Feds approve Indiana ban on soda, candy from SNAP purchases
Hoosiers will no longer be allowed to purchase candy and soda using taxpayer-funded food assistance, making Indiana the first state to receive a federal waiver for the restriction.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins signed off on Indiana's request this week, according to a Friday news release from Gov. Mike Braun's office.
The Republican governor signed an executive order in April as part of his 'Make Indiana Healthy Again' plan to limit the use of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. The new policy will take effect Jan. 1, 2026, per a spokesperson for the governor.
'More taxpayer-funded SNAP dollars are spent on sugary drinks and candy than on fruits and vegetables,' Braun said in a statement. 'Indiana is proud to lead the way in the Make America Healthy Again agenda by making this common-sense move to return SNAP to its intended purpose: nutrition.'
RFK Jr., Dr. Oz kick off 'Make Indiana Healthy Again' initiative with Gov. Mike Braun
Braun said he requested the federal waiver to allow Indiana to impose its own restrictions on the program.
He pointed to USDA data showing that soda is the most purchased item with SNAP benefits. Nationwide, SNAP recipients spend more on sugary drinks, desserts and candy than on fruits and vegetables combined.
Research additionally shows children in SNAP households consume 43% more sugary beverages than children in similar-income households not enrolled in the program.
Indiana was one of the first states to apply for the waiver and is part of a broader push by the Braun administration to combat diet-related health problems and improve food quality in low-income Hoosier communities.
The announcement initially came during a rollout event for the initiative, where U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. praised Indiana's approach.
'I urge every governor across America to follow your lead,' Kennedy said during the April 15 visit in Indianapolis. He called for other reforms, too, like banning certain food dyes and additives, expanding farm-to-school programs, implementing fitness testing in schools, and increasing SNAP transparency.
Related executive orders recently signed by Braun include those to add work requirements for more SNAP recipients; commissioning studies about food safety and diet-related illness; and various proposals to generally limit 'waste, fraud and abuse' in the state's Medicaid program.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
43 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
SNAP cuts will worsen Indianapolis' housing crisis for working families
IndyStar's recent article, "'A gut punch': Indy program that offered parking spots to people living in autos shuts down," reported that Safe Park Indy, a program offering safe overnight parking in addition to food and other resources for people living in their vehicles, closed due to overwhelming demand on Aug. 13. According to founder Elizabeth Friedland, the wait list had over 400 people. A survey of those on the wait list showed that 28% had attended college, 8% had a bachelor's degree and half had at least one job, including social workers, nurses and teachers. It's important to recognize that housing insecurity affects people from all walks of life, including students trying to stay enrolled while living in their cars. It's also vital to recognize that housing insecurity and food insecurity are intimately related. When SNAP benefits increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, food insecurity dropped, especially among low-income households. Students stayed in school. Families could breathe. Every $1 in SNAP benefits also generates about $1.50 in economic activity, and in some studies, up to $1.79. Opinion: We can't make Indiana healthy again until we fix our food supply With sweeping federal cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, things will likely get worse for these Indianapolis residents forced to live in their vehicles. Local programs simply don't have the resources to make up for cuts. Slashing $186 billion from nutrition programs and adding work requirements for recipients up to age 64 will only shift costs to emergency rooms, shelters and schools.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Legislature overrides governor's veto to enact controversial law: 'An awful turning point'
Legislature overrides governor's veto to enact controversial law: 'An awful turning point' The North Carolina legislature overrode the governor's veto in order to approve a bill that could slow future environmental regulations. What's happening? Having already passed through the State House and Senate this past spring, House Bill 402 was vetoed by Democratic Governor Josh Stein in June. Republican lawmakers found enough votes to override the veto in late July, making it law, along with another seven previously vetoed bills. Also known as the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny — or REINS — Act, HB 402 aims to place additional restrictions on the passage of any new environmental regulation in the state. According to North Carolina Health News, the new law will require any environmental regulation "with a projected financial impact" of $1 million over five years to be approved by a two-thirds majority of the body making the rule. For anything over $10 million, it requires unanimous approval. And for any regulation projected to cost $20 million or more, it requires formal approval from the state's General Assembly. Why is this concerning? This law could make it virtually impossible for any kind of real, substantive regulation to be implemented, environmental advocates say. "Lawmakers who passed this bill did not have the best interests of North Carolinians at heart," said Mary Maclean Asbill, director of the state's Southern Environmental Law Center's office. "This new law marks an awful turning point for families and communities across North Carolina when elected officials in the state legislature ignore serious illnesses and deaths in favor of polluters' profits," she continued in a release, per NCHN. The outlet noted that House Speaker Destin Hall, a Republican, said, "What we had in the REINS Act was a situation where if you have a regulation that is extremely expensive, our position is that it's something that [the legislature] needs to take a look at." Meanwhile, environmental advocates say that viewing each new regulation through a strictly financial lens — rather than through a lens that weighs the cost against the potential benefits for public health and essential ecosystems — will make passage of new legislation practically unobtainable. What's being done in North Carolina? While this legislation's finalization is certainly a blow to many environmentalists and public health advocates, their hopes are not completely lost in North Carolina. A pair of bills, HB 569 and Senate Bill 666, could still have major impacts on the state's environmental regulations, according to NCHN. Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home? Majorly Sometimes Not really I don't know enough about them Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. HB 569 would require polluters to reimburse public water systems for clean-ups of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. SB 666 would charge the Environmental Management Commission with setting regulatory limits on PFAS. It's unclear how either bill could be impacted by HB 402 becoming law, though, and the status of both bills remains uncertain at this stage. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
UPI
17 hours ago
- UPI
21 state AG's ask feds to ban 'designer Xanax' after Kentucky ban
1 of 2 | "This deadly drug has no place in our communities, and now we have the tools needed to get it off the streets and protect more lives," two-term Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear (pictured at the August 2024 DNC in Chicago, Ill.) said Monday. File Photo by Tannen Maury/UPI | License Photo Aug. 19 (UPI) -- Kentucky designated "bromazolam" as a Schedule 1 controlled substance as Gov. Andy Beshear also led a push to have it designated similarly at the federal level. Beshear announced the effort to ban the drug, also known as "designer Xanax" Monday after bromazolam was detected in at least 48 overdose deaths in Kentucky last year. "This deadly drug has no place in our communities, and now we have the tools needed to get it off the streets and protect more lives," the two-term Democratic governor said in a statement. The governor's signature immediately banned the drug from being sold in Kentucky and empowered law enforcement to act and arrest for sales or possession. It also provides further tools for authorities in Beshear's statewide crackdown. A 2021 report suggested that overdose deaths linked to illicit "designer" drugs had surged in the United States a staggering 520% between 2019 and 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to data from 32 states and the District of Columbia. On Monday, the rumored Democratic presidential candidate pointed to "important progress" in Kentucky's fight against addiction with three straight years of declines in overdose deaths. "And we're committed to ensuring that work continues," Beshear added. Beshear's executive action this week reportedly came following a request by the state's Republican Attorney General Russell Coleman. "We live in a moment when as little as one pill can kill -- and is killing -- our kids," Coleman said Monday in a joint statement with Beshear. "I'm glad we could work together to tackle this grave threat," he added on the bipartisan effort to rid the streets of the "designer" bromazolam. In 1985 the federal government enacted its ban on the so-called "designer drug" Ecstasy entirely due to the fact it was created by chemists and Ecstasy spin-offs were starting to hit the streets. Coleman and 20 other GOP state attorneys general are now calling on the federal government to follow state actions. "Despite its clear dangers, bromazolam remains unscheduled at the federal level, creating significant challenges for law enforcement and public health officials trying to respond to this emerging crisis," read a letter in part to DEA Administrator Terry Cole signed by Coleman and Alabama's Attorney General Steve Marshall, Tim Griffin in Arkansas, Florida's James Uthmeier, Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, Indiana's Attorney General Todd Rokita and Brenna Bird from Iowa, Liz Murrill of Louisiana, Lynn Fitch of Mississippi, Montana's Austin Knudsen, Mike Hilgers of Nebraska, Drew Wrigley of North Dakota, Dave Yost of Ohio, Oklahoma's Gentner Drummond, Pennsylvania's new Attorney General Dave Sunday, Alan Wilson of South Carolina, Marty Jackley of South Dakota, Jonathan Skrmetti of Tennessee, Virgina's Jason Miyares, John 'JB' McCuskey of West Virginia and Ken Paxton of Texas. Coleman's letter pointed to how the originally synthesized but never approved for medical use bromazolam is now being illegally sold on the streets and in online platforms. The band of Republican state chief law enforcement officers argues that without its scheduling on a federal level, bromazolam will continue to "evade traditional regulatory and prosecutorial tools," which they added will hinder interdiction efforts and enable "continued distribution through illicit channels." "Virginia took proactive action by scheduling bromazolam," Virginia's Attorney General Jason Miyares said Monday. "Now, I'm encouraging federal action to ensure every state has the same tools to protect Americans," the Republican AG and first Latino elected to statewide office in Virginia posted on social media.
