
‘E-tattoo' could track mental workload for people in high-stake jobs, study says
Whether it is doing sums or working out what to text your new date, some tasks produce a furrowed brow. Now scientists say they have come up with a device to monitor such effort: an electronic tattoo, stuck to the forehead.
The researchers say the device could prove valuable among pilots, healthcare workers and other professions where managing mental workload is crucial to preventing catastrophes.
'For this kind of high-demand and high-stake scenario, eventually we hope to have this real-time mental workload decoder that can give people some warning and alert so that they can self-adjust, or they can ask AI or a co-worker to offload some of their work,' said Dr Nanshu Lu, an author of the research from the University of Texas at Austin, adding the device may not only help workers avoid serious mistakes but also protect their health.
Writing in the journal Device, Lu and colleagues describe how using questionnaires to investigate mental workload is problematic, not least as people are poor at objectively judging cognitive effort and they are usually conducted after a task.
Meanwhile, existing electroencephalography (EEG) and electrooculography (EOG) devices, that can be used to assess mental workload by measuring brain waves and eye movements respectively, are wired, bulky and prone to erroneous measurements arising from movements.
By contrast, the 'e-tattoo' is a lightweight, flexible, wireless device.
The black, wiggly path of the e-tattoo is composed of a graphite-based conductive material, and is attached to the forehead using conductive adhesive film.
Four square EEG electrodes, positioned on the forehead, each detect a different region of brain activity – with a reference electrode behind the ear – while rectangular EOG electrodes, placed vertically and horizontally around the eyes, provide data about eye movements. Each of the stretchable electrodes is coated in an additional conductive material.
The e-tattoo, which is bespoke and disposable, is connected to a reusable flexible printed circuit using conductive tape, while a lightweight battery can be clipped to the device.
After finding the e-tattoo worked as well as traditional EEG and EOG devices for monitoring brain waves and eye movements the team tested the technology on six participants.
Each participant was shown a screen on which 20 letters flashed up, one at a time, at various locations. Participants were asked to click a mouse if either the letter itself, or its location, matched one shown a given number of letters (N) back. Each participant carried out the task multiple times, with the N value varying between 0 and 3 – corresponding to four levels of difficulty.
The team found that as the task became harder, the different types of brainwave detected showed shifts in activity that corresponded to a greater mental workload.
The team then fed the EEG and EOG data, together with the 'N' numbers, into a machine-learning algorithm. After a training period, the researchers found the algorithm did better than chance at predicting the mental workload of a participant based on their EEG and EOG data alone.
Lu said the full device –including chip and battery – was expected to cost less than $200 (£148). The team are now developing the approach so signals can be decoded by the device's microprocessor and sent to an app to alert the user if their mental workload is too high.
But the remedy is not, necessarily, to switch to a simple task.
'Previous studies indicated that the optimal mental performance occurs when the mental workload demand is not too low or too high,' said Lu. 'When it's too low, it's very boring, and the people will just lose focus.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D17%2C0%2C17%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
California fish carry human-infecting parasites that can cause stroke or heart attack, researchers find
More than 90 percent of popular freshwater game fish in Southern California contain a parasite that is capable of inducing strokes or heart attacks in the humans who eat them. Researchers said the parasites were two species of flatworms known as trematodes. At no more than a few centimeters in length, the flukes – a class of flatworms – can result in weight loss or lethargy. Although rare, infection has also resulted in more severe consequences. 'Americans don't usually think about parasites when they eat freshwater fish because it hasn't historically been an issue here,' Ryan Hechinger, an ecologist and parasitologist at UC San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, said in a statement. 'But these trematodes have now been widely introduced in the U.S. and that means that doctors and the public should be aware.' He is the senior author of the study which was published Tuesday in the Journal of Infectious Diseases. It was funded by the National Institutes of Health. To identify this issue, Hechinger, the University of Nebraska's Daniel Metz, and former Scripps graduate student and Smithsonian Environmental Research Center marine scientist Emma Palmer examined 84 fish from seven different species in 2023. Those fish included largemouth bass and bluegill, which were collected from five frequented fishing locations in San Diego County. Of those, 93 percent were infected with the Haplorchis pumilio parasite, and some were the host to thousands. Two of the five locations yielded positive results for the second parasite known as Centrocestus formosanus, which occurred in 91 percent of the fish. Historically, the trematodes have infected people in Southeast Asia and likely arrived in the U.S. more than a decade ago inside an invasive aquatic snail known as the red-rimmed melania. That snail is found in 17 states and Puerto Rico. Previous work led by Hechinger had found that the red-rimmed melania and its parasites are widespread in the Golden State. So, what is the risk to Californians and Americans at large? Hechinger says there haven't been any reported cases of parasites infecting Americans yets, but 'nobody is looking for cases and doctors aren't required to report them.' Californians should make sure to monitor fish advisories for any changes. The risks posed by them are easy to avoid as, if you fully cook your fish or freeze any that's intended to be eaten raw for at least a week, the parasites will die. Although, the authors found that many Americans are likely consuming freshwater fish without taking the proper precautions. The greatest health threats come from repeated infection over many months or years. Foodborne trematode infections cause two million life years lost to disability and death worldwide every year, according to the World Health Organization. They recommend that fish-borne trematode infection be added to the list of diseases doctors are required to report to public health officials. 'These parasites are here in the U.S., and they're infecting fish that people are eating,' said Hechinger. 'We hope this study can help make public health officials, doctors and the public more aware.'


The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Marjorie Taylor Greene criticized for not reading Trump's ‘big beautiful' bill
Republican firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has drawn widespread criticism from Democratic colleagues for admitting that not only did she not read Donald Trump's tax and spending bill before voting for it, but she would have voted against it had she read thoroughly. Greene revealed she was unaware of a provision in Trump's 'one big beautiful bill' (OBBB) that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence systems for a decade. The Georgia representative said she would have voted against the entire bill if she had known about the AI language buried on pages 278-279. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene wrote on X. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' Democratic lawmakers, who all voted against the bill, responded with incredulity of Greene's admission. 'You have one job. To. Read. The. Fucking. Bill,' Representative Eric Swalwell wrote in response. Representative Ted Lieu said he had read the AI provision beforehand and 'that's one reason I voted no on the GOP's big, ugly bill', he posted on X. 'PRO TIP: It's helpful to read stuff before voting on it.' Representative Mark Pocan was more forward: 'Read the f**king bill instead of clapping for it like a performing monkey. You should have done your job while it was written. You didn't. You own that vote.' The AI provision was added just two nights before the bill's markup. It would prohibit state and local governments from pursuing 'any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems' for 10 years, unless the purpose is to facilitate deployment of such systems. The language applies broadly to facial recognition systems, generative AI and automated decision-making tools used in hiring, housing and public benefits. Several states have already passed laws creating safeguards around such systems, which could become unenforceable if the bill passes the Senate. It also raises questions about the curious case of Republicans not reading sprawling legislation about provisions in the bill. Representative Mike Flood of Nebraska was booed by voters at a heated town hall last week when he admitted that a provision restricting federal judges' ability to enforce contempt orders was 'unknown' to him when he voted for the same bill. 'I am not going to hide the truth: This provision was unknown to me when I voted for that bill,' Flood told the audience, prompting shouts from constituents who responded: 'You voted for all of it.' But Greene and Flood aren't the only unexpected sources to now disapprove of aspects of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill': the world's richest man and Trump ally Elon Musk called the legislation a 'disgusting abomination' on X Tuesday afternoon. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote, adding that it would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion'. Democrats have highlighted that the bill includes significant cuts to healthcare and social programs, with reductions to Medicaid affecting millions of Americans and cuts to food assistance programs. In response to Greene's admission, representative Yvette Clarke wrote: 'Reading is fundamental! Maybe if your colleagues weren't so hellbent on jamming a bill down our throats in the dead of night, and bending the knee to Trump, you would've caught this, Sis!' Representative Delia Ramirez noted that Greene appeared to have missed other provisions affecting her constituents: 'Oh, Marjorie! If you had read the bill, you would've also seen that 149,705 of your constituents could lose their Medicaid.' The House energy and commerce committee advanced the reconciliation package last Wednesday. Greene has called for the AI provision to be removed in the Senate, warning that 'we have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years'.


Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Amy Poehler makes stark confession about being in the public eye
Amy Poehler may be embracing her age - but she doesn't mind a bit of help from photoshop. The 53-year-old comedian revealed she does not object to a little airbrushing on her photos, sharing her thoughts while talking to Saturday Night Live alum Seth Meyers, 50, on her podcast Good Hang. The duo were talking about when they graced the cover of Entertainment Weekly for SNL's 50th anniversary, admitting it was 'worst photograph' taken of either of them. The pair joked they both have great faces - but only 'as long they are moving.' 'I feel very strongly that the thing we have in common is we have great faces that as long as they're moving,' Meyers joked. Poehler then went on to joke she is now a fan of retouching, sharing her hilarious reaction when she is told her photoshoot snaps may receive a 'light retouch.' 'Light retouch?' she said in disbelief. 'I would say "eyes and a mouth. That's all I want to see."' she joked. 'I want the heaviest retouching you could ever do.' 'Don't feel like you're doing me a courtesy of being like "We barely touched it,"' Meyers agreed. 'I'm like "Go nuts, get your best touch guy in here."' Poehler cheekily added its very in vogue to be 'natural' right now, joking she's 'against that.' 'One hundred percent if you want to see the real thing,' Meyers agreed. 'But otherwise you're getting the retouch.' 'If you're asking me to stay still then we need to paint over. We need to change my nose and everything,' Poehler said. Poehler has previously spoken about the joy of getting older, posting a photo of herself using the 'old age' filter in 2023. The Mean Girls actress simply captioned the picture, 'May I be so lucky.' She previously spoke about finding joy in getting older, telling The Ageist: 'When you get older, one of the sad and hard things about getting older is you have to make room for joy. She continued: 'It doesn't come as naturally as when you're little. So you have to keep making sure you make some room for it..' Meyers and Poehler met working on Saturday Night Live in 2001, and went on to host hosting Weekend Update together. Poehler left SNL in 2008, while Meyers left in 2014 and now hosts Late Night With Seth Meyers. Poehler has had an impressive lineup of guests on her podcast since it launched, including Michelle Obama, Tina Fey, and Jack Black. The comedian revealed the moment that left her red-faced with Michelle on her podcast, explaining it happened when the former First Lady made a cameo on her hit sitcom Parks and Recreation in 2014. She confessed the unfortunate incident to Michelle, 61, herself. 'We were busy. We were hitting a bunch of places that day - you were perfect, you got your line,' Amy told Barack Obama's wife. 'You hit your mark, you said your line and my character Leslie Knope is supposed to be overwhelmed by seeing you and I, Amy Poehler, was also very jazzed and I went to say my line and I drooled,' she recounted, laughing. Michelle also let out a laugh and said she did not remember the incident, with Amy admitting she is 'so glad.' 'I don't know if I saw it,' she reassured Amy once again.