor Kristine Macartney, director of the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance.
'While that's inevitable, what we don't want – and I promise you as a paediatrician who has cared for many kids critically ill in hospital with flu – we don't want to see kids with severe illness.'
We often think of the flu as a nuisance for young people and adults, and a threat for the elderly. Consider flu vaccination rates: 60 per cent of Australians over 65 have had a jab, compared to 24.7 per cent of those under five.
'They are new in the world, and they are getting infected with a lot of different viruses.'
Professor Kristine Macartney on the susceptibility of children
But influenza hospitalisation rates among very young children are surprisingly high – higher still if you add in all those who have co-infections, such as RSV at the same time.
Young children also tend to suffer the most from the flu. They typically have higher fevers, more severe symptoms, and shed more of the virus, which explains why they are such effective transmitters.
Indeed, every year the flu kills about 250,000 to 500,000 people globally, including about 28,000 people under 18.
Some years, the hospitalisation rate for Australians under five exceeds that of those over 65. And while children with comorbidities are particularly at risk, there does seem to be a lot of random variation, with some perfectly healthy youngsters getting severely ill and ending up in intensive care.
'The vast majority of kids we see hospitalised each year … are healthy children. When this happens, it is a shock to parents,' Macartney says.
Per the most recent Australian influenza season report, 39 people died with the flu in sentinel hospitals (those participating in influenza surveillance) in 2023, nine of them children.
When we are infected, or vaccinated, our bodies develop armies of antibodies specific to glycoproteins on the surface of the virus.
Loading
Over time, and under pressure from our new antibodies, the virus mutates – a process known as antigenic drift – eventually to the point where our antibodies no longer recognise it. We undergo another cycle of infection and immunity.
Remarkably, antibodies developed to a flu infection in childhood may actually offer us lifelong protection against similar strains of flu, a process known as immune imprinting.
Australia licenses two free vaccines for children under five. Unlike the adult vaccine, they are given over two doses.
Vaccinating kids for the flu seems to work reasonably well. A large US study in 2020 found having at least one dose of vaccine cut the chances of hospitalisation from the flu by 55 per cent.
'So it's good, but it's not great,' says Professor Robert Booy, an infectious diseases paediatrician at the University of Sydney, who has run clinical trials of flu vaccines. The overall reduction in infections tends to sit at about 50 to 60 per cent, he says.
There are also community benefits. Vaccinating children seems to cut the amount of virus that is spread around the community. Given the number of viruses parents have to endure from their children, avoiding one seems a smart bet.
And the vaccine seems safe. Australia conducted one of the phase 3 trials for one of our vaccines licensed in children. It reported zero serious adverse events or deaths. Just 1.1 per cent of parents take their children to see a doctor in the days after getting a flu shot.
Given all this, why are flu vaccination rates falling among kids?
Loading
The obvious answer is: the pandemic. During 2020, parents wanted to protect their kids from COVID, but there was no COVID vaccine, so they got a flu jab instead. 'People were trying to take action against something,' says Jessica Kaufman, head of the vaccine social science team at the Murdoch Children's Research Institute.
After COVID was no longer front of mind, parents began putting less emphasis on the importance of flu protection. Parents are busy as it is without one more thing to think about – and kids don't much like having needles stuck in their arms.
The flu vaccine is optional, compared to the more stringently recommended vaccines of childhood. Perhaps some parents worry about over-jabbing their kids?
But the world is full of antigens, Booy says. Adding one more is not going to make much of a difference.
'It's a vaccine that is completely safe. It absolutely helps benefit not only the child, but also the immediate family and everyone around them. Children are super-spreaders,' Macartney says.
'It is definitely not too late to vaccinate. We have influenza on the rise at the moment – it's looking to be well above previous years.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Maggie Beer has an urgent financial deadline for her aged care mission
Maggie Beer has an urgent financial deadline for her aged care mission

9 News

time15 minutes ago

  • 9 News

Maggie Beer has an urgent financial deadline for her aged care mission

Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Maggie Beer has a financial deadline for her culinary mission to transform food at thousands of aged care homes . The effusive celebrity chef, 80, is using her reputation and influence to head up the Maggie Beer Foundation and has been working to put delicious food onto the plates of vulnerable elderly Australians. Speaking at the National Press Club in Canberra today, Beer said the government cash injection to her foundation for first-of-its-kind specialised chef training in aged care homes will run out in 2026. Maggie Beer, Founder of the Maggie Beer Foundation addresses the media at the National Press Club. (Getty) "We simply have not got the capacity to meet demand and our current funding ends in September next year," Beer said. "[We've had] 135 homes will be through this program. Every day, we get a new inquiry. 135 homes doesn't sound much, but believe you me, the filtering down effect is there. "We, the foundation, myself, personally, are advocating fiercely for it to continue." Beer is building a roadmap for a future model of aged care and food is at the heart of it. Part of the mission is to bridge the training gap in cook and chef roles across the nearly 2700 Commonwealth-subsidised homes in Australia. Her message has been simple: lovingly-prepared, nutritious food equals better wellbeing. She told the press club that an ageing population urgently demands more skilled chefs, kitchen hands and staff with a passion for food. "Beautiful food will make such a difference to the wellbeing of residents and pride of the teams," she said. "Without those equal amounts of flavour, goodness and pleasure, food becomes a commodity. "Food becomes institutionalised, and leads to residents not eating well, or not eating enough. And that leads to malnutrition." Beer is building a roadmap for a future model of aged care and food is at the heart of it. (Getty) Beer said meals shouldn't be an "afterthought" in aged care homes. But she acknowledged that underfunding is rampant. In 2021/22, an average of just $14.46 was spent on food per resident per day at aged care providers. "Fresh real ingredients provide flavour that frozen never can, and we can show aged care homes that cooking fresh actually does not cost more," she added. "However, only if supported by the skill set, passion and knowledge and support of management, it is all possible and because I know there's so little money to spare within aged care homes." Aged care facilities are home to some of the most vulnerable members of Australia's elderly population. According to Dementia Australia, there are an estimated 433,300 Australians living with dementia in 2025. And over half of the 245,000 people in aged care were living with dementia as of 2022. Beer said good food can be a familiar, safe space for those enduring the sometimes traumatic transition of moving into care. "One of the most evocative things is a sense of smell that stays with us and smell that links to good memories," Beer explained. "Living with dementia is so hard but I can tell you those instincts are still there. "It's never going to be easy, but all those things can make such a difference." The celebrity chef said meals shouldn't be an "afterthought" in aged care homes. (Maggie Beer/Instagram) In a submission on the Aged Care Bill 2024, The Maggie Beer Foundation Trainer Mentor Program asked for an extension to its funding beyond September 2026. The Maggie Beer Foundation has petitioned for $15.3 million across three years to fund its program to improve food in aged care and solutions for older people recieving care at home. Beer also issued a plea to the Federal Minister for Ageing and Seniors Sam Rae, who was sitting in the room in Canberra today, for more funding. "We run a very lean show. And there's no money for us to be funded," she said. "I can't bear to think of it as being lost. It's so very valuable. "So you can be sure I will be advocating fiercely again to the government to support the program." national food Australia Aged Care federal politics CONTACT US

A new drug helped Lee survive breast cancer. Then she was thrown a curveball
A new drug helped Lee survive breast cancer. Then she was thrown a curveball

9 News

time4 hours ago

  • 9 News

A new drug helped Lee survive breast cancer. Then she was thrown a curveball

Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here When Sydney woman Lee Hunt was diagnosed with an aggressive breast cancer back in 2005, she underwent gruelling rounds of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She also began taking what was a relatively new and promising targeted therapy drug at the time, Herceptin, which has been shown to boost the effects of chemotherapy. Little did Hunt know that the very treatments that likely saved her life would lead to serious health problems down the track. Lee Hunt, pictured with her husband and grandson. (Supplied) Five years after finishing her cancer treatments, she began to notice strange symptoms. "I just started fainting, and feeling very dizzy," Hunt said. Hunt was referred to a haematologist by her GP, on the assumption that it might be her low blood pressure causing the problem. Luckily, the hematologist was aware of growing evidence of breast cancer survivors developing heart problems after taking Herceptin. Hunt was sent to see a cardiologist, who diagnosed her with cardiotoxity, which refers to long-term damage to the heart caused by a medical treatment. Hunt isn't alone, with data showing heart disease related to cancer treatment is emerging as a significant threat to breast cancer survivors. It is now estimated that up to 30 percent of breast cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy will go on to develop potentially life-threatening heart complications as a side effect of associated targeted therapies, immunotherapies or the chemotherapy itself. Lee Hunt, pictured with her husband on a hiking trip in Italy. (Supplied) Australian scientists at the Heart Research Institute hope to have a solution to the problem soon, in the form of a new drug that patients can take while undergoing chemotherapy to prevent heart damage. Professor Julie McMullen leads a team of researchers at the institute who have earmarked two potential drugs which have been showing promise. The drugs are being tested on revolutionary "mini-hearts" created in the lab. The size of a grain of sand, these tiny hearts are made from donated human blood, and have their own heartbeat. Professor Julie McMullen and researcher Dr Clara Liu Chung Ming are pictured the Heart Research Institute's laboratory. (Supplied) The tiny heart model was developed in the laboratory of University of Technology Associate Professor Carmine Gentile in an Australian first. "We can collect blood from breast cancer patients, and then isolate their cells, and with those cells, we can make these little mini hearts," McMullen said. "Then, if we put some cancer drugs onto them, we can see if that impacts how they beat. "We can also test whether one of our protective drugs protects them against any defects in how they beat." The ambitious cardio-oncology project also aims to understand why some patients are more susceptible to cardiotoxicity than others, helping pave the way for more personalised treatment in the future. "We currently have limited knowledge on why cardiotoxicity occurs and which women will be most impacted," McMullen said. "This research has the opportunity to identify women at risk of cardiotoxicity before symptoms are present, so we can develop drugs to protect the heart during and after cancer treatment." national health Breast Cancer Research Australia CONTACT US

Is private health worth the cost? More and more wealthy people say no
Is private health worth the cost? More and more wealthy people say no

AU Financial Review

time4 hours ago

  • AU Financial Review

Is private health worth the cost? More and more wealthy people say no

The number of high-income Australians paying a tax penalty as punishment for not having private hospital insurance is nearing 600,000, triggering calls for an overhaul of government incentives designed to ease pressure on the public healthcare system. The latest Australian Tax Office data shows a 25 per cent annual increase in the number of people paying the Medicare levy surcharge, a tax penalty averaging $1500 annually, because they believe it is cheaper than forking out for expensive private health cover.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store