Russia launches 'massive' attack into Ukraine amid Trump-Zelenskyy dispute
Ukraine's air force said Russia launched 14 missiles and 161 drones into the country in a massive overnight bombardment, as President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned against Russian deception in revived peace talks.
Ukraine's air force said it shot down 80 of the drones launched in the latest Russian barrage, with another 78 lost in flight without causing any damage. The 14 missiles targeted energy infrastructure, the air force said, adding it would not reveal how many were intercepted.
Ukrainian Energy Minister German Galushchenko wrote on Facebook that Russia conducted a "massive" missile and drone attack on "gas infrastructure."
The aim of the "criminal attacks" was to "stop the production of gas, which is necessary to provide citizens' household needs and centralized heating," he said.
MORE: Ukraine reels as Trump criticism echoes Russian disinformation campaign
"While Russia continues to blatantly lie about not attacking civilian critical infrastructure, we are witnessing multiple missiles targeting Ukrainian gas mining facilities at once," Galushchenko wrote.
"Such actions of the enemy prove only once again that Russia is trying to hurt ordinary Ukrainians, plunged into the cold in the middle of winter," he added. "This is outright terrorism."
Russia's Defense Ministry, meanwhile, said its strike targeted "gas and energy infrastructure facilities that ensure the operation of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine."
"The strike's objective has been achieved," the ministry said. "All facilities have been hit."
Russia's long-range strikes into Ukraine have not eased despite the opening of talks with President Donald Trump's administration aimed at ending Moscow's three-year-old full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
MORE: Fact check: No, Zelenskyy doesn't have 4% approval as Trump claims; it's over 50%
The talks began this week in Saudi Arabia without Ukrainian participation, Kyiv's exclusion prompting condemnation in Ukraine and across Europe.
Such criticism appeared to irk Trump, who this week criticized European allies and the Ukrainian leadership for having failed to end Russia's war. The president went on to call Zelenskyy a "dictator without elections," claiming -- without providing evidence -- that his Ukrainian counterpart's public approval rating was as low as 4%.
Trump also wrote on Truth Social that Zelenskyy "better move fast or he is not going to have a country left."
Zelenskyy, meanwhile, suggested Trump is in a "disinformation space," attributing at least some of the U.S. leader's criticism to Russian disinformation campaigns.
On Thursday, Zelenskyy marked the anniversary of the culmination of Ukraine's 2014 Maidan Revolution -- in which pro-Western protesters overthrew Moscow-aligned President Viktor Yanukovych.
MORE: Trump calls Zelenskyy 'dictator' as Ukraine leader slams him for 'disinformation'
"It was in these days of 2014 that Russia chose war -- it began the first steps towards the occupation of Crimea," Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram. "While people were being killed in Kyiv, and people were defending their freedom, Putin decided to strike another blow."
"Since then, the world has been living in a new reality, when Russia is trying to deceive everyone," the president wrote. "And it is very important not to give in, to be together. It is very important to support those who defend freedom."
Ukraine is continuing its own long-range campaign against Russian military and industrial infrastructure, especially targets linked to the country's lucrative fossil fuel industry. Ukrainian security services have referred to the campaign as "drone sanctions."
Russia's Defense Ministry said on Thursday that its forces shot down 13 Ukrainian drones over the previous 24 hours.
ABC News' Nataliia Popova, Oleksiy Pshemyskiy and Fidel Pavlenko contributed to this report.
Russia launches 'massive' attack into Ukraine amid Trump-Zelenskyy dispute originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer Says America Won't Be 'Truly Liberated' Until It Strikes Rare-Earth Deals With Other Countries: US Doesn't 'Have The Cards'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Jim Cramer warned that the United States must cut deals with nations other than China for rare-earth minerals, or we'll never be 'truly liberated" from Beijing's grip. What Happened: The CNBC 'Mad Money' host told viewers on Wednesday that China mines about 60% and refines roughly 90% of the world's rare earths. This, as Cramer described earlier this month, gives China "a stranglehold" over supply chains that feed electronics, autos and defense hardware. Trending: Let your money work smarter: . No hidden fees, no commitment. "What the heck were we thinking when we started a trade war without having this rare-earths issue all buttoned up and ready to go?" he asked, adding that Washington doesn't 'have the cards" while it depends on Chinese exports already throttled by new licensing rules. Cramer urged the White House to waive steep tariffs and strike rapid supply pacts with Brazil, Vietnam and Australia, countries he said hold the raw materials for earth minerals and magnets. "We need to make these rare-earth deals with the same alacrity that the White House gave out the reciprocal tariffs on 'liberation day,'" Cramer said. Jim Cramer isn't the only one sounding the alarm bell. Officials have long warned that America's reliance on China for rare-earth minerals creates a strategic threat and in April, China slapped export restrictions on those minerals after President Donald Trump raised tariffs It Matters: According to a Reuters report, Trump said on Wednesday that Beijing would 'supply the minerals up front' as part of a tentative trade framework still awaiting his and President Xi Jinping's signatures. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick insists that the accord will ease the curbs, yet analysts note China could tighten shipments again if talks stall. Automakers have already sounded alarms. A Reuters survey found that some European suppliers were idling plants, while others warned of shutdowns by mid-July. An older report reveals companies are willing to "pay any price" for alloys and magnets. Reacting to the development, U.S. Futures were down on Wednesday night, with the S&P 500 futures down 0.30%, trading at 6,011; Nasdaq futures down 0.32%, at 21,818.50; and the Dow Jones futures, trading at 42,764, down 0.34%. Read Next: Level up your portfolio tracking with Snowball Analytics: see all your investments in one dashboard with real-time stock and dividend tracking for free today. Photo courtesy: Shutterstock This article Jim Cramer Says America Won't Be 'Truly Liberated' Until It Strikes Rare-Earth Deals With Other Countries: US Doesn't 'Have The Cards' originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Axios
14 minutes ago
- Axios
Focus groups: North Carolina swing voters mostly OK with Trump's LA response
A majority of North Carolina swing voters in our latest Engagious / Sago focus groups supported President Trump's deportations and activation of the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles, despite some concerns about civil rights and government overreach. The big picture: These Biden-to-Trump voters' desire to eject undocumented migrants from the U.S. — and their critical views of California and Democrats — shape how they see this massive test of executive power playing out far from their own hometowns. Seven of 12 panelists said they support the president's activation of the National Guard and Marines in L.A. despite Gov. Gavin Newsom's and local officials' objections. Three disapproved; two didn't have an opinion. Eight of the 12 said they believe Democrats prioritize illegal immigrants over American citizens. Why it matters: "Democrats who doubt their party remains out of touch with swing voters will be stunned by what these North Carolinians told us about immigration," said Rich Thau, President of Engagious, who moderated the focus groups. How it works: Axios observed two Engagious / Sago online focus groups Tuesday night with North Carolinians who said they voted for Joe Biden in 2020 and Donald Trump in 2024. The panelists included nine independents and three Republicans. While a focus group is not a statistically significant sample like a poll, the responses show how some voters are thinking and talking about current events. What they're saying: "The stance California has on illegal immigration only enables all these people, and they're not going to stop it," said Gregory D., 43, of Greensboro. "So we need to bring it up another level. It needs to stop. California doesn't want to stop it." "It's in the best interest of the nation that we call this, I don't know, uprising, call it what you want, but yeah, that needs to get nipped in the bud, just like George Floyd and all that sh*t should have," said Alex H., 44, of Charlotte. Butch F., 58, of Mebane, said he believes illegal immigrants got government assistance that reduced North Carolinians' access to disaster funds. Gerius J., 33, of Charlotte, said he's for diversity but wants to "do it the right way. Get the right paperwork, the right documentation." He said Democrats "have always wanted illegals to come here," and if anyone objects, "you're the bad guy. And as a U.S. citizen, I'm not the bad guy. I just want things to be done the right way." The other side: Karen L., 61, of Wilmington, said of Trump's immigration actions, "When he first started out, it seemed like he was really going after the criminals — like, the ones committing murder and rape — and he was getting all of them. And we don't want them here if they're [here] illegally, especially. But now ... it's way too extreme, and he's violating civil rights, and he's causing more chaos than anything." Rachid O., 46, of Raleigh, said the administration should prioritize arresting and deporting criminals, above all undocumented immigrants. Many undocumented immigrants pay taxes "so they contribute to the country," he said. Between the lines: Shifting the focus to combating illegal immigration may help him with some voters who have cooled on his performance in other areas. Several panelists voiced concerns about the economy, tariffs and political corruption and objected to Trump's moves to cut university research, or possible Medicaid cuts in the spending and tax-cut bill before Congress. "It's getting harder and harder to afford things," said Kimberly S., 37, of Sanford. "We are just kind of told, 'Hey, you just got to bear with us just a little bit more,' and it doesn't feel like it's getting any easier." Shauna S., 54, of Harrisburg, said when it comes to tariffs, "There's no plan, and it's been erratic. It appears to be an opportunity to manipulate the markets, and I really want someone to investigate where and who's actually gaining financially every time these tariffs are being threatened and then removed. I'm just curious what's really happening."
Axios
14 minutes ago
- Axios
Israel's strike on Iran was 8 months in the making
Israel's stunning and sprawling operation overnight targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, missile sites, scientists and generals followed eight months of intensive clandestine preparations. Why it matters: The operation launched a new war in the Middle East that could draw in the U.S., demolished any hopes of a nuclear deal, and dealt arguably the biggest single blow to the Iranian regime since the 1979 revolution. And it is only just beginning. Driving the news: Israel is attempting to "eliminate" Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities in an operation expected to last at least several days, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced. Other Israeli officials said it could take weeks. Israel attempted — just in the opening hours — to assassinate nuclear scientists it claims had the know-how to make a nuclear bomb. Around 25 scientists were targeted and at least two are confirmed dead so far. Israel also targeted the entire top brass of Iran's military. The commander of the Revolutionary Guard and military chief of staff were both confirmed dead, along with another senior general. The Israeli operation didn't just include air strikes. Israel's Mossad intelligence service has operatives on the ground conducting covert sabotage operations on missile and air defense sites, officials said. Israel is expected to keep pounding Iran's underground nuclear facilities in the coming days, along with other targets. Behind the scenes: The idea for an operation simultaneously targeting Iran's missile and nuclear programs — which Netanyahu has described as existential threats to Israel — took hold after Iran struck Israel in October, during a cycle of tit-for-tat escalation between the countries. Motivated both by Iran's fast-growing missile arsenal and its weakened air defenses following Israel's retaliation, Netanyahu ordered the military and intelligence services to begin planning. The Israeli military said another factor was intelligence about nuclear weaponization research and development that indicated Iran could build a bomb more quickly if it elected to do so. The planned opening in the coming weeks of a new underground enrichment facility that would be immune to even massive U.S. bunker busters added to the urgency. Friction point: Even as President Trump pursued a nuclear deal, Israel was preparing for this strike — gathering intelligence, positioning assets and eventually conducting drills. Those preparations alarmed some in the White House, who worried Netanyahu might move even without a green light from Trump. Netanyahu assured Trump he wouldn't. The White House, for its part, told Netanyahu that if Israel attacked Iran, it would do so alone. Trump himself said several times in recent days, including several hours before the strikes, that he opposed an Israeli strike that could "blow up" the negotiations. The intrigue: But in the hours after the attack began, Israeli officials briefed reporters that this was all coordinated with Washington. Two Israeli officials claimed to Axios that Trump and his aides were only pretending to oppose an Israeli attack in public — and didn't express opposition in private. "We had a clear U.S. green light," one claimed. The goal, they say, was to convince Iran that no attack was imminent and make sure Iranians on Israel's target list wouldn't move to new locations. Netanyahu's aides even briefed Israeli reporters that Trump had tried to put the brakes on an Israeli strike in a call on Monday, when in reality the call dealt with coordination ahead of the attack, Israeli officials now say. State of play: The U.S. side has not confirmed any of that. In the hours before and after the strike, the Trump administration distanced itself from the Israeli operation in public statements and private messages to allies. Secretary of State Marco Rubio swiftly stated that Israel's attack was "unilateral" with no U.S. involvement. Hours later, Trump confirmed he knew the attack was coming but stressed the U.S. had no military involvement. The degree of U.S. intelligence, logistical and defensive support for Israel's operation remains to be seen. What to watch: Israel is now bracing for Iran to unleash hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones toward Israel, and perhaps also U.S. bases in the region.
